C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexprWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
Why should universal income be universal?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?
15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?
Is it necessary to use pronouns with the verb "essere"?
The Digit Triangles
Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?
What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean
How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week
Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?
Does the reader need to like the PoV character?
Creating two special characters
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?
Permission on Database
I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?
What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?
C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr
What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`
Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:
template <typename base>
class derived
template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)
void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
My target is C++2a.
I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/
c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20
|
show 3 more comments
Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:
template <typename base>
class derived
template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)
void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
My target is C++2a.
I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/
c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20
Hmm, the body of aif constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in theif constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
4
Maybe you can do something withstd::is_constant_evaluated
?
– 0x5453
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
1
@AartStuurman: What isdo_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not beconstexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it aconstexpr
function, and pass it the value ofget_data
as a parameter?
– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:
template <typename base>
class derived
template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)
void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
My target is C++2a.
I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/
c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20
Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:
template <typename base>
class derived
template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)
void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
My target is C++2a.
I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/
c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20
c++ templates template-meta-programming constexpr c++20
edited 5 hours ago
max66
38.1k74471
38.1k74471
asked 6 hours ago
Aart StuurmanAart Stuurman
920726
920726
Hmm, the body of aif constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in theif constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
4
Maybe you can do something withstd::is_constant_evaluated
?
– 0x5453
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
1
@AartStuurman: What isdo_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not beconstexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it aconstexpr
function, and pass it the value ofget_data
as a parameter?
– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Hmm, the body of aif constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in theif constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
4
Maybe you can do something withstd::is_constant_evaluated
?
– 0x5453
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
1
@AartStuurman: What isdo_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not beconstexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it aconstexpr
function, and pass it the value ofget_data
as a parameter?
– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago
Hmm, the body of a
if constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
Hmm, the body of a
if constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
4
4
Maybe you can do something with
std::is_constant_evaluated
?– 0x5453
6 hours ago
Maybe you can do something with
std::is_constant_evaluated
?– 0x5453
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
1
1
@AartStuurman: What is
do_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr
function, and pass it the value of get_data
as a parameter?– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago
@AartStuurman: What is
do_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr
function, and pass it the value of get_data
as a parameter?– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value()
static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );
template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;
template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));
template <typename base>
struct derived
template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;
void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;
void execute ()
if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
;
struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;
struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;
int main ()
derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).
This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.
The idea is, the overload that returns true
is selected when and only when Lambda()
can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.
template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;
template <typename base>
class derived
// ...
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.
– max66
1 hour ago
add a comment |
template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;
This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view
.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value()
static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );
template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;
template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));
template <typename base>
struct derived
template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;
void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;
void execute ()
if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
;
struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;
struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;
int main ()
derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value()
static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );
template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;
template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));
template <typename base>
struct derived
template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;
void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;
void execute ()
if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
;
struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;
struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;
int main ()
derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value()
static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );
template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;
template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));
template <typename base>
struct derived
template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;
void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;
void execute ()
if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
;
struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;
struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;
int main ()
derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"
Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value()
static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );
template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;
template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));
template <typename base>
struct derived
template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;
void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;
void execute ()
if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
;
struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;
struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;
int main ()
derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
max66max66
38.1k74471
38.1k74471
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
add a comment |
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/
– matovitch
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
@matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)
– max66
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).
This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.
The idea is, the overload that returns true
is selected when and only when Lambda()
can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.
template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;
template <typename base>
class derived
// ...
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.
– max66
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).
This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.
The idea is, the overload that returns true
is selected when and only when Lambda()
can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.
template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;
template <typename base>
class derived
// ...
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.
– max66
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).
This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.
The idea is, the overload that returns true
is selected when and only when Lambda()
can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.
template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;
template <typename base>
class derived
// ...
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).
This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.
The idea is, the overload that returns true
is selected when and only when Lambda()
can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.
template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;
template <typename base>
class derived
// ...
void execute()
if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
cpplearnercpplearner
5,39722341
5,39722341
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.
– max66
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.
– max66
1 hour ago
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (
base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.– max66
1 hour ago
Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (
base::get_data()
) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.– max66
1 hour ago
add a comment |
template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;
This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view
.
add a comment |
template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;
This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view
.
add a comment |
template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;
This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view
.
template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;
This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view
.
answered 4 hours ago
cpplearnercpplearner
5,39722341
5,39722341
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hmm, the body of a
if constexpr
will only be evaluated if the expression in theif constexpr
is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?
– Aart Stuurman
6 hours ago
4
Maybe you can do something with
std::is_constant_evaluated
?– 0x5453
6 hours ago
en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if
– Jesper Juhl
6 hours ago
1
@AartStuurman: What is
do_stuff
that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not beconstexpr
? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it aconstexpr
function, and pass it the value ofget_data
as a parameter?– Nicol Bolas
5 hours ago