Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active

Is it true that four-wheel drive is less efficient and if so, why?

Is it possible for a PC to dismember a humanoid?

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

What historical events would have to change in order to make 19th century "steampunk" technology possible?

What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Expand and Contract

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

How can the positive/negative planes be described?

Why was the shrinking from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)?

Will a Schottky diode save my LEDs against reversed voltage?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

In 'Revenger,' what does 'cove' come from?

Replacing legend item names in Carto VL

What exactly is ineptocracy?

What's the in-universe reasoning behind sorcerers needing material components?

Where to include php files in wordpress and how to refer to them later



Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?


Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active













10















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    8 hours ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    7 hours ago















10















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    8 hours ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    7 hours ago













10












10








10


2






I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question
















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.







c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









max66

38.8k74473




38.8k74473










asked 9 hours ago









NoSenseEtAlNoSenseEtAl

7,7011677184




7,7011677184







  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    8 hours ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    7 hours ago












  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    8 hours ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    7 hours ago







1




1





What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

– Max Langhof
8 hours ago






What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

– Max Langhof
8 hours ago














I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

– NoSenseEtAl
7 hours ago





I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

– NoSenseEtAl
7 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9















Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



Follows an example



#include <type_traits>

template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;

constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;

int main()

auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    7 hours ago



















4














Yet another simpler option:



#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...



The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






share|improve this answer

























  • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago












  • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    5 hours ago











  • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago






  • 3





    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    3 hours ago












  • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    3 hours ago



















3














#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

else

std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)

std::cout <<t << " foo n";


void fooi(const int& t)

std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);

Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);


// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      7 hours ago
















    9















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      7 hours ago














    9












    9








    9








    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer
















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 7 hours ago









    max66max66

    38.8k74473




    38.8k74473







    • 1





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      7 hours ago













    • 1





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      7 hours ago








    1




    1





    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    7 hours ago






    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    7 hours ago














    4














    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      5 hours ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago






    • 3





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      3 hours ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      3 hours ago
















    4














    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      5 hours ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago






    • 3





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      3 hours ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      3 hours ago














    4












    4








    4







    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer















    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 6 hours ago









    olivecoderolivecoder

    2,0681215




    2,0681215












    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      5 hours ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago






    • 3





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      3 hours ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      3 hours ago


















    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      5 hours ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      5 hours ago






    • 3





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      3 hours ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      3 hours ago

















    Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago






    Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago














    @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    5 hours ago





    @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    5 hours ago













    Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago





    Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    5 hours ago




    3




    3





    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    3 hours ago






    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    3 hours ago














    Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    3 hours ago






    Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    3 hours ago












    3














    #include <variant>
    #include <string>
    #include <iostream>

    template <class U, typename T = void>
    struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

    template <typename U>
    struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

    template <typename U>
    struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


    template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

    template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

    template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

    template <typename F>
    decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

    template <typename T>
    using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

    std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

    using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
    if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

    std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
    return;

    v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

    else

    std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





    template <class T>
    void foo(const T& t)

    std::cout <<t << " foo n";


    void fooi(const int& t)

    std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


    int main()
    Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
    Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
    Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
    Visit(foo<int>);

    Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
    Visit(fooi);


    // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



    I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



    I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      #include <variant>
      #include <string>
      #include <iostream>

      template <class U, typename T = void>
      struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

      template <typename U>
      struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

      template <typename U>
      struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


      template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

      template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

      template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

      template <typename F>
      decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

      template <typename T>
      using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

      std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


      template <typename V>
      void Visit(V v)
      if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

      using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
      if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

      std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
      return;

      v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

      else

      std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





      template <class T>
      void foo(const T& t)

      std::cout <<t << " foo n";


      void fooi(const int& t)

      std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


      int main()
      Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
      Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
      Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
      Visit(foo<int>);

      Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
      Visit(fooi);


      // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



      I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



      I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        #include <variant>
        #include <string>
        #include <iostream>

        template <class U, typename T = void>
        struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


        template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

        template <typename F>
        decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

        template <typename T>
        using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

        std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


        template <typename V>
        void Visit(V v)
        if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

        using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
        if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

        std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
        return;

        v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

        else

        std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





        template <class T>
        void foo(const T& t)

        std::cout <<t << " foo n";


        void fooi(const int& t)

        std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


        int main()
        Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
        Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
        Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
        Visit(foo<int>);

        Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
        Visit(fooi);


        // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



        I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



        I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






        share|improve this answer













        #include <variant>
        #include <string>
        #include <iostream>

        template <class U, typename T = void>
        struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


        template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

        template <typename F>
        decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

        template <typename T>
        using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

        std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


        template <typename V>
        void Visit(V v)
        if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

        using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
        if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

        std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
        return;

        v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

        else

        std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





        template <class T>
        void foo(const T& t)

        std::cout <<t << " foo n";


        void fooi(const int& t)

        std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


        int main()
        Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
        Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
        Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
        Visit(foo<int>);

        Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
        Visit(fooi);


        // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



        I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



        I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        Martin mMartin m

        885




        885



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

            How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?How to convey the scale of my humanoid without science or units?How does the “space drive” conserve momentum?Planet Vanishes - How does this affect the orbiting starships?How does a community of a Universe Simulator have the same language as its creator?How would US Presidential elections be affected if voters could choose the state their vote for President was counted in?How Does One Ensures the Immortality of Their ConsciousnessHow do I retain national independence while also having a one world government?How can Ganymede have an Earth-like gravity without us having realized it?How would one make a lion mount for a fantasy world?