Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAssistance with a Test Class to increase code coverageCompilation error with a unit testError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to Booleanschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classWhy is this test giving 0% coverage?Test class for the zenkraft process classI am not able to cover the specific code in Apex classHow to cover global class and method in test classHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Test Class: Unable to assert enqueueJob

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Short story: child made less intelligent and less attractive

RequirePermission not working

writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture

Finding the area between two curves with Integrate

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

How to quickly solve partial fractions equation?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

Can a flute soloist sit?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Is bread bad for ducks?

Correct punctuation for showing a character's confusion

Can I have a signal generator on while it's not connected?

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

How come people say “Would of”?

How to translate "being like"?

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?

How can I have a shield and a way of attacking with a ranged weapon at the same time?



Is it a good practice to use a static variable in a Test Class and use that in the actual class instead of Test.isRunningTest()?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAssistance with a Test Class to increase code coverageCompilation error with a unit testError: Compile Error: Illegal assignment from String to Booleanschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classWhy is this test giving 0% coverage?Test class for the zenkraft process classI am not able to cover the specific code in Apex classHow to cover global class and method in test classHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Test Class: Unable to assert enqueueJob



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    6 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    6 hours ago

















1















I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    6 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    6 hours ago













1












1








1


0






I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2












share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I've read about using a static variable from a class in the test class but I'm wondering if this is legal enough to do.



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
public void method1()
if(Test.isRunningTest)
//always true if its hitting from a test class.
else if(Test.isRunningTest && myTestClass.mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2









apex unit-test code-coverage






share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









ApzApz

61




61




New contributor




Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Apz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    6 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    6 hours ago












  • 2





    What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

    – David Reed
    6 hours ago











  • I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

    – Apz
    6 hours ago







2




2





What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

– David Reed
6 hours ago





What code/why are you trying to gate in test context? That's something one generally ought to do only if one really has to and has run out of other tools, in my opinion.

– David Reed
6 hours ago













I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

– Apz
6 hours ago





I'm sorry but can't share my code here. I can explain why am trying to do this, let's say there is an if condition which can't be made true from a test class but can be done using Test.isRunningTest() in actual class. What this does now is that, it will always get into this if condition but not the next if-else conditions. My bad if this is confusing.

– Apz
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






share|improve this answer

























  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    6 hours ago











  • Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • It shouldn't work.

    – Adrian Larson
    1 hour ago











  • So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

    – Apz
    1 hour ago


















0














No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






share|improve this answer

























  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    6 hours ago











  • Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • It shouldn't work.

    – Adrian Larson
    1 hour ago











  • So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

    – Apz
    1 hour ago















2














You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






share|improve this answer

























  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    6 hours ago











  • Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • It shouldn't work.

    – Adrian Larson
    1 hour ago











  • So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

    – Apz
    1 hour ago













2












2








2







You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.






share|improve this answer















You cannot reference a test class from a production class. You have the pattern reversed on where the Boolean flag should be.



You should avoid code which runs only out of a test context wherever possible. There are a few exceptions, such as:



  • Disabling a trigger framework to save on run times if they become prohibitive

  • Disabling batch chaining or other aspects of asynchronous processing

In these cases, you still should not use Test.isRunningTest() (at least according to our coding guideline where I work). Instead, you should use a @TestVisible flag in your production code.



public with sharing class MyClass

@TestVisible static Boolean shouldDoStuff = true;
public static void doStuff()

if (!shouldDoStuff) return;

// actual logic

public static void doNonGatedStuff()

doStuff();

// other logic


@IsTest class MyClass

@IsTest static void testDoStuff()

MyClass.shouldDoStuff = false;

// rest of test




Sometimes you will see this logic reversed. For example our typical flag for trigger handlers is called bypassTrigger, which would obviously default to false. You set it to true before inserting some records for setup, then bookend it back to false so that any further operations will still run the trigger.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

110k19120256




110k19120256












  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    6 hours ago











  • Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • It shouldn't work.

    – Adrian Larson
    1 hour ago











  • So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

    – Apz
    1 hour ago

















  • P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

    – Adrian Larson
    6 hours ago











  • Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • It shouldn't work.

    – Adrian Larson
    1 hour ago











  • So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

    – Apz
    1 hour ago
















P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

– sfdcfox
6 hours ago





P.S. You didn't actually answer the question of "if this is legal?"

– sfdcfox
6 hours ago













Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

– Adrian Larson
6 hours ago





Because the way it was written wouldn't work, I simply showed how it can be done.

– Adrian Larson
6 hours ago













Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

– Apz
1 hour ago





Thanks for the response. I was actually able to use that static Boolean flag (from Test class) in my actual class, in order to get into a scope and looks like it worked. Do you think am missing something? The procedure that you showed is perfect but I just don't want to make any changes to the prod class since am just supposed to get the coverage up. That's the main reason for this question. Thanks again.

– Apz
1 hour ago













It shouldn't work.

– Adrian Larson
1 hour ago





It shouldn't work.

– Adrian Larson
1 hour ago













So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

– Apz
1 hour ago





So you're saying 'myTestClass.mySwitch' will throw an error if it's used outside the test context?

– Apz
1 hour ago













0














No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago















0














No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago













0












0








0







No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.






share|improve this answer















No, it is not valid. You cannot access any variables or methods inside a class marked @isTest outside of a test context. Instead, you need to place the static variable inside the actual class, then modify it in the test class:



@isTest
public class myTestClass
public static testMethod void myTestMethod1()
// code //

public static testMethod void myTestMethod2()
actualClass.mySwitch = true;
// code //



public class actualClass
@TestVisible static Boolean mySwitch = false;
public void method2()
if(mySwitch)
//do something from myTestMethod2





You can use @TestVisible to prevent accessing the variable outside of testing context.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









sfdcfoxsfdcfox

264k13211458




264k13211458












  • Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago

















  • Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

    – Apz
    1 hour ago











  • @Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago
















Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

– Apz
1 hour ago





Thanks for the response. I was able to use a static variable from a test class in a prod class. Is this something which is frowned upon or is just NOT allowed? If it's the latter then it should thrown an error before saving, right? It ran successfully and in fact got what I was hoping for.

– Apz
1 hour ago













@Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

– sfdcfox
1 hour ago





@Apz No, it shouldn't work. I tried this and got a compilation error.

– sfdcfox
1 hour ago













Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

– Apz
1 hour ago





Sorry to bug but I checked it in my developer org and sandbox, it works fine for me.

– Apz
1 hour ago













@Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

– sfdcfox
1 hour ago





@Apz Not sure how you managed to do it--it is not allowed. Do not try to do it.

– sfdcfox
1 hour ago










Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Apz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257558%2fis-it-a-good-practice-to-use-a-static-variable-in-a-test-class-and-use-that-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe