What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?
How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish
Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Exchange,swap or switch
Map of water taps to fill bottles
Mjolnir's timeline from Thor's perspective
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
French for 'It must be my imagination'?
Does a strong solution to a SDE imply lipschitz condition?
Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?
A strange hotel
Realistic Necromancy?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?
Critique of timeline aesthetic
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?
How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
quantum-gate notation
edited 1 hour ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,72341556
6,72341556
asked 1 hour ago
can'tcauchycan'tcauchy
1945
1945
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
edited 42 mins ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,72341556
6,72341556
answered 1 hour ago
Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova
1,9401212
1,9401212
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
27 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,fracsqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2) + 1(fracsqrt2)(frac+langle1sqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
edited 38 mins ago
answered 56 mins ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦Sanchayan Dutta
6,72341556
6,72341556
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown