Reading books and checking websites has/have helped them The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Use of otherwise to indicate contrastGrammar - has or haveCorrect? “I have three new books, two bought from Amazon, and another one given by my sister”Statistics 'has' or 'have' applications?Do I use “has” or “have” when talking about a sports team?Not much has/have changedUsage of have and hadthe likes of which has/have'Editors' picks' Vs. 'Editor's picks'Does his wife have or has his wife got..?
Is there a way to generate uniformly distributed points on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers per point?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
"is" operation returns false with ndarray.data attribute, even though two array objects have same id
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
One-dimensional Japanese puzzle
Sub-subscripts in strings cause different spacings than subscripts
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?
What is the role of 'For' here?
Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Make it rain characters
"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
Reading books and checking websites has/have helped them
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Use of otherwise to indicate contrastGrammar - has or haveCorrect? “I have three new books, two bought from Amazon, and another one given by my sister”Statistics 'has' or 'have' applications?Do I use “has” or “have” when talking about a sports team?Not much has/have changedUsage of have and hadthe likes of which has/have'Editors' picks' Vs. 'Editor's picks'Does his wife have or has his wife got..?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Which is more correct to say?
Reading books and checking websites has helped them.
Reading books and checking websites have helped them.
grammar
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Which is more correct to say?
Reading books and checking websites has helped them.
Reading books and checking websites have helped them.
grammar
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
Which is more correct to say?
Reading books and checking websites has helped them.
Reading books and checking websites have helped them.
grammar
Which is more correct to say?
Reading books and checking websites has helped them.
Reading books and checking websites have helped them.
grammar
grammar
asked Nov 13 '18 at 18:22
Allemande249Allemande249
476
476
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 3 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
2
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
2
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19
2
2
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Think of ‘reading books and checking websites’ as being ‘an activity’. A completed ‘activity’.
‘Something you did’, which collectively is ‘activity’. This makes it, in English ‘one thing’ (implied).
So we would use ‘has’, which refers to the singular. ‘Have’, in my view, is absolutely not correct in this sentence and sounds very weird to my (English!) ears - iffff... those sentences are complete.
Howeverrr...
...If you continued on with the second sentence - for example:
‘Reading books and checking websites have helped them to gain a further understanding of the Italian Renaissance’
Then in that case, we do need to say ‘have’. Because now, what is implied is ‘the activities’. Multiple and discrete ‘activities’. Which then takes the plural.
Whyyyy?
- Single things (even when ‘implied’) take the singular ‘has’
‘This completed activity or group of activities’ (perceived as one thing - ‘this activity’ - singular) has helped them
- Multiple things (even when implied) take the plural ‘have’
‘These two activities’ (perceived as multiple things) have helped them
In a nutshell: use ‘has’ when you want to refer to the individual activities that took place. Use ‘have’ when you want to refer to ‘the activity’ (or ‘effort) that ‘went on’.
add a comment |
The second is correct in this instance. Because there are two subjects joined by and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb. Gregg's Reference Manual (11th ed.) paragraph 1002a explains this as follows:
If the subject consists of two or more words that are connected by and or by both ... and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb.
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472800%2freading-books-and-checking-websites-has-have-helped-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Think of ‘reading books and checking websites’ as being ‘an activity’. A completed ‘activity’.
‘Something you did’, which collectively is ‘activity’. This makes it, in English ‘one thing’ (implied).
So we would use ‘has’, which refers to the singular. ‘Have’, in my view, is absolutely not correct in this sentence and sounds very weird to my (English!) ears - iffff... those sentences are complete.
Howeverrr...
...If you continued on with the second sentence - for example:
‘Reading books and checking websites have helped them to gain a further understanding of the Italian Renaissance’
Then in that case, we do need to say ‘have’. Because now, what is implied is ‘the activities’. Multiple and discrete ‘activities’. Which then takes the plural.
Whyyyy?
- Single things (even when ‘implied’) take the singular ‘has’
‘This completed activity or group of activities’ (perceived as one thing - ‘this activity’ - singular) has helped them
- Multiple things (even when implied) take the plural ‘have’
‘These two activities’ (perceived as multiple things) have helped them
In a nutshell: use ‘has’ when you want to refer to the individual activities that took place. Use ‘have’ when you want to refer to ‘the activity’ (or ‘effort) that ‘went on’.
add a comment |
Think of ‘reading books and checking websites’ as being ‘an activity’. A completed ‘activity’.
‘Something you did’, which collectively is ‘activity’. This makes it, in English ‘one thing’ (implied).
So we would use ‘has’, which refers to the singular. ‘Have’, in my view, is absolutely not correct in this sentence and sounds very weird to my (English!) ears - iffff... those sentences are complete.
Howeverrr...
...If you continued on with the second sentence - for example:
‘Reading books and checking websites have helped them to gain a further understanding of the Italian Renaissance’
Then in that case, we do need to say ‘have’. Because now, what is implied is ‘the activities’. Multiple and discrete ‘activities’. Which then takes the plural.
Whyyyy?
- Single things (even when ‘implied’) take the singular ‘has’
‘This completed activity or group of activities’ (perceived as one thing - ‘this activity’ - singular) has helped them
- Multiple things (even when implied) take the plural ‘have’
‘These two activities’ (perceived as multiple things) have helped them
In a nutshell: use ‘has’ when you want to refer to the individual activities that took place. Use ‘have’ when you want to refer to ‘the activity’ (or ‘effort) that ‘went on’.
add a comment |
Think of ‘reading books and checking websites’ as being ‘an activity’. A completed ‘activity’.
‘Something you did’, which collectively is ‘activity’. This makes it, in English ‘one thing’ (implied).
So we would use ‘has’, which refers to the singular. ‘Have’, in my view, is absolutely not correct in this sentence and sounds very weird to my (English!) ears - iffff... those sentences are complete.
Howeverrr...
...If you continued on with the second sentence - for example:
‘Reading books and checking websites have helped them to gain a further understanding of the Italian Renaissance’
Then in that case, we do need to say ‘have’. Because now, what is implied is ‘the activities’. Multiple and discrete ‘activities’. Which then takes the plural.
Whyyyy?
- Single things (even when ‘implied’) take the singular ‘has’
‘This completed activity or group of activities’ (perceived as one thing - ‘this activity’ - singular) has helped them
- Multiple things (even when implied) take the plural ‘have’
‘These two activities’ (perceived as multiple things) have helped them
In a nutshell: use ‘has’ when you want to refer to the individual activities that took place. Use ‘have’ when you want to refer to ‘the activity’ (or ‘effort) that ‘went on’.
Think of ‘reading books and checking websites’ as being ‘an activity’. A completed ‘activity’.
‘Something you did’, which collectively is ‘activity’. This makes it, in English ‘one thing’ (implied).
So we would use ‘has’, which refers to the singular. ‘Have’, in my view, is absolutely not correct in this sentence and sounds very weird to my (English!) ears - iffff... those sentences are complete.
Howeverrr...
...If you continued on with the second sentence - for example:
‘Reading books and checking websites have helped them to gain a further understanding of the Italian Renaissance’
Then in that case, we do need to say ‘have’. Because now, what is implied is ‘the activities’. Multiple and discrete ‘activities’. Which then takes the plural.
Whyyyy?
- Single things (even when ‘implied’) take the singular ‘has’
‘This completed activity or group of activities’ (perceived as one thing - ‘this activity’ - singular) has helped them
- Multiple things (even when implied) take the plural ‘have’
‘These two activities’ (perceived as multiple things) have helped them
In a nutshell: use ‘has’ when you want to refer to the individual activities that took place. Use ‘have’ when you want to refer to ‘the activity’ (or ‘effort) that ‘went on’.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 23:11
JelilaJelila
3,0461315
3,0461315
add a comment |
add a comment |
The second is correct in this instance. Because there are two subjects joined by and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb. Gregg's Reference Manual (11th ed.) paragraph 1002a explains this as follows:
If the subject consists of two or more words that are connected by and or by both ... and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb.
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
The second is correct in this instance. Because there are two subjects joined by and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb. Gregg's Reference Manual (11th ed.) paragraph 1002a explains this as follows:
If the subject consists of two or more words that are connected by and or by both ... and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb.
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
The second is correct in this instance. Because there are two subjects joined by and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb. Gregg's Reference Manual (11th ed.) paragraph 1002a explains this as follows:
If the subject consists of two or more words that are connected by and or by both ... and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb.
The second is correct in this instance. Because there are two subjects joined by and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb. Gregg's Reference Manual (11th ed.) paragraph 1002a explains this as follows:
If the subject consists of two or more words that are connected by and or by both ... and, the subject is plural and requires a plural verb.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 19:39
Bryan PettitBryan Pettit
485
485
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
In that case, would the phrase "Reading the book and checking this website has helped them." be correct?
– Allemande249
Nov 13 '18 at 20:01
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
I think it should be have in that instance as well, but I'm having a hard time finding a specific supporting source. An easier way to get around has vs. have might be to change the sentence to get rid of the ambiguous checking; in most cases, reading could apply both to books and websites. Therefore, "Reading the book and this website has helped them..." would work because the subject is the singular Reading. (Using this logic, the original question asked would be "Reading books and websites has helped them...".)
– Bryan Pettit
Nov 13 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472800%2freading-books-and-checking-websites-has-have-helped-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Both are acceptable, check with the topic of "notional agreement" or "synesis". If you see both activities as one undertaking, then there's no reason you can't use "has" instead of "have". The boring example I keep bringing up is "The band are/is playing". Also, there are many questions on this site about this topic.
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:40
Also how related the subjects are can matter, see this example: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– Zebrafish
Nov 13 '18 at 20:49
I can only make have work if you treat reading and checking as adjectives. I.e., there are math books, writing books and reading books and there are websites that test things (testing websites) and websites that check things (checking websites). Both reading books and checking websites have helped them. But I'm sure that's not the intended meaning.
– Jim
Nov 14 '18 at 3:19