Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?

What is the role of 'For' here?

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Can a flute soloist sit?

Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Do warforged have souls?

1960s short story making fun of James Bond-style spy fiction

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners

Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?



Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold










5












$begingroup$


The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



    Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



    If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



    And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




    1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



    2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.



      Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2



      If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?



      And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?




      1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.



      2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.







      differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago







      Peter Kagey

















      asked 4 hours ago









      Peter KageyPeter Kagey

      1,58572053




      1,58572053




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



          Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



          See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



          This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



            EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
              $endgroup$
              – Ted Shifrin
              4 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It's a nice example; you should leave it.
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Kagey
              4 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            8












            $begingroup$

            First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



            Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



            See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



            This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              8












              $begingroup$

              First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



              Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



              See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



              This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                8












                8








                8





                $begingroup$

                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:



                Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.



                See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.



                This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago

























                answered 4 hours ago









                Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan

                48.7k344110




                48.7k344110





















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago













                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.



                    EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 4 hours ago

























                    answered 4 hours ago









                    Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin

                    65k44792




                    65k44792











                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ted Shifrin
                      4 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Peter Kagey
                      4 hours ago















                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    4 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    4 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    4 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Ted Shifrin
                    4 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    4 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    It's a nice example; you should leave it.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Peter Kagey
                    4 hours ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

                    Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

                    Чепеларе Съдържание География | История | Население | Спортни и природни забележителности | Културни и исторически обекти | Религии | Обществени институции | Известни личности | Редовни събития | Галерия | Източници | Литература | Външни препратки | Навигация41°43′23.99″ с. ш. 24°41′09.99″ и. д. / 41.723333° с. ш. 24.686111° и. д.*ЧепелареЧепеларски Linux fest 2002Начало на Зимен сезон 2005/06Национални хайдушки празници „Капитан Петко Войвода“Град ЧепелареЧепеларе – народният ски курортbgrod.orgwww.terranatura.hit.bgСправка за населението на гр. Исперих, общ. Исперих, обл. РазградМузей на родопския карстМузей на спорта и скитеЧепеларебългарскибългарскианглийскитукИстория на градаСки писти в ЧепелареВремето в ЧепелареРадио и телевизия в ЧепелареЧепеларе мами с родопски чар и добри пистиЕвтин туризъм и снежни атракции в ЧепелареМестоположениеИнформация и снимки от музея на родопския карст3D панорами от ЧепелареЧепелареррр