15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?If I pay taxes on my earnings, would someone also pay taxes on the same earnings if I subcontract them and pay a share?Graduate student stipend 1099-misc taxes seem to be coming out too high. Am I doing something wrong?UK self-employed freelancing in Japan. Who do I pay tax to on my earnings?UK Income tax relief for ISAs: How does the sheltering of earnings work?How does a tuition insurance payment affect 529 withdrawals?Does receiving a 1099-MISC require one to file a tax return even if he normally would not be required to file?Can earnings reported in boxes 3 or 7 on a 1099-misc be contributed toward an IRA?Managing Side Income from Online Earnings. Tax QuestionNon-resident alien taxHow to report 1099-MISC Box 7 bonus ($0 in box 3), but not an independent contractor and not self employed (payment from client of my employer)

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

How to draw a matrix with arrows in limited space

The Digit Triangles

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?

Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?

A variation to the phrase "hanging over my shoulders"

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Is it ethical to recieve stipend after publishing enough papers?

How can ping know if my host is down

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

A Trivial Diagnosis

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

US tourist/student visa

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

How does electrical safety system work on ISS?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Will the Sticky MAC access policy prevent unauthorized hubs from connecting to a network?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?



15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?


If I pay taxes on my earnings, would someone also pay taxes on the same earnings if I subcontract them and pay a share?Graduate student stipend 1099-misc taxes seem to be coming out too high. Am I doing something wrong?UK self-employed freelancing in Japan. Who do I pay tax to on my earnings?UK Income tax relief for ISAs: How does the sheltering of earnings work?How does a tuition insurance payment affect 529 withdrawals?Does receiving a 1099-MISC require one to file a tax return even if he normally would not be required to file?Can earnings reported in boxes 3 or 7 on a 1099-misc be contributed toward an IRA?Managing Side Income from Online Earnings. Tax QuestionNon-resident alien taxHow to report 1099-MISC Box 7 bonus ($0 in box 3), but not an independent contractor and not self employed (payment from client of my employer)













11















This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.



For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.



However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.



This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?










share|improve this question









New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 4





    As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

    – user662852
    5 hours ago











  • Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 7





    You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

    – Najel
    5 hours ago











  • By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago















11















This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.



For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.



However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.



This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?










share|improve this question









New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 4





    As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

    – user662852
    5 hours ago











  • Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 7





    You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

    – Najel
    5 hours ago











  • By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago













11












11








11








This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.



For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.



However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.



This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?










share|improve this question









New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This year is my first year in the USA. My sole earnings were an honorarium from a university for $7,500 -- reported on a 1099-MISC form in box 7.



For this, I was on-site for a few days and talked about my particular technical expertise with university staff, and joined them in a publication.



However, as I have just been unpleasantly informed by turbotax, this does not make me a poor person earning under the $12k deductible. This makes me a self-employed business and thus I have to pay about 15% taxes on these earnings.



This seems completely crazy. Have I missed something?







united-states taxes self-employment






share|improve this question









New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago







A-Foreign-Scientist-2018













New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









A-Foreign-Scientist-2018A-Foreign-Scientist-2018

5614




5614




New contributor




A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






A-Foreign-Scientist-2018 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 4





    As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

    – user662852
    5 hours ago











  • Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 7





    You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

    – Najel
    5 hours ago











  • By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago












  • 4





    As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

    – user662852
    5 hours ago











  • Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 7





    You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

    – Najel
    5 hours ago











  • By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago







4




4





As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

– user662852
5 hours ago





As your user name says "A Foreign Scientist", check your visa against this list. There is a paragraph that develops this statement "A NONRESIDENT ALIEN is not liable for the self-employment tax." irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/…

– user662852
5 hours ago













Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
5 hours ago





Thanks -- I have an I-765 EAD and therefore I am a resident alien.

– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
5 hours ago




7




7





You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

– Najel
5 hours ago





You will need to verify whether you are a non-resident for tax purposes - this is different from immigration definition. If you are a NR for tax, you cannot use Turbotax, as it does not offer support for this - find software that support form 1040NR (non resident).

– Najel
5 hours ago













By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

– Davislor
1 hour ago





By the way, this is one reason why the urban legend that half of all Americans pay no taxes is so absurd. If you drive a car and pay gas tax, or live in a state with a sales tax, you can very easily think of others.

– Davislor
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















21














The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.



Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.



In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.



Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.






share|improve this answer

























  • From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 8





    Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago











  • @jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

    – paulj
    4 hours ago






  • 4





    @paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

    – Ben Voigt
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    @GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

    – Ben Voigt
    2 hours ago


















10














Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.



Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.6%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.






share|improve this answer























  • If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

    – Nobody
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago











  • No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

    – Nobody
    37 mins ago











  • @Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

    – D Stanley
    31 mins ago










protected by JoeTaxpayer 1 hour ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









21














The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.



Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.



In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.



Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.






share|improve this answer

























  • From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 8





    Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago











  • @jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

    – paulj
    4 hours ago






  • 4





    @paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

    – Ben Voigt
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    @GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

    – Ben Voigt
    2 hours ago















21














The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.



Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.



In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.



Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.






share|improve this answer

























  • From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 8





    Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago











  • @jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

    – paulj
    4 hours ago






  • 4





    @paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

    – Ben Voigt
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    @GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

    – Ben Voigt
    2 hours ago













21












21








21







The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.



Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.



In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.



Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.






share|improve this answer















The 15% you're seeing is self-employment tax. The standard deduction still applies, and you are not paying any federal income tax. Self-employment tax pays for social security and medicare, normally employees and employers split those, the self-employed pay the full 15.3% themselves.



Self-employment tax is based on the business net profit, so any business expenses associated with this income can be used to offset income and reduce the tax liability. If you had to fly in and stay at a hotel, for example, those costs should be factored in.



In some cases, honoraria is mis-classified as Nonemployee Compensation (Box 7) instead of Other Income (Box 3). Which box is appropriate depends on the nature of your engagement, Other Income would typically not be subjected to self employment tax.



Edit: I was remembering common mis-classification issues at universities with fellowship income, not honoraria. Honoraria is sometimes mis-classified, but in your case I would guess Box 7 is proper, but could still be worth looking into further.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









Hart COHart CO

33k57793




33k57793












  • From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 8





    Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago











  • @jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

    – paulj
    4 hours ago






  • 4





    @paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

    – Ben Voigt
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    @GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

    – Ben Voigt
    2 hours ago

















  • From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

    – A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
    5 hours ago






  • 8





    Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago











  • @jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

    – paulj
    4 hours ago






  • 4





    @paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

    – Ben Voigt
    4 hours ago






  • 2





    @GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

    – Ben Voigt
    2 hours ago
















From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
5 hours ago





From my understanding, whilst this was all science and research stuff, I DID provide a 'service' as the IRS understands it and I can't safely claim this as a scholarship.

– A-Foreign-Scientist-2018
5 hours ago




8




8





Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

– jamesqf
4 hours ago





Yes. If you were a poor person earning that amount in W2 wages, you'd have had the ~15% taken out before you even got your paycheck.

– jamesqf
4 hours ago













@jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

– paulj
4 hours ago





@jamesqf And that tax, at least for medicare, stops at around 80k. i.e. People with higher incomes actually pay a smaller rate than those earning a lower income. Welcome to America!

– paulj
4 hours ago




4




4





@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago





@paulj: Your memory is a bit lacking. The social security tax (larger portion of FICA stops), but not at 80k, more like 128k or 130k, The medicare portion doesn't stop, and in fact goes up (see "Additional Medicate Tax"; that threshold for that to kick in is typically 200k).

– Ben Voigt
4 hours ago




2




2





@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

– Ben Voigt
2 hours ago





@GalacticCowboy: Yes, that half won't appear on a W2 or paycheck in any shape or form, it's already been taken out (as jamesqf said). The other half does appear as social security and medicare withholding. It's all a government scam to make you think social security and medicare are only costing you half as much as actually is being taken.

– Ben Voigt
2 hours ago













10














Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.



Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.6%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.






share|improve this answer























  • If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

    – Nobody
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago











  • No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

    – Nobody
    37 mins ago











  • @Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

    – D Stanley
    31 mins ago
















10














Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.



Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.6%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.






share|improve this answer























  • If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

    – Nobody
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago











  • No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

    – Nobody
    37 mins ago











  • @Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

    – D Stanley
    31 mins ago














10












10








10







Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.



Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.6%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.






share|improve this answer













Self-employment tax is basically you covering the medicare and social security "tax" that would have been covered by your employer if you were on their payroll. The standard deduction is for income tax that you should not be subject to. It does not apply to self-employment tax.



Note that if you were an employee, you still would have paid half of that amount (7.6%) in the form of withholdings from your paycheck.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









D StanleyD Stanley

57.7k10169175




57.7k10169175












  • If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

    – Nobody
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago











  • No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

    – Nobody
    37 mins ago











  • @Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

    – D Stanley
    31 mins ago


















  • If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

    – Nobody
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

    – Davislor
    1 hour ago











  • No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

    – Nobody
    37 mins ago











  • @Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

    – D Stanley
    31 mins ago

















If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

– Nobody
1 hour ago





If you were an employee, I'm pretty sure you would have paid exactly the same, no matter how it's phrased. We have the same system here, "half paid by employer, half by employee", and that always works out to the employee paying all of it. By nature, it's not a tax on the business, but a tax that takes some of what the company spends on the employee away from the employee.

– Nobody
1 hour ago




1




1





@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

– D Stanley
1 hour ago





@Nobody Then your system is wrong. Employers are required to pay half of the medicare and social security tax and withhold the other half.

– D Stanley
1 hour ago




1




1





And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

– Davislor
1 hour ago





And your employer would’ve picked up the other half, which is why a self-employed worker pays twice as much.

– Davislor
1 hour ago













No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

– Nobody
37 mins ago





No, you misunderstand. Saying that the employer pays a part is just a book keeping trick. For both the employer and the employee, it's like the employee pays both parts. The employer only cares about total cost for the employee. The employee only cares about what they actually get to spend. The difference is the tax, no matter how you "divide" it between them both.

– Nobody
37 mins ago













@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

– D Stanley
31 mins ago






@Nobody Not true. If an employer pays an employee $100 gross, their total cost is $107.60 - the salary plus their portion of FICA/MC. If they pay a contractor $100, their total cost is $100. The government gets $15 either way.

– D Stanley
31 mins ago






protected by JoeTaxpayer 1 hour ago



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe

Dokschytsy (Steed) Kwelen | NawigatsjuunBelarus: Vitebsk Region, citypopulation.de