Can I run a new neutral wire to repair a broken circuit?How can I upgrade a 3 wire appliance receptacle to a 4 wire receptacle?How can I find an open neutral?Contractor cut wire in wall - all still works fine - is this dangerous?Need help troubleshooting dead outletsOutlet w/3 neutrals, 3 hots, 1 ground?Can I connect to a separate neutral (white) wire for my switch/outlet combination?Dead receptacle in the basementMultiple outlets not workingHow can I provide neutral wires for my smart switches?Neutral wire going into panel has ~120 volts on it

Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?

What about the virus in 12 Monkeys?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

What is a romance in Latin?

Is it logically or scientifically possible to artificially send energy to the body?

What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?

How to tell a function to use the default argument values?

Short story with a alien planet, government officials must wear exploding medallions

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

Expand and Contract

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

Valid term from quadratic sequence?

Arrow those variables!

Are there any examples of a variable being normally distributed that is *not* due to the Central Limit Theorem?

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?



Can I run a new neutral wire to repair a broken circuit?


How can I upgrade a 3 wire appliance receptacle to a 4 wire receptacle?How can I find an open neutral?Contractor cut wire in wall - all still works fine - is this dangerous?Need help troubleshooting dead outletsOutlet w/3 neutrals, 3 hots, 1 ground?Can I connect to a separate neutral (white) wire for my switch/outlet combination?Dead receptacle in the basementMultiple outlets not workingHow can I provide neutral wires for my smart switches?Neutral wire going into panel has ~120 volts on it













3















Recently one wall of outlets quit working. Testing shows the hots are all good and the grounds are all good but the neutrals are all dead. They are all connected to each other but somewhere have lost the connection to the panel.



Can I add a neutral from another nearby outlet which will make these outlets work without tearing up the walls to find where the neutral has become disconnected?










share|improve this question









New contributor




James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    Recently one wall of outlets quit working. Testing shows the hots are all good and the grounds are all good but the neutrals are all dead. They are all connected to each other but somewhere have lost the connection to the panel.



    Can I add a neutral from another nearby outlet which will make these outlets work without tearing up the walls to find where the neutral has become disconnected?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3








      Recently one wall of outlets quit working. Testing shows the hots are all good and the grounds are all good but the neutrals are all dead. They are all connected to each other but somewhere have lost the connection to the panel.



      Can I add a neutral from another nearby outlet which will make these outlets work without tearing up the walls to find where the neutral has become disconnected?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Recently one wall of outlets quit working. Testing shows the hots are all good and the grounds are all good but the neutrals are all dead. They are all connected to each other but somewhere have lost the connection to the panel.



      Can I add a neutral from another nearby outlet which will make these outlets work without tearing up the walls to find where the neutral has become disconnected?







      electrical wiring






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      isherwood

      51.1k460130




      51.1k460130






      New contributor




      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 8 hours ago









      James WolfJames Wolf

      161




      161




      New contributor




      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      James Wolf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10














          No, you cannot do this. Assuming the nearby outlet you want to borrow neutral from is on a different circuit, you will be overloading its neutral. Even if it is the same circuit, it's very bad practice to leave broken wiring energized without fixing it -- what if it moves a little and reconnects just enough to arc? Then your house is on fire.



          However, fixing this properly probably isn't as much work as you think. You most likely will not need to tear up your walls. Unless you recently drove a nail through a wire, the wire inside the walls usually doesn't just break. Rather, where things go wrong is at the outlets themselves. The so-called "backstab" outlets are especially prone to having the wires come lose over time. So the fix for this will involve pulling out each outlet in turn, making sure all screws, wirenuts, etc are tight, and ideally replacing any backstabs in the circuit. Most likely you'll find one of the outlets had the white wire come loose, and when you tighten it, everything starts working again.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 4





            The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

            – Ed Beal
            6 hours ago











          • If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

            – JPhi1618
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

            – Nate Strickland
            5 hours ago


















          5














          Absolutely not. That sort of thinking works with safety ground, which does not ever carry current, except during a fault condition (and we hope there aren't 2 independent fault conditions occurring at once).



          However, current flows in loops. Neutral is the normal "return half" of the loop, and it needs to be dedicated to this circuit. In fact, neutrals don't have fuses and rely on the circuit breaker on the hot side to protect the neutral. You can't have two circuits sharing a neutral, or you get this!



          enter image description here




          But there's another problem. This is AC power. It reverses polarity 100/120 times a second, which throws electro-magnetic force into everything around the wires. That's why transformers work. To keep that from causing a lot of problems, we require that all the current that goes out one wire comes back on another in the same cable or conduit. Among the wires, currents are equal and opposite, so their electro-magnetic forces cancel each other out.



          Now, borrowing a neutral means current is now making a big loop - "out" (really, it's AC) this circuit's "hot" wire and returning via another circuit's "neutral" wire. That will throw EMF on both circuits, causing all sorts of mischief - eddy current heating, wire vibration leading to noise and metal fatigue leading to cracking and spot heating, etc. Nope.



          Because of this, all practical wiring is done on a physical "tree" topology -- a branch may "split", but it may never "loop back" onto itself or another branch (except in one particular way, and even then, only in the UK where this is officially sanctioned).




          Now, it can be hard to see when you're not practiced in a field. But this is most likely an easy problem. Wire breaks inside walls are rare. Wire problems are almost always at terminations of the cable run... And by definition, this must occur at either the last working outlet or the first failed outlet in the sequence.



          As Nate discusses in his answer, backstab connections are the usual culprit. You're best changing it to a screw connection, but current Code advises using an $80 torque screwdriver, because "too loose" is more of a problem than "too tight".



          If it's at the service panel, the neutral may go to a neutral bar, or a GFCI or AFCI breaker. Torque matters here too.



          Lastly, if this diagnosis is given you by a 3-light tester, know that some of us call it a "Magic 8-ball" tester. It is made as a pass-fail device for new wiring e.g. During new construction. When troubleshooting old existing work, the legends can be wrong to the point of whimsical. The lights are useful; they save you the trouble of making 3 measurements with a neon tester.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

            – Nate Strickland
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "73"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          James Wolf is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f161304%2fcan-i-run-a-new-neutral-wire-to-repair-a-broken-circuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10














          No, you cannot do this. Assuming the nearby outlet you want to borrow neutral from is on a different circuit, you will be overloading its neutral. Even if it is the same circuit, it's very bad practice to leave broken wiring energized without fixing it -- what if it moves a little and reconnects just enough to arc? Then your house is on fire.



          However, fixing this properly probably isn't as much work as you think. You most likely will not need to tear up your walls. Unless you recently drove a nail through a wire, the wire inside the walls usually doesn't just break. Rather, where things go wrong is at the outlets themselves. The so-called "backstab" outlets are especially prone to having the wires come lose over time. So the fix for this will involve pulling out each outlet in turn, making sure all screws, wirenuts, etc are tight, and ideally replacing any backstabs in the circuit. Most likely you'll find one of the outlets had the white wire come loose, and when you tighten it, everything starts working again.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 4





            The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

            – Ed Beal
            6 hours ago











          • If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

            – JPhi1618
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

            – Nate Strickland
            5 hours ago















          10














          No, you cannot do this. Assuming the nearby outlet you want to borrow neutral from is on a different circuit, you will be overloading its neutral. Even if it is the same circuit, it's very bad practice to leave broken wiring energized without fixing it -- what if it moves a little and reconnects just enough to arc? Then your house is on fire.



          However, fixing this properly probably isn't as much work as you think. You most likely will not need to tear up your walls. Unless you recently drove a nail through a wire, the wire inside the walls usually doesn't just break. Rather, where things go wrong is at the outlets themselves. The so-called "backstab" outlets are especially prone to having the wires come lose over time. So the fix for this will involve pulling out each outlet in turn, making sure all screws, wirenuts, etc are tight, and ideally replacing any backstabs in the circuit. Most likely you'll find one of the outlets had the white wire come loose, and when you tighten it, everything starts working again.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 4





            The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

            – Ed Beal
            6 hours ago











          • If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

            – JPhi1618
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

            – Nate Strickland
            5 hours ago













          10












          10








          10







          No, you cannot do this. Assuming the nearby outlet you want to borrow neutral from is on a different circuit, you will be overloading its neutral. Even if it is the same circuit, it's very bad practice to leave broken wiring energized without fixing it -- what if it moves a little and reconnects just enough to arc? Then your house is on fire.



          However, fixing this properly probably isn't as much work as you think. You most likely will not need to tear up your walls. Unless you recently drove a nail through a wire, the wire inside the walls usually doesn't just break. Rather, where things go wrong is at the outlets themselves. The so-called "backstab" outlets are especially prone to having the wires come lose over time. So the fix for this will involve pulling out each outlet in turn, making sure all screws, wirenuts, etc are tight, and ideally replacing any backstabs in the circuit. Most likely you'll find one of the outlets had the white wire come loose, and when you tighten it, everything starts working again.






          share|improve this answer













          No, you cannot do this. Assuming the nearby outlet you want to borrow neutral from is on a different circuit, you will be overloading its neutral. Even if it is the same circuit, it's very bad practice to leave broken wiring energized without fixing it -- what if it moves a little and reconnects just enough to arc? Then your house is on fire.



          However, fixing this properly probably isn't as much work as you think. You most likely will not need to tear up your walls. Unless you recently drove a nail through a wire, the wire inside the walls usually doesn't just break. Rather, where things go wrong is at the outlets themselves. The so-called "backstab" outlets are especially prone to having the wires come lose over time. So the fix for this will involve pulling out each outlet in turn, making sure all screws, wirenuts, etc are tight, and ideally replacing any backstabs in the circuit. Most likely you'll find one of the outlets had the white wire come loose, and when you tighten it, everything starts working again.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Nate StricklandNate Strickland

          3068




          3068







          • 4





            The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

            – Ed Beal
            6 hours ago











          • If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

            – JPhi1618
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

            – Nate Strickland
            5 hours ago












          • 4





            The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

            – Ed Beal
            6 hours ago











          • If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

            – JPhi1618
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

            – Nate Strickland
            5 hours ago







          4




          4





          The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

          – Ed Beal
          6 hours ago





          The failure is usually at the last working outlet or the first non working outlet. In rare cases where nothing on the circuit works it can be in the panel.

          – Ed Beal
          6 hours ago













          If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

          – JPhi1618
          6 hours ago





          If a breaker was tripping you might think about damage to the wire between boxes more (drove a nail into a wire, etc) but it would be hard for wire damage to result in only a broken neutral. Find all the outlets that do work and start checking them starting with the closest one to the broken outlet.

          – JPhi1618
          6 hours ago




          1




          1





          That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

          – Nate Strickland
          5 hours ago





          That's true; most likely OP can get away with only checking only two outlets IF they know what order the circuit is wired in. However, I still recommend opening them all up since most likely they were all wired at the same time with the same techniques, and if one failed, the others might not be far behind. And that way you don't need to know the circuit order, which most likely OP doesn't.

          – Nate Strickland
          5 hours ago













          5














          Absolutely not. That sort of thinking works with safety ground, which does not ever carry current, except during a fault condition (and we hope there aren't 2 independent fault conditions occurring at once).



          However, current flows in loops. Neutral is the normal "return half" of the loop, and it needs to be dedicated to this circuit. In fact, neutrals don't have fuses and rely on the circuit breaker on the hot side to protect the neutral. You can't have two circuits sharing a neutral, or you get this!



          enter image description here




          But there's another problem. This is AC power. It reverses polarity 100/120 times a second, which throws electro-magnetic force into everything around the wires. That's why transformers work. To keep that from causing a lot of problems, we require that all the current that goes out one wire comes back on another in the same cable or conduit. Among the wires, currents are equal and opposite, so their electro-magnetic forces cancel each other out.



          Now, borrowing a neutral means current is now making a big loop - "out" (really, it's AC) this circuit's "hot" wire and returning via another circuit's "neutral" wire. That will throw EMF on both circuits, causing all sorts of mischief - eddy current heating, wire vibration leading to noise and metal fatigue leading to cracking and spot heating, etc. Nope.



          Because of this, all practical wiring is done on a physical "tree" topology -- a branch may "split", but it may never "loop back" onto itself or another branch (except in one particular way, and even then, only in the UK where this is officially sanctioned).




          Now, it can be hard to see when you're not practiced in a field. But this is most likely an easy problem. Wire breaks inside walls are rare. Wire problems are almost always at terminations of the cable run... And by definition, this must occur at either the last working outlet or the first failed outlet in the sequence.



          As Nate discusses in his answer, backstab connections are the usual culprit. You're best changing it to a screw connection, but current Code advises using an $80 torque screwdriver, because "too loose" is more of a problem than "too tight".



          If it's at the service panel, the neutral may go to a neutral bar, or a GFCI or AFCI breaker. Torque matters here too.



          Lastly, if this diagnosis is given you by a 3-light tester, know that some of us call it a "Magic 8-ball" tester. It is made as a pass-fail device for new wiring e.g. During new construction. When troubleshooting old existing work, the legends can be wrong to the point of whimsical. The lights are useful; they save you the trouble of making 3 measurements with a neon tester.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

            – Nate Strickland
            1 hour ago















          5














          Absolutely not. That sort of thinking works with safety ground, which does not ever carry current, except during a fault condition (and we hope there aren't 2 independent fault conditions occurring at once).



          However, current flows in loops. Neutral is the normal "return half" of the loop, and it needs to be dedicated to this circuit. In fact, neutrals don't have fuses and rely on the circuit breaker on the hot side to protect the neutral. You can't have two circuits sharing a neutral, or you get this!



          enter image description here




          But there's another problem. This is AC power. It reverses polarity 100/120 times a second, which throws electro-magnetic force into everything around the wires. That's why transformers work. To keep that from causing a lot of problems, we require that all the current that goes out one wire comes back on another in the same cable or conduit. Among the wires, currents are equal and opposite, so their electro-magnetic forces cancel each other out.



          Now, borrowing a neutral means current is now making a big loop - "out" (really, it's AC) this circuit's "hot" wire and returning via another circuit's "neutral" wire. That will throw EMF on both circuits, causing all sorts of mischief - eddy current heating, wire vibration leading to noise and metal fatigue leading to cracking and spot heating, etc. Nope.



          Because of this, all practical wiring is done on a physical "tree" topology -- a branch may "split", but it may never "loop back" onto itself or another branch (except in one particular way, and even then, only in the UK where this is officially sanctioned).




          Now, it can be hard to see when you're not practiced in a field. But this is most likely an easy problem. Wire breaks inside walls are rare. Wire problems are almost always at terminations of the cable run... And by definition, this must occur at either the last working outlet or the first failed outlet in the sequence.



          As Nate discusses in his answer, backstab connections are the usual culprit. You're best changing it to a screw connection, but current Code advises using an $80 torque screwdriver, because "too loose" is more of a problem than "too tight".



          If it's at the service panel, the neutral may go to a neutral bar, or a GFCI or AFCI breaker. Torque matters here too.



          Lastly, if this diagnosis is given you by a 3-light tester, know that some of us call it a "Magic 8-ball" tester. It is made as a pass-fail device for new wiring e.g. During new construction. When troubleshooting old existing work, the legends can be wrong to the point of whimsical. The lights are useful; they save you the trouble of making 3 measurements with a neon tester.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

            – Nate Strickland
            1 hour ago













          5












          5








          5







          Absolutely not. That sort of thinking works with safety ground, which does not ever carry current, except during a fault condition (and we hope there aren't 2 independent fault conditions occurring at once).



          However, current flows in loops. Neutral is the normal "return half" of the loop, and it needs to be dedicated to this circuit. In fact, neutrals don't have fuses and rely on the circuit breaker on the hot side to protect the neutral. You can't have two circuits sharing a neutral, or you get this!



          enter image description here




          But there's another problem. This is AC power. It reverses polarity 100/120 times a second, which throws electro-magnetic force into everything around the wires. That's why transformers work. To keep that from causing a lot of problems, we require that all the current that goes out one wire comes back on another in the same cable or conduit. Among the wires, currents are equal and opposite, so their electro-magnetic forces cancel each other out.



          Now, borrowing a neutral means current is now making a big loop - "out" (really, it's AC) this circuit's "hot" wire and returning via another circuit's "neutral" wire. That will throw EMF on both circuits, causing all sorts of mischief - eddy current heating, wire vibration leading to noise and metal fatigue leading to cracking and spot heating, etc. Nope.



          Because of this, all practical wiring is done on a physical "tree" topology -- a branch may "split", but it may never "loop back" onto itself or another branch (except in one particular way, and even then, only in the UK where this is officially sanctioned).




          Now, it can be hard to see when you're not practiced in a field. But this is most likely an easy problem. Wire breaks inside walls are rare. Wire problems are almost always at terminations of the cable run... And by definition, this must occur at either the last working outlet or the first failed outlet in the sequence.



          As Nate discusses in his answer, backstab connections are the usual culprit. You're best changing it to a screw connection, but current Code advises using an $80 torque screwdriver, because "too loose" is more of a problem than "too tight".



          If it's at the service panel, the neutral may go to a neutral bar, or a GFCI or AFCI breaker. Torque matters here too.



          Lastly, if this diagnosis is given you by a 3-light tester, know that some of us call it a "Magic 8-ball" tester. It is made as a pass-fail device for new wiring e.g. During new construction. When troubleshooting old existing work, the legends can be wrong to the point of whimsical. The lights are useful; they save you the trouble of making 3 measurements with a neon tester.






          share|improve this answer















          Absolutely not. That sort of thinking works with safety ground, which does not ever carry current, except during a fault condition (and we hope there aren't 2 independent fault conditions occurring at once).



          However, current flows in loops. Neutral is the normal "return half" of the loop, and it needs to be dedicated to this circuit. In fact, neutrals don't have fuses and rely on the circuit breaker on the hot side to protect the neutral. You can't have two circuits sharing a neutral, or you get this!



          enter image description here




          But there's another problem. This is AC power. It reverses polarity 100/120 times a second, which throws electro-magnetic force into everything around the wires. That's why transformers work. To keep that from causing a lot of problems, we require that all the current that goes out one wire comes back on another in the same cable or conduit. Among the wires, currents are equal and opposite, so their electro-magnetic forces cancel each other out.



          Now, borrowing a neutral means current is now making a big loop - "out" (really, it's AC) this circuit's "hot" wire and returning via another circuit's "neutral" wire. That will throw EMF on both circuits, causing all sorts of mischief - eddy current heating, wire vibration leading to noise and metal fatigue leading to cracking and spot heating, etc. Nope.



          Because of this, all practical wiring is done on a physical "tree" topology -- a branch may "split", but it may never "loop back" onto itself or another branch (except in one particular way, and even then, only in the UK where this is officially sanctioned).




          Now, it can be hard to see when you're not practiced in a field. But this is most likely an easy problem. Wire breaks inside walls are rare. Wire problems are almost always at terminations of the cable run... And by definition, this must occur at either the last working outlet or the first failed outlet in the sequence.



          As Nate discusses in his answer, backstab connections are the usual culprit. You're best changing it to a screw connection, but current Code advises using an $80 torque screwdriver, because "too loose" is more of a problem than "too tight".



          If it's at the service panel, the neutral may go to a neutral bar, or a GFCI or AFCI breaker. Torque matters here too.



          Lastly, if this diagnosis is given you by a 3-light tester, know that some of us call it a "Magic 8-ball" tester. It is made as a pass-fail device for new wiring e.g. During new construction. When troubleshooting old existing work, the legends can be wrong to the point of whimsical. The lights are useful; they save you the trouble of making 3 measurements with a neon tester.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          HarperHarper

          75.5k449151




          75.5k449151












          • Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

            – Nate Strickland
            1 hour ago

















          • Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

            – Nate Strickland
            1 hour ago
















          Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

          – Nate Strickland
          1 hour ago





          Excellent answer as always. The only small quibble is that the cost of torque screwdrivers has come down significantly recently, and decent ones can now be had for ~$45. Though for regular outlets with Cu wire, I feel like "as tight as you can get it" with a regular screwdriver is fine -- it's probably a bit more torque than spec but the screw head will usually strip out long before the wire gets damaged.

          – Nate Strickland
          1 hour ago










          James Wolf is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          James Wolf is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          James Wolf is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          James Wolf is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f161304%2fcan-i-run-a-new-neutral-wire-to-repair-a-broken-circuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

          Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

          Чепеларе Съдържание География | История | Население | Спортни и природни забележителности | Културни и исторически обекти | Религии | Обществени институции | Известни личности | Редовни събития | Галерия | Източници | Литература | Външни препратки | Навигация41°43′23.99″ с. ш. 24°41′09.99″ и. д. / 41.723333° с. ш. 24.686111° и. д.*ЧепелареЧепеларски Linux fest 2002Начало на Зимен сезон 2005/06Национални хайдушки празници „Капитан Петко Войвода“Град ЧепелареЧепеларе – народният ски курортbgrod.orgwww.terranatura.hit.bgСправка за населението на гр. Исперих, общ. Исперих, обл. РазградМузей на родопския карстМузей на спорта и скитеЧепеларебългарскибългарскианглийскитукИстория на градаСки писти в ЧепелареВремето в ЧепелареРадио и телевизия в ЧепелареЧепеларе мами с родопски чар и добри пистиЕвтин туризъм и снежни атракции в ЧепелареМестоположениеИнформация и снимки от музея на родопския карст3D панорами от ЧепелареЧепелареррр