Is it necessary to end the sentence after “of which”, “to which”, etc. with the word linked to proposition?Usage / examples of “of which”how to explain the word “that” used in this sentenceDoes removing the comma before 'which' etc in a non-restrictive clause change the meaning of the sentence?Comma before where when the clause is at the end of the sentenceWhat is the significance of “it did” at the end of a sentence?Which is the correct verb form with Who?moving relative clause to the end of a sentenceWhich word does the “which” in this sentence point to?Which or who after “the soldier and his sword”?Can a which-clause be used with another which in this sentence?Which of these nouns does the relative clause go with?

Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Lied on resume at previous job

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Add an angle to a sphere

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

I see my dog run

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?



Is it necessary to end the sentence after “of which”, “to which”, etc. with the word linked to proposition?


Usage / examples of “of which”how to explain the word “that” used in this sentenceDoes removing the comma before 'which' etc in a non-restrictive clause change the meaning of the sentence?Comma before where when the clause is at the end of the sentenceWhat is the significance of “it did” at the end of a sentence?Which is the correct verb form with Who?moving relative clause to the end of a sentenceWhich word does the “which” in this sentence point to?Which or who after “the soldier and his sword”?Can a which-clause be used with another which in this sentence?Which of these nouns does the relative clause go with?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















To understand my question, let me draw you to the sample sentences I bring from another post: Usage / examples of "of which".




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was most afraid.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were very proud.



In all of the above sentences ending words afraid, consisted, and proud are split from of in their normal usage, (e.g. afraid of). Is it still valid to proceed beyond these ending verbs like these :




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was afraid more than anything.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted as he has predicted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were most proud due to their hard work.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 8 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 3





    They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

    – Barmar
    Jun 7 '17 at 5:14






  • 1





    ...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 7:50











  • @Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

    – chanp
    Jun 7 '17 at 10:49












  • Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 11:44






  • 1





    @chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

    – FumbleFingers
    Apr 12 '18 at 17:03

















3















To understand my question, let me draw you to the sample sentences I bring from another post: Usage / examples of "of which".




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was most afraid.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were very proud.



In all of the above sentences ending words afraid, consisted, and proud are split from of in their normal usage, (e.g. afraid of). Is it still valid to proceed beyond these ending verbs like these :




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was afraid more than anything.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted as he has predicted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were most proud due to their hard work.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 8 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 3





    They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

    – Barmar
    Jun 7 '17 at 5:14






  • 1





    ...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 7:50











  • @Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

    – chanp
    Jun 7 '17 at 10:49












  • Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 11:44






  • 1





    @chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

    – FumbleFingers
    Apr 12 '18 at 17:03













3












3








3








To understand my question, let me draw you to the sample sentences I bring from another post: Usage / examples of "of which".




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was most afraid.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were very proud.



In all of the above sentences ending words afraid, consisted, and proud are split from of in their normal usage, (e.g. afraid of). Is it still valid to proceed beyond these ending verbs like these :




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was afraid more than anything.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted as he has predicted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were most proud due to their hard work.










share|improve this question
















To understand my question, let me draw you to the sample sentences I bring from another post: Usage / examples of "of which".




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was most afraid.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were very proud.



In all of the above sentences ending words afraid, consisted, and proud are split from of in their normal usage, (e.g. afraid of). Is it still valid to proceed beyond these ending verbs like these :




  1. She discovered so many spiders, of which she was afraid more than anything.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises, of which the test mostly consisted as he has predicted.

  3. The team won a silver medal, of which they were most proud due to their hard work.







relative-clauses






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 13 '18 at 22:27









Laurel

34.8k668121




34.8k668121










asked Jun 7 '17 at 5:00









chanpchanp

1162




1162





bumped to the homepage by Community 8 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 8 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.









  • 3





    They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

    – Barmar
    Jun 7 '17 at 5:14






  • 1





    ...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 7:50











  • @Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

    – chanp
    Jun 7 '17 at 10:49












  • Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 11:44






  • 1





    @chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

    – FumbleFingers
    Apr 12 '18 at 17:03












  • 3





    They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

    – Barmar
    Jun 7 '17 at 5:14






  • 1





    ...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 7:50











  • @Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

    – chanp
    Jun 7 '17 at 10:49












  • Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Jun 7 '17 at 11:44






  • 1





    @chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

    – FumbleFingers
    Apr 12 '18 at 17:03







3




3





They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

– Barmar
Jun 7 '17 at 5:14





They're grammatical, but they're all very confusing constructions IMO. When you put too much after of which, it's ambiguous what the relative clauses refer to.

– Barmar
Jun 7 '17 at 5:14




1




1





...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 7 '17 at 7:50





...Yes, clunky. I'd use two sentences in B1,2,3; I'd start both examples 2 with 'The test'.

– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 7 '17 at 7:50













@Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

– chanp
Jun 7 '17 at 10:49






@Edwin Thanks. I see. You mean "The test consisted mostly the listening and reading excercies. He answered all of them". Correct?

– chanp
Jun 7 '17 at 10:49














Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 7 '17 at 11:44





Yes, that sounds much better. It does however shift the emphasis a little.

– Edwin Ashworth
Jun 7 '17 at 11:44




1




1





@chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

– FumbleFingers
Apr 12 '18 at 17:03





@chanp: Since you're specifically asking about constructions involving of which (which as Edwin says, is "clunky" / confusing in your examples), you might like to note that it's perfectly natural to say The test mostly consisted of listening and reading exercises, all of which he answered.

– FumbleFingers
Apr 12 '18 at 17:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














All of those sentences are correct, although not in a form you would commonly encounter.



When you see "of which," it is typically designed to rephrase a sentence so that it doesn't end with a preposition. It's a myth that ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong, but it is still avoided by some people. (Even if somebody doesn't believe it to be wrong, they might prefer the alternate writing style.)



  • Original: These are the spiders she's afraid of.

  • Reprhased: These are the spiders of which she's afraid.

The sentence examples you give have a similar quality, but are more complex. Interestingly, it's the use of the commas that seems to result in any awkwardness. (And, perhaps, some verbiage after as a result.)



If you're worried about how they might sound but don't want to change them into two sentences, you could replace the commas with em dashes, along with some other rephrasing. (Incidentally, doing this also removes your use of "of which.")



  1. She discovered so many spiders---her greatest fear.

  2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises---as he had predicted, the test had consisted mostly of those.

  3. The team won a silver medal---a proud recognition of their hard work..

I may have changed things too much, but the idea is there. I, however, don't necessarily have an issue with the original construction. Depending on context, it's a more simplistic phrasing. Changing them as I did---or turning them into two sentences---will also change their tone of voice and "reception." You will need to determine what your priorities are.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f392813%2fis-it-necessary-to-end-the-sentence-after-of-which-to-which-etc-with-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    All of those sentences are correct, although not in a form you would commonly encounter.



    When you see "of which," it is typically designed to rephrase a sentence so that it doesn't end with a preposition. It's a myth that ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong, but it is still avoided by some people. (Even if somebody doesn't believe it to be wrong, they might prefer the alternate writing style.)



    • Original: These are the spiders she's afraid of.

    • Reprhased: These are the spiders of which she's afraid.

    The sentence examples you give have a similar quality, but are more complex. Interestingly, it's the use of the commas that seems to result in any awkwardness. (And, perhaps, some verbiage after as a result.)



    If you're worried about how they might sound but don't want to change them into two sentences, you could replace the commas with em dashes, along with some other rephrasing. (Incidentally, doing this also removes your use of "of which.")



    1. She discovered so many spiders---her greatest fear.

    2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises---as he had predicted, the test had consisted mostly of those.

    3. The team won a silver medal---a proud recognition of their hard work..

    I may have changed things too much, but the idea is there. I, however, don't necessarily have an issue with the original construction. Depending on context, it's a more simplistic phrasing. Changing them as I did---or turning them into two sentences---will also change their tone of voice and "reception." You will need to determine what your priorities are.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      All of those sentences are correct, although not in a form you would commonly encounter.



      When you see "of which," it is typically designed to rephrase a sentence so that it doesn't end with a preposition. It's a myth that ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong, but it is still avoided by some people. (Even if somebody doesn't believe it to be wrong, they might prefer the alternate writing style.)



      • Original: These are the spiders she's afraid of.

      • Reprhased: These are the spiders of which she's afraid.

      The sentence examples you give have a similar quality, but are more complex. Interestingly, it's the use of the commas that seems to result in any awkwardness. (And, perhaps, some verbiage after as a result.)



      If you're worried about how they might sound but don't want to change them into two sentences, you could replace the commas with em dashes, along with some other rephrasing. (Incidentally, doing this also removes your use of "of which.")



      1. She discovered so many spiders---her greatest fear.

      2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises---as he had predicted, the test had consisted mostly of those.

      3. The team won a silver medal---a proud recognition of their hard work..

      I may have changed things too much, but the idea is there. I, however, don't necessarily have an issue with the original construction. Depending on context, it's a more simplistic phrasing. Changing them as I did---or turning them into two sentences---will also change their tone of voice and "reception." You will need to determine what your priorities are.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        All of those sentences are correct, although not in a form you would commonly encounter.



        When you see "of which," it is typically designed to rephrase a sentence so that it doesn't end with a preposition. It's a myth that ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong, but it is still avoided by some people. (Even if somebody doesn't believe it to be wrong, they might prefer the alternate writing style.)



        • Original: These are the spiders she's afraid of.

        • Reprhased: These are the spiders of which she's afraid.

        The sentence examples you give have a similar quality, but are more complex. Interestingly, it's the use of the commas that seems to result in any awkwardness. (And, perhaps, some verbiage after as a result.)



        If you're worried about how they might sound but don't want to change them into two sentences, you could replace the commas with em dashes, along with some other rephrasing. (Incidentally, doing this also removes your use of "of which.")



        1. She discovered so many spiders---her greatest fear.

        2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises---as he had predicted, the test had consisted mostly of those.

        3. The team won a silver medal---a proud recognition of their hard work..

        I may have changed things too much, but the idea is there. I, however, don't necessarily have an issue with the original construction. Depending on context, it's a more simplistic phrasing. Changing them as I did---or turning them into two sentences---will also change their tone of voice and "reception." You will need to determine what your priorities are.






        share|improve this answer













        All of those sentences are correct, although not in a form you would commonly encounter.



        When you see "of which," it is typically designed to rephrase a sentence so that it doesn't end with a preposition. It's a myth that ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong, but it is still avoided by some people. (Even if somebody doesn't believe it to be wrong, they might prefer the alternate writing style.)



        • Original: These are the spiders she's afraid of.

        • Reprhased: These are the spiders of which she's afraid.

        The sentence examples you give have a similar quality, but are more complex. Interestingly, it's the use of the commas that seems to result in any awkwardness. (And, perhaps, some verbiage after as a result.)



        If you're worried about how they might sound but don't want to change them into two sentences, you could replace the commas with em dashes, along with some other rephrasing. (Incidentally, doing this also removes your use of "of which.")



        1. She discovered so many spiders---her greatest fear.

        2. He answered all the listening and reading exercises---as he had predicted, the test had consisted mostly of those.

        3. The team won a silver medal---a proud recognition of their hard work..

        I may have changed things too much, but the idea is there. I, however, don't necessarily have an issue with the original construction. Depending on context, it's a more simplistic phrasing. Changing them as I did---or turning them into two sentences---will also change their tone of voice and "reception." You will need to determine what your priorities are.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 12 '18 at 16:53









        Jason BassfordJason Bassford

        19.8k32647




        19.8k32647



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f392813%2fis-it-necessary-to-end-the-sentence-after-of-which-to-which-etc-with-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

            Чепеларе Съдържание География | История | Население | Спортни и природни забележителности | Културни и исторически обекти | Религии | Обществени институции | Известни личности | Редовни събития | Галерия | Източници | Литература | Външни препратки | Навигация41°43′23.99″ с. ш. 24°41′09.99″ и. д. / 41.723333° с. ш. 24.686111° и. д.*ЧепелареЧепеларски Linux fest 2002Начало на Зимен сезон 2005/06Национални хайдушки празници „Капитан Петко Войвода“Град ЧепелареЧепеларе – народният ски курортbgrod.orgwww.terranatura.hit.bgСправка за населението на гр. Исперих, общ. Исперих, обл. РазградМузей на родопския карстМузей на спорта и скитеЧепеларебългарскибългарскианглийскитукИстория на градаСки писти в ЧепелареВремето в ЧепелареРадио и телевизия в ЧепелареЧепеларе мами с родопски чар и добри пистиЕвтин туризъм и снежни атракции в ЧепелареМестоположениеИнформация и снимки от музея на родопския карст3D панорами от ЧепелареЧепелареррр