Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding the distribution when the observations are dependentThe correct probability distribution / way to identify large deviations in a set of daily changes to portfolio valueWhich Distribution Does the Data Point Belong to?Distribution of Sample Means Compared to Population MeanRight skewed asymmetric Gaussian-like distributionModel building and data analysisWhat would the distribution of time spent per day on a given site look like?Distinguish between underlying Distribution and data shape in data transforming?Test to determine whether the empirical distribution for a given day is an outlier compared with other daysError on mean from measurements made from a distribution with a possible long tail
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Unclear about dynamic binding
0 rank tensor vs 1D vector
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
is it ok to reduce charging current for li ion 18650 battery?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?
How a 64-bit process virtual address space is divided in Linux?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"
A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See
Rotate a column
Domestic-to-international connection at Orlando (MCO)
Powershell. How to parse gci Name?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Can MTA send mail via a relay without being told so?
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?
Why isn't acceleration always zero whenever velocity is zero, such as the moment a ball bounces off a wall?
Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Can a Bladesinger Wizard use Bladesong with a Hand Crossbow?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFinding the distribution when the observations are dependentThe correct probability distribution / way to identify large deviations in a set of daily changes to portfolio valueWhich Distribution Does the Data Point Belong to?Distribution of Sample Means Compared to Population MeanRight skewed asymmetric Gaussian-like distributionModel building and data analysisWhat would the distribution of time spent per day on a given site look like?Distinguish between underlying Distribution and data shape in data transforming?Test to determine whether the empirical distribution for a given day is an outlier compared with other daysError on mean from measurements made from a distribution with a possible long tail
$begingroup$
I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?
My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.
Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?
distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?
My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.
Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?
distributions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?
My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.
Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?
distributions
$endgroup$
I have this question: What do you think the distribution of time spent per day on YouTube looks like?
My answer is that it is probably normally distributed and highly left skewed. I expect there is one mode where most users spend around some average time and then a long right tale since some users are overwhelming power users.
Is that a fair answer? Is there a better word for that distribution?
distributions
distributions
asked 4 hours ago
CauderCauder
556
556
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.
It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.
Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)
More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400316%2fis-a-distribution-that-is-normal-but-highly-skewed-considered-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.
$endgroup$
A distribution that is normal is not highly skewed. That is a contradiction. Normally distributed variables have skew = 0.
answered 4 hours ago
Peter Flom♦Peter Flom
76.5k11107213
76.5k11107213
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
What is a better way to describe the distribution? Is there a word for that type of distribution where it centers around a mode and then has a long tail?
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Unimodal and skewed is as close as I can come...
$endgroup$
– jbowman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Perfect. Thanks @jbowman
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
As an aside, it's just really incredible that people give their time to help other people get better at this stuff. I know it goes without saying, but it's so cool what you both do!
$endgroup$
– Cauder
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.
It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.
It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.
It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution
New contributor
$endgroup$
If it has long right tail, then it's right skewed.
It can't be a normal distribution since skew !=0, it's perhaps a unimodal skew normal distribution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
beholdbehold
656
656
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.
Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)
More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.
Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)
More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.
Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)
More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.
$endgroup$
A fraction per day is certainly not negative. This rules out the normal distribution, which has probability mass over the entire real axis - in particular over the negative half.
Power law distributions are often used to model things like income distributions, sizes of cities etc. They are nonnegative and typically highly skewed. These would be the first I would try in modeling time spent watching YouTube. (Or monitoring CrossValidated questions.)
More information on power laws can be found here or here, or in our power-law tag.
answered 4 hours ago
Stephan KolassaStephan Kolassa
47.1k7100175
47.1k7100175
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You're completely correct that normal distributions have support on the real line. And yet...they're no an awful model for some strictly positive qualities, like adults' height or weight, where the mean and variance are such that the negative values are very unlikely under the model.
$endgroup$
– Matt Krause
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400316%2fis-a-distribution-that-is-normal-but-highly-skewed-considered-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown