declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What is a smart pointer and when should I use one?Returning unique_ptr from functionsWhy is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionWhy should I use a pointer rather than the object itself?Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsFunction pointer, which can point to every thing?Has a std::byte pointer the same aliasing implications as char*?declare and define function pointer variable in one line
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
Fastest way to shutdown Ubuntu Mate 18.10
Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
A pseudo-riley?
Why does GHC infer a monomorphic type here, even with MonomorphismRestriction disabled?
How can I quit an app using Terminal?
Whats the best way to handle refactoring a big file?
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?
Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers
Is it a good idea to use COLUMN AS (left([Another_Column],(4)) instead of LEFT in the select?
Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
What's the point of interval inversion?
When airplanes disconnect from a tanker during air to air refueling, why do they bank so sharply to the right?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?
Removing read access from a file
declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What is a smart pointer and when should I use one?Returning unique_ptr from functionsWhy is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionWhy should I use a pointer rather than the object itself?Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsFunction pointer, which can point to every thing?Has a std::byte pointer the same aliasing implications as char*?declare and define function pointer variable in one line
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
add a comment |
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
9 hours ago
add a comment |
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
c++
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
Guillaume Racicot
15.8k53568
15.8k53568
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
emma brainemma brain
913
913
New contributor
New contributor
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
9 hours ago
add a comment |
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
9 hours ago
3
3
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
1
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You're missing the
&
before whatever
. FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
You're missing the
&
before whatever
. FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should be char
in your typedef
)– andreee
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should be char
in your typedef
)– andreee
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55400483%2fdeclare-as-function-pointer-and-initialize-in-the-same-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
answered 9 hours ago
n.m.n.m.
73.7k885172
73.7k885172
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 hours ago
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:
char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.– cmaster
2 hours ago
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:
char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.– cmaster
2 hours ago
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
answered 8 hours ago
Guillaume RacicotGuillaume Racicot
15.8k53568
15.8k53568
add a comment |
add a comment |
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55400483%2fdeclare-as-function-pointer-and-initialize-in-the-same-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
9 hours ago
You're missing the
&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
9 hours ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)– andreee
9 hours ago