Why is there so much iron?Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?What examples are there of fuzzy concepts in astronomy?How much iron would I have to shoot into the Sun to blow it up?Possible intergalactic celestial objectsWhat prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?Type II supernovae explosionsWhat causes a supernova explosion?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?Could the singularity of a black hole just be an iron / dark matter sphere?

In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived​?

Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?

Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?

Am I eligible for the Eurail Youth pass? I am 27.5 years old

Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Unfrosted light bulb

Existence of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon

Worshiping one God at a time?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

gerund and noun applications

Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?

Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeon

In the 1924 version of The Thief of Bagdad, no character is named, right?

What does Jesus mean regarding "Raca," and "you fool?" - is he contrasting them?

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?

Writing in a Christian voice

My friend is being a hypocrite

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?



Why is there so much iron?


Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?What examples are there of fuzzy concepts in astronomy?How much iron would I have to shoot into the Sun to blow it up?Possible intergalactic celestial objectsWhat prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?Type II supernovae explosionsWhat causes a supernova explosion?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?Could the singularity of a black hole just be an iron / dark matter sphere?













13












$begingroup$


We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?



Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.



White dwarfs do not deposit iron.



Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.



Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)



Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.



Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    23 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    3 hours ago















13












$begingroup$


We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?



Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.



White dwarfs do not deposit iron.



Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.



Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)



Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.



Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    23 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    3 hours ago













13












13








13


1



$begingroup$


We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?



Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.



White dwarfs do not deposit iron.



Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.



Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)



Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.



Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We all know where iron comes from. But as I am reading up on supernovas it got me wondering why there is as much iron as there is in the universe?



Brown dwarfs do not deposit iron.



White dwarfs do not deposit iron.



Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.



Type II leave either a neutron star or black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)



Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.



Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?







astrophysics astronomy






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Jens

2,40611431




2,40611431










asked yesterday









RickRick

51612




51612







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    23 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    3 hours ago












  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nat
    23 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    7 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
    $endgroup$
    – Rick
    3 hours ago







7




7




$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday




$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
yesterday












$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday





$begingroup$
I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe? (I was thinking that the amount of iron being made during the compression of the rest of the star could not account for all of the iron in the universe...) Type II's do not seem to happen that often....do they?
$endgroup$
– Rick
yesterday





2




2




$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago





$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
23 hours ago













$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
Your duplicate sir (though one must rephrase the question a little) chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/40407/… In short: the Iron nucleus is the most stable - so thankfully, there's actually not THAT much in the universe else we'd be getting very close to the heat death.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
7 hours ago













$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
3 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$

The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.



A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.



Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.



The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Tausig
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
    $endgroup$
    – N. Steinle
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
    $endgroup$
    – N. Steinle
    4 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Jeffries
    3 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for clarifying!
    $endgroup$
    – N. Steinle
    13 mins ago


















7












$begingroup$

Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).




enter image description here
Image source

Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    4 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      19












      $begingroup$

      The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.



      A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.



      Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.



      The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Tausig
        10 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob Jeffries
        3 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you very much for clarifying!
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        13 mins ago















      19












      $begingroup$

      The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.



      A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.



      Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.



      The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Tausig
        10 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob Jeffries
        3 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you very much for clarifying!
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        13 mins ago













      19












      19








      19





      $begingroup$

      The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.



      A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.



      Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.



      The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.



      A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.



      Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.



      The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered 17 hours ago









      Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries

      69.5k7139240




      69.5k7139240







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Tausig
        10 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob Jeffries
        3 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you very much for clarifying!
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        13 mins ago












      • 1




        $begingroup$
        On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Tausig
        10 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        4 hours ago






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
        $endgroup$
        – Rob Jeffries
        3 hours ago











      • $begingroup$
        Thank you very much for clarifying!
        $endgroup$
        – N. Steinle
        13 mins ago







      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Tausig
      10 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Tausig
      10 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      4 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      4 hours ago




      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Jeffries
      3 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      @N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Jeffries
      3 hours ago













      $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for clarifying!
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      13 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for clarifying!
      $endgroup$
      – N. Steinle
      13 mins ago











      7












      $begingroup$

      Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).




      enter image description here
      Image source

      Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
        $endgroup$
        – Kyle Kanos
        4 hours ago















      7












      $begingroup$

      Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).




      enter image description here
      Image source

      Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
        $endgroup$
        – Kyle Kanos
        4 hours ago













      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$

      Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).




      enter image description here
      Image source

      Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).




      enter image description here
      Image source

      Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.








      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 4 hours ago

























      answered 10 hours ago









      Keith McClaryKeith McClary

      1,249410




      1,249410











      • $begingroup$
        While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
        $endgroup$
        – Kyle Kanos
        4 hours ago
















      • $begingroup$
        While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
        $endgroup$
        – Kyle Kanos
        4 hours ago















      $begingroup$
      While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Kyle Kanos
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Kyle Kanos
      4 hours ago











      0












      $begingroup$

      The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$

















        0












        $begingroup$

        The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.






          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The comes huge amounts of energy from generating Helium form hydrogen, the star gets a lot form generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a giant excess of energy.







          share|cite|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 20 hours ago









          Uwe PilzUwe Pilz

          875




          875




          New contributor




          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Anthony XAnthony X

                  2,78211220




                  2,78211220



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

                      Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

                      Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe