Assassin's bullet with mercuryEnergy based artillery style weapons?Semiliquid atmosphere - Is my premise/conclusions correct; and will it get the result I want?Culture and law if humans evolved with the ability to manipulate the four classical elements (to an extent)?Sword with mercury coreRealistic fantasy slimesWhat conditions would support mercury as bodily fluid?Making a slow orbit around a large gas giantCreating a steampunk-esque/cybernetic “Big Iron” revolverCan biological material be magnetic?Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

How can I determine if the org that I'm currently connected to is a scratch org?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

What does “the session was packed” mean in this context?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?

How to tell a function to use the default argument values?

Ambiguity in the definition of entropy

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

What does the expression "A Mann!" means

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Reverse dictionary where values are lists

Why is this clock signal connected to a capacitor to gnd?

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

When is человек used as the word man instead of человек

Avoiding direct proof while writing proof by induction

Short story with a alien planet, government officials must wear exploding medallions

Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures

Cursor Replacement for Newbies

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?



Assassin's bullet with mercury


Energy based artillery style weapons?Semiliquid atmosphere - Is my premise/conclusions correct; and will it get the result I want?Culture and law if humans evolved with the ability to manipulate the four classical elements (to an extent)?Sword with mercury coreRealistic fantasy slimesWhat conditions would support mercury as bodily fluid?Making a slow orbit around a large gas giantCreating a steampunk-esque/cybernetic “Big Iron” revolverCan biological material be magnetic?Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible?













7












$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    5 hours ago















7












$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    5 hours ago













7












7








7





$begingroup$


This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.



And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.







science-based chemistry assassination






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Nathan HoppNathan Hopp

2811211




2811211







  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    5 hours ago












  • 18




    $begingroup$
    Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
    $endgroup$
    – Gryphon
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
    $endgroup$
    – nzaman
    8 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    6 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
    $endgroup$
    – Cadence
    5 hours ago







18




18




$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
8 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
8 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
7 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
6 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
5 hours ago










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

No.



If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.



If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.



If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
    $endgroup$
    – Mazura
    2 hours ago


















6












$begingroup$

Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Zeiss Ikon
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
    $endgroup$
    – Blckknght
    5 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$

No.



Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



Edited due to being wrong all over.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
    $endgroup$
    – Brythan
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    6 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.



If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream. Especially if they are wearing body armor.



Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is pretty much guaranteed to quickly bleed out and die.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



    This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



    You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.



      If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        -1












        $begingroup$

        Mercury



        Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



        Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



        In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



        • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          8 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
          $endgroup$
          – Liam Morris
          6 hours ago











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8












        $begingroup$

        No.



        If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.



        If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.



        If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
          $endgroup$
          – Mazura
          2 hours ago















        8












        $begingroup$

        No.



        If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.



        If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.



        If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
          $endgroup$
          – Mazura
          2 hours ago













        8












        8








        8





        $begingroup$

        No.



        If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.



        If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.



        If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        No.



        If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.



        If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.



        If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        AlexanderAlexander

        21.7k53485




        21.7k53485











        • $begingroup$
          I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
          $endgroup$
          – Mazura
          2 hours ago
















        • $begingroup$
          I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
          $endgroup$
          – Mazura
          2 hours ago















        $begingroup$
        I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
        $endgroup$
        – Mazura
        2 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
        $endgroup$
        – Mazura
        2 hours ago











        6












        $begingroup$

        Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



        On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



        Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 3




          $begingroup$
          Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
          $endgroup$
          – Blckknght
          5 hours ago















        6












        $begingroup$

        Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



        On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



        Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 3




          $begingroup$
          Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
          $endgroup$
          – Blckknght
          5 hours ago













        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



        On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



        Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.



        On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.



        Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago









        Brythan

        20.9k74286




        20.9k74286










        answered 8 hours ago









        Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

        2,304116




        2,304116







        • 3




          $begingroup$
          Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
          $endgroup$
          – Blckknght
          5 hours ago












        • 3




          $begingroup$
          Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
          $endgroup$
          – Starfish Prime
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeiss Ikon
          7 hours ago






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
          $endgroup$
          – Blckknght
          5 hours ago







        3




        3




        $begingroup$
        Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        7 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        7 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        7 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        7 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        7 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        7 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        7 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
        $endgroup$
        – Zeiss Ikon
        7 hours ago




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
        $endgroup$
        – Blckknght
        5 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
        $endgroup$
        – Blckknght
        5 hours ago











        5












        $begingroup$

        No.



        Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



        This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



        To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



        Edited due to being wrong all over.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 3




          $begingroup$
          How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
          $endgroup$
          – Brythan
          7 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
          $endgroup$
          – Spehro Pefhany
          6 hours ago
















        5












        $begingroup$

        No.



        Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



        This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



        To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



        Edited due to being wrong all over.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 3




          $begingroup$
          How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
          $endgroup$
          – Brythan
          7 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
          $endgroup$
          – Spehro Pefhany
          6 hours ago














        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        No.



        Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



        This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



        To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



        Edited due to being wrong all over.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        No.



        Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.



        This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.



        To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.



        Edited due to being wrong all over.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 8 hours ago









        AgrajagAgrajag

        6,68411348




        6,68411348







        • 3




          $begingroup$
          How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
          $endgroup$
          – Brythan
          7 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
          $endgroup$
          – Spehro Pefhany
          6 hours ago













        • 3




          $begingroup$
          How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
          $endgroup$
          – Brythan
          7 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
          $endgroup$
          – Spehro Pefhany
          6 hours ago








        3




        3




        $begingroup$
        How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
        $endgroup$
        – Brythan
        7 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
        $endgroup$
        – Brythan
        7 hours ago




        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
        $endgroup$
        – Spehro Pefhany
        6 hours ago





        $begingroup$
        I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
        $endgroup$
        – Spehro Pefhany
        6 hours ago












        2












        $begingroup$

        While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.



        If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream. Especially if they are wearing body armor.



        Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is pretty much guaranteed to quickly bleed out and die.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          2












          $begingroup$

          While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.



          If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream. Especially if they are wearing body armor.



          Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is pretty much guaranteed to quickly bleed out and die.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.



            If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream. Especially if they are wearing body armor.



            Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is pretty much guaranteed to quickly bleed out and die.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.



            If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream. Especially if they are wearing body armor.



            Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is pretty much guaranteed to quickly bleed out and die.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 4 hours ago









            NosajimikiNosajimiki

            2,342118




            2,342118





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                  This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                  You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                    This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                    You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.



                    This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.



                    You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 7 hours ago









                    Brythan

                    20.9k74286




                    20.9k74286










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    Liam MorrisLiam Morris

                    549214




                    549214





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.



                        If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.



                          If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.



                            If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.



                            If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            SonvarSonvar

                            5947




                            5947





















                                -1












                                $begingroup$

                                Mercury



                                Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                                Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                                In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                                • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  7 hours ago






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  7 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  6 hours ago















                                -1












                                $begingroup$

                                Mercury



                                Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                                Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                                In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                                • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  7 hours ago






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  7 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  6 hours ago













                                -1












                                -1








                                -1





                                $begingroup$

                                Mercury



                                Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                                Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                                In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                                • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm





                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                Mercury



                                Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.



                                Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.



                                In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection. But adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.



                                • https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm






                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered 8 hours ago









                                gwallygwally

                                3,476814




                                3,476814











                                • $begingroup$
                                  Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  7 hours ago






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  7 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  6 hours ago
















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  7 hours ago






                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Zeiss Ikon
                                  7 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Liam Morris
                                  6 hours ago















                                $begingroup$
                                Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Zeiss Ikon
                                8 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Zeiss Ikon
                                8 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Liam Morris
                                7 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                @ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Liam Morris
                                7 hours ago




                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                $endgroup$
                                – Zeiss Ikon
                                7 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
                                $endgroup$
                                – Zeiss Ikon
                                7 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Liam Morris
                                6 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                @ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Liam Morris
                                6 hours ago

















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

                                Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

                                Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe