Should the concept of a quantity of objects be considered singular or plural? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Making adult decisions “is” or “are” really not fun: Which is correct?Why is 'more than one' considered singular?Plural followed by singular - “have” or “has”?“We are American” or “We are Americans”? The singular vs. the plural form?Is “a row of” plural or singular?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Should objects be singular or plural in percentage statistics?Can singular nouns be compared to plural ones?“Boatload of things” - singular or plural?“Singular noun + of + plural nouns + singular verb” confusion
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author
Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?
What's the meaning of 間時肆拾貳 at a car parking sign
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
How does debian/ubuntu knows a package has a updated version
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
In predicate logic, does existential quantification (∃) include universal quantification (∀), i.e. can 'some' imply 'all'?
Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?
What is a non-alternating simple group with big order, but relatively few conjugacy classes?
How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?
What is the role of the transistor and diode in a soft start circuit?
Single word antonym of "flightless"
List of Python versions
Bete Noir -- no dairy
Short Story with Cinderella as a Voo-doo Witch
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
How to align text above triangle figure
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together
What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?
Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram
Should the concept of a quantity of objects be considered singular or plural?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Making adult decisions “is” or “are” really not fun: Which is correct?Why is 'more than one' considered singular?Plural followed by singular - “have” or “has”?“We are American” or “We are Americans”? The singular vs. the plural form?Is “a row of” plural or singular?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Should objects be singular or plural in percentage statistics?Can singular nouns be compared to plural ones?“Boatload of things” - singular or plural?“Singular noun + of + plural nouns + singular verb” confusion
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
My gut says that
"Fifteen options is too many"
is more correct than
"Fifteen options are too many"
but I can't articulate why the subject feels like a singular concept.
Which is correct?
grammatical-number verb-agreement
New contributor
add a comment |
My gut says that
"Fifteen options is too many"
is more correct than
"Fifteen options are too many"
but I can't articulate why the subject feels like a singular concept.
Which is correct?
grammatical-number verb-agreement
New contributor
add a comment |
My gut says that
"Fifteen options is too many"
is more correct than
"Fifteen options are too many"
but I can't articulate why the subject feels like a singular concept.
Which is correct?
grammatical-number verb-agreement
New contributor
My gut says that
"Fifteen options is too many"
is more correct than
"Fifteen options are too many"
but I can't articulate why the subject feels like a singular concept.
Which is correct?
grammatical-number verb-agreement
grammatical-number verb-agreement
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
ASKrahnASKrahn
1013
1013
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In brief, this is an example of notional agreement. If you're thinking of the options as a unit or quote, say
Fifteen options is too many.
If you're thinking of the options as individual, countable options, say
Fifteen options are too many.
First, let's lay out the rule you already know: usually you want your subject and your verb to agree in number. According to this paradigm, you would say:
Fifteen options are too many.
Six options are too many.
?A range of options is too many.
The last example shows something interesting. According to the previous rule, "a range" is singular and therefore the singular verb "is" should be used. However, "a range of options" feels like a plural concept - there have to be multiple options to have a range. Subject-verb agreement on the basis of semantics or feelings - like the one you have in your question - is called notional agreement.
Merriam-Webster gives several examples where plural unit nouns with numbers might take a singular verb.
Ten dollars is the cost of admission.
Is five miles too far to walk?
Two plus three makes five.
The explanations for precisely when to use singular or plural verbs vary. Some prescriptive grammarians ignore notional agreement and treat violations of conventional S-V agreement as an error. Some, like editor Erin Brenner, create very specific rules for when to apply notional agreement:
Specific amounts of money take a singular verb, while vague amounts take a plural verb.
Whatever the exact explanation (here's one more), the logic here is that you use singular when there's a semantic reason for thinking of the noun phrase as singular and plural when there's a semantic reason to think of it as plural. My own inclination: the Merriam-Webster examples and your example ("Fifteen options is too many") treat the amount (ten dollars, five miles, two plus three, fifteen options) as notionally singular because they feel like a unit quantity. Conceptually, someone asking after the quoted amount would likely treat the figure as singular:
How much is the cost of admission?
How many options is too many?
When thinking in terms of a unit, figure, or quote, singular works.
A small shift in perspective will mean that we are thinking of the plural collection of items, rather than a unit quantity:
How many dollar bills are required to pay admission?
What options are the most redundant to you?
Both questions require thinking about multiple individual items rather than a set number. Hence, with quantities, notional agreement should be considered alongside conventional subject-verb agreement.
add a comment |
I see what you mean. Depends how you look at it.
The number 15 for options is too many/big. We should have a smaller number of options.
Fifteen options?! That (number of options) is too many.
Or
These 15 options are too many/numerous. We should have fewer than 10 options.
Bottom line: If it is a plural subject, it should conjugated as such. As to why you feel like numerous entities should 'count' as a singular concept, I suggest you explore concepts like mass nouns or noun phrases. Note that those concepts may not directly apply to the example you provided, but are I would argue contextual neighbors.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
ASKrahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494136%2fshould-the-concept-of-a-quantity-of-objects-be-considered-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In brief, this is an example of notional agreement. If you're thinking of the options as a unit or quote, say
Fifteen options is too many.
If you're thinking of the options as individual, countable options, say
Fifteen options are too many.
First, let's lay out the rule you already know: usually you want your subject and your verb to agree in number. According to this paradigm, you would say:
Fifteen options are too many.
Six options are too many.
?A range of options is too many.
The last example shows something interesting. According to the previous rule, "a range" is singular and therefore the singular verb "is" should be used. However, "a range of options" feels like a plural concept - there have to be multiple options to have a range. Subject-verb agreement on the basis of semantics or feelings - like the one you have in your question - is called notional agreement.
Merriam-Webster gives several examples where plural unit nouns with numbers might take a singular verb.
Ten dollars is the cost of admission.
Is five miles too far to walk?
Two plus three makes five.
The explanations for precisely when to use singular or plural verbs vary. Some prescriptive grammarians ignore notional agreement and treat violations of conventional S-V agreement as an error. Some, like editor Erin Brenner, create very specific rules for when to apply notional agreement:
Specific amounts of money take a singular verb, while vague amounts take a plural verb.
Whatever the exact explanation (here's one more), the logic here is that you use singular when there's a semantic reason for thinking of the noun phrase as singular and plural when there's a semantic reason to think of it as plural. My own inclination: the Merriam-Webster examples and your example ("Fifteen options is too many") treat the amount (ten dollars, five miles, two plus three, fifteen options) as notionally singular because they feel like a unit quantity. Conceptually, someone asking after the quoted amount would likely treat the figure as singular:
How much is the cost of admission?
How many options is too many?
When thinking in terms of a unit, figure, or quote, singular works.
A small shift in perspective will mean that we are thinking of the plural collection of items, rather than a unit quantity:
How many dollar bills are required to pay admission?
What options are the most redundant to you?
Both questions require thinking about multiple individual items rather than a set number. Hence, with quantities, notional agreement should be considered alongside conventional subject-verb agreement.
add a comment |
In brief, this is an example of notional agreement. If you're thinking of the options as a unit or quote, say
Fifteen options is too many.
If you're thinking of the options as individual, countable options, say
Fifteen options are too many.
First, let's lay out the rule you already know: usually you want your subject and your verb to agree in number. According to this paradigm, you would say:
Fifteen options are too many.
Six options are too many.
?A range of options is too many.
The last example shows something interesting. According to the previous rule, "a range" is singular and therefore the singular verb "is" should be used. However, "a range of options" feels like a plural concept - there have to be multiple options to have a range. Subject-verb agreement on the basis of semantics or feelings - like the one you have in your question - is called notional agreement.
Merriam-Webster gives several examples where plural unit nouns with numbers might take a singular verb.
Ten dollars is the cost of admission.
Is five miles too far to walk?
Two plus three makes five.
The explanations for precisely when to use singular or plural verbs vary. Some prescriptive grammarians ignore notional agreement and treat violations of conventional S-V agreement as an error. Some, like editor Erin Brenner, create very specific rules for when to apply notional agreement:
Specific amounts of money take a singular verb, while vague amounts take a plural verb.
Whatever the exact explanation (here's one more), the logic here is that you use singular when there's a semantic reason for thinking of the noun phrase as singular and plural when there's a semantic reason to think of it as plural. My own inclination: the Merriam-Webster examples and your example ("Fifteen options is too many") treat the amount (ten dollars, five miles, two plus three, fifteen options) as notionally singular because they feel like a unit quantity. Conceptually, someone asking after the quoted amount would likely treat the figure as singular:
How much is the cost of admission?
How many options is too many?
When thinking in terms of a unit, figure, or quote, singular works.
A small shift in perspective will mean that we are thinking of the plural collection of items, rather than a unit quantity:
How many dollar bills are required to pay admission?
What options are the most redundant to you?
Both questions require thinking about multiple individual items rather than a set number. Hence, with quantities, notional agreement should be considered alongside conventional subject-verb agreement.
add a comment |
In brief, this is an example of notional agreement. If you're thinking of the options as a unit or quote, say
Fifteen options is too many.
If you're thinking of the options as individual, countable options, say
Fifteen options are too many.
First, let's lay out the rule you already know: usually you want your subject and your verb to agree in number. According to this paradigm, you would say:
Fifteen options are too many.
Six options are too many.
?A range of options is too many.
The last example shows something interesting. According to the previous rule, "a range" is singular and therefore the singular verb "is" should be used. However, "a range of options" feels like a plural concept - there have to be multiple options to have a range. Subject-verb agreement on the basis of semantics or feelings - like the one you have in your question - is called notional agreement.
Merriam-Webster gives several examples where plural unit nouns with numbers might take a singular verb.
Ten dollars is the cost of admission.
Is five miles too far to walk?
Two plus three makes five.
The explanations for precisely when to use singular or plural verbs vary. Some prescriptive grammarians ignore notional agreement and treat violations of conventional S-V agreement as an error. Some, like editor Erin Brenner, create very specific rules for when to apply notional agreement:
Specific amounts of money take a singular verb, while vague amounts take a plural verb.
Whatever the exact explanation (here's one more), the logic here is that you use singular when there's a semantic reason for thinking of the noun phrase as singular and plural when there's a semantic reason to think of it as plural. My own inclination: the Merriam-Webster examples and your example ("Fifteen options is too many") treat the amount (ten dollars, five miles, two plus three, fifteen options) as notionally singular because they feel like a unit quantity. Conceptually, someone asking after the quoted amount would likely treat the figure as singular:
How much is the cost of admission?
How many options is too many?
When thinking in terms of a unit, figure, or quote, singular works.
A small shift in perspective will mean that we are thinking of the plural collection of items, rather than a unit quantity:
How many dollar bills are required to pay admission?
What options are the most redundant to you?
Both questions require thinking about multiple individual items rather than a set number. Hence, with quantities, notional agreement should be considered alongside conventional subject-verb agreement.
In brief, this is an example of notional agreement. If you're thinking of the options as a unit or quote, say
Fifteen options is too many.
If you're thinking of the options as individual, countable options, say
Fifteen options are too many.
First, let's lay out the rule you already know: usually you want your subject and your verb to agree in number. According to this paradigm, you would say:
Fifteen options are too many.
Six options are too many.
?A range of options is too many.
The last example shows something interesting. According to the previous rule, "a range" is singular and therefore the singular verb "is" should be used. However, "a range of options" feels like a plural concept - there have to be multiple options to have a range. Subject-verb agreement on the basis of semantics or feelings - like the one you have in your question - is called notional agreement.
Merriam-Webster gives several examples where plural unit nouns with numbers might take a singular verb.
Ten dollars is the cost of admission.
Is five miles too far to walk?
Two plus three makes five.
The explanations for precisely when to use singular or plural verbs vary. Some prescriptive grammarians ignore notional agreement and treat violations of conventional S-V agreement as an error. Some, like editor Erin Brenner, create very specific rules for when to apply notional agreement:
Specific amounts of money take a singular verb, while vague amounts take a plural verb.
Whatever the exact explanation (here's one more), the logic here is that you use singular when there's a semantic reason for thinking of the noun phrase as singular and plural when there's a semantic reason to think of it as plural. My own inclination: the Merriam-Webster examples and your example ("Fifteen options is too many") treat the amount (ten dollars, five miles, two plus three, fifteen options) as notionally singular because they feel like a unit quantity. Conceptually, someone asking after the quoted amount would likely treat the figure as singular:
How much is the cost of admission?
How many options is too many?
When thinking in terms of a unit, figure, or quote, singular works.
A small shift in perspective will mean that we are thinking of the plural collection of items, rather than a unit quantity:
How many dollar bills are required to pay admission?
What options are the most redundant to you?
Both questions require thinking about multiple individual items rather than a set number. Hence, with quantities, notional agreement should be considered alongside conventional subject-verb agreement.
answered 6 hours ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
7,5661430
7,5661430
add a comment |
add a comment |
I see what you mean. Depends how you look at it.
The number 15 for options is too many/big. We should have a smaller number of options.
Fifteen options?! That (number of options) is too many.
Or
These 15 options are too many/numerous. We should have fewer than 10 options.
Bottom line: If it is a plural subject, it should conjugated as such. As to why you feel like numerous entities should 'count' as a singular concept, I suggest you explore concepts like mass nouns or noun phrases. Note that those concepts may not directly apply to the example you provided, but are I would argue contextual neighbors.
add a comment |
I see what you mean. Depends how you look at it.
The number 15 for options is too many/big. We should have a smaller number of options.
Fifteen options?! That (number of options) is too many.
Or
These 15 options are too many/numerous. We should have fewer than 10 options.
Bottom line: If it is a plural subject, it should conjugated as such. As to why you feel like numerous entities should 'count' as a singular concept, I suggest you explore concepts like mass nouns or noun phrases. Note that those concepts may not directly apply to the example you provided, but are I would argue contextual neighbors.
add a comment |
I see what you mean. Depends how you look at it.
The number 15 for options is too many/big. We should have a smaller number of options.
Fifteen options?! That (number of options) is too many.
Or
These 15 options are too many/numerous. We should have fewer than 10 options.
Bottom line: If it is a plural subject, it should conjugated as such. As to why you feel like numerous entities should 'count' as a singular concept, I suggest you explore concepts like mass nouns or noun phrases. Note that those concepts may not directly apply to the example you provided, but are I would argue contextual neighbors.
I see what you mean. Depends how you look at it.
The number 15 for options is too many/big. We should have a smaller number of options.
Fifteen options?! That (number of options) is too many.
Or
These 15 options are too many/numerous. We should have fewer than 10 options.
Bottom line: If it is a plural subject, it should conjugated as such. As to why you feel like numerous entities should 'count' as a singular concept, I suggest you explore concepts like mass nouns or noun phrases. Note that those concepts may not directly apply to the example you provided, but are I would argue contextual neighbors.
answered 6 hours ago
CarlyCarly
1,560213
1,560213
add a comment |
add a comment |
ASKrahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ASKrahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ASKrahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ASKrahn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494136%2fshould-the-concept-of-a-quantity-of-objects-be-considered-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown