How to use Commas When an Introductory Clause Precedes a Dependent/Subordinate Clause The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InUse of commas in a subordinate clauseWhen to use commas (if at all) with subordinate clauses?Commas to separate a dependent clause or not?Commas with nested subordinate clauses both of which are restrictive (essential to the meaning)Comma issue: noun of direct address in the middle of the sentence after conjunctionComma after nonrestrictive adverbial (dependent) clause at the end of the sentenceRule of punctuation when a principal sentence is followed by two or more subordinate sentencesUse of then as a dependent conjunctionSubordinate Clauses and CommasIs there a hard rule for where commas go when there seems to be two independent clauses but there's only one subject?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture
Output the Arecibo Message
Can a flute soloist sit?
How come people say “Would of”?
What is this business jet?
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed
Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?
Inverse Relationship Between Precision and Recall
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
What is preventing me from simply constructing a hash that's lower than the current target?
Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?
Is there a way to generate a point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
How can I have a shield and a way of attacking with a ranged weapon at the same time?
"as much details as you can remember"
What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty
How to use Commas When an Introductory Clause Precedes a Dependent/Subordinate Clause
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InUse of commas in a subordinate clauseWhen to use commas (if at all) with subordinate clauses?Commas to separate a dependent clause or not?Commas with nested subordinate clauses both of which are restrictive (essential to the meaning)Comma issue: noun of direct address in the middle of the sentence after conjunctionComma after nonrestrictive adverbial (dependent) clause at the end of the sentenceRule of punctuation when a principal sentence is followed by two or more subordinate sentencesUse of then as a dependent conjunctionSubordinate Clauses and CommasIs there a hard rule for where commas go when there seems to be two independent clauses but there's only one subject?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
1
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
add a comment |
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
20.1k32648
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10