Sound waves in different octavesWhy do I hear beats through headphones only at low frequencies?The definition of “frequency” in different contextsSound Wave Propagation: Why HF are more specular while LF are more omniHow are complex sound waves combined?Frequency dependance of sound wave reflectionWhy is a single string's vibration very weak but on the other hand, a guitar's string can be very loud?Is it possible to estimate the speed of a passing vehicle using a musical ear and the doppler effect?Intensity of sound and pitch perceptionWhere do pure tones occur in nature, besides harmonics?Why can we distinguish different pitches in a chord but not different hues of light?

Storage of electrolytic capacitors - how long?

Difference between shutdown options

Possible Eco thriller, man invents a device to remove rain from glass

The Digit Triangles

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Limit max CPU usage SQL SERVER with WSRM

Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?

How to I force windows to use a specific version of SQLCMD?

What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"

Personal or impersonal in a technical resume

Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?

In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?



Sound waves in different octaves


Why do I hear beats through headphones only at low frequencies?The definition of “frequency” in different contextsSound Wave Propagation: Why HF are more specular while LF are more omniHow are complex sound waves combined?Frequency dependance of sound wave reflectionWhy is a single string's vibration very weak but on the other hand, a guitar's string can be very loud?Is it possible to estimate the speed of a passing vehicle using a musical ear and the doppler effect?Intensity of sound and pitch perceptionWhere do pure tones occur in nature, besides harmonics?Why can we distinguish different pitches in a chord but not different hues of light?













3












$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.







waves acoustics frequency






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Ben Crowell

53.1k6164310




53.1k6164310






New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Ava Miller Ava Miller

162




162




New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    8 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    7 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– PhysicsDave
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– PhysicsDave
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
8 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
@PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
$endgroup$
– Pieter
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
@PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
$endgroup$
– Pieter
7 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
$endgroup$
– user45266
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
$endgroup$
– user45266
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
$endgroup$
– user45266
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
$endgroup$
– user45266
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




No, it's the first overtone.




How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    58 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$

I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest, and the overtones are integer multiples of it.



The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



    So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




    would the slopes of the waves align?




    The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



    One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      8 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
      $endgroup$
      – Pieter
      7 hours ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467666%2fsound-waves-in-different-octaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      58 mins ago















    9












    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      58 mins ago













    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Ben CrowellBen Crowell

    53.1k6164310




    53.1k6164310











    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      58 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      4 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      58 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    4 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    58 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @whatsisname - Yes, but the spectrum is perceived because there are multiple hairs for a single octave.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    58 mins ago











    4












    $begingroup$

    I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest, and the overtones are integer multiples of it.



    The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



    The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



    The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest, and the overtones are integer multiples of it.



      The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



      The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



      The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest, and the overtones are integer multiples of it.



        The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



        The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



        The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest, and the overtones are integer multiples of it.



        The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



        The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



        The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 4 hours ago









        flaudemusflaudemus

        1,873313




        1,873313





















            2












            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              7 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              7 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago









            flaudemus

            1,873313




            1,873313










            answered 8 hours ago









            PieterPieter

            9,04331536




            9,04331536











            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              7 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              7 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Crowell
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Crowell
            8 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
            $endgroup$
            – Pieter
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @BenCrowell The OP also wrote something about beats.
            $endgroup$
            – Pieter
            7 hours ago










            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467666%2fsound-waves-in-different-octaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

            Чепеларе Съдържание География | История | Население | Спортни и природни забележителности | Културни и исторически обекти | Религии | Обществени институции | Известни личности | Редовни събития | Галерия | Източници | Литература | Външни препратки | Навигация41°43′23.99″ с. ш. 24°41′09.99″ и. д. / 41.723333° с. ш. 24.686111° и. д.*ЧепелареЧепеларски Linux fest 2002Начало на Зимен сезон 2005/06Национални хайдушки празници „Капитан Петко Войвода“Град ЧепелареЧепеларе – народният ски курортbgrod.orgwww.terranatura.hit.bgСправка за населението на гр. Исперих, общ. Исперих, обл. РазградМузей на родопския карстМузей на спорта и скитеЧепеларебългарскибългарскианглийскитукИстория на градаСки писти в ЧепелареВремето в ЧепелареРадио и телевизия в ЧепелареЧепеларе мами с родопски чар и добри пистиЕвтин туризъм и снежни атракции в ЧепелареМестоположениеИнформация и снимки от музея на родопския карст3D панорами от ЧепелареЧепелареррр