Coordinate position not preciseWith TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them
At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?
How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus?
Finding all intervals that match predicate in vector
Cynical novel that describes an America ruled by the media, arms manufacturers, and ethnic figureheads
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Can criminal fraud exist without damages?
What is the oldest known work of fiction?
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
How does residential electricity work?
What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?
Student evaluations of teaching assistants
Print name if parameter passed to function
How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?
Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?
There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be
Ways to speed up user implemented RK4
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
Best way to store options for panels
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?
Hide Select Output from T-SQL
Coordinate position not precise
With TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:
Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
add a comment |
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:
Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine whenA1
is a coordinate.
– marmot
5 hours ago
add a comment |
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:
Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
My problem is as follows:
- I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).
- I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).
It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:
Why is this occurring?
tikz-pgf coordinates
tikz-pgf coordinates
asked 5 hours ago
Thevesh ThevaThevesh Theva
519114
519114
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine whenA1
is a coordinate.
– marmot
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply saydraw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine whenA1
is a coordinate.
– marmot
5 hours ago
1
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine when A1
is a coordinate.– marmot
5 hours ago
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine when A1
is a coordinate.– marmot
5 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate
instead of node
because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennode
andcoordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate
and result will become as you wish:
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node
and coordinate
arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep
. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt
the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections
library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate
instead of node
because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennode
andcoordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate
instead of node
because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennode
andcoordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate
instead of node
because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate
instead of node
because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
answered 5 hours ago
marmotmarmot
112k5141267
112k5141267
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennode
andcoordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference betweennode
andcoordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.
– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
1
1
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!
– Thevesh Theva
5 hours ago
1
1
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between
node
and coordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.– Kpym
3 hours ago
I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between
node
and coordinate
. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.– Kpym
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
@Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.
– marmot
3 hours ago
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate
and result will become as you wish:
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node
and coordinate
arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep
. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt
the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections
library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate
and result will become as you wish:
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node
and coordinate
arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep
. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt
the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections
library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
add a comment |
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate
and result will become as you wish:
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node
and coordinate
arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep
. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt
the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections
library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate
and result will become as you wish:
documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;
draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
difference between node
and coordinate
arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep
. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt
the result will be the same.
off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections
library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
ZarkoZarko
128k868167
128k868167
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Node's have finite size and you can simply say
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1);
which will work fine whenA1
is a coordinate.– marmot
5 hours ago