What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?

Exchange,swap or switch

Map of water taps to fill bottles

Mjolnir's timeline from Thor's perspective

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

Does a strong solution to a SDE imply lipschitz condition?

Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?

How can I practically buy stocks?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?

A strange hotel

Realistic Necromancy?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?



What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?


How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?



$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    1












    $begingroup$


    When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?



    $$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?



      $$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?



      $$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$







      quantum-gate notation






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Sanchayan Dutta

      6,72341556




      6,72341556










      asked 1 hour ago









      can'tcauchycan'tcauchy

      1945




      1945




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          This might mean using the ketbra notation:



          $$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



          This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.



          A couple of other examples:



          $$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$



          $$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            27 mins ago



















          0












          $begingroup$

          The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:



          $$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$



          Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:




          In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.




          The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:



          $$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
          $$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
          $$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



          To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:



          $$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
          $$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
          $$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$



          So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.



          We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "694"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            This might mean using the ketbra notation:



            $$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



            This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.



            A couple of other examples:



            $$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$



            $$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
              $endgroup$
              – Sanchayan Dutta
              27 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            This might mean using the ketbra notation:



            $$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



            This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.



            A couple of other examples:



            $$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$



            $$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
              $endgroup$
              – Sanchayan Dutta
              27 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            This might mean using the ketbra notation:



            $$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



            This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.



            A couple of other examples:



            $$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$



            $$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            This might mean using the ketbra notation:



            $$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



            This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.



            A couple of other examples:



            $$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$



            $$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 42 mins ago









            Sanchayan Dutta

            6,72341556




            6,72341556










            answered 1 hour ago









            Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova

            1,9401212




            1,9401212











            • $begingroup$
              For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
              $endgroup$
              – Sanchayan Dutta
              27 mins ago

















            • $begingroup$
              For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
              $endgroup$
              – Sanchayan Dutta
              27 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            27 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
            $endgroup$
            – Sanchayan Dutta
            27 mins ago














            0












            $begingroup$

            The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:



            $$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$



            Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:




            In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.




            The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:



            $$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
            $$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
            $$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



            To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:



            $$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
            $$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
            $$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$



            So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.



            We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:



              $$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$



              Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:




              In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.




              The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:



              $$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
              $$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
              $$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



              To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:



              $$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
              $$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
              $$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$



              So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.



              We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:



                $$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$



                Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:




                In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.




                The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:



                $$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
                $$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
                $$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



                To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:



                $$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
                $$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
                $$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$



                So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.



                We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:



                $$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$



                Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:




                In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.




                The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:



                $$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
                $$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
                $$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$



                To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:



                $$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
                $$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
                $$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$



                So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.



                We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 38 mins ago

























                answered 56 mins ago









                Sanchayan DuttaSanchayan Dutta

                6,72341556




                6,72341556



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

                    How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?How to convey the scale of my humanoid without science or units?How does the “space drive” conserve momentum?Planet Vanishes - How does this affect the orbiting starships?How does a community of a Universe Simulator have the same language as its creator?How would US Presidential elections be affected if voters could choose the state their vote for President was counted in?How Does One Ensures the Immortality of Their ConsciousnessHow do I retain national independence while also having a one world government?How can Ganymede have an Earth-like gravity without us having realized it?How would one make a lion mount for a fantasy world?

                    Output visual diagram of pictureASCII-art logic gate diagramBooks on a ShelfDetermine the Dimensions of a Rotated RectangleDraw a Houndstooth PatternDraw and label an ASCII hexagonal gridGolf me an ASCII AlphabetASCII Jigsaw PuzzleOutput a pretty boxASCII-Art Venn DiagramASCII Exact Cover with Rectangles