Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“Least Astonishment” and the Mutable Default ArgumentHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I concatenate two lists in Python?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?check two dictionaries that have similar keys but different valueshow to compare two dictionaries to check if a key is present in both of them

If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

Output the Arecibo Message

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

How to translate "being like"?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

Geography at the pixel level

Loose spokes after only a few rides

How come people say “Would of”?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Match Roman Numerals

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?



Compute the product of 3 dictionaries and concatenate keys and values



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In“Least Astonishment” and the Mutable Default ArgumentHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I sort a list of dictionaries by a value of the dictionary?How do I sort a dictionary by value?Add new keys to a dictionary?Check if a given key already exists in a dictionaryHow do I concatenate two lists in Python?Iterating over dictionaries using 'for' loopsHow to remove a key from a Python dictionary?check two dictionaries that have similar keys but different valueshow to compare two dictionaries to check if a key is present in both of them



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








8















Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



dict1 = 
"A": "a"


dict2 =
"B": "b",
"C": "c",
"D": "d",
"E": "e"


dict3 =
"F": "f",
"G": "g"



I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



The desired output would be a single dictionary:




# dict1 x dict2
"A_B": "a and b",
"A_C": "a and c",
"A_D": "a and d",
"A_E": "a and e",

# dict1 x dict3
"A_F": "a and f",
"A_G": "a and g",

# dict1 x dict2 x dict3
"A_B_F": "a and b and f",
"A_B_G": "a and b and g",
"A_C_F": "a and c and f",
"A_C_G": "a and c and g",
"A_D_F": "a and d and f",
"A_D_G": "a and d and g",
"A_E_F": "a and e and f",
"A_E_G": "a and e and g"



I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










share|improve this question




























    8















    Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



    dict1 = 
    "A": "a"


    dict2 =
    "B": "b",
    "C": "c",
    "D": "d",
    "E": "e"


    dict3 =
    "F": "f",
    "G": "g"



    I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



    The desired output would be a single dictionary:




    # dict1 x dict2
    "A_B": "a and b",
    "A_C": "a and c",
    "A_D": "a and d",
    "A_E": "a and e",

    # dict1 x dict3
    "A_F": "a and f",
    "A_G": "a and g",

    # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
    "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
    "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
    "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
    "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
    "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
    "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
    "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
    "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



    I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










    share|improve this question
























      8












      8








      8


      1






      Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



      dict1 = 
      "A": "a"


      dict2 =
      "B": "b",
      "C": "c",
      "D": "d",
      "E": "e"


      dict3 =
      "F": "f",
      "G": "g"



      I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



      The desired output would be a single dictionary:




      # dict1 x dict2
      "A_B": "a and b",
      "A_C": "a and c",
      "A_D": "a and d",
      "A_E": "a and e",

      # dict1 x dict3
      "A_F": "a and f",
      "A_G": "a and g",

      # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
      "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
      "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
      "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
      "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
      "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
      "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
      "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
      "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



      I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.










      share|improve this question














      Assuming that I have 3 different dictionaries:



      dict1 = 
      "A": "a"


      dict2 =
      "B": "b",
      "C": "c",
      "D": "d",
      "E": "e"


      dict3 =
      "F": "f",
      "G": "g"



      I want to compute the product of these dictionaries (excluding the product between dict2 and dict3) and combine both the keys and values where the keys are concatenated with _ and values with ' and '



      The desired output would be a single dictionary:




      # dict1 x dict2
      "A_B": "a and b",
      "A_C": "a and c",
      "A_D": "a and d",
      "A_E": "a and e",

      # dict1 x dict3
      "A_F": "a and f",
      "A_G": "a and g",

      # dict1 x dict2 x dict3
      "A_B_F": "a and b and f",
      "A_B_G": "a and b and g",
      "A_C_F": "a and c and f",
      "A_C_G": "a and c and g",
      "A_D_F": "a and d and f",
      "A_D_G": "a and d and g",
      "A_E_F": "a and e and f",
      "A_E_G": "a and e and g"



      I had a look at the documentation for itertools but I was not able to understand how I can achieve the desired output.







      python






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      Old-SchoolOld-School

      606




      606






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
          First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



          for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
          k, v = zip(*t)
          print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


          Output:



          A_B_F - a and b and f
          A_B_G - a and b and g
          A_C_F - a and c and f
          A_C_G - a and c and g
          A_D_F - a and d and f
          A_D_G - a and d and g
          A_E_F - a and e and f
          A_E_G - a and e and g


          Now, just populate a result dictionary:



          result = 
          for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
          k, v = zip(*t)
          result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


          You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




          Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



          import itertools
          import pprint


          dict1 =
          "A": "a"


          dict2 =
          "B": "b",
          "C": "c",
          "D": "d",
          "E": "e"


          dict3 =
          "F": "f",
          "G": "g"



          result =
          for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
          for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
          k, v = zip(*t)
          result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

          pprint.pprint(result)


          Output:



          'A_B': 'a and b',
          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
          'A_C': 'a and c',
          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
          'A_D': 'a and d',
          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
          'A_E': 'a and e',
          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
          'A_F': 'a and f',
          'A_G': 'a and g'





          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            is functools supposed to be itertools?

            – Ben Jones
            7 hours ago







          • 1





            @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

            – Right leg
            7 hours ago











          • No worries. Now I know about functools!

            – Ben Jones
            7 hours ago






          • 1





            @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

            – Right leg
            7 hours ago











          • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

            – ShadowRanger
            7 hours ago


















          1














          To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



          def pair_dicts(data, c):
          if not data:
          keys, values = zip(*c)
          yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
          else:
          for i in data[0]:
          yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

          def combos(d, c = []):
          if len(c) == len(d):
          yield c
          else:
          if len(c) > 1:
          yield c
          for i in d:
          if all(h != i for h in c):
          yield from combos(d, c+[i])

          new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
          final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


          Output:



          'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





          share|improve this answer























          • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

            – Right leg
            6 hours ago


















          0














          I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



          (Explanation below)



          import itertools as it

          dict1 =
          "A": "a"


          dict2 =
          "B": "b",
          "C": "c",
          "D": "d",
          "E": "e"


          dict3 =
          "F": "f",
          "G": "g"




          def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
          return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
          map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

          result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
          result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
          result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
          result
          #'A_B': 'a and b',
          # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
          # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
          # 'A_C': 'a and c',
          # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
          # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
          # 'A_D': 'a and d',
          # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
          # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
          # 'A_E': 'a and e',
          # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
          # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
          # 'A_F': 'a and f',
          # 'A_G': 'a and g'


          The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



          list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
          # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


          The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



          "_".join(('A', 'C'))
          # 'A_C'
          list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
          # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


          Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.



























            0














            Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



            from itertools import product, combinations


            # create a list and sum dict to be used later
            t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
            k =
            for d in t:
            k.update(d)


            # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
            # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

            results =
            for i in range(2, 4):
            a = [
            [
            results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
            for y in product(*x)
            ]
            for x in combinations(t, i)
            if dict1 in x
            ]

            results


            Output:



            'A_B': 'a and b',
            'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
            'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
            'A_C': 'a and c',
            'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
            'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
            'A_D': 'a and d',
            'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
            'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
            'A_E': 'a and e',
            'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
            'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
            'A_F': 'a and f',
            'A_G': 'a and g'





            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




















              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55636895%2fcompute-the-product-of-3-dictionaries-and-concatenate-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              7














              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                7 hours ago















              7














              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer




















              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                7 hours ago













              7












              7








              7







              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'





              share|improve this answer















              The function that will do the job is itertools.product.
              First, here is how you can print out the product dict1 x dict2 x dict3:



              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()): 
              k, v = zip(*t)
              print("_".join(k), "-", " and ".join(v))


              Output:



              A_B_F - a and b and f
              A_B_G - a and b and g
              A_C_F - a and c and f
              A_C_G - a and c and g
              A_D_F - a and d and f
              A_D_G - a and d and g
              A_E_F - a and e and f
              A_E_G - a and e and g


              Now, just populate a result dictionary:



              result = 
              for t in product(dict1.items(), dict2.items(), dict3.items()):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)


              You can now add to this dictionary the dict1 x dict2 and dict1 x dict3 products, that are even simpler to compute.




              Based on @ShadowRanger's comment, here is a complete snippet:



              import itertools
              import pprint


              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"



              result =
              for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)):
              for t in itertools.product(*(d.items() for d in dicts)):
              k, v = zip(*t)
              result["_".join(k)] = " and ".join(v)

              pprint.pprint(result)


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b',
              'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              'A_C': 'a and c',
              'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              'A_D': 'a and d',
              'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              'A_E': 'a and e',
              'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              'A_F': 'a and f',
              'A_G': 'a and g'






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 7 hours ago

























              answered 7 hours ago









              Right legRight leg

              8,54342450




              8,54342450







              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                7 hours ago












              • 1





                is functools supposed to be itertools?

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago







              • 1





                @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • No worries. Now I know about functools!

                – Ben Jones
                7 hours ago






              • 1





                @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

                – Right leg
                7 hours ago











              • Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

                – ShadowRanger
                7 hours ago







              1




              1





              is functools supposed to be itertools?

              – Ben Jones
              7 hours ago






              is functools supposed to be itertools?

              – Ben Jones
              7 hours ago





              1




              1





              @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

              – Right leg
              7 hours ago





              @BenJones Yeah sure my bad, I always mix them up...

              – Right leg
              7 hours ago













              No worries. Now I know about functools!

              – Ben Jones
              7 hours ago





              No worries. Now I know about functools!

              – Ben Jones
              7 hours ago




              1




              1





              @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

              – Right leg
              7 hours ago





              @BenJones Wanna learn about some more magic? Check out more_itertools :)

              – Right leg
              7 hours ago













              Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

              – ShadowRanger
              7 hours ago





              Adding an outer loop of for dicts in ((dict1, dict2), (dict1, dict3), (dict1, dict2, dict3)): and making the inner loop for t in product(*[d.items() for d in dicts]): would let you produce the result with minimal code repetition.

              – ShadowRanger
              7 hours ago













              1














              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer























              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                6 hours ago















              1














              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer























              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                6 hours ago













              1












              1








              1







              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'





              share|improve this answer













              To produce all pairings, you can use two recursive generator functions: one to find the overall combinations of dictionaries, and the other to pair the keys and values:



              def pair_dicts(data, c):
              if not data:
              keys, values = zip(*c)
              yield ('_'.join(keys), ' and '.join(values))
              else:
              for i in data[0]:
              yield from pair_dicts(data[1:], c+[i])

              def combos(d, c = []):
              if len(c) == len(d):
              yield c
              else:
              if len(c) > 1:
              yield c
              for i in d:
              if all(h != i for h in c):
              yield from combos(d, c+[i])

              new_d = [[list(c.items()) for c in i] for i in combos([dict1, dict2, dict3])]
              final_result = dict(i for b in new_d for i in pair_dicts(b, []))


              Output:



              'A_B': 'a and b', 'A_C': 'a and c', 'A_D': 'a and d', 'A_E': 'a and e', 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f', 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g', 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f', 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g', 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f', 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g', 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f', 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g', 'A_F': 'a and f', 'A_G': 'a and g', 'A_F_B': 'a and f and b', 'A_F_C': 'a and f and c', 'A_F_D': 'a and f and d', 'A_F_E': 'a and f and e', 'A_G_B': 'a and g and b', 'A_G_C': 'a and g and c', 'A_G_D': 'a and g and d', 'A_G_E': 'a and g and e', 'B_A': 'b and a', 'C_A': 'c and a', 'D_A': 'd and a', 'E_A': 'e and a', 'B_A_F': 'b and a and f', 'B_A_G': 'b and a and g', 'C_A_F': 'c and a and f', 'C_A_G': 'c and a and g', 'D_A_F': 'd and a and f', 'D_A_G': 'd and a and g', 'E_A_F': 'e and a and f', 'E_A_G': 'e and a and g', 'B_F': 'b and f', 'B_G': 'b and g', 'C_F': 'c and f', 'C_G': 'c and g', 'D_F': 'd and f', 'D_G': 'd and g', 'E_F': 'e and f', 'E_G': 'e and g', 'B_F_A': 'b and f and a', 'B_G_A': 'b and g and a', 'C_F_A': 'c and f and a', 'C_G_A': 'c and g and a', 'D_F_A': 'd and f and a', 'D_G_A': 'd and g and a', 'E_F_A': 'e and f and a', 'E_G_A': 'e and g and a', 'F_A': 'f and a', 'G_A': 'g and a', 'F_A_B': 'f and a and b', 'F_A_C': 'f and a and c', 'F_A_D': 'f and a and d', 'F_A_E': 'f and a and e', 'G_A_B': 'g and a and b', 'G_A_C': 'g and a and c', 'G_A_D': 'g and a and d', 'G_A_E': 'g and a and e', 'F_B': 'f and b', 'F_C': 'f and c', 'F_D': 'f and d', 'F_E': 'f and e', 'G_B': 'g and b', 'G_C': 'g and c', 'G_D': 'g and d', 'G_E': 'g and e', 'F_B_A': 'f and b and a', 'F_C_A': 'f and c and a', 'F_D_A': 'f and d and a', 'F_E_A': 'f and e and a', 'G_B_A': 'g and b and a', 'G_C_A': 'g and c and a', 'G_D_A': 'g and d and a', 'G_E_A': 'g and e and a'






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 7 hours ago









              Ajax1234Ajax1234

              43k42954




              43k42954












              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                6 hours ago

















              • Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

                – Right leg
                6 hours ago
















              Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

              – Right leg
              6 hours ago





              Although it's not an issue here, I'd generally advise against using a list or any other mutable value as a default value, and would rather go for def combos(d, c=None): if c is None: c = []. See stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/…

              – Right leg
              6 hours ago











              0














              I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



              (Explanation below)



              import itertools as it

              dict1 =
              "A": "a"


              dict2 =
              "B": "b",
              "C": "c",
              "D": "d",
              "E": "e"


              dict3 =
              "F": "f",
              "G": "g"




              def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
              return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
              map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

              result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
              result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
              result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
              result
              #'A_B': 'a and b',
              # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
              # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
              # 'A_C': 'a and c',
              # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
              # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
              # 'A_D': 'a and d',
              # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
              # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
              # 'A_E': 'a and e',
              # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
              # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
              # 'A_F': 'a and f',
              # 'A_G': 'a and g'


              The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



              list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
              # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


              The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



              "_".join(('A', 'C'))
              # 'A_C'
              list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
              # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


              Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                0














                I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                (Explanation below)



                import itertools as it

                dict1 =
                "A": "a"


                dict2 =
                "B": "b",
                "C": "c",
                "D": "d",
                "E": "e"


                dict3 =
                "F": "f",
                "G": "g"




                def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                result
                #'A_B': 'a and b',
                # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                # 'A_C'
                list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                  (Explanation below)



                  import itertools as it

                  dict1 =
                  "A": "a"


                  dict2 =
                  "B": "b",
                  "C": "c",
                  "D": "d",
                  "E": "e"


                  dict3 =
                  "F": "f",
                  "G": "g"




                  def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                  return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                  map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                  result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                  result
                  #'A_B': 'a and b',
                  # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                  # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                  # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                  # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                  # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                  # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                  # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                  # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                  # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                  # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                  # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                  # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                  # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                  The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                  list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                  # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                  The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                  "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                  # 'A_C'
                  list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                  # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                  Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  I created a (not so nice) function to do your task with arbitrary number of dictionaries.



                  (Explanation below)



                  import itertools as it

                  dict1 =
                  "A": "a"


                  dict2 =
                  "B": "b",
                  "C": "c",
                  "D": "d",
                  "E": "e"


                  dict3 =
                  "F": "f",
                  "G": "g"




                  def custom_dict_product(dictionaries):
                  return dict(zip(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, dictionaries))),
                  map(" and ".join, it.product(*map(dict.values, dictionaries)))))

                  result = custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2])
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict3]))
                  result.update(custom_dict_product([dict1,dict2,dict3]))
                  result
                  #'A_B': 'a and b',
                  # 'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                  # 'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                  # 'A_C': 'a and c',
                  # 'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                  # 'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                  # 'A_D': 'a and d',
                  # 'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                  # 'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                  # 'A_E': 'a and e',
                  # 'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                  # 'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                  # 'A_F': 'a and f',
                  # 'A_G': 'a and g'


                  The function takes the given dictionaries and gets their keys and values, which is done by map(dict.keys, dictionaries))and map(dict.values, dictionaries)). The results of the first call



                  list(it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2])))
                  # [('A', 'C'), ('A', 'E'), ('A', 'B'), ('A', 'D')]


                  The tuples insides this list are then forced to your desired structure with join(and again an map call to do this for every element):



                  "_".join(('A', 'C'))
                  # 'A_C'
                  list(map("_".join, it.product(*map(dict.keys, [dict1,dict2]))))
                  # ['A_C', 'A_E', 'A_B', 'A_D']


                  Finally the two resulting lists are transformed to tuples of (keys, values) with the call of zip and handed to the dictionary creation.







                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 7 hours ago





















                  New contributor




                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 7 hours ago









                  Sparky05Sparky05

                  985




                  985




                  New contributor




                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Sparky05 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      0














                      Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                      from itertools import product, combinations


                      # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                      t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                      k =
                      for d in t:
                      k.update(d)


                      # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                      # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                      results =
                      for i in range(2, 4):
                      a = [
                      [
                      results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                      for y in product(*x)
                      ]
                      for x in combinations(t, i)
                      if dict1 in x
                      ]

                      results


                      Output:



                      'A_B': 'a and b',
                      'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                      'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                      'A_C': 'a and c',
                      'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                      'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                      'A_D': 'a and d',
                      'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                      'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                      'A_E': 'a and e',
                      'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                      'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                      'A_F': 'a and f',
                      'A_G': 'a and g'





                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                        0














                        Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                        from itertools import product, combinations


                        # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                        t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                        k =
                        for d in t:
                        k.update(d)


                        # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                        # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                        results =
                        for i in range(2, 4):
                        a = [
                        [
                        results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                        for y in product(*x)
                        ]
                        for x in combinations(t, i)
                        if dict1 in x
                        ]

                        results


                        Output:



                        'A_B': 'a and b',
                        'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                        'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                        'A_C': 'a and c',
                        'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                        'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                        'A_D': 'a and d',
                        'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                        'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                        'A_E': 'a and e',
                        'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                        'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                        'A_F': 'a and f',
                        'A_G': 'a and g'





                        share|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                          from itertools import product, combinations


                          # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                          t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                          k =
                          for d in t:
                          k.update(d)


                          # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                          # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                          results =
                          for i in range(2, 4):
                          a = [
                          [
                          results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                          for y in product(*x)
                          ]
                          for x in combinations(t, i)
                          if dict1 in x
                          ]

                          results


                          Output:



                          'A_B': 'a and b',
                          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                          'A_C': 'a and c',
                          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                          'A_D': 'a and d',
                          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                          'A_E': 'a and e',
                          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                          'A_F': 'a and f',
                          'A_G': 'a and g'





                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                          Here a dirty, but working, solution that makes use of itertools



                          from itertools import product, combinations


                          # create a list and sum dict to be used later
                          t = [dict1, dict2, dict3]
                          k =
                          for d in t:
                          k.update(d)


                          # iterate over "i" order of combinations ("dict1_X" or "dict1_X_Y") and
                          # the cartesian product of keys for each combination

                          results =
                          for i in range(2, 4):
                          a = [
                          [
                          results.update("_".join(y): " and ".join([k[j] for j in y]))
                          for y in product(*x)
                          ]
                          for x in combinations(t, i)
                          if dict1 in x
                          ]

                          results


                          Output:



                          'A_B': 'a and b',
                          'A_B_F': 'a and b and f',
                          'A_B_G': 'a and b and g',
                          'A_C': 'a and c',
                          'A_C_F': 'a and c and f',
                          'A_C_G': 'a and c and g',
                          'A_D': 'a and d',
                          'A_D_F': 'a and d and f',
                          'A_D_G': 'a and d and g',
                          'A_E': 'a and e',
                          'A_E_F': 'a and e and f',
                          'A_E_G': 'a and e and g',
                          'A_F': 'a and f',
                          'A_G': 'a and g'






                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 5 hours ago





















                          New contributor




                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                          answered 6 hours ago









                          Lante DellarovereLante Dellarovere

                          1616




                          1616




                          New contributor




                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          New contributor





                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          Lante Dellarovere is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55636895%2fcompute-the-product-of-3-dictionaries-and-concatenate-keys-and-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

                              Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

                              Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe