What comes after “octuplet”?What is the polite way to acknowledge a pregnant lady after a long hiatus?Single term to include children from multiple birthsWhich comes first: cat or dog?What is a less ambiguous word for “confuse” in context of describing two similar things?'Before or After' in one wordIs there a word for human litter-mates?What comes after thrice?What is the word for a word that comes at the end of a sentence?Word for “item after next”Word for relationships between triplets“Here comes trouble”: why is not it “Here trouble comes”?What is a sibling that comes long after all the other siblings called?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Does having a TSA Pre-Check member in your flight reservation increase the chances that everyone gets Pre-Check?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Are all species of CANNA edible?

Query about absorption line spectra

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

Customize circled numbers

Transformation of random variables and joint distributions

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

Find last 3 digits of this monster number

Varistor? Purpose and principle

How do I extrude a face to a single vertex

How to color a curve

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Aligning individual characters/glyphs like a monospace font

Translation of Scottish 16th century church stained glass

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

Is a model fitted to data or is data fitted to a model?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?



What comes after “octuplet”?


What is the polite way to acknowledge a pregnant lady after a long hiatus?Single term to include children from multiple birthsWhich comes first: cat or dog?What is a less ambiguous word for “confuse” in context of describing two similar things?'Before or After' in one wordIs there a word for human litter-mates?What comes after thrice?What is the word for a word that comes at the end of a sentence?Word for “item after next”Word for relationships between triplets“Here comes trouble”: why is not it “Here trouble comes”?What is a sibling that comes long after all the other siblings called?













10















After singletons, twins, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets, sextuplets, septuplets, and octuplets, what comes next?










share|improve this question



















  • 22





    Exhaustion, I suspect.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 1:54











  • Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:07






  • 1





    I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:32







  • 2





    The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 3:32











  • @Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 4:34















10















After singletons, twins, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets, sextuplets, septuplets, and octuplets, what comes next?










share|improve this question



















  • 22





    Exhaustion, I suspect.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 1:54











  • Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:07






  • 1





    I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:32







  • 2





    The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 3:32











  • @Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 4:34













10












10








10


1






After singletons, twins, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets, sextuplets, septuplets, and octuplets, what comes next?










share|improve this question
















After singletons, twins, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets, sextuplets, septuplets, and octuplets, what comes next?







single-word-requests nouns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 3 '11 at 19:09







Daniel

















asked Jun 27 '11 at 1:51









DanielDaniel

47.4k60231357




47.4k60231357







  • 22





    Exhaustion, I suspect.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 1:54











  • Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:07






  • 1





    I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:32







  • 2





    The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 3:32











  • @Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 4:34












  • 22





    Exhaustion, I suspect.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 1:54











  • Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:07






  • 1





    I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:32







  • 2





    The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 3:32











  • @Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 4:34







22




22





Exhaustion, I suspect.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 1:54





Exhaustion, I suspect.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 1:54













Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

– Daniel
Jun 27 '11 at 2:07





Which is correct: "decaplet" or "decuplet"?

– Daniel
Jun 27 '11 at 2:07




1




1





I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:32






I assumed "decuplet" at first, then looked at Wikipedia and changed my mind to "decaplet." However, no "real" dictionary within reach (except Wiktionary, which I consider only mildly more reliable than Wikipedia - both incredibly useful, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either one) has an entry for either spelling at all. So... "decaplet", I guess, in the absence of better testimony. ("Decuplet" feels more correct to me, but...)

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:32





2




2





The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 3:32





The word itself doesn't 'really' exist, in part because it has no 'real-world' referents. But this NGram quite clearly shows that decuplet is overwhelmingly prefered. Wikipedia is vulnerable to such howlers because in many cases we're just getting one person's misguided opinion... ngrams.googlelabs.com/…

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 3:32













@Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 4:34





@Fumble - Thank you for that; I'm ashamed of myself for backpedalling.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 4:34










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















13














We don't often need it, but the word is nonuplet.



Next after that comes decuplets, who according to the Guinness Book of World Records were born at Bacacay, Brazil on April 22, 1946. (I must admit I'm somewhat sceptical).



It's hard to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word that probably doesn't make it into many (if any) 'authoritative' dictionaries, but I will just say that - Wikipedia notwithstanding - I don't have much time for decaplets. Here's an NGram showing that not many others do either (in fact, there are 5 instances of decaplet in the NGram corpus, as opposed to 2450 decuplets).






share|improve this answer

























  • I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:25











  • @MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:15











  • I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:26











  • @MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:31






  • 1





    E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 16:04



















2














Nonuplets. There doesn't seem to be any record of decuplets, undecuplets, dodecuplets, etc.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    My goodness; they all died!

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:03











  • In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:08


















1














Next is nonuplets followed by decuplets. I'm pretty sure there are no recorded decuplet births, let alone greater.



Update: After further investigation, I came across this image on Wikimedia Commons:



Undecaplets




"Pregnancy with 11 fetuses (after Paré)." Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) reported the case of an Italian woman, Dorothea, who allegedly gave birth to undecaplets after having given birth to nonuplets. This illustration is a copy of an original by Ambroise Paré from the 1900 edition of Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine by George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle.




Related: The article "Multiple birth" on Wikipedia.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:34






  • 1





    Related question...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:36


















0














Nonuplets (9), decuplets(10), undecuplets(11), duodecuplets(12)
BTW, I'm a fifth grader.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

    – Scott
    14 mins ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31675%2fwhat-comes-after-octuplet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13














We don't often need it, but the word is nonuplet.



Next after that comes decuplets, who according to the Guinness Book of World Records were born at Bacacay, Brazil on April 22, 1946. (I must admit I'm somewhat sceptical).



It's hard to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word that probably doesn't make it into many (if any) 'authoritative' dictionaries, but I will just say that - Wikipedia notwithstanding - I don't have much time for decaplets. Here's an NGram showing that not many others do either (in fact, there are 5 instances of decaplet in the NGram corpus, as opposed to 2450 decuplets).






share|improve this answer

























  • I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:25











  • @MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:15











  • I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:26











  • @MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:31






  • 1





    E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 16:04
















13














We don't often need it, but the word is nonuplet.



Next after that comes decuplets, who according to the Guinness Book of World Records were born at Bacacay, Brazil on April 22, 1946. (I must admit I'm somewhat sceptical).



It's hard to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word that probably doesn't make it into many (if any) 'authoritative' dictionaries, but I will just say that - Wikipedia notwithstanding - I don't have much time for decaplets. Here's an NGram showing that not many others do either (in fact, there are 5 instances of decaplet in the NGram corpus, as opposed to 2450 decuplets).






share|improve this answer

























  • I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:25











  • @MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:15











  • I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:26











  • @MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:31






  • 1





    E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 16:04














13












13








13







We don't often need it, but the word is nonuplet.



Next after that comes decuplets, who according to the Guinness Book of World Records were born at Bacacay, Brazil on April 22, 1946. (I must admit I'm somewhat sceptical).



It's hard to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word that probably doesn't make it into many (if any) 'authoritative' dictionaries, but I will just say that - Wikipedia notwithstanding - I don't have much time for decaplets. Here's an NGram showing that not many others do either (in fact, there are 5 instances of decaplet in the NGram corpus, as opposed to 2450 decuplets).






share|improve this answer















We don't often need it, but the word is nonuplet.



Next after that comes decuplets, who according to the Guinness Book of World Records were born at Bacacay, Brazil on April 22, 1946. (I must admit I'm somewhat sceptical).



It's hard to be dogmatic about the spelling of a word that probably doesn't make it into many (if any) 'authoritative' dictionaries, but I will just say that - Wikipedia notwithstanding - I don't have much time for decaplets. Here's an NGram showing that not many others do either (in fact, there are 5 instances of decaplet in the NGram corpus, as opposed to 2450 decuplets).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 13 at 23:14









Laurel

33.8k667118




33.8k667118










answered Jun 27 '11 at 1:58









FumbleFingersFumbleFingers

120k33245429




120k33245429












  • I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:25











  • @MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:15











  • I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:26











  • @MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:31






  • 1





    E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 16:04


















  • I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:25











  • @MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:15











  • I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:26











  • @MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

    – FumbleFingers
    Jun 27 '11 at 15:31






  • 1





    E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 16:04

















I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:25





I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting!

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:25













@MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 15:15





@MT_Head: I wasn't aware that there'd been even an unofficial sighting of a unicorn, but that doesn't stop us deciding in advance what we'll call it and how we'll spell it, before we actually come across one. :)

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 15:15













I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 15:26





I posted that before the whole kerfuffle of spelling came up; I was simply referring to the fact that I'd never actually heard of a decuplet birth (let alone a "natural" one, without benefit of fertility drugs.)

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 15:26













@MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 15:31





@MT_Head: Yes, I knew. I meant that between us we've nailed the spelling for ten babies. So the current score is Wikipedia:0, EL&U:1.

– FumbleFingers
Jun 27 '11 at 15:31




1




1





E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 16:04






E-L-U! E-L-U! E-L-U! (or for soccer fans, 'Elú, elú, elú elú!')

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 16:04














2














Nonuplets. There doesn't seem to be any record of decuplets, undecuplets, dodecuplets, etc.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    My goodness; they all died!

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:03











  • In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:08















2














Nonuplets. There doesn't seem to be any record of decuplets, undecuplets, dodecuplets, etc.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    My goodness; they all died!

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:03











  • In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:08













2












2








2







Nonuplets. There doesn't seem to be any record of decuplets, undecuplets, dodecuplets, etc.






share|improve this answer















Nonuplets. There doesn't seem to be any record of decuplets, undecuplets, dodecuplets, etc.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 19 at 6:12









sumelic

49.9k8117225




49.9k8117225










answered Jun 27 '11 at 1:56









MT_HeadMT_Head

14.4k13655




14.4k13655







  • 1





    My goodness; they all died!

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:03











  • In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:08












  • 1





    My goodness; they all died!

    – Daniel
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:03











  • In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:08







1




1





My goodness; they all died!

– Daniel
Jun 27 '11 at 2:03





My goodness; they all died!

– Daniel
Jun 27 '11 at 2:03













In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:08





In the natural order of things, they generally would. It's only due to the Miracles of Modern Medicine© that we can have such wonders as OctoMom©.

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:08











1














Next is nonuplets followed by decuplets. I'm pretty sure there are no recorded decuplet births, let alone greater.



Update: After further investigation, I came across this image on Wikimedia Commons:



Undecaplets




"Pregnancy with 11 fetuses (after Paré)." Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) reported the case of an Italian woman, Dorothea, who allegedly gave birth to undecaplets after having given birth to nonuplets. This illustration is a copy of an original by Ambroise Paré from the 1900 edition of Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine by George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle.




Related: The article "Multiple birth" on Wikipedia.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:34






  • 1





    Related question...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:36















1














Next is nonuplets followed by decuplets. I'm pretty sure there are no recorded decuplet births, let alone greater.



Update: After further investigation, I came across this image on Wikimedia Commons:



Undecaplets




"Pregnancy with 11 fetuses (after Paré)." Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) reported the case of an Italian woman, Dorothea, who allegedly gave birth to undecaplets after having given birth to nonuplets. This illustration is a copy of an original by Ambroise Paré from the 1900 edition of Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine by George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle.




Related: The article "Multiple birth" on Wikipedia.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:34






  • 1





    Related question...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:36













1












1








1







Next is nonuplets followed by decuplets. I'm pretty sure there are no recorded decuplet births, let alone greater.



Update: After further investigation, I came across this image on Wikimedia Commons:



Undecaplets




"Pregnancy with 11 fetuses (after Paré)." Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) reported the case of an Italian woman, Dorothea, who allegedly gave birth to undecaplets after having given birth to nonuplets. This illustration is a copy of an original by Ambroise Paré from the 1900 edition of Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine by George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle.




Related: The article "Multiple birth" on Wikipedia.






share|improve this answer















Next is nonuplets followed by decuplets. I'm pretty sure there are no recorded decuplet births, let alone greater.



Update: After further investigation, I came across this image on Wikimedia Commons:



Undecaplets




"Pregnancy with 11 fetuses (after Paré)." Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) reported the case of an Italian woman, Dorothea, who allegedly gave birth to undecaplets after having given birth to nonuplets. This illustration is a copy of an original by Ambroise Paré from the 1900 edition of Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine by George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle.




Related: The article "Multiple birth" on Wikipedia.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jan 19 at 6:14









sumelic

49.9k8117225




49.9k8117225










answered Jun 27 '11 at 2:02









rintaunrintaun

2,81621419




2,81621419







  • 1





    Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:34






  • 1





    Related question...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:36












  • 1





    Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:34






  • 1





    Related question...

    – MT_Head
    Jun 27 '11 at 2:36







1




1





Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:34





Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down...

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:34




1




1





Related question...

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:36





Related question...

– MT_Head
Jun 27 '11 at 2:36











0














Nonuplets (9), decuplets(10), undecuplets(11), duodecuplets(12)
BTW, I'm a fifth grader.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

    – Scott
    14 mins ago















0














Nonuplets (9), decuplets(10), undecuplets(11), duodecuplets(12)
BTW, I'm a fifth grader.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

    – Scott
    14 mins ago













0












0








0







Nonuplets (9), decuplets(10), undecuplets(11), duodecuplets(12)
BTW, I'm a fifth grader.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










Nonuplets (9), decuplets(10), undecuplets(11), duodecuplets(12)
BTW, I'm a fifth grader.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 1 hour ago









user341422user341422

1




1




New contributor




user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user341422 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

    – Scott
    14 mins ago

















  • If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

    – Scott
    14 mins ago
















If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

– Scott
14 mins ago





If you aren't at least 13 years old, you shouldn't be here.

– Scott
14 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31675%2fwhat-comes-after-octuplet%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe