Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThere is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes
If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic wars mean?
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?
How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
How to type a long/em dash `—`
Mathematics of imaging the black hole
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
What is this business jet?
How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?
Is it correct to say the Neural Networks are an alternative way of performing Maximum Likelihood Estimation? if not, why?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Can there be female White Walkers?
Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThere is two boxes with one with 8 balls and one with 4 ballsdrawing balls from box without replacemntRandom distribution of colored balls into boxes.Optimal Number of White BallsCompute possible outcomes when get balls from a boxPoisson Approximation Problem involving putting balls into boxesCompute expected received balls from boxesput n balls into n boxesA question of probability regarding expectation and variance of a random variable.Distributing 5 distinct balls into 3 distinct boxes
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
- There are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls.
- Each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, independently of the other balls.
- Let $X_i$ be the number of balls in box $i$,
$1 leq i leq r$. - Compute $mathbbEleft[X_iright], mathbbEleft[X_iX_jright]$.
I am preparing for an exam, and I have no idea how to approach this problem. Can someone push me in the right direction ?.
probability-theory
probability-theory
edited 6 hours ago
Felix Marin
68.9k7110147
68.9k7110147
asked 7 hours ago
631631
585
585
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
$endgroup$
Since there are $r$ boxes and $n$ balls, and each ball is placed in a box with equal probability, we have:
$$ mathbbE[X_i] = fracnr $$
Now, we would like to know what is $mathbbE[X_i X_j] $.
We begin by making the following observation:
$$X_i = n - sum_jneq iX_j $$
Which gives us:
$$ X_isum_jneq iX_j = nX_i - X_i^2$$
Now, fix $i$ (we can do this because of the symmetry in the question), and thus we have:
beginalignmathbbE[X_i X_j] &= frac1rBig(mathbbE[X_i sum_jneq i X_j] + mathbbE[X_i^2]Big) \
&= frac1r mathbbE[nX_i] \
&= fracn^2r^2
endalign
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Sean LeeSean Lee
801214
801214
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
If indeed $E(X_i X_j) = E(X_i) E(X_j)$ for $i in j$ then that implies zero correlation. I would expect a bit of negative correlation. (And indeed, my preliminary calculation based on the decomposition from VHarisop's answer seems to result in $E(X_i X_j) = fracn(n-1)r^2$ for $i ne j$ and $E(X_i^2) = fracnr + fracn(n-1)r^2$.)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, it seemed a little strange to me initially, but its consistent with your results btw: $frac1r[(r-1)E(X_iX_j) + E(X_i^2)] = fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I've now expanded VHarisop's answer with my calculations for part two of the question.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
$endgroup$
For the first part, you can use linearity of expectation to compute $mathbbE[X_i]$.
Specifically, you know that for a fixed box, the probability of putting a ball in it
is $frac1r$. Let
$$
Y_k^(i) = begincases
1 &, text if ball $k$ was placed in box $i$ \
0 &, text otherwise
endcases,
$$
which satisfies $mathbbE[Y_k^(i)] = mathbbP(Y_k^(i) = 1) = frac1r.$
Then you can write
$$
X_i = sum_j=1^n Y_j^(i) Rightarrow mathbbEX_i = sum_j=1^n frac1r = fracnr.
$$
For the second part, you can proceed similarly: $X_i = sum_k=1^n Y_k^(i)$ and $X_j = sum_ell=1^n Y_ell^(j)$, so:
$$
X_i X_j = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) implies
mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)).
$$
We will first treat the case where $i ne j$. Then, for each term in the sum such that $k = ell$, we must have $Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j) = Y_k^(i) Y_k^(j) = 0$ since it impossible for ball $k$ to be placed both in box $i$ and in box $j$. On the other hand, if $k ne ell$, then the events corresponding to $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent since the placement of balls $k$ and $ell$ are independent, which implies that $Y_k^(i)$ and $Y_ell^(j)$ are independent random variables. Therefore, in this case,
$$mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j)) = mathbbE(Y_k^(i)) mathbbE(Y_ell^(j)) = frac1r cdot frac1r.$$
In summary, if $i ne j$, then
$$mathbbE(X_i X_j) = sum_k=1^n sum_ell=1^n delta_k ne ell cdot frac1r^2 = fracn(n-1)r^2$$
where $delta_k ne ell$ represents the indicator value which is 1 when $k ne ell$ and 0 when $k = ell$.
For the case $i = j$, I will leave the similar computation of $mathbbE(X_i^2)$ to you, with just the hint that the difference is in the expected value of $mathbbE(Y_k^(i) Y_ell^(j))$ for the case $k = ell$.
edited 1 hour ago
Daniel Schepler
9,3341821
9,3341821
answered 6 hours ago
VHarisopVHarisop
1,228421
1,228421
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I decided to add my solution to part two, using your notation, to your answer to avoid having an answer split between your part and a part I would post separately. Feel free to edit it more to your liking, or even revert the addition if you prefer.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
$endgroup$
Think of placing the ball in box "$i$" as success and not placing it as a failure.
This situation can be represented using the Hypergeometric Distribution.
$$
P(X=k) = fracK choose k N- Kchoose n - kN choose n.
$$
$N$ is the population size (number of boxes $r$)
$K$ is the number of success states in the population (just $1$ because the success is defined as placing the ball in box "$i$".)
$n$ is the number of draws (the number of balls $n$).
$k$ is the number of observed successes (the number of balls in box "$i$").
The expectation of the Hypergeometric Distribution is $nfracKN$, hence the mean of your variable
$$E[X_i]=nfrac1r=fracnr$$
answered 6 hours ago
RScrlliRScrlli
761114
761114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184022%2fcomputing-the-expectation-of-the-number-of-balls-in-a-box%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are there any restrictions on $j$?
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SeanLee In the question, no. I'm guessing it would have the same restrictions as i.
$endgroup$
– 631
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Computationally, the answer to the second part appears to be $fracn^2r^2$
$endgroup$
– Sean Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you studied covariance matrices, or vector-valued random variables, at all? That would seem to me to provide the most compact notation for solving this problem.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
54 mins ago