Symmetry in quantum mechanicsSymmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsQuantum mechanics and Lorentz symmetryGenerators of a certain symmetry in Quantum MechanicsEquivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorConcrete example that projective representation of symmetry group occurs in a quantum system except the case of spin half integer?Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhat is the definition of parity operator in quantum mechanics?Symmetry of Hamiltonian in harmonic oscillatorDifference between symmetry transformation and basis transformationSymmetries in quantum mechanicsWhat happens to the global $U(1)$ symmetry in alternative formulations of Quantum Mechanics?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?
How to manage monthly salary
Lied on resume at previous job
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Some basic questions on halt and move in Turing machines
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Eliminate empty elements from a list with a specific pattern
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
extract characters between two commas?
Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?
Weird behaviour when using querySelector
Why is making salt water prohibited on Shabbat?
Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?
How to create a consistant feel for character names in a fantasy setting?
What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?
Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?
Is this homebrew feat, Beast of Burden, balanced?
Symmetry in quantum mechanics
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsQuantum mechanics and Lorentz symmetryGenerators of a certain symmetry in Quantum MechanicsEquivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorConcrete example that projective representation of symmetry group occurs in a quantum system except the case of spin half integer?Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhat is the definition of parity operator in quantum mechanics?Symmetry of Hamiltonian in harmonic oscillatorDifference between symmetry transformation and basis transformationSymmetries in quantum mechanicsWhat happens to the global $U(1)$ symmetry in alternative formulations of Quantum Mechanics?
$begingroup$
My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$
Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?
quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$
Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?
quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$
Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?
quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
$endgroup$
My professor told us that in quantum mechanics a transformation is a symmetry transformation if $$ UH(psi) = HU(psi) $$
Can you give me an easy explanation for this definition?
quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator
quantum-mechanics operators symmetry hamiltonian commutator
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
edited 5 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
107k121991239
107k121991239
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
asked 7 hours ago
SimoBartzSimoBartz
847
847
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.
In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
$$
ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
tag1
$$
We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
$$
Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
tag2
$$
If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
$$
ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
tag3
$$
which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.
For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
endalign*
If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
$left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
then also
$$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.
Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
beginalign*
[A, P]=0
endalign*
for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471292%2fsymmetry-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.
In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
$$
ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
tag1
$$
We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
$$
Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
tag2
$$
If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
$$
ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
tag3
$$
which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.
For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.
In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
$$
ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
tag1
$$
We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
$$
Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
tag2
$$
If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
$$
ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
tag3
$$
which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.
For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.
In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
$$
ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
tag1
$$
We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
$$
Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
tag2
$$
If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
$$
ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
tag3
$$
which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.
For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
$endgroup$
In a context like this, a symmetry is a transformation that converts solutions of the equation(s) of motion to other solutions of the equation(s) of motion.
In this case, the equation of motion is the Schrödinger equation
$$
ihbarfracddtpsi=Hpsi.
tag1
$$
We can multiply both sides of equation (1) by $U$ to get
$$
Uihbarfracddtpsi=UHpsi.
tag2
$$
If $UH=HU$ and $U$ is independent of time, then equation (2) may be rewritten as
$$
ihbarfracddtUpsi=HUpsi.
tag3
$$
which says that if $psi$ solves equation (1), then so does $Upsi$, so $U$ is a symmetry.
For a more general definition of symmetry in QM, see
Symmetry transformations on a quantum system; Definitions
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
answered 7 hours ago
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
13.3k21745
13.3k21745
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is a good answer but it brings to another question, why do we call symmetry this condition?
$endgroup$
– SimoBartz
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimoBartz That's a good question. In a more completely specified model, say with lots of local observables as in quantum field theory, we would require that a symmetry preserve things like the relationships between those observables in space and time. But in the present question, only the Hamiltonian is specified, so there is nothing else to preserve.
$endgroup$
– Chiral Anomaly
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
endalign*
If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
$left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
then also
$$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.
Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
beginalign*
[A, P]=0
endalign*
for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
endalign*
If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
$left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
then also
$$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.
Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
beginalign*
[A, P]=0
endalign*
for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
endalign*
If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
$left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
then also
$$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.
Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
beginalign*
[A, P]=0
endalign*
for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
$endgroup$
What you have written there is nothing but the commutator. Consider for example the time evolution operator beginalign*
Uleft(t-t_0right)=e^-ileft(t-t_0right) H
endalign*
If $psileft(xi_1, dots, xi_N ; t_0right)$ is the wave function at time $t_0$ and $U(t−t0)$ is the time evolution operator that for all permutations $P$ satisfies
$left[Uleft(t-t_0right), Pright]=0$
then also
$$left(P Uleft(t-t_0right) psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)=left(Uleft(t-t_0right) P psiright)left(xi_1, ldots, xi_N ; t_0right)$$
This means that the permuted time evolved wave function is the same as the time evolved permuted wave function.
Another example would be if you consider identical particles. An arbitrary observable $A$ should be the same under the permutation operator $P$ if one has identical particles. This is to say:
beginalign*
[A, P]=0
endalign*
for all $Pin S_N$ (in permutation group of $N$ particles).
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
answered 7 hours ago
LeviathanLeviathan
747
747
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471292%2fsymmetry-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
