free fall ellipse or parabola? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHohmann transfer orbit questionsPractical limits on the size of orbiting objects: could two pebbles orbit each otherCan a very small portion of an ellipse be a parabola?Are retrograde capture orbits “easier” than prograde capture orbits?How does acceleration affect the orbit?Prove that orbits are conic sectionsDo the planets really orbit the Sun?Meaning of the focus of an elliptical orbitHow did people get ellipses of Newton's equations of motion and gravitation?Is spacetime in an ellipse around a massive object, or does it just slope down towards the massive object?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule
How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?
Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv
Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish
Expressing the idea of having a very busy time
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?
Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed
What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico
How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?
"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"
It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
Film where the government was corrupt with aliens, people sent to kill aliens are given rigged visors not showing the right aliens
The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle
Why did early computer designers eschew integers?
What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?
Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!
Decide between Polyglossia and Babel for LuaLaTeX in 2019
free fall ellipse or parabola?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHohmann transfer orbit questionsPractical limits on the size of orbiting objects: could two pebbles orbit each otherCan a very small portion of an ellipse be a parabola?Are retrograde capture orbits “easier” than prograde capture orbits?How does acceleration affect the orbit?Prove that orbits are conic sectionsDo the planets really orbit the Sun?Meaning of the focus of an elliptical orbitHow did people get ellipses of Newton's equations of motion and gravitation?Is spacetime in an ellipse around a massive object, or does it just slope down towards the massive object?
$begingroup$
Herbert Spencer somewhere says that the parabola of a ballistic object is actually a portion of an ellipse that is indistinguishable from a parabola--is that true? It would seem plausible since satellite orbits are ellipses and artillery trajectories are interrupted orbits.
newtonian-mechanics gravity orbital-motion projectile free-fall
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Herbert Spencer somewhere says that the parabola of a ballistic object is actually a portion of an ellipse that is indistinguishable from a parabola--is that true? It would seem plausible since satellite orbits are ellipses and artillery trajectories are interrupted orbits.
newtonian-mechanics gravity orbital-motion projectile free-fall
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Herbert Spencer somewhere says that the parabola of a ballistic object is actually a portion of an ellipse that is indistinguishable from a parabola--is that true? It would seem plausible since satellite orbits are ellipses and artillery trajectories are interrupted orbits.
newtonian-mechanics gravity orbital-motion projectile free-fall
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
$endgroup$
Herbert Spencer somewhere says that the parabola of a ballistic object is actually a portion of an ellipse that is indistinguishable from a parabola--is that true? It would seem plausible since satellite orbits are ellipses and artillery trajectories are interrupted orbits.
newtonian-mechanics gravity orbital-motion projectile free-fall
newtonian-mechanics gravity orbital-motion projectile free-fall
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
edited 3 hours ago
Aaron Stevens
13.7k42250
13.7k42250
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
asked 3 hours ago
user56930user56930
374
374
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The difference between the two cases is the direction of the gravity vector. If gravity is pulling towards a point (as we see in orbital mechanics), ballistic objects follow an elliptical (or sometimes hyperbolic) path. If, however, gravity points in a constant direction (as we often assume in terrestrial physics problems: it pulls "down"), we get a parabolic trajectory.
On the timescales of these trajectories that we call parabolic, the difference in direction of gravity from start to end of the flight is so tremendously minimal, that we can treat it as a perturbation from the "down" vector and then ignore it entirely. This works until the object is flying fast enough that the changing gravity vector starts to have a non-trivial effect.
At orbital velocities, the effect is so non-trivial that we don't even try to model it as a "down" vector plus a perturbation. We just model the vector pointing towards the center of the gravitational body.
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469780%2ffree-fall-ellipse-or-parabola%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The difference between the two cases is the direction of the gravity vector. If gravity is pulling towards a point (as we see in orbital mechanics), ballistic objects follow an elliptical (or sometimes hyperbolic) path. If, however, gravity points in a constant direction (as we often assume in terrestrial physics problems: it pulls "down"), we get a parabolic trajectory.
On the timescales of these trajectories that we call parabolic, the difference in direction of gravity from start to end of the flight is so tremendously minimal, that we can treat it as a perturbation from the "down" vector and then ignore it entirely. This works until the object is flying fast enough that the changing gravity vector starts to have a non-trivial effect.
At orbital velocities, the effect is so non-trivial that we don't even try to model it as a "down" vector plus a perturbation. We just model the vector pointing towards the center of the gravitational body.
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The difference between the two cases is the direction of the gravity vector. If gravity is pulling towards a point (as we see in orbital mechanics), ballistic objects follow an elliptical (or sometimes hyperbolic) path. If, however, gravity points in a constant direction (as we often assume in terrestrial physics problems: it pulls "down"), we get a parabolic trajectory.
On the timescales of these trajectories that we call parabolic, the difference in direction of gravity from start to end of the flight is so tremendously minimal, that we can treat it as a perturbation from the "down" vector and then ignore it entirely. This works until the object is flying fast enough that the changing gravity vector starts to have a non-trivial effect.
At orbital velocities, the effect is so non-trivial that we don't even try to model it as a "down" vector plus a perturbation. We just model the vector pointing towards the center of the gravitational body.
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The difference between the two cases is the direction of the gravity vector. If gravity is pulling towards a point (as we see in orbital mechanics), ballistic objects follow an elliptical (or sometimes hyperbolic) path. If, however, gravity points in a constant direction (as we often assume in terrestrial physics problems: it pulls "down"), we get a parabolic trajectory.
On the timescales of these trajectories that we call parabolic, the difference in direction of gravity from start to end of the flight is so tremendously minimal, that we can treat it as a perturbation from the "down" vector and then ignore it entirely. This works until the object is flying fast enough that the changing gravity vector starts to have a non-trivial effect.
At orbital velocities, the effect is so non-trivial that we don't even try to model it as a "down" vector plus a perturbation. We just model the vector pointing towards the center of the gravitational body.
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
$endgroup$
The difference between the two cases is the direction of the gravity vector. If gravity is pulling towards a point (as we see in orbital mechanics), ballistic objects follow an elliptical (or sometimes hyperbolic) path. If, however, gravity points in a constant direction (as we often assume in terrestrial physics problems: it pulls "down"), we get a parabolic trajectory.
On the timescales of these trajectories that we call parabolic, the difference in direction of gravity from start to end of the flight is so tremendously minimal, that we can treat it as a perturbation from the "down" vector and then ignore it entirely. This works until the object is flying fast enough that the changing gravity vector starts to have a non-trivial effect.
At orbital velocities, the effect is so non-trivial that we don't even try to model it as a "down" vector plus a perturbation. We just model the vector pointing towards the center of the gravitational body.
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
answered 3 hours ago
Cort AmmonCort Ammon
24.1k34779
24.1k34779
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For the orbital model, the magnitude of the vector changes (as $1/r^2$) as well as the direction.
$endgroup$
– NLambert
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469780%2ffree-fall-ellipse-or-parabola%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
