Pre-amplifier input protectionDesigning a 30 watt audio amplifier50 volts regulated power supplyRegulated audio inputAnalog preprocessing circuit (anti-alias/pre-amp) for driving ADCHow are the resistor values R1 and R2 calculated for a transistor amplifier that has a voltage divider biasConnect LED from audio output without it blinking?Some questions regarding input stage of audio signals to the pre-amplifierCrossover distortion returns when load is appliedHow build a practical AC over voltage protection circuit for the input of an arduino boardQ: Need help designing Pre-Amplifier

Are student evaluations of teaching assistants read by others in the faculty?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

Fine Tuning of the Universe

How did Arya survive the stabbing?

How do I find the solutions of the following equation?

How to run a prison with the smallest amount of guards?

Different result between scanning in Epson's "color negative film" mode and scanning in positive -> invert curve in post?

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Pole-zeros of a real-valued causal FIR system

How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`

How does buying out courses with grant money work?

You cannot touch me, but I can touch you, who am I?

What does "I’d sit this one out, Cap," imply or mean in the context?

CREATE opcode: what does it really do?

Gears on left are inverse to gears on right?

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?



Pre-amplifier input protection


Designing a 30 watt audio amplifier50 volts regulated power supplyRegulated audio inputAnalog preprocessing circuit (anti-alias/pre-amp) for driving ADCHow are the resistor values R1 and R2 calculated for a transistor amplifier that has a voltage divider biasConnect LED from audio output without it blinking?Some questions regarding input stage of audio signals to the pre-amplifierCrossover distortion returns when load is appliedHow build a practical AC over voltage protection circuit for the input of an arduino boardQ: Need help designing Pre-Amplifier













1












$begingroup$


I am building the Velleman K1803 pre-amplifier kit. This amplifier has a maximum input signal of 40mv. The audio input to the pre-amplifier will be a piezo-electric sensor, and this can certainly exceed the specified maximum.



I believe that the input can be protected with a pair of diodes, but there is a huge range of diodes available.



It is some time since I have done any electronics, and so far my searches have not resulted in a suitable circuit design which could achieve the protection at the low signal voltage specified. For the record, the input is audio in the range 20Hz to 20kHz, and could possibly lie in the range +/- 0.5V.



I would appreciate some guidance on where to look for a suitable diode and circuit. I can of course supply a circuit diagram of the amplifier if needed










share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    3 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


I am building the Velleman K1803 pre-amplifier kit. This amplifier has a maximum input signal of 40mv. The audio input to the pre-amplifier will be a piezo-electric sensor, and this can certainly exceed the specified maximum.



I believe that the input can be protected with a pair of diodes, but there is a huge range of diodes available.



It is some time since I have done any electronics, and so far my searches have not resulted in a suitable circuit design which could achieve the protection at the low signal voltage specified. For the record, the input is audio in the range 20Hz to 20kHz, and could possibly lie in the range +/- 0.5V.



I would appreciate some guidance on where to look for a suitable diode and circuit. I can of course supply a circuit diagram of the amplifier if needed










share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    3 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am building the Velleman K1803 pre-amplifier kit. This amplifier has a maximum input signal of 40mv. The audio input to the pre-amplifier will be a piezo-electric sensor, and this can certainly exceed the specified maximum.



I believe that the input can be protected with a pair of diodes, but there is a huge range of diodes available.



It is some time since I have done any electronics, and so far my searches have not resulted in a suitable circuit design which could achieve the protection at the low signal voltage specified. For the record, the input is audio in the range 20Hz to 20kHz, and could possibly lie in the range +/- 0.5V.



I would appreciate some guidance on where to look for a suitable diode and circuit. I can of course supply a circuit diagram of the amplifier if needed










share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am building the Velleman K1803 pre-amplifier kit. This amplifier has a maximum input signal of 40mv. The audio input to the pre-amplifier will be a piezo-electric sensor, and this can certainly exceed the specified maximum.



I believe that the input can be protected with a pair of diodes, but there is a huge range of diodes available.



It is some time since I have done any electronics, and so far my searches have not resulted in a suitable circuit design which could achieve the protection at the low signal voltage specified. For the record, the input is audio in the range 20Hz to 20kHz, and could possibly lie in the range +/- 0.5V.



I would appreciate some guidance on where to look for a suitable diode and circuit. I can of course supply a circuit diagram of the amplifier if needed







amplifier audio diodes protection






share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









GeoffGeoff

61




61




New contributor




Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Geoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    3 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    3 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
$endgroup$
– Toor
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Normally you would clamp to the maximum that the input can take, not the expected maximum of the signal source. It is likely that the 40mV maximum is the maximum that the amp can take and still work properly...but you're not worried about that. You're worried about the maximum it can take and not have damage occur. There's a difference. You can either use a TVS diode that clamp in reverse-breakdown or "regular" sufficiently fast diodes that clamp in forward bias to clamp the voltage to the rail supply (but this requires a rail supply to be present).
$endgroup$
– Toor
3 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

A pair of inexpensive back-to-back silicon diodes across the input lines should be sufficient to limit input to 600 mV. Germanium diodes or Schottky diodes would keep the voltage lower yet, but they're generally more fragile and/or more expensive than ordinary Si iodes. Since the specifications limit response to 20 kHz, even Si rectifier diodes should not degrade performance noticeably.



Though the maximum rated signal for the Velleman K1803 is 40 mV, there is no DC path from input to IC1a, below, so a transient 600 mV should do no harm.



Velleman K1803 schematic from https://www.velleman.eu/downloads/0/illustrated/illustrated_assembly_manual_k1803_rev2.pdf






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    1 hour ago


















2












$begingroup$

Just change one of the feedback resistors to have less gain so it can accept larger input voltages without clipping.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Geoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429404%2fpre-amplifier-input-protection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    A pair of inexpensive back-to-back silicon diodes across the input lines should be sufficient to limit input to 600 mV. Germanium diodes or Schottky diodes would keep the voltage lower yet, but they're generally more fragile and/or more expensive than ordinary Si iodes. Since the specifications limit response to 20 kHz, even Si rectifier diodes should not degrade performance noticeably.



    Though the maximum rated signal for the Velleman K1803 is 40 mV, there is no DC path from input to IC1a, below, so a transient 600 mV should do no harm.



    Velleman K1803 schematic from https://www.velleman.eu/downloads/0/illustrated/illustrated_assembly_manual_k1803_rev2.pdf






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      1 hour ago















    2












    $begingroup$

    A pair of inexpensive back-to-back silicon diodes across the input lines should be sufficient to limit input to 600 mV. Germanium diodes or Schottky diodes would keep the voltage lower yet, but they're generally more fragile and/or more expensive than ordinary Si iodes. Since the specifications limit response to 20 kHz, even Si rectifier diodes should not degrade performance noticeably.



    Though the maximum rated signal for the Velleman K1803 is 40 mV, there is no DC path from input to IC1a, below, so a transient 600 mV should do no harm.



    Velleman K1803 schematic from https://www.velleman.eu/downloads/0/illustrated/illustrated_assembly_manual_k1803_rev2.pdf






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      1 hour ago













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    A pair of inexpensive back-to-back silicon diodes across the input lines should be sufficient to limit input to 600 mV. Germanium diodes or Schottky diodes would keep the voltage lower yet, but they're generally more fragile and/or more expensive than ordinary Si iodes. Since the specifications limit response to 20 kHz, even Si rectifier diodes should not degrade performance noticeably.



    Though the maximum rated signal for the Velleman K1803 is 40 mV, there is no DC path from input to IC1a, below, so a transient 600 mV should do no harm.



    Velleman K1803 schematic from https://www.velleman.eu/downloads/0/illustrated/illustrated_assembly_manual_k1803_rev2.pdf






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    A pair of inexpensive back-to-back silicon diodes across the input lines should be sufficient to limit input to 600 mV. Germanium diodes or Schottky diodes would keep the voltage lower yet, but they're generally more fragile and/or more expensive than ordinary Si iodes. Since the specifications limit response to 20 kHz, even Si rectifier diodes should not degrade performance noticeably.



    Though the maximum rated signal for the Velleman K1803 is 40 mV, there is no DC path from input to IC1a, below, so a transient 600 mV should do no harm.



    Velleman K1803 schematic from https://www.velleman.eu/downloads/0/illustrated/illustrated_assembly_manual_k1803_rev2.pdf







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    DrMoishe PippikDrMoishe Pippik

    8867




    8867







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      1 hour ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      1 hour ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    R2 puts a severe limit on transient current into the IC anyways. Not sure the OP has a transient problem to fix. Reducing R5 to reduce gain may be a better choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    1 hour ago













    2












    $begingroup$

    Just change one of the feedback resistors to have less gain so it can accept larger input voltages without clipping.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      Just change one of the feedback resistors to have less gain so it can accept larger input voltages without clipping.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Just change one of the feedback resistors to have less gain so it can accept larger input voltages without clipping.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Just change one of the feedback resistors to have less gain so it can accept larger input voltages without clipping.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        JustmeJustme

        2,0221413




        2,0221413




















            Geoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Geoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Geoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Geoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429404%2fpre-amplifier-input-protection%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

            What is the correct present continuous form of “thunder” and “lightning”? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat is the past tense of “lightning”?What part of speech is the “be + verb” here? What tense are these sentences in?Present perfect and present perfect continuous for actions in progressIs it correct to mix past, present and future tense in a sentence?Correct verb form in two sentencesSimple vs Continuous in the Past Tense and in the Future TenseUsing present continuous passive (is being) for describing repeating (undesirable) actionssituations in which simple present and present continuous are interchangeable?Present Perfect Simple vs Present Perfect ContinuousWhat is the proper way to express a future action that depends on a past event?Progressive Form of Be and Lately in Present Continuous

            Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active