How to split IPA spelling into syllablesHow to convert IPA into CPA (Nuance)?Can a syllable be open before a lenghtened consonant?Correct syllabification in (American) EnglishAre there any sources that provide accurate IPA transcriptions for Danish?IPA to plain simple English translatorSeeking IPA study aids (symbol memorization, audio recognition, transcription practice)“split into” — putting the stress on the right syllableThe anatomy of the L soundThe breakdown of the word “strength” or “cheap” or “sheep”Accurately representing stress
Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset
Put the phone down / Put down the phone
Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?
Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?
Turning a hard to access nut?
How to preserve electronics (computers, ipads, phones) for hundreds of years?
Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions
Sort with assumptions
What is the purpose of using a decision tree?
Capacitor electron flow
How would a solely written language work mechanically
Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
Derivative of an interpolated function
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats
categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant
How to split IPA spelling into syllables
How to convert IPA into CPA (Nuance)?Can a syllable be open before a lenghtened consonant?Correct syllabification in (American) EnglishAre there any sources that provide accurate IPA transcriptions for Danish?IPA to plain simple English translatorSeeking IPA study aids (symbol memorization, audio recognition, transcription practice)“split into” — putting the stress on the right syllableThe anatomy of the L soundThe breakdown of the word “strength” or “cheap” or “sheep”Accurately representing stress
First, please forgive my ignorance, I'm completely new to linguistics.
Given the IPA spelling for word, is it possible to programmatically split it into its sounds? So, for example, given the word "ingredient" and it's IPA spelling "ɪn'gridiənt", is it possible to split it into ["ɪn", "gri", "di", "ənt"]? Is there perhaps a finite list of sounds, at least in the English language, by which an IPA word can be split?
Any help appreciated
ipa syllables phonotactics
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
First, please forgive my ignorance, I'm completely new to linguistics.
Given the IPA spelling for word, is it possible to programmatically split it into its sounds? So, for example, given the word "ingredient" and it's IPA spelling "ɪn'gridiənt", is it possible to split it into ["ɪn", "gri", "di", "ənt"]? Is there perhaps a finite list of sounds, at least in the English language, by which an IPA word can be split?
Any help appreciated
ipa syllables phonotactics
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
First, please forgive my ignorance, I'm completely new to linguistics.
Given the IPA spelling for word, is it possible to programmatically split it into its sounds? So, for example, given the word "ingredient" and it's IPA spelling "ɪn'gridiənt", is it possible to split it into ["ɪn", "gri", "di", "ənt"]? Is there perhaps a finite list of sounds, at least in the English language, by which an IPA word can be split?
Any help appreciated
ipa syllables phonotactics
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
First, please forgive my ignorance, I'm completely new to linguistics.
Given the IPA spelling for word, is it possible to programmatically split it into its sounds? So, for example, given the word "ingredient" and it's IPA spelling "ɪn'gridiənt", is it possible to split it into ["ɪn", "gri", "di", "ənt"]? Is there perhaps a finite list of sounds, at least in the English language, by which an IPA word can be split?
Any help appreciated
ipa syllables phonotactics
ipa syllables phonotactics
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
edited 5 hours ago
Nardog
1,1041415
1,1041415
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
asked 7 hours ago
skedlyskedly
311
311
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
skedly is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is, in fact, possible! It's not trivial, but it is straightforward.
Your goal seems to be to break an English word (written in phonemic IPA) into syllables. There's a bit of controversy about how useful the concept of a "syllable" is in English, and a few different theories about what exactly a "syllable" is if it does exist, but the following is pretty widely accepted and should be good for your purpose.
First, the theory of syllable structure: every syllable looks something like ONC, where O is the onset, N is the nucleus, and C is the coda. The nucleus is a vowel(*), and always has to be there; the onset and coda are groups of consonants, and aren't required.
Second, the maximal onset principle: we want the onset to be as long as possible. So "tube" is /tub/, but "tuba" is /tu.ba/: the /b/ goes with the second syllable, because that makes the onset bigger.
Third, the syllable structure constraints: certain patterns of consonants aren't allowed together. This one varies by language, but in English, the onset can only be three consonants long at most, and you can't have a stop followed by a fricative in the onset, among many others. So "axle" is /ak.səl/ instead of */a.ksəl/, despite the maximal onset principle. Wikipedia has a good list of these constrains.
So if you want an algorithm for doing this:
- Locate all the nuclei (vowels)
- For each nucleus, work backward, adding sounds to the onset
- If the onset stops being valid, take a step back, then put all the rest of the sounds in the previous syllable's coda
(*) Some analyses of English have syllabic resonants, while others treat them as /ə/ plus resonant. In this answer I'm assuming you're using the version with schwa.
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then inserteɪgbefore each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.
– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
skedly is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30933%2fhow-to-split-ipa-spelling-into-syllables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is, in fact, possible! It's not trivial, but it is straightforward.
Your goal seems to be to break an English word (written in phonemic IPA) into syllables. There's a bit of controversy about how useful the concept of a "syllable" is in English, and a few different theories about what exactly a "syllable" is if it does exist, but the following is pretty widely accepted and should be good for your purpose.
First, the theory of syllable structure: every syllable looks something like ONC, where O is the onset, N is the nucleus, and C is the coda. The nucleus is a vowel(*), and always has to be there; the onset and coda are groups of consonants, and aren't required.
Second, the maximal onset principle: we want the onset to be as long as possible. So "tube" is /tub/, but "tuba" is /tu.ba/: the /b/ goes with the second syllable, because that makes the onset bigger.
Third, the syllable structure constraints: certain patterns of consonants aren't allowed together. This one varies by language, but in English, the onset can only be three consonants long at most, and you can't have a stop followed by a fricative in the onset, among many others. So "axle" is /ak.səl/ instead of */a.ksəl/, despite the maximal onset principle. Wikipedia has a good list of these constrains.
So if you want an algorithm for doing this:
- Locate all the nuclei (vowels)
- For each nucleus, work backward, adding sounds to the onset
- If the onset stops being valid, take a step back, then put all the rest of the sounds in the previous syllable's coda
(*) Some analyses of English have syllabic resonants, while others treat them as /ə/ plus resonant. In this answer I'm assuming you're using the version with schwa.
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then inserteɪgbefore each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.
– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
add a comment |
This is, in fact, possible! It's not trivial, but it is straightforward.
Your goal seems to be to break an English word (written in phonemic IPA) into syllables. There's a bit of controversy about how useful the concept of a "syllable" is in English, and a few different theories about what exactly a "syllable" is if it does exist, but the following is pretty widely accepted and should be good for your purpose.
First, the theory of syllable structure: every syllable looks something like ONC, where O is the onset, N is the nucleus, and C is the coda. The nucleus is a vowel(*), and always has to be there; the onset and coda are groups of consonants, and aren't required.
Second, the maximal onset principle: we want the onset to be as long as possible. So "tube" is /tub/, but "tuba" is /tu.ba/: the /b/ goes with the second syllable, because that makes the onset bigger.
Third, the syllable structure constraints: certain patterns of consonants aren't allowed together. This one varies by language, but in English, the onset can only be three consonants long at most, and you can't have a stop followed by a fricative in the onset, among many others. So "axle" is /ak.səl/ instead of */a.ksəl/, despite the maximal onset principle. Wikipedia has a good list of these constrains.
So if you want an algorithm for doing this:
- Locate all the nuclei (vowels)
- For each nucleus, work backward, adding sounds to the onset
- If the onset stops being valid, take a step back, then put all the rest of the sounds in the previous syllable's coda
(*) Some analyses of English have syllabic resonants, while others treat them as /ə/ plus resonant. In this answer I'm assuming you're using the version with schwa.
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then inserteɪgbefore each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.
– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
add a comment |
This is, in fact, possible! It's not trivial, but it is straightforward.
Your goal seems to be to break an English word (written in phonemic IPA) into syllables. There's a bit of controversy about how useful the concept of a "syllable" is in English, and a few different theories about what exactly a "syllable" is if it does exist, but the following is pretty widely accepted and should be good for your purpose.
First, the theory of syllable structure: every syllable looks something like ONC, where O is the onset, N is the nucleus, and C is the coda. The nucleus is a vowel(*), and always has to be there; the onset and coda are groups of consonants, and aren't required.
Second, the maximal onset principle: we want the onset to be as long as possible. So "tube" is /tub/, but "tuba" is /tu.ba/: the /b/ goes with the second syllable, because that makes the onset bigger.
Third, the syllable structure constraints: certain patterns of consonants aren't allowed together. This one varies by language, but in English, the onset can only be three consonants long at most, and you can't have a stop followed by a fricative in the onset, among many others. So "axle" is /ak.səl/ instead of */a.ksəl/, despite the maximal onset principle. Wikipedia has a good list of these constrains.
So if you want an algorithm for doing this:
- Locate all the nuclei (vowels)
- For each nucleus, work backward, adding sounds to the onset
- If the onset stops being valid, take a step back, then put all the rest of the sounds in the previous syllable's coda
(*) Some analyses of English have syllabic resonants, while others treat them as /ə/ plus resonant. In this answer I'm assuming you're using the version with schwa.
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
This is, in fact, possible! It's not trivial, but it is straightforward.
Your goal seems to be to break an English word (written in phonemic IPA) into syllables. There's a bit of controversy about how useful the concept of a "syllable" is in English, and a few different theories about what exactly a "syllable" is if it does exist, but the following is pretty widely accepted and should be good for your purpose.
First, the theory of syllable structure: every syllable looks something like ONC, where O is the onset, N is the nucleus, and C is the coda. The nucleus is a vowel(*), and always has to be there; the onset and coda are groups of consonants, and aren't required.
Second, the maximal onset principle: we want the onset to be as long as possible. So "tube" is /tub/, but "tuba" is /tu.ba/: the /b/ goes with the second syllable, because that makes the onset bigger.
Third, the syllable structure constraints: certain patterns of consonants aren't allowed together. This one varies by language, but in English, the onset can only be three consonants long at most, and you can't have a stop followed by a fricative in the onset, among many others. So "axle" is /ak.səl/ instead of */a.ksəl/, despite the maximal onset principle. Wikipedia has a good list of these constrains.
So if you want an algorithm for doing this:
- Locate all the nuclei (vowels)
- For each nucleus, work backward, adding sounds to the onset
- If the onset stops being valid, take a step back, then put all the rest of the sounds in the previous syllable's coda
(*) Some analyses of English have syllabic resonants, while others treat them as /ə/ plus resonant. In this answer I'm assuming you're using the version with schwa.
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
12.3k11952
12.3k11952
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then inserteɪgbefore each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.
– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
add a comment |
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then inserteɪgbefore each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.
– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
What a fantastic answer. You're right, I'm trying to programatically translate a word or phrase into Aig, aka Aigy-Paigy. WordsApi provides the syllables and the IPA for a given word. I'm now considering where to insert eɪg. It might take me a while to decode and then code what you've provided but you've given me lots to go on. Thank you.
– skedly
7 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then insert
eɪg before each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.– Draconis
6 hours ago
@skedly You're in luck in that case! That's even easier: find all the vowels (you can identify them on an IPA chart), then insert
eɪg before each one. The only trick is figuring out whether two vowels in a row are a diphthong (should be treated as one vowel) or hiatus (should go in separate syllables). But there are only a handful of diphthongs in English, so you can just look those up in a table.– Draconis
6 hours ago
1
1
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
I want to add that the "syllable structure constraints" is part, and a big part at that, of the subject called phonotactics. This Wikipedia article may itself be useful, though it doesn't look great, but mainly, I think it may be a useful keyword for further searches if you need to refine your algorithm beyond what this answer provides.
– LjL
5 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
It might be noted that the maximal onset principle is problematic with compound words or continuous speech (which require semantic parsing) -- but that doesn't matter re. Aigy-Paigy which inserts adjacent to the nucleus.
– amI
2 hours ago
add a comment |
skedly is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
skedly is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
skedly is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
skedly is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30933%2fhow-to-split-ipa-spelling-into-syllables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
