A case of the snifflesCheckerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?

Revoked SSL certificate

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Why can't I see bouncing of switch on oscilloscope screen?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Theorems that impeded progress

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

meaning of に in 本当に?

Codimension of non-flat locus

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Rock identification in KY

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX



A case of the sniffles


Checkerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?













6












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    6 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    6 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)







mathematics situation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









postmortespostmortes

508212




508212







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    6 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    6 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago















6












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









hexominohexomino

45.8k4140219




45.8k4140219











  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
6 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?How to convey the scale of my humanoid without science or units?How does the “space drive” conserve momentum?Planet Vanishes - How does this affect the orbiting starships?How does a community of a Universe Simulator have the same language as its creator?How would US Presidential elections be affected if voters could choose the state their vote for President was counted in?How Does One Ensures the Immortality of Their ConsciousnessHow do I retain national independence while also having a one world government?How can Ganymede have an Earth-like gravity without us having realized it?How would one make a lion mount for a fantasy world?

Output visual diagram of pictureASCII-art logic gate diagramBooks on a ShelfDetermine the Dimensions of a Rotated RectangleDraw a Houndstooth PatternDraw and label an ASCII hexagonal gridGolf me an ASCII AlphabetASCII Jigsaw PuzzleOutput a pretty boxASCII-Art Venn DiagramASCII Exact Cover with Rectangles