node command while defining a coordinate in TikZStrange behavior in TikZ draw commandHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Numerical conditional within tikz keys?Help understanding the coordinate system used in tikzWhy do I get an extra white page before my TikZ picture?figure 2 for Crossed Ladders ProblemTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to draw a square and its diagonals with arrows?Include node at end point tikz decorations
Installing PowerShell on 32-bit Kali OS fails
Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?
Proof of Lemma: Every integer can be written as a product of primes
Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?
Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element
Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?
A known event to a history junkie
Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?
In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?
How to interpret the phrase "t’en a fait voir à toi"?
A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?
word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome
The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
What if somebody invests in my application?
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
What is Sitecore Managed Cloud?
Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?
How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction
What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?
Latex for-and in equation
node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ
Strange behavior in TikZ draw commandHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Numerical conditional within tikz keys?Help understanding the coordinate system used in tikzWhy do I get an extra white page before my TikZ picture?figure 2 for Crossed Ladders ProblemTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to draw a square and its diagonals with arrows?Include node at end point tikz decorations
This question is related to Strange behavior in TikZ draw command but is not the same.
While working with coordinates
and nodes
in TikZ, I was expecting that:
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
and
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
would yield the same result. But they don't. I get the following output:
With coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
, I meant, the system will create a node at (4,0)
and will place the text $x$
to its right.
Based on the output, I see the text $x$
is placed at (0,0)
, with the above command.
Why does this happen.
MWE:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryintersections
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) |- (4,0);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
add a comment |
This question is related to Strange behavior in TikZ draw command but is not the same.
While working with coordinates
and nodes
in TikZ, I was expecting that:
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
and
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
would yield the same result. But they don't. I get the following output:
With coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
, I meant, the system will create a node at (4,0)
and will place the text $x$
to its right.
Based on the output, I see the text $x$
is placed at (0,0)
, with the above command.
Why does this happen.
MWE:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryintersections
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) |- (4,0);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
1
Why would they? Trypath (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts withdocumentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?
– marmot
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just adddraw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.
– JouleV
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that incoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
theat (4,0)
gets eaten up bycoordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees"node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate(0,0)
to parse it.
– marmot
6 hours ago
add a comment |
This question is related to Strange behavior in TikZ draw command but is not the same.
While working with coordinates
and nodes
in TikZ, I was expecting that:
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
and
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
would yield the same result. But they don't. I get the following output:
With coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
, I meant, the system will create a node at (4,0)
and will place the text $x$
to its right.
Based on the output, I see the text $x$
is placed at (0,0)
, with the above command.
Why does this happen.
MWE:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryintersections
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) |- (4,0);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
This question is related to Strange behavior in TikZ draw command but is not the same.
While working with coordinates
and nodes
in TikZ, I was expecting that:
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
and
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
would yield the same result. But they don't. I get the following output:
With coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
, I meant, the system will create a node at (4,0)
and will place the text $x$
to its right.
Based on the output, I see the text $x$
is placed at (0,0)
, with the above command.
Why does this happen.
MWE:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryintersections
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
coordinate (y) at (0,3) node[above] $y$;
node[right] at (x) $x$;
node[above] at (y) $y$;
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) |- (4,0);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
edited 8 hours ago
subham soni
asked 8 hours ago
subham sonisubham soni
4,51983184
4,51983184
1
Why would they? Trypath (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts withdocumentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?
– marmot
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just adddraw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.
– JouleV
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that incoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
theat (4,0)
gets eaten up bycoordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees"node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate(0,0)
to parse it.
– marmot
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Why would they? Trypath (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts withdocumentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?
– marmot
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just adddraw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.
– JouleV
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that incoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
theat (4,0)
gets eaten up bycoordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees"node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate(0,0)
to parse it.
– marmot
6 hours ago
1
1
Why would they? Try
path (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts with documentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?– marmot
8 hours ago
Why would they? Try
path (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts with documentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?– marmot
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just add
draw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.– JouleV
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just add
draw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.– JouleV
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that in
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
the at (4,0)
gets eaten up by coordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees" node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate (0,0)
to parse it.– marmot
6 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that in
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
the at (4,0)
gets eaten up by coordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees" node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate (0,0)
to parse it.– marmot
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
try the following:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
%usetikzlibraryintersections not used in this mwe
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate[label=right:$x$] (x) at (4,0);
coordinate[label=above:$y$] (y) at (0,3);
draw[<->,thick] (y) |- (x);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
In section 17.2.1 of the TikZ manual, the commands for such works are shown:
path ... node ...
(1.1)or
node ...
(1.2)path ... coordinate ...
(2.1)or
coordinate ...
(2.2)
coordinate ... node ...
are not present!
That is why coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
and node[right] at (x) $x$;
don't give the same result. In fact, coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is understood as
coordinate (x) at (4,0);
path node[right] $x$; % (0,0) in case no coordinates are specified
That is why we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (2,0) node[draw,right] world;
fill (x) circle (1pt)
(0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
and we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
node[draw] (x) at (2,0) Hello node[draw,right] world;
fill (0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
So how to solve it? We can't combine (2.2) or (1.2) with ... node ...
, but we can do it with (1.1) or (2.1):
path (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
Remember that draw
, fill
, filldraw
... are all daughters of path
, so they are all valid. But node
and coordinate
are not.
I found this using the draw
powerful trick :)
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate becausecoordinate ...;
is the same aspath coordinate ...
, socoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same aspath coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at(0,0)
).
– Kpym
4 hours ago
add a comment |
It doesn't give you the expected result because the syntax is not appropriate. (At which level do you expect an explanation? Does it help that in coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
at (4,0)
got "absorbed" by coordinate (x)
so that TikZ adds the default coordinate (0,0)
to interpret node[right] $x$
?) You can condense all statements to one line.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) coordinate (y) node[above] $y$ |- (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481386%2fnode-command-while-defining-a-coordinate-in-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
try the following:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
%usetikzlibraryintersections not used in this mwe
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate[label=right:$x$] (x) at (4,0);
coordinate[label=above:$y$] (y) at (0,3);
draw[<->,thick] (y) |- (x);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
try the following:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
%usetikzlibraryintersections not used in this mwe
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate[label=right:$x$] (x) at (4,0);
coordinate[label=above:$y$] (y) at (0,3);
draw[<->,thick] (y) |- (x);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
try the following:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
%usetikzlibraryintersections not used in this mwe
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate[label=right:$x$] (x) at (4,0);
coordinate[label=above:$y$] (y) at (0,3);
draw[<->,thick] (y) |- (x);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
try the following:
documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
%usetikzlibraryintersections not used in this mwe
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate[label=right:$x$] (x) at (4,0);
coordinate[label=above:$y$] (y) at (0,3);
draw[<->,thick] (y) |- (x);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
answered 7 hours ago
ZarkoZarko
128k868167
128k868167
add a comment |
add a comment |
In section 17.2.1 of the TikZ manual, the commands for such works are shown:
path ... node ...
(1.1)or
node ...
(1.2)path ... coordinate ...
(2.1)or
coordinate ...
(2.2)
coordinate ... node ...
are not present!
That is why coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
and node[right] at (x) $x$;
don't give the same result. In fact, coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is understood as
coordinate (x) at (4,0);
path node[right] $x$; % (0,0) in case no coordinates are specified
That is why we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (2,0) node[draw,right] world;
fill (x) circle (1pt)
(0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
and we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
node[draw] (x) at (2,0) Hello node[draw,right] world;
fill (0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
So how to solve it? We can't combine (2.2) or (1.2) with ... node ...
, but we can do it with (1.1) or (2.1):
path (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
Remember that draw
, fill
, filldraw
... are all daughters of path
, so they are all valid. But node
and coordinate
are not.
I found this using the draw
powerful trick :)
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate becausecoordinate ...;
is the same aspath coordinate ...
, socoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same aspath coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at(0,0)
).
– Kpym
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In section 17.2.1 of the TikZ manual, the commands for such works are shown:
path ... node ...
(1.1)or
node ...
(1.2)path ... coordinate ...
(2.1)or
coordinate ...
(2.2)
coordinate ... node ...
are not present!
That is why coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
and node[right] at (x) $x$;
don't give the same result. In fact, coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is understood as
coordinate (x) at (4,0);
path node[right] $x$; % (0,0) in case no coordinates are specified
That is why we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (2,0) node[draw,right] world;
fill (x) circle (1pt)
(0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
and we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
node[draw] (x) at (2,0) Hello node[draw,right] world;
fill (0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
So how to solve it? We can't combine (2.2) or (1.2) with ... node ...
, but we can do it with (1.1) or (2.1):
path (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
Remember that draw
, fill
, filldraw
... are all daughters of path
, so they are all valid. But node
and coordinate
are not.
I found this using the draw
powerful trick :)
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate becausecoordinate ...;
is the same aspath coordinate ...
, socoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same aspath coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at(0,0)
).
– Kpym
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In section 17.2.1 of the TikZ manual, the commands for such works are shown:
path ... node ...
(1.1)or
node ...
(1.2)path ... coordinate ...
(2.1)or
coordinate ...
(2.2)
coordinate ... node ...
are not present!
That is why coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
and node[right] at (x) $x$;
don't give the same result. In fact, coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is understood as
coordinate (x) at (4,0);
path node[right] $x$; % (0,0) in case no coordinates are specified
That is why we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (2,0) node[draw,right] world;
fill (x) circle (1pt)
(0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
and we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
node[draw] (x) at (2,0) Hello node[draw,right] world;
fill (0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
So how to solve it? We can't combine (2.2) or (1.2) with ... node ...
, but we can do it with (1.1) or (2.1):
path (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
Remember that draw
, fill
, filldraw
... are all daughters of path
, so they are all valid. But node
and coordinate
are not.
I found this using the draw
powerful trick :)
In section 17.2.1 of the TikZ manual, the commands for such works are shown:
path ... node ...
(1.1)or
node ...
(1.2)path ... coordinate ...
(2.1)or
coordinate ...
(2.2)
coordinate ... node ...
are not present!
That is why coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
and node[right] at (x) $x$;
don't give the same result. In fact, coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is understood as
coordinate (x) at (4,0);
path node[right] $x$; % (0,0) in case no coordinates are specified
That is why we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
coordinate (x) at (2,0) node[draw,right] world;
fill (x) circle (1pt)
(0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
and we get
with this code
documentclass[tikz]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
node[draw] (x) at (2,0) Hello node[draw,right] world;
fill (0,0) circle (1pt);
endtikzpicture
enddocument
So how to solve it? We can't combine (2.2) or (1.2) with ... node ...
, but we can do it with (1.1) or (2.1):
path (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
Remember that draw
, fill
, filldraw
... are all daughters of path
, so they are all valid. But node
and coordinate
are not.
I found this using the draw
powerful trick :)
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
JouleVJouleV
7,89222053
7,89222053
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate becausecoordinate ...;
is the same aspath coordinate ...
, socoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same aspath coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at(0,0)
).
– Kpym
4 hours ago
add a comment |
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate becausecoordinate ...;
is the same aspath coordinate ...
, socoordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same aspath coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at(0,0)
).
– Kpym
4 hours ago
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate because
coordinate ...;
is the same as path coordinate ...
, so coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same as path coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at (0,0)
).– Kpym
4 hours ago
When you say that "coordinate ... node ... are not present!" it is not very accurate because
coordinate ...;
is the same as path coordinate ...
, so coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
is the same as path coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
which is valid (but as you mention the node is set at (0,0)
).– Kpym
4 hours ago
add a comment |
It doesn't give you the expected result because the syntax is not appropriate. (At which level do you expect an explanation? Does it help that in coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
at (4,0)
got "absorbed" by coordinate (x)
so that TikZ adds the default coordinate (0,0)
to interpret node[right] $x$
?) You can condense all statements to one line.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) coordinate (y) node[above] $y$ |- (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
It doesn't give you the expected result because the syntax is not appropriate. (At which level do you expect an explanation? Does it help that in coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
at (4,0)
got "absorbed" by coordinate (x)
so that TikZ adds the default coordinate (0,0)
to interpret node[right] $x$
?) You can condense all statements to one line.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) coordinate (y) node[above] $y$ |- (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
add a comment |
It doesn't give you the expected result because the syntax is not appropriate. (At which level do you expect an explanation? Does it help that in coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
at (4,0)
got "absorbed" by coordinate (x)
so that TikZ adds the default coordinate (0,0)
to interpret node[right] $x$
?) You can condense all statements to one line.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) coordinate (y) node[above] $y$ |- (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
It doesn't give you the expected result because the syntax is not appropriate. (At which level do you expect an explanation? Does it help that in coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
at (4,0)
got "absorbed" by coordinate (x)
so that TikZ adds the default coordinate (0,0)
to interpret node[right] $x$
?) You can condense all statements to one line.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]standalone
begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[<->,thick] (0,3) coordinate (y) node[above] $y$ |- (4,0) coordinate (x) node[right] $x$;
endtikzpicture
enddocument
answered 7 hours ago
marmotmarmot
111k5140264
111k5140264
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481386%2fnode-command-while-defining-a-coordinate-in-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Why would they? Try
path (x) node[right] $x$;path (y) node[above] $y$;
. If you give TikZ contradicting instructions, or place the instructions in the wrong order, you will get an unexpected result. BTW, you expect answerers to provide you with a full MWE, i.e. a document that starts withdocumentclass
etc. Could you please consider also using such an MWE in your question?– marmot
8 hours ago
@marmot - I have added the MWE.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
A trick to solve all these mysteries: just add
draw
option to the nodes, and you will probably see the difference.– JouleV
8 hours ago
@JouleV - That would still not explain why it happens. I am more interested in the why part.
– subham soni
8 hours ago
The "why part" is simply that in
coordinate (x) at (4,0) node[right] $x$;
theat (4,0)
gets eaten up bycoordinate (x) at
and then TikZ "sees"node[right] $x$
and inserts the default coordinate(0,0)
to parse it.– marmot
6 hours ago