Why is there so much iron?Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?What examples are there of fuzzy concepts in astronomy?How much iron would I have to shoot into the Sun to blow it up?Possible intergalactic celestial objectsWhat prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?Type II supernovae explosionsWhat causes a supernova explosion?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?Could the singularity of a black hole just be an iron / dark matter sphere?
In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived?
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?
Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old
Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents
World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Unfrosted light bulb
Existence of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon
Worshiping one God at a time?
How to terminate ping <dest> &
Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?
I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?
gerund and noun applications
Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?
Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeon
In the 1924 version of The Thief of Bagdad, no character is named, right?
What does Jesus mean regarding "Raca," and "you fool?" - is he contrasting them?
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?
Writing in a Christian voice
My friend is being a hypocrite
What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?
Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
Why is there so much iron?
Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?What examples are there of fuzzy concepts in astronomy?How much iron would I have to shoot into the Sun to blow it up?Possible intergalactic celestial objectsWhat prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?Type II supernovae explosionsWhat causes a supernova explosion?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?Could the singularity of a black hole just be an iron / dark matter sphere?
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?
Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.
White dwarfs do not deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?
Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.
White dwarfs do not deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?
Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.
White dwarfs do not deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy
$endgroup$
We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?
Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.
White dwarfs do not deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy
astrophysics astronomy
edited 11 hours ago
Jens
2,40611431
2,40611431
asked yesterday
RickRick
51612
51612
7
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago
add a comment |
7
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
Image source
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
$endgroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered 17 hours ago
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.5k7139240
69.5k7139240
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
4 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
13 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
Image source
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
Image source
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
Image source
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
$endgroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
Image source
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,249410
1,249410
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.
New contributor
$endgroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 20 hours ago
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
875
875
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
$endgroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 hours ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78211220
2,78211220
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday
$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago