Overloading istream>> to read comma-separated inputClass to read comma separated data from diskCalculator - C++ operator-overloadingSelecting results as a comma-separated stringCreating an istream peekerCustomized streambuffer for C++ istreamC++ operator overloading for matrix operationsC++ operator overloading for matrix operations - follow-upEncapsulation preserving operator= overloading in C++Operator Overloading Tricks in C++C++ Read istream into string with exceptions

Closest Prime Number

Proof of work - lottery approach

Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

How did Arya survive the stabbing?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

Why are there no referendums in the US?

Do the temporary hit points from Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

Type int? vs type int

Pole-zeros of a real-valued causal FIR system

Risk of infection at the gym?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Go Pregnant or Go Home

Fastening aluminum fascia to wooden subfascia

How to pronounce the slash sign

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

How does the UK government determine the size of a mandate?

Is this version of a gravity generator feasible?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Detecting if an element is found inside a container

Balance Issues for a Custom Sorcerer Variant



Overloading istream>> to read comma-separated input


Class to read comma separated data from diskCalculator - C++ operator-overloadingSelecting results as a comma-separated stringCreating an istream peekerCustomized streambuffer for C++ istreamC++ operator overloading for matrix operationsC++ operator overloading for matrix operations - follow-upEncapsulation preserving operator= overloading in C++Operator Overloading Tricks in C++C++ Read istream into string with exceptions













6












$begingroup$


I have the following very simple class:



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, accusation&);
;


I have overloaded my extraction from istream operator as follows:



std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& readable)

std::vector<std::string> accusation;
std::string token, word;
//divide by commas
while (std::getline(is, token, ','))

std::string pushable;
std::stringstream ss(token);
while (ss >> word) pushable += word + " ";
if (pushable.size() != 0) pushable.pop_back(); //remove that last white space
std::transform(pushable.begin(), pushable.end(), pushable.begin(), ::tolower);
accusation.push_back(pushable);

if (accusation.size() == 3)

is.clear();
bool valid false ;
//check it matches one of the clue::characters
for (const auto& character : clue::characters)
if (accusation[0] == character)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::weapons
for (const auto& weapon : clue::weapons)
if (accusation[1] == weapon)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::places
for (const auto& place : clue::places)
if (accusation[2] == place)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

readable.murderer = accusation[0];
readable.weapon = accusation[1];
readable.place = accusation[2];

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);
return is;



I am reading input as green, dagger, kitchen and storing it in my accusation. The first element has to be in clue::characters (an array of possible game characters), second element in clue::weapons, and third element in clue::places.



Can somebody suggest a cleaner way to overload this operator? The code works as expected, but I believe that there is a lot of space for improvements. Any push into the right direction is highly appreciated.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
    $endgroup$
    – 422_unprocessable_entity
    7 hours ago















6












$begingroup$


I have the following very simple class:



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, accusation&);
;


I have overloaded my extraction from istream operator as follows:



std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& readable)

std::vector<std::string> accusation;
std::string token, word;
//divide by commas
while (std::getline(is, token, ','))

std::string pushable;
std::stringstream ss(token);
while (ss >> word) pushable += word + " ";
if (pushable.size() != 0) pushable.pop_back(); //remove that last white space
std::transform(pushable.begin(), pushable.end(), pushable.begin(), ::tolower);
accusation.push_back(pushable);

if (accusation.size() == 3)

is.clear();
bool valid false ;
//check it matches one of the clue::characters
for (const auto& character : clue::characters)
if (accusation[0] == character)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::weapons
for (const auto& weapon : clue::weapons)
if (accusation[1] == weapon)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::places
for (const auto& place : clue::places)
if (accusation[2] == place)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

readable.murderer = accusation[0];
readable.weapon = accusation[1];
readable.place = accusation[2];

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);
return is;



I am reading input as green, dagger, kitchen and storing it in my accusation. The first element has to be in clue::characters (an array of possible game characters), second element in clue::weapons, and third element in clue::places.



Can somebody suggest a cleaner way to overload this operator? The code works as expected, but I believe that there is a lot of space for improvements. Any push into the right direction is highly appreciated.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
    $endgroup$
    – 422_unprocessable_entity
    7 hours ago













6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


I have the following very simple class:



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, accusation&);
;


I have overloaded my extraction from istream operator as follows:



std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& readable)

std::vector<std::string> accusation;
std::string token, word;
//divide by commas
while (std::getline(is, token, ','))

std::string pushable;
std::stringstream ss(token);
while (ss >> word) pushable += word + " ";
if (pushable.size() != 0) pushable.pop_back(); //remove that last white space
std::transform(pushable.begin(), pushable.end(), pushable.begin(), ::tolower);
accusation.push_back(pushable);

if (accusation.size() == 3)

is.clear();
bool valid false ;
//check it matches one of the clue::characters
for (const auto& character : clue::characters)
if (accusation[0] == character)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::weapons
for (const auto& weapon : clue::weapons)
if (accusation[1] == weapon)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::places
for (const auto& place : clue::places)
if (accusation[2] == place)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

readable.murderer = accusation[0];
readable.weapon = accusation[1];
readable.place = accusation[2];

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);
return is;



I am reading input as green, dagger, kitchen and storing it in my accusation. The first element has to be in clue::characters (an array of possible game characters), second element in clue::weapons, and third element in clue::places.



Can somebody suggest a cleaner way to overload this operator? The code works as expected, but I believe that there is a lot of space for improvements. Any push into the right direction is highly appreciated.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have the following very simple class:



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream&, accusation&);
;


I have overloaded my extraction from istream operator as follows:



std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& readable)

std::vector<std::string> accusation;
std::string token, word;
//divide by commas
while (std::getline(is, token, ','))

std::string pushable;
std::stringstream ss(token);
while (ss >> word) pushable += word + " ";
if (pushable.size() != 0) pushable.pop_back(); //remove that last white space
std::transform(pushable.begin(), pushable.end(), pushable.begin(), ::tolower);
accusation.push_back(pushable);

if (accusation.size() == 3)

is.clear();
bool valid false ;
//check it matches one of the clue::characters
for (const auto& character : clue::characters)
if (accusation[0] == character)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::weapons
for (const auto& weapon : clue::weapons)
if (accusation[1] == weapon)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

valid = false;
//check it matches one of the clue::places
for (const auto& place : clue::places)
if (accusation[2] == place)

valid = true;
break;

if (valid)

readable.murderer = accusation[0];
readable.weapon = accusation[1];
readable.place = accusation[2];

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);

else
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);
return is;



I am reading input as green, dagger, kitchen and storing it in my accusation. The first element has to be in clue::characters (an array of possible game characters), second element in clue::weapons, and third element in clue::places.



Can somebody suggest a cleaner way to overload this operator? The code works as expected, but I believe that there is a lot of space for improvements. Any push into the right direction is highly appreciated.







c++ beginner parsing stream overloading






share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







Daniel Duque













New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Daniel DuqueDaniel Duque

484




484




New contributor




Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Daniel Duque is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
    $endgroup$
    – 422_unprocessable_entity
    7 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
    $endgroup$
    – 422_unprocessable_entity
    7 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
$endgroup$
– 422_unprocessable_entity
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to CR, Could you please change the title to show the requirement from business/exercise point of view rather than your concerns. Concerns should go into the body of the question. :)
$endgroup$
– 422_unprocessable_entity
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

95 percent of programming is looking for redundancies and eliminating them.



For example, why do you bother with reading strings into accusations[] first, and then later copying them into readable.murderer et cetera? Why not just read them directly into readable.murderer? This would have the bonus of eliminating those "magic number" indices 0, 1, and 2, and replacing them with readable (no pun intended) identifiers.



std::getline(is, readable.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.place, ','); // shouldn't this last one be 'n' not ','?


You should test your code and see if it does what you wanted.



std::istringstream iss(
"Mr Green, lead pipe, conservatoryn"
"Mrs Peacock, noose, kitchen"
);
accusation acc;
iss >> acc;


This reads 5 items into accusation. Is this what you wanted to happen?




Reduce repetition. You have the following snippet repeated three times:



 for (const auto& THING : THINGS)
if (accusation[INDEX] == THING)

valid = true;
break;



So, first of all, we wrap the loop body in curly braces to protect against goto fail; and then we factor it out into a function.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
for (auto&& elt : vec)
if (elt == value)
return true;


return false;



And then our main function's code can become simply



bool valid = vector_contains(clue::characters, readable.murderer)
&& vector_contains(clue::weapons, readable.weapon)
&& vector_contains(clue::places, readable.place);
if (!valid)
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);




The body of vector_contains could also be implemented simply by using an STL algorithm, e.g.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value);



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::find(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value) != vec.end();



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&](const auto& elt)
return elt == value;
);



I named the function vector_contains, rather than simply contains, because in my estimation there is a very real possibility that C++2a might add std::contains to the library and thus break any code using ADL calls to contains.




Minor nits:



  • I strongly recommend making all your constructors explicit, to eliminate bugs from unintentional implicit conversions. (Yes, even your multi-argument constructors.)


  • I strongly recommend making operator>> and operator<< into inline friend functions — define them right inside the body of your class. This will make them findable only via ADL, and is generally what you want. It'll look a lot more reasonable, too, once you've refactored your operator>> to be only five or six lines long! :)



You're also doing something weird with stringstream to remove whitespace from the ends of each piece of the string. You should factor that out into a helper function, and then simplify it. Say,



std::string strip(const std::string& s)

int i = 0;
while (isspace(s[i])) ++i;
int j = s.size();
while (j >= 1 && isspace(s[j-1])) --j;
return s.substr(i, j-i);



https://wandbox.org/permlink/uVSolN0Nepk48Mgm



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
explicit accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& a)
std::getline(is, a.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, a.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, a.place);
if (!vector_contains(clue::characters, a.murderer)
;


Deciding whether your std::transform lowercasing should be removed, kept, or folded into the helper function vector_contains (renaming that function to indicate its new purpose, and using a non-mutating facility such as strcasecmp) is left as an exercise for the reader.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Duque
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – Quuxplusone
    5 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Daniel Duque is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216343%2foverloading-istream-to-read-comma-separated-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

95 percent of programming is looking for redundancies and eliminating them.



For example, why do you bother with reading strings into accusations[] first, and then later copying them into readable.murderer et cetera? Why not just read them directly into readable.murderer? This would have the bonus of eliminating those "magic number" indices 0, 1, and 2, and replacing them with readable (no pun intended) identifiers.



std::getline(is, readable.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.place, ','); // shouldn't this last one be 'n' not ','?


You should test your code and see if it does what you wanted.



std::istringstream iss(
"Mr Green, lead pipe, conservatoryn"
"Mrs Peacock, noose, kitchen"
);
accusation acc;
iss >> acc;


This reads 5 items into accusation. Is this what you wanted to happen?




Reduce repetition. You have the following snippet repeated three times:



 for (const auto& THING : THINGS)
if (accusation[INDEX] == THING)

valid = true;
break;



So, first of all, we wrap the loop body in curly braces to protect against goto fail; and then we factor it out into a function.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
for (auto&& elt : vec)
if (elt == value)
return true;


return false;



And then our main function's code can become simply



bool valid = vector_contains(clue::characters, readable.murderer)
&& vector_contains(clue::weapons, readable.weapon)
&& vector_contains(clue::places, readable.place);
if (!valid)
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);




The body of vector_contains could also be implemented simply by using an STL algorithm, e.g.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value);



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::find(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value) != vec.end();



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&](const auto& elt)
return elt == value;
);



I named the function vector_contains, rather than simply contains, because in my estimation there is a very real possibility that C++2a might add std::contains to the library and thus break any code using ADL calls to contains.




Minor nits:



  • I strongly recommend making all your constructors explicit, to eliminate bugs from unintentional implicit conversions. (Yes, even your multi-argument constructors.)


  • I strongly recommend making operator>> and operator<< into inline friend functions — define them right inside the body of your class. This will make them findable only via ADL, and is generally what you want. It'll look a lot more reasonable, too, once you've refactored your operator>> to be only five or six lines long! :)



You're also doing something weird with stringstream to remove whitespace from the ends of each piece of the string. You should factor that out into a helper function, and then simplify it. Say,



std::string strip(const std::string& s)

int i = 0;
while (isspace(s[i])) ++i;
int j = s.size();
while (j >= 1 && isspace(s[j-1])) --j;
return s.substr(i, j-i);



https://wandbox.org/permlink/uVSolN0Nepk48Mgm



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
explicit accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& a)
std::getline(is, a.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, a.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, a.place);
if (!vector_contains(clue::characters, a.murderer)
;


Deciding whether your std::transform lowercasing should be removed, kept, or folded into the helper function vector_contains (renaming that function to indicate its new purpose, and using a non-mutating facility such as strcasecmp) is left as an exercise for the reader.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Duque
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – Quuxplusone
    5 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$

95 percent of programming is looking for redundancies and eliminating them.



For example, why do you bother with reading strings into accusations[] first, and then later copying them into readable.murderer et cetera? Why not just read them directly into readable.murderer? This would have the bonus of eliminating those "magic number" indices 0, 1, and 2, and replacing them with readable (no pun intended) identifiers.



std::getline(is, readable.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.place, ','); // shouldn't this last one be 'n' not ','?


You should test your code and see if it does what you wanted.



std::istringstream iss(
"Mr Green, lead pipe, conservatoryn"
"Mrs Peacock, noose, kitchen"
);
accusation acc;
iss >> acc;


This reads 5 items into accusation. Is this what you wanted to happen?




Reduce repetition. You have the following snippet repeated three times:



 for (const auto& THING : THINGS)
if (accusation[INDEX] == THING)

valid = true;
break;



So, first of all, we wrap the loop body in curly braces to protect against goto fail; and then we factor it out into a function.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
for (auto&& elt : vec)
if (elt == value)
return true;


return false;



And then our main function's code can become simply



bool valid = vector_contains(clue::characters, readable.murderer)
&& vector_contains(clue::weapons, readable.weapon)
&& vector_contains(clue::places, readable.place);
if (!valid)
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);




The body of vector_contains could also be implemented simply by using an STL algorithm, e.g.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value);



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::find(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value) != vec.end();



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&](const auto& elt)
return elt == value;
);



I named the function vector_contains, rather than simply contains, because in my estimation there is a very real possibility that C++2a might add std::contains to the library and thus break any code using ADL calls to contains.




Minor nits:



  • I strongly recommend making all your constructors explicit, to eliminate bugs from unintentional implicit conversions. (Yes, even your multi-argument constructors.)


  • I strongly recommend making operator>> and operator<< into inline friend functions — define them right inside the body of your class. This will make them findable only via ADL, and is generally what you want. It'll look a lot more reasonable, too, once you've refactored your operator>> to be only five or six lines long! :)



You're also doing something weird with stringstream to remove whitespace from the ends of each piece of the string. You should factor that out into a helper function, and then simplify it. Say,



std::string strip(const std::string& s)

int i = 0;
while (isspace(s[i])) ++i;
int j = s.size();
while (j >= 1 && isspace(s[j-1])) --j;
return s.substr(i, j-i);



https://wandbox.org/permlink/uVSolN0Nepk48Mgm



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
explicit accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& a)
std::getline(is, a.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, a.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, a.place);
if (!vector_contains(clue::characters, a.murderer)
;


Deciding whether your std::transform lowercasing should be removed, kept, or folded into the helper function vector_contains (renaming that function to indicate its new purpose, and using a non-mutating facility such as strcasecmp) is left as an exercise for the reader.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Duque
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – Quuxplusone
    5 hours ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$

95 percent of programming is looking for redundancies and eliminating them.



For example, why do you bother with reading strings into accusations[] first, and then later copying them into readable.murderer et cetera? Why not just read them directly into readable.murderer? This would have the bonus of eliminating those "magic number" indices 0, 1, and 2, and replacing them with readable (no pun intended) identifiers.



std::getline(is, readable.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.place, ','); // shouldn't this last one be 'n' not ','?


You should test your code and see if it does what you wanted.



std::istringstream iss(
"Mr Green, lead pipe, conservatoryn"
"Mrs Peacock, noose, kitchen"
);
accusation acc;
iss >> acc;


This reads 5 items into accusation. Is this what you wanted to happen?




Reduce repetition. You have the following snippet repeated three times:



 for (const auto& THING : THINGS)
if (accusation[INDEX] == THING)

valid = true;
break;



So, first of all, we wrap the loop body in curly braces to protect against goto fail; and then we factor it out into a function.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
for (auto&& elt : vec)
if (elt == value)
return true;


return false;



And then our main function's code can become simply



bool valid = vector_contains(clue::characters, readable.murderer)
&& vector_contains(clue::weapons, readable.weapon)
&& vector_contains(clue::places, readable.place);
if (!valid)
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);




The body of vector_contains could also be implemented simply by using an STL algorithm, e.g.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value);



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::find(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value) != vec.end();



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&](const auto& elt)
return elt == value;
);



I named the function vector_contains, rather than simply contains, because in my estimation there is a very real possibility that C++2a might add std::contains to the library and thus break any code using ADL calls to contains.




Minor nits:



  • I strongly recommend making all your constructors explicit, to eliminate bugs from unintentional implicit conversions. (Yes, even your multi-argument constructors.)


  • I strongly recommend making operator>> and operator<< into inline friend functions — define them right inside the body of your class. This will make them findable only via ADL, and is generally what you want. It'll look a lot more reasonable, too, once you've refactored your operator>> to be only five or six lines long! :)



You're also doing something weird with stringstream to remove whitespace from the ends of each piece of the string. You should factor that out into a helper function, and then simplify it. Say,



std::string strip(const std::string& s)

int i = 0;
while (isspace(s[i])) ++i;
int j = s.size();
while (j >= 1 && isspace(s[j-1])) --j;
return s.substr(i, j-i);



https://wandbox.org/permlink/uVSolN0Nepk48Mgm



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
explicit accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& a)
std::getline(is, a.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, a.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, a.place);
if (!vector_contains(clue::characters, a.murderer)
;


Deciding whether your std::transform lowercasing should be removed, kept, or folded into the helper function vector_contains (renaming that function to indicate its new purpose, and using a non-mutating facility such as strcasecmp) is left as an exercise for the reader.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



95 percent of programming is looking for redundancies and eliminating them.



For example, why do you bother with reading strings into accusations[] first, and then later copying them into readable.murderer et cetera? Why not just read them directly into readable.murderer? This would have the bonus of eliminating those "magic number" indices 0, 1, and 2, and replacing them with readable (no pun intended) identifiers.



std::getline(is, readable.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, readable.place, ','); // shouldn't this last one be 'n' not ','?


You should test your code and see if it does what you wanted.



std::istringstream iss(
"Mr Green, lead pipe, conservatoryn"
"Mrs Peacock, noose, kitchen"
);
accusation acc;
iss >> acc;


This reads 5 items into accusation. Is this what you wanted to happen?




Reduce repetition. You have the following snippet repeated three times:



 for (const auto& THING : THINGS)
if (accusation[INDEX] == THING)

valid = true;
break;



So, first of all, we wrap the loop body in curly braces to protect against goto fail; and then we factor it out into a function.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
for (auto&& elt : vec)
if (elt == value)
return true;


return false;



And then our main function's code can become simply



bool valid = vector_contains(clue::characters, readable.murderer)
&& vector_contains(clue::weapons, readable.weapon)
&& vector_contains(clue::places, readable.place);
if (!valid)
is.setstate(std::ios_base::failbit);




The body of vector_contains could also be implemented simply by using an STL algorithm, e.g.



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value);



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::find(vec.begin(), vec.end(), value) != vec.end();



or



template<class T>
bool vector_contains(const std::vector<T>& vec, const T& value)
return std::any_of(vec.begin(), vec.end(), [&](const auto& elt)
return elt == value;
);



I named the function vector_contains, rather than simply contains, because in my estimation there is a very real possibility that C++2a might add std::contains to the library and thus break any code using ADL calls to contains.




Minor nits:



  • I strongly recommend making all your constructors explicit, to eliminate bugs from unintentional implicit conversions. (Yes, even your multi-argument constructors.)


  • I strongly recommend making operator>> and operator<< into inline friend functions — define them right inside the body of your class. This will make them findable only via ADL, and is generally what you want. It'll look a lot more reasonable, too, once you've refactored your operator>> to be only five or six lines long! :)



You're also doing something weird with stringstream to remove whitespace from the ends of each piece of the string. You should factor that out into a helper function, and then simplify it. Say,



std::string strip(const std::string& s)

int i = 0;
while (isspace(s[i])) ++i;
int j = s.size();
while (j >= 1 && isspace(s[j-1])) --j;
return s.substr(i, j-i);



https://wandbox.org/permlink/uVSolN0Nepk48Mgm



class accusation

private:
std::string murderer;
std::string weapon;
std::string place;
public:
accusation() = default;
explicit accusation(std::string, std::string, std::string);
friend std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream&, const accusation&);
friend std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& is, accusation& a)
std::getline(is, a.murderer, ',');
std::getline(is, a.weapon, ',');
std::getline(is, a.place);
if (!vector_contains(clue::characters, a.murderer)
;


Deciding whether your std::transform lowercasing should be removed, kept, or folded into the helper function vector_contains (renaming that function to indicate its new purpose, and using a non-mutating facility such as strcasecmp) is left as an exercise for the reader.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









QuuxplusoneQuuxplusone

12.8k12062




12.8k12062











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Duque
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – Quuxplusone
    5 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Duque
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – Quuxplusone
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Duque
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks for all your feedback, it has been very eye-opening reading all your suggestions. Regarding your 'strip' function, it only removes white spaces from the beginning and the end of a string; opposed to what I was doing which deleted extra white space between words as well. Nevertheless I get your point, and will improve my code from all your suggestions.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Duque
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
$endgroup$
– Quuxplusone
5 hours ago





$begingroup$
Given that you made mr green acceptable as a synonym for Mr Green, maybe you should consider whether mrgreen should be acceptable as well. Then you wouldn't even need to remove spaces; you could just write a non-mutating string comparison, similar to strcasecmp, that ignores all whitespace too. Personally, I would go the other direction and force the user to enter Mr Green using that one exact spelling, to increase simplicity and ease-of-teaching-the-interface. If you do want to do clever fuzzy matching, look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_string_matching for ideas.
$endgroup$
– Quuxplusone
5 hours ago











Daniel Duque is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Daniel Duque is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Daniel Duque is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Daniel Duque is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216343%2foverloading-istream-to-read-comma-separated-input%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe

Dokschytsy (Steed) Kwelen | NawigatsjuunBelarus: Vitebsk Region, citypopulation.de