When do we use “adept in” and “adept at”? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)When should I use “in” or “on”?Which preposition is used for the subject “school”?Prepositions used with “renovation”To be “glad of” or “glad about”?“In and of itself”? What does it mean?Use of prepositions with verbsIs there a difference between using “of” and “for” as the preposition for “repent”?When is it appropriate to use “adjustor” instead of “adjuster”?When to use prepositions (specific examples)?Which is more suitable? from or of?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Printing attributes of selection in ArcPy?

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

Trying to understand entropy as a novice in thermodynamics

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

I can't produce songs

White walkers, cemeteries and wights

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

Where is the Next Backup Size entry on iOS 12?

Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

What does Turing mean by this statement?

One-one communication

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Project Euler #1 in C++

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Why are vacuum tubes still used in amateur radios?

Why is the change of basis formula counter-intuitive? [See details]

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?



When do we use “adept in” and “adept at”?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)When should I use “in” or “on”?Which preposition is used for the subject “school”?Prepositions used with “renovation”To be “glad of” or “glad about”?“In and of itself”? What does it mean?Use of prepositions with verbsIs there a difference between using “of” and “for” as the preposition for “repent”?When is it appropriate to use “adjustor” instead of “adjuster”?When to use prepositions (specific examples)?Which is more suitable? from or of?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I was reading a chapter on choosing the appropriate preposition and found there are two different uses of adept with two different prepositions, namely “in” and “at”.



The examples that were given did not help me to understand the difference well.










share|improve this question
























  • I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:06












  • Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

    – Hot Licks
    28 mins ago

















4















I was reading a chapter on choosing the appropriate preposition and found there are two different uses of adept with two different prepositions, namely “in” and “at”.



The examples that were given did not help me to understand the difference well.










share|improve this question
























  • I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:06












  • Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

    – Hot Licks
    28 mins ago













4












4








4


3






I was reading a chapter on choosing the appropriate preposition and found there are two different uses of adept with two different prepositions, namely “in” and “at”.



The examples that were given did not help me to understand the difference well.










share|improve this question
















I was reading a chapter on choosing the appropriate preposition and found there are two different uses of adept with two different prepositions, namely “in” and “at”.



The examples that were given did not help me to understand the difference well.







word-choice word-usage prepositions adjectives






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 16 '18 at 7:46









sumelic

50.7k8121228




50.7k8121228










asked Aug 7 '16 at 20:54









Humayun Al RasheidHumayun Al Rasheid

21113




21113












  • I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:06












  • Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

    – Hot Licks
    28 mins ago

















  • I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:06












  • Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

    – Hot Licks
    28 mins ago
















I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:06






I think you're quite right. Even finding the more common pairing on Google ('adept in fishing', say) doesn't guarantee the best answer, and dictionaries below OED level seem of little use. The few Google Ngram pairs I've checked suggest choices I'd feel happier with.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:06














Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

– Hot Licks
28 mins ago





Adept in a field. Adept at a skill.

– Hot Licks
28 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














In short popularity wise two uses can be discerned:




Adept at word ending in -ing; E.g. I am adept at answering.



Adept in the noun of whatever; E.g. I am adept in the art of answering.





A dive into the digitized google corpus reveals some patterns:



  • adept in verb(ing) results in 5k hits

  • adept at verb(ing) results in 55k hits

Therefore at is widely more common when followed by such a verb.



Adept in/at, followed by the noun of, the result is different.



  • adept in the noun of results in 4.7k hits

  • adept at the noun of results in meager 900 hits


After these two that are pretty clear I looked at adept at/in noun and here it gets murkier. On the first look at seems to be winning with 6.3k hits versus 2k hits for in. However a lot of those are nominalized verbs ending on -ing (7 out of the top 10). The other three are self as used in self-whatever (management, study...), problem in what looks to exclusively problem solving and finally mathematics. The last also claims the top three spot in the adept in search. That leaves 158 'at' vs 110 'in' for mathematics. Politics is 95 'at' to 66 'in'. Music however '137' in to just 50 'at'.



The only obvious pattern seems that noun or verb, if the word ends on -ing use adept at.




On a speculative note it might be shifting towards adept at noun, since a lot of entries in the adept in noun results are more obscure, old or fantasy based (alchemy, astrology, occult, sorcery, necromancy, woodcraft), they also seem more negative over all (deceit, crime, villainy, intrigue, politics ;)).






share|improve this answer























  • While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

    – dakab
    Aug 31 '16 at 19:42


















0














Well, shooting from the hip here, I'd guess that it should sound correct, but that answer is of no help to someone looking for a rule or a non-native English speaker.

I'll say that you'd use in when talking about a general skill and at when being more specific. Some examples which sound right to my ear:



He's adept at puzzle=making.

She's adept in the field of study regarding puzzle-making.



He's adept at making others look foolish.

She's adept in the art of making her adversaries look foolish.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:14












  • @Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:16






  • 1





    I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:02











  • These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:16












  • @EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:24











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f341631%2fwhen-do-we-use-adept-in-and-adept-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














In short popularity wise two uses can be discerned:




Adept at word ending in -ing; E.g. I am adept at answering.



Adept in the noun of whatever; E.g. I am adept in the art of answering.





A dive into the digitized google corpus reveals some patterns:



  • adept in verb(ing) results in 5k hits

  • adept at verb(ing) results in 55k hits

Therefore at is widely more common when followed by such a verb.



Adept in/at, followed by the noun of, the result is different.



  • adept in the noun of results in 4.7k hits

  • adept at the noun of results in meager 900 hits


After these two that are pretty clear I looked at adept at/in noun and here it gets murkier. On the first look at seems to be winning with 6.3k hits versus 2k hits for in. However a lot of those are nominalized verbs ending on -ing (7 out of the top 10). The other three are self as used in self-whatever (management, study...), problem in what looks to exclusively problem solving and finally mathematics. The last also claims the top three spot in the adept in search. That leaves 158 'at' vs 110 'in' for mathematics. Politics is 95 'at' to 66 'in'. Music however '137' in to just 50 'at'.



The only obvious pattern seems that noun or verb, if the word ends on -ing use adept at.




On a speculative note it might be shifting towards adept at noun, since a lot of entries in the adept in noun results are more obscure, old or fantasy based (alchemy, astrology, occult, sorcery, necromancy, woodcraft), they also seem more negative over all (deceit, crime, villainy, intrigue, politics ;)).






share|improve this answer























  • While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

    – dakab
    Aug 31 '16 at 19:42















5














In short popularity wise two uses can be discerned:




Adept at word ending in -ing; E.g. I am adept at answering.



Adept in the noun of whatever; E.g. I am adept in the art of answering.





A dive into the digitized google corpus reveals some patterns:



  • adept in verb(ing) results in 5k hits

  • adept at verb(ing) results in 55k hits

Therefore at is widely more common when followed by such a verb.



Adept in/at, followed by the noun of, the result is different.



  • adept in the noun of results in 4.7k hits

  • adept at the noun of results in meager 900 hits


After these two that are pretty clear I looked at adept at/in noun and here it gets murkier. On the first look at seems to be winning with 6.3k hits versus 2k hits for in. However a lot of those are nominalized verbs ending on -ing (7 out of the top 10). The other three are self as used in self-whatever (management, study...), problem in what looks to exclusively problem solving and finally mathematics. The last also claims the top three spot in the adept in search. That leaves 158 'at' vs 110 'in' for mathematics. Politics is 95 'at' to 66 'in'. Music however '137' in to just 50 'at'.



The only obvious pattern seems that noun or verb, if the word ends on -ing use adept at.




On a speculative note it might be shifting towards adept at noun, since a lot of entries in the adept in noun results are more obscure, old or fantasy based (alchemy, astrology, occult, sorcery, necromancy, woodcraft), they also seem more negative over all (deceit, crime, villainy, intrigue, politics ;)).






share|improve this answer























  • While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

    – dakab
    Aug 31 '16 at 19:42













5












5








5







In short popularity wise two uses can be discerned:




Adept at word ending in -ing; E.g. I am adept at answering.



Adept in the noun of whatever; E.g. I am adept in the art of answering.





A dive into the digitized google corpus reveals some patterns:



  • adept in verb(ing) results in 5k hits

  • adept at verb(ing) results in 55k hits

Therefore at is widely more common when followed by such a verb.



Adept in/at, followed by the noun of, the result is different.



  • adept in the noun of results in 4.7k hits

  • adept at the noun of results in meager 900 hits


After these two that are pretty clear I looked at adept at/in noun and here it gets murkier. On the first look at seems to be winning with 6.3k hits versus 2k hits for in. However a lot of those are nominalized verbs ending on -ing (7 out of the top 10). The other three are self as used in self-whatever (management, study...), problem in what looks to exclusively problem solving and finally mathematics. The last also claims the top three spot in the adept in search. That leaves 158 'at' vs 110 'in' for mathematics. Politics is 95 'at' to 66 'in'. Music however '137' in to just 50 'at'.



The only obvious pattern seems that noun or verb, if the word ends on -ing use adept at.




On a speculative note it might be shifting towards adept at noun, since a lot of entries in the adept in noun results are more obscure, old or fantasy based (alchemy, astrology, occult, sorcery, necromancy, woodcraft), they also seem more negative over all (deceit, crime, villainy, intrigue, politics ;)).






share|improve this answer













In short popularity wise two uses can be discerned:




Adept at word ending in -ing; E.g. I am adept at answering.



Adept in the noun of whatever; E.g. I am adept in the art of answering.





A dive into the digitized google corpus reveals some patterns:



  • adept in verb(ing) results in 5k hits

  • adept at verb(ing) results in 55k hits

Therefore at is widely more common when followed by such a verb.



Adept in/at, followed by the noun of, the result is different.



  • adept in the noun of results in 4.7k hits

  • adept at the noun of results in meager 900 hits


After these two that are pretty clear I looked at adept at/in noun and here it gets murkier. On the first look at seems to be winning with 6.3k hits versus 2k hits for in. However a lot of those are nominalized verbs ending on -ing (7 out of the top 10). The other three are self as used in self-whatever (management, study...), problem in what looks to exclusively problem solving and finally mathematics. The last also claims the top three spot in the adept in search. That leaves 158 'at' vs 110 'in' for mathematics. Politics is 95 'at' to 66 'in'. Music however '137' in to just 50 'at'.



The only obvious pattern seems that noun or verb, if the word ends on -ing use adept at.




On a speculative note it might be shifting towards adept at noun, since a lot of entries in the adept in noun results are more obscure, old or fantasy based (alchemy, astrology, occult, sorcery, necromancy, woodcraft), they also seem more negative over all (deceit, crime, villainy, intrigue, politics ;)).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 8 '16 at 14:21









HelmarHelmar

4,96472362




4,96472362












  • While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

    – dakab
    Aug 31 '16 at 19:42

















  • While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

    – dakab
    Aug 31 '16 at 19:42
















While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

– dakab
Aug 31 '16 at 19:42





While the question has been closed on grounds I am not able to relate to, this answer has finally clarified this long sought-after question with both empiricism and humour. Thanks!

– dakab
Aug 31 '16 at 19:42













0














Well, shooting from the hip here, I'd guess that it should sound correct, but that answer is of no help to someone looking for a rule or a non-native English speaker.

I'll say that you'd use in when talking about a general skill and at when being more specific. Some examples which sound right to my ear:



He's adept at puzzle=making.

She's adept in the field of study regarding puzzle-making.



He's adept at making others look foolish.

She's adept in the art of making her adversaries look foolish.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:14












  • @Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:16






  • 1





    I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:02











  • These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:16












  • @EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:24















0














Well, shooting from the hip here, I'd guess that it should sound correct, but that answer is of no help to someone looking for a rule or a non-native English speaker.

I'll say that you'd use in when talking about a general skill and at when being more specific. Some examples which sound right to my ear:



He's adept at puzzle=making.

She's adept in the field of study regarding puzzle-making.



He's adept at making others look foolish.

She's adept in the art of making her adversaries look foolish.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:14












  • @Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:16






  • 1





    I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:02











  • These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:16












  • @EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:24













0












0








0







Well, shooting from the hip here, I'd guess that it should sound correct, but that answer is of no help to someone looking for a rule or a non-native English speaker.

I'll say that you'd use in when talking about a general skill and at when being more specific. Some examples which sound right to my ear:



He's adept at puzzle=making.

She's adept in the field of study regarding puzzle-making.



He's adept at making others look foolish.

She's adept in the art of making her adversaries look foolish.






share|improve this answer















Well, shooting from the hip here, I'd guess that it should sound correct, but that answer is of no help to someone looking for a rule or a non-native English speaker.

I'll say that you'd use in when talking about a general skill and at when being more specific. Some examples which sound right to my ear:



He's adept at puzzle=making.

She's adept in the field of study regarding puzzle-making.



He's adept at making others look foolish.

She's adept in the art of making her adversaries look foolish.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 31 mins ago

























answered Aug 7 '16 at 21:58









ChowzenChowzen

1437




1437







  • 2





    While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:14












  • @Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:16






  • 1





    I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:02











  • These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:16












  • @EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:24












  • 2





    While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:14












  • @Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 22:16






  • 1





    I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:02











  • These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:16












  • @EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

    – Chowzen
    Aug 7 '16 at 23:24







2




2





While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 22:14






While I think there's an element of truth in what you say, it's worse suggesting a rule that doesn't really work than making a less precise claim. If you compare Google hits for "adept in dancing" and "adept at dancing", you'll see they are approximately equal. Also, 'adept in needlework' and 'adept at needlework' give roughly similar results. 'Adept in sports' and 'adept at sports' are neck-and-neck. / Answers of the 'shooting-from-the-hip' variety are never exactly appreciated on ELU.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 22:14














@Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

– Chowzen
Aug 7 '16 at 22:16





@Edwin Ashworth It sounds to me like 2.5 million people out there are wrong. I do freelance copywriting and proofreading for extra cash and I would definitely at least suggest that "adept at the art of" be changed. It just sounds bad.

– Chowzen
Aug 7 '16 at 22:16




1




1





I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:02





I think you make a valid point; the downvote isn't mine (though I'd guess it's for an unsupported answer). I've tried to find at least a partial pattern, linking say 'adept in' to 'skilled in' (followed by more 'verby' ing-forms, fields rather than particulars) and 'adept at' to 'good at', but results I wouldn't expect keep appearing in Google data. 'Skilled in chess' is the favoured form (19 / 20 relevant hits in the first two pages of 30 000 hits). 'Adept in fishing' seems to outperform the at-version.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:02













These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:16






These two Google Ngrams provide more substantial evidence (than raw Google data) that 'adept at the art of' is becoming as acceptable as 'adept in the art of'. I'm with you in preferring the latter, but am anti-prescriptivist enough not to consider the alternative incorrect.

– Edwin Ashworth
Aug 7 '16 at 23:16














@EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

– Chowzen
Aug 7 '16 at 23:24





@EdwinAshworth -- I never said that anything was "incorrect," I was going with what "sounds right to my ear." Also, by the by, the day you find me using Google Ngrams to determine whether a sentence sounds good or not is the day you'll find me dead at my desk, a letter opener protruding from my lifeless chest. :)

– Chowzen
Aug 7 '16 at 23:24

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f341631%2fwhen-do-we-use-adept-in-and-adept-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe