The present perfect usageDoes the present perfect imply an action finished in the past?New way of understanding the present perfect tenseIn the tense of present perfect, Are 'recent past' and 'hot news' the same?Does 'hot news' in present past tense contains 'recent past'?What category does the 'the recent perfect' belong to?Omitting articles when contrasting people or things with “and”Present Perfect Usage of “Think” for Recent PastPresent Perfect Usage of “Think” for Recent PastPresent perfect with a past temporal expressionPresent perfect tense and specific time expression?
Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?
What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?
Multiplicative persistence
A Trivial Diagnosis
How much of a Devil Fruit must be consumed to gain the power?
Can I turn my anal-retentiveness into a career?
Non-trope happy ending?
awk assign to multiple variables at once
What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
C++ copy constructor called at return
What is the difference between lands and mana?
Creating two special characters
Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?
Is it necessary to use pronouns with the verb "essere"?
How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
How can I write humor as character trait?
How to draw a matrix with arrows in limited space
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
The present perfect usage
Does the present perfect imply an action finished in the past?New way of understanding the present perfect tenseIn the tense of present perfect, Are 'recent past' and 'hot news' the same?Does 'hot news' in present past tense contains 'recent past'?What category does the 'the recent perfect' belong to?Omitting articles when contrasting people or things with “and”Present Perfect Usage of “Think” for Recent PastPresent Perfect Usage of “Think” for Recent PastPresent perfect with a past temporal expressionPresent perfect tense and specific time expression?
According to the Cambridge grammar of the English language ( CGEL ) by Geoffrey. K. Pullum and Rodney Huddlestone, there are four different uses of the present perfect tense : the continuative, the experiental ( or existential ) perfect, the resultative perfect and the perfect of recent past. ( 2002 :143-145 )
Not so long ago, I came across a grammar book, in which the present perfect tense was explained differently. It states that -" when we can not make a present tense sentence with a similar meaning, we do not normally use the present perfect ( even if we are giving " news " ). My question is - why can not we use the present perfect tense, to be more precise, the perfect of recent past when we are giving " news " ? For example : Granny hit me ! Why can not we say - Granny has hit me ? Especially if the impact of the hit is visible on the body ? Can we remember this as a rule of thumb ? Does it sound okay to you ?
grammar
add a comment |
According to the Cambridge grammar of the English language ( CGEL ) by Geoffrey. K. Pullum and Rodney Huddlestone, there are four different uses of the present perfect tense : the continuative, the experiental ( or existential ) perfect, the resultative perfect and the perfect of recent past. ( 2002 :143-145 )
Not so long ago, I came across a grammar book, in which the present perfect tense was explained differently. It states that -" when we can not make a present tense sentence with a similar meaning, we do not normally use the present perfect ( even if we are giving " news " ). My question is - why can not we use the present perfect tense, to be more precise, the perfect of recent past when we are giving " news " ? For example : Granny hit me ! Why can not we say - Granny has hit me ? Especially if the impact of the hit is visible on the body ? Can we remember this as a rule of thumb ? Does it sound okay to you ?
grammar
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
According to the Cambridge grammar of the English language ( CGEL ) by Geoffrey. K. Pullum and Rodney Huddlestone, there are four different uses of the present perfect tense : the continuative, the experiental ( or existential ) perfect, the resultative perfect and the perfect of recent past. ( 2002 :143-145 )
Not so long ago, I came across a grammar book, in which the present perfect tense was explained differently. It states that -" when we can not make a present tense sentence with a similar meaning, we do not normally use the present perfect ( even if we are giving " news " ). My question is - why can not we use the present perfect tense, to be more precise, the perfect of recent past when we are giving " news " ? For example : Granny hit me ! Why can not we say - Granny has hit me ? Especially if the impact of the hit is visible on the body ? Can we remember this as a rule of thumb ? Does it sound okay to you ?
grammar
According to the Cambridge grammar of the English language ( CGEL ) by Geoffrey. K. Pullum and Rodney Huddlestone, there are four different uses of the present perfect tense : the continuative, the experiental ( or existential ) perfect, the resultative perfect and the perfect of recent past. ( 2002 :143-145 )
Not so long ago, I came across a grammar book, in which the present perfect tense was explained differently. It states that -" when we can not make a present tense sentence with a similar meaning, we do not normally use the present perfect ( even if we are giving " news " ). My question is - why can not we use the present perfect tense, to be more precise, the perfect of recent past when we are giving " news " ? For example : Granny hit me ! Why can not we say - Granny has hit me ? Especially if the impact of the hit is visible on the body ? Can we remember this as a rule of thumb ? Does it sound okay to you ?
grammar
grammar
asked 1 hour ago
BeqaBeqa
616414
616414
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The book you are referring to gives a summative assessment of Present Perfect far from the madding pedantic analysis. In the four differences you have mentioned from the authority, the recurring theme is that it has a present relevance. And exactly that's what your grammar book says. With the help of two negative sentences the writer affirms this relevance of present in present perfect. When this relationship with the present is gone, it becomes the thing of the past. Present perfect is at the threshold,— one step in the past, one step in present looking forward but no step further.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490818%2fthe-present-perfect-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The book you are referring to gives a summative assessment of Present Perfect far from the madding pedantic analysis. In the four differences you have mentioned from the authority, the recurring theme is that it has a present relevance. And exactly that's what your grammar book says. With the help of two negative sentences the writer affirms this relevance of present in present perfect. When this relationship with the present is gone, it becomes the thing of the past. Present perfect is at the threshold,— one step in the past, one step in present looking forward but no step further.
add a comment |
The book you are referring to gives a summative assessment of Present Perfect far from the madding pedantic analysis. In the four differences you have mentioned from the authority, the recurring theme is that it has a present relevance. And exactly that's what your grammar book says. With the help of two negative sentences the writer affirms this relevance of present in present perfect. When this relationship with the present is gone, it becomes the thing of the past. Present perfect is at the threshold,— one step in the past, one step in present looking forward but no step further.
add a comment |
The book you are referring to gives a summative assessment of Present Perfect far from the madding pedantic analysis. In the four differences you have mentioned from the authority, the recurring theme is that it has a present relevance. And exactly that's what your grammar book says. With the help of two negative sentences the writer affirms this relevance of present in present perfect. When this relationship with the present is gone, it becomes the thing of the past. Present perfect is at the threshold,— one step in the past, one step in present looking forward but no step further.
The book you are referring to gives a summative assessment of Present Perfect far from the madding pedantic analysis. In the four differences you have mentioned from the authority, the recurring theme is that it has a present relevance. And exactly that's what your grammar book says. With the help of two negative sentences the writer affirms this relevance of present in present perfect. When this relationship with the present is gone, it becomes the thing of the past. Present perfect is at the threshold,— one step in the past, one step in present looking forward but no step further.
answered 28 secs ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
1,991613
1,991613
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490818%2fthe-present-perfect-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Perhaps this should be asked at ell.stackexchange.com ?? That is where learners of English ask questions.
– GEdgar
1 hour ago