A word to describe the expected amount of information gained from learning the answer to a given questionWord for both questions and answersWhat should I call the “list of answers” a student gives in a test?Word for “handout issued by teacher”What is a person who fakes responses on a survey?A word to describe an unexpected advancement in someone's learning progressWord for data/information from medical scannerWhat is a word to describe these two separate but related items in a software application?can a figure in a paper be titled “questions respective [topic] ?”Difference between an information question and a distrusting questionWhat do you call a question you know the answer to, but you want an answer?

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

How to read string as hex number in bash?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Animating wave motion in water

Does the Shadow Magic sorcerer's Eyes of the Dark feature work on all Darkness spells or just his/her own?

TDE Master Key Rotation

Is VPN a layer 3 concept?

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?

Why I don't get the wanted width of tcbox?

Homology of the fiber

Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania

Determine voltage drop over 10G resistors with cheap multimeter

Unfrosted light bulb

How can I create URL shortcuts/redirects for task/diff IDs in Phabricator?

Extraneous elements in "Europe countries" list

Do I need to convey a moral for each of my blog post?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?

Emojional cryptic crossword

The English Debate

Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do



A word to describe the expected amount of information gained from learning the answer to a given question


Word for both questions and answersWhat should I call the “list of answers” a student gives in a test?Word for “handout issued by teacher”What is a person who fakes responses on a survey?A word to describe an unexpected advancement in someone's learning progressWord for data/information from medical scannerWhat is a word to describe these two separate but related items in a software application?can a figure in a paper be titled “questions respective [topic] ?”Difference between an information question and a distrusting questionWhat do you call a question you know the answer to, but you want an answer?













1















In relation to my question on Mathematics.SE, I would like to know what English words would fit the best to describe the expected amount of information that will be gained by learning the answer to a given question or by learning the responses to a given questionnaire.



The word should describe the question or the questionnaire, not the answers. Thus, words like "informativeness" or "information value" would fit poorly, because the common view is that the information is contained in answers, not in questions (though in fact both are important).



For example, the value that is to be described is a priori higher for the question "What is your favourite dish?" than for the question "Do you like French fries?" It is also a priori higher for the question "Are you married?" than for the questions "Do you pay taxes?" and "Are you a lawyer?" (assuming nothing is known about the person being asked, the answers to the last two questions are easier to guess in advance -- "yes" and "no" respectively).



Usage examples:




The question "What is your favourite dish?" has higher foo (or more foo) than the question "Do you like French fries?"



The total foo of a questionnaire is the sum of foos of its questions.




I know that this is an instance of entropy value, but I am looking for a more common and intuitive term, if such exists.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Please provide an example sentence.

    – Ubi hatt
    2 days ago











  • I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago











  • @JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

    – Alexey
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago












  • @JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

    – Alexey
    2 days ago
















1















In relation to my question on Mathematics.SE, I would like to know what English words would fit the best to describe the expected amount of information that will be gained by learning the answer to a given question or by learning the responses to a given questionnaire.



The word should describe the question or the questionnaire, not the answers. Thus, words like "informativeness" or "information value" would fit poorly, because the common view is that the information is contained in answers, not in questions (though in fact both are important).



For example, the value that is to be described is a priori higher for the question "What is your favourite dish?" than for the question "Do you like French fries?" It is also a priori higher for the question "Are you married?" than for the questions "Do you pay taxes?" and "Are you a lawyer?" (assuming nothing is known about the person being asked, the answers to the last two questions are easier to guess in advance -- "yes" and "no" respectively).



Usage examples:




The question "What is your favourite dish?" has higher foo (or more foo) than the question "Do you like French fries?"



The total foo of a questionnaire is the sum of foos of its questions.




I know that this is an instance of entropy value, but I am looking for a more common and intuitive term, if such exists.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Please provide an example sentence.

    – Ubi hatt
    2 days ago











  • I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago











  • @JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

    – Alexey
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago












  • @JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

    – Alexey
    2 days ago














1












1








1


1






In relation to my question on Mathematics.SE, I would like to know what English words would fit the best to describe the expected amount of information that will be gained by learning the answer to a given question or by learning the responses to a given questionnaire.



The word should describe the question or the questionnaire, not the answers. Thus, words like "informativeness" or "information value" would fit poorly, because the common view is that the information is contained in answers, not in questions (though in fact both are important).



For example, the value that is to be described is a priori higher for the question "What is your favourite dish?" than for the question "Do you like French fries?" It is also a priori higher for the question "Are you married?" than for the questions "Do you pay taxes?" and "Are you a lawyer?" (assuming nothing is known about the person being asked, the answers to the last two questions are easier to guess in advance -- "yes" and "no" respectively).



Usage examples:




The question "What is your favourite dish?" has higher foo (or more foo) than the question "Do you like French fries?"



The total foo of a questionnaire is the sum of foos of its questions.




I know that this is an instance of entropy value, but I am looking for a more common and intuitive term, if such exists.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In relation to my question on Mathematics.SE, I would like to know what English words would fit the best to describe the expected amount of information that will be gained by learning the answer to a given question or by learning the responses to a given questionnaire.



The word should describe the question or the questionnaire, not the answers. Thus, words like "informativeness" or "information value" would fit poorly, because the common view is that the information is contained in answers, not in questions (though in fact both are important).



For example, the value that is to be described is a priori higher for the question "What is your favourite dish?" than for the question "Do you like French fries?" It is also a priori higher for the question "Are you married?" than for the questions "Do you pay taxes?" and "Are you a lawyer?" (assuming nothing is known about the person being asked, the answers to the last two questions are easier to guess in advance -- "yes" and "no" respectively).



Usage examples:




The question "What is your favourite dish?" has higher foo (or more foo) than the question "Do you like French fries?"



The total foo of a questionnaire is the sum of foos of its questions.




I know that this is an instance of entropy value, but I am looking for a more common and intuitive term, if such exists.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Alexey













New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









AlexeyAlexey

1094




1094




New contributor




Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Alexey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Please provide an example sentence.

    – Ubi hatt
    2 days ago











  • I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago











  • @JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

    – Alexey
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago












  • @JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

    – Alexey
    2 days ago


















  • Please provide an example sentence.

    – Ubi hatt
    2 days ago











  • I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago











  • @JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

    – Alexey
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago












  • @JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

    – Alexey
    2 days ago

















Please provide an example sentence.

– Ubi hatt
2 days ago





Please provide an example sentence.

– Ubi hatt
2 days ago













I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago





I don't see a problem with saying that one question has more information value than another question. After all, answering it will provide more information. If you already knew the answer, you wouldn't normally ask the question in the first place. (And the same is true of Socratic questioning where you are trying to get the person answering to provide more information for themselves.)

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago













@JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

– Alexey
2 days ago





@JasonBassford, it feels to me that it is rather "one question has more value than another for getting information."

– Alexey
2 days ago




1




1





@Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago






@Alexey But how is more value any different than information value? Surely, the value of the question lies in the amount of information it will return when answered. Or, if not, how is the value being measured? (Like in physics and descriptions of energy, I suppose you could say that a question has potential information value, while an answer has kinetic information value.)

– Jason Bassford
2 days ago














@JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

– Alexey
2 days ago






@JasonBassford, potential information value seems closer. I do not think a question contains information. It is about measuring how efficient the question is for extracting information (if it is answered).

– Alexey
2 days ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














You mentioned the technical term




entropy




which means, in the information theory sense, the number of bits of information in a message, or likewise the thing you are asking for. It is however pretty technical, and also has its provably equivalent but equally obscure interpretation in thermodynamics. As such, replacing the informal phrase 'amount of information' with entropy will be only understood under very technical contexts.



You may be looking for an informal synonym, one that can replace 'entropy' to get the same idea, analogous to your example of 'salt' for 'sodium chloride'. As 'entropy' is a latter day technical invention for a new concept (by Rudolf Clausius in 1854), there is no existing informal older term.



So, there is no single informal word for entropy.



That's a hard thing to prove definitively (as opposed to suggesting a term that every one can see and judge yes or no). But the timing of the term is some justification that it is unlikely.



Asking for a single word for a complex concept is expecting a lot of any language. English and more likely its fans may have spoiled you by popularizing all the ineffable situations that turn out to have single words for them (eg 'justice', 'game', 'ineffable')



However, there may well be near enough synonyms or synonymous phrases for the concept. The title 'amount of information' is sufficient or even simply




'information'.







share|improve this answer






























    1














    One question can be a better discriminator than another.




    A characteristic which enables people or things to be distinguished from one another.




    [Oxford]



    Although the question does not contain the sought-after information, one question has the ability to elicit more information than another. You will find references in the psychological testing domain to high-information yielding questions as good discriminators. For instance, if a particular math problem covaries meaningfully with IQ, that problem is said to be a good discriminator for IQ.



    If I'm trying to find a criminal suspect who is an American male, the question "Is he over 7 feet" is a poor discriminator, because it provides very little information for the answer "no". An If I use the median of the population of 5 feet, 9.5 inches, the question is guaranteed to eliminate half the population, which is the maximum one can guarantee, regardless of the answer.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

      – Alexey
      8 hours ago











    • Discriminatory value would fit then.

      – jimm101
      8 hours ago










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489981%2fa-word-to-describe-the-expected-amount-of-information-gained-from-learning-the-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    You mentioned the technical term




    entropy




    which means, in the information theory sense, the number of bits of information in a message, or likewise the thing you are asking for. It is however pretty technical, and also has its provably equivalent but equally obscure interpretation in thermodynamics. As such, replacing the informal phrase 'amount of information' with entropy will be only understood under very technical contexts.



    You may be looking for an informal synonym, one that can replace 'entropy' to get the same idea, analogous to your example of 'salt' for 'sodium chloride'. As 'entropy' is a latter day technical invention for a new concept (by Rudolf Clausius in 1854), there is no existing informal older term.



    So, there is no single informal word for entropy.



    That's a hard thing to prove definitively (as opposed to suggesting a term that every one can see and judge yes or no). But the timing of the term is some justification that it is unlikely.



    Asking for a single word for a complex concept is expecting a lot of any language. English and more likely its fans may have spoiled you by popularizing all the ineffable situations that turn out to have single words for them (eg 'justice', 'game', 'ineffable')



    However, there may well be near enough synonyms or synonymous phrases for the concept. The title 'amount of information' is sufficient or even simply




    'information'.







    share|improve this answer



























      1














      You mentioned the technical term




      entropy




      which means, in the information theory sense, the number of bits of information in a message, or likewise the thing you are asking for. It is however pretty technical, and also has its provably equivalent but equally obscure interpretation in thermodynamics. As such, replacing the informal phrase 'amount of information' with entropy will be only understood under very technical contexts.



      You may be looking for an informal synonym, one that can replace 'entropy' to get the same idea, analogous to your example of 'salt' for 'sodium chloride'. As 'entropy' is a latter day technical invention for a new concept (by Rudolf Clausius in 1854), there is no existing informal older term.



      So, there is no single informal word for entropy.



      That's a hard thing to prove definitively (as opposed to suggesting a term that every one can see and judge yes or no). But the timing of the term is some justification that it is unlikely.



      Asking for a single word for a complex concept is expecting a lot of any language. English and more likely its fans may have spoiled you by popularizing all the ineffable situations that turn out to have single words for them (eg 'justice', 'game', 'ineffable')



      However, there may well be near enough synonyms or synonymous phrases for the concept. The title 'amount of information' is sufficient or even simply




      'information'.







      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        You mentioned the technical term




        entropy




        which means, in the information theory sense, the number of bits of information in a message, or likewise the thing you are asking for. It is however pretty technical, and also has its provably equivalent but equally obscure interpretation in thermodynamics. As such, replacing the informal phrase 'amount of information' with entropy will be only understood under very technical contexts.



        You may be looking for an informal synonym, one that can replace 'entropy' to get the same idea, analogous to your example of 'salt' for 'sodium chloride'. As 'entropy' is a latter day technical invention for a new concept (by Rudolf Clausius in 1854), there is no existing informal older term.



        So, there is no single informal word for entropy.



        That's a hard thing to prove definitively (as opposed to suggesting a term that every one can see and judge yes or no). But the timing of the term is some justification that it is unlikely.



        Asking for a single word for a complex concept is expecting a lot of any language. English and more likely its fans may have spoiled you by popularizing all the ineffable situations that turn out to have single words for them (eg 'justice', 'game', 'ineffable')



        However, there may well be near enough synonyms or synonymous phrases for the concept. The title 'amount of information' is sufficient or even simply




        'information'.







        share|improve this answer













        You mentioned the technical term




        entropy




        which means, in the information theory sense, the number of bits of information in a message, or likewise the thing you are asking for. It is however pretty technical, and also has its provably equivalent but equally obscure interpretation in thermodynamics. As such, replacing the informal phrase 'amount of information' with entropy will be only understood under very technical contexts.



        You may be looking for an informal synonym, one that can replace 'entropy' to get the same idea, analogous to your example of 'salt' for 'sodium chloride'. As 'entropy' is a latter day technical invention for a new concept (by Rudolf Clausius in 1854), there is no existing informal older term.



        So, there is no single informal word for entropy.



        That's a hard thing to prove definitively (as opposed to suggesting a term that every one can see and judge yes or no). But the timing of the term is some justification that it is unlikely.



        Asking for a single word for a complex concept is expecting a lot of any language. English and more likely its fans may have spoiled you by popularizing all the ineffable situations that turn out to have single words for them (eg 'justice', 'game', 'ineffable')



        However, there may well be near enough synonyms or synonymous phrases for the concept. The title 'amount of information' is sufficient or even simply




        'information'.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        MitchMitch

        52.2k15105219




        52.2k15105219























            1














            One question can be a better discriminator than another.




            A characteristic which enables people or things to be distinguished from one another.




            [Oxford]



            Although the question does not contain the sought-after information, one question has the ability to elicit more information than another. You will find references in the psychological testing domain to high-information yielding questions as good discriminators. For instance, if a particular math problem covaries meaningfully with IQ, that problem is said to be a good discriminator for IQ.



            If I'm trying to find a criminal suspect who is an American male, the question "Is he over 7 feet" is a poor discriminator, because it provides very little information for the answer "no". An If I use the median of the population of 5 feet, 9.5 inches, the question is guaranteed to eliminate half the population, which is the maximum one can guarantee, regardless of the answer.






            share|improve this answer























            • Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

              – Alexey
              8 hours ago











            • Discriminatory value would fit then.

              – jimm101
              8 hours ago















            1














            One question can be a better discriminator than another.




            A characteristic which enables people or things to be distinguished from one another.




            [Oxford]



            Although the question does not contain the sought-after information, one question has the ability to elicit more information than another. You will find references in the psychological testing domain to high-information yielding questions as good discriminators. For instance, if a particular math problem covaries meaningfully with IQ, that problem is said to be a good discriminator for IQ.



            If I'm trying to find a criminal suspect who is an American male, the question "Is he over 7 feet" is a poor discriminator, because it provides very little information for the answer "no". An If I use the median of the population of 5 feet, 9.5 inches, the question is guaranteed to eliminate half the population, which is the maximum one can guarantee, regardless of the answer.






            share|improve this answer























            • Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

              – Alexey
              8 hours ago











            • Discriminatory value would fit then.

              – jimm101
              8 hours ago













            1












            1








            1







            One question can be a better discriminator than another.




            A characteristic which enables people or things to be distinguished from one another.




            [Oxford]



            Although the question does not contain the sought-after information, one question has the ability to elicit more information than another. You will find references in the psychological testing domain to high-information yielding questions as good discriminators. For instance, if a particular math problem covaries meaningfully with IQ, that problem is said to be a good discriminator for IQ.



            If I'm trying to find a criminal suspect who is an American male, the question "Is he over 7 feet" is a poor discriminator, because it provides very little information for the answer "no". An If I use the median of the population of 5 feet, 9.5 inches, the question is guaranteed to eliminate half the population, which is the maximum one can guarantee, regardless of the answer.






            share|improve this answer













            One question can be a better discriminator than another.




            A characteristic which enables people or things to be distinguished from one another.




            [Oxford]



            Although the question does not contain the sought-after information, one question has the ability to elicit more information than another. You will find references in the psychological testing domain to high-information yielding questions as good discriminators. For instance, if a particular math problem covaries meaningfully with IQ, that problem is said to be a good discriminator for IQ.



            If I'm trying to find a criminal suspect who is an American male, the question "Is he over 7 feet" is a poor discriminator, because it provides very little information for the answer "no". An If I use the median of the population of 5 feet, 9.5 inches, the question is guaranteed to eliminate half the population, which is the maximum one can guarantee, regardless of the answer.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            jimm101jimm101

            7,42792239




            7,42792239












            • Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

              – Alexey
              8 hours ago











            • Discriminatory value would fit then.

              – jimm101
              8 hours ago

















            • Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

              – Alexey
              8 hours ago











            • Discriminatory value would fit then.

              – jimm101
              8 hours ago
















            Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

            – Alexey
            8 hours ago





            Thanks, i'll think about it. I was also thinking about "inquiring power", "examination value"...

            – Alexey
            8 hours ago













            Discriminatory value would fit then.

            – jimm101
            8 hours ago





            Discriminatory value would fit then.

            – jimm101
            8 hours ago










            Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Alexey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489981%2fa-word-to-describe-the-expected-amount-of-information-gained-from-learning-the-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

            Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe