Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Contractible manifold with boundary - is it a disc?Manifolds with two coordinate chartsDoes a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary?If 2-manifolds are homeomorphic and smooth, are they diffeomorphic?Exotic line arrangementsVolume form on a hyperbolic manifold with geodesic boundaryOn compact, orientable 3-manifolds with non-empty boundaryExtension of a group action beyond the boundaryFinding a specific Global Smooth FunctionRemove a disc from a manifold. When is the resulting sphere nullhomotopic?

Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Contractible manifold with boundary - is it a disc?Manifolds with two coordinate chartsDoes a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary?If 2-manifolds are homeomorphic and smooth, are they diffeomorphic?Exotic line arrangementsVolume form on a hyperbolic manifold with geodesic boundaryOn compact, orientable 3-manifolds with non-empty boundaryExtension of a group action beyond the boundaryFinding a specific Global Smooth FunctionRemove a disc from a manifold. When is the resulting sphere nullhomotopic?










2












$begingroup$


Let $M$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ M neq emptyset$, where $circ M$ is the boundary of $M$. Let $N$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ N neq emptyset$ and $bullet M approx bullet N$, where $bullet M$ denotes the interior of $M$ and $approx$ denotes homeomorphic. Does it necessarily hold that $N approx M$?



(I have asked this question before here, but there were no replies.)










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $M$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ M neq emptyset$, where $circ M$ is the boundary of $M$. Let $N$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ N neq emptyset$ and $bullet M approx bullet N$, where $bullet M$ denotes the interior of $M$ and $approx$ denotes homeomorphic. Does it necessarily hold that $N approx M$?



    (I have asked this question before here, but there were no replies.)










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let $M$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ M neq emptyset$, where $circ M$ is the boundary of $M$. Let $N$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ N neq emptyset$ and $bullet M approx bullet N$, where $bullet M$ denotes the interior of $M$ and $approx$ denotes homeomorphic. Does it necessarily hold that $N approx M$?



      (I have asked this question before here, but there were no replies.)










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Let $M$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ M neq emptyset$, where $circ M$ is the boundary of $M$. Let $N$ be a compact connected manifold-with-boundary such that $circ N neq emptyset$ and $bullet M approx bullet N$, where $bullet M$ denotes the interior of $M$ and $approx$ denotes homeomorphic. Does it necessarily hold that $N approx M$?



      (I have asked this question before here, but there were no replies.)







      differential-topology manifolds






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      YCor

      29.1k486140




      29.1k486140






      New contributor




      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      kabakaba

      1111




      1111




      New contributor




      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      kaba is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          No, there are examples detected by Whitehead torsion. If $P$ is a compact connected $(n-1)$-manifold with empty boundary, then (assuming $nge 6$) for every element $tau$ of the Whitehead group of $pi_1(P)$ there is an $h$-cobordism $M$ on $P$ such that $tau$ is the Whitehead torsion of the pair $(M,P)$. The interior of $M$ will be isomorphic to $Ptimesmathbb R$, but if $tau$ is nontrivial then $M$ will not be isomorphic to $Ptimes I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
            $endgroup$
            – kaba
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Goodwillie
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          kaba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328149%2fis-a-manifold-with-boundary-with-given-interior-and-non-empty-boundary-essential%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          No, there are examples detected by Whitehead torsion. If $P$ is a compact connected $(n-1)$-manifold with empty boundary, then (assuming $nge 6$) for every element $tau$ of the Whitehead group of $pi_1(P)$ there is an $h$-cobordism $M$ on $P$ such that $tau$ is the Whitehead torsion of the pair $(M,P)$. The interior of $M$ will be isomorphic to $Ptimesmathbb R$, but if $tau$ is nontrivial then $M$ will not be isomorphic to $Ptimes I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
            $endgroup$
            – kaba
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Goodwillie
            3 hours ago















          8












          $begingroup$

          No, there are examples detected by Whitehead torsion. If $P$ is a compact connected $(n-1)$-manifold with empty boundary, then (assuming $nge 6$) for every element $tau$ of the Whitehead group of $pi_1(P)$ there is an $h$-cobordism $M$ on $P$ such that $tau$ is the Whitehead torsion of the pair $(M,P)$. The interior of $M$ will be isomorphic to $Ptimesmathbb R$, but if $tau$ is nontrivial then $M$ will not be isomorphic to $Ptimes I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
            $endgroup$
            – kaba
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Goodwillie
            3 hours ago













          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          No, there are examples detected by Whitehead torsion. If $P$ is a compact connected $(n-1)$-manifold with empty boundary, then (assuming $nge 6$) for every element $tau$ of the Whitehead group of $pi_1(P)$ there is an $h$-cobordism $M$ on $P$ such that $tau$ is the Whitehead torsion of the pair $(M,P)$. The interior of $M$ will be isomorphic to $Ptimesmathbb R$, but if $tau$ is nontrivial then $M$ will not be isomorphic to $Ptimes I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No, there are examples detected by Whitehead torsion. If $P$ is a compact connected $(n-1)$-manifold with empty boundary, then (assuming $nge 6$) for every element $tau$ of the Whitehead group of $pi_1(P)$ there is an $h$-cobordism $M$ on $P$ such that $tau$ is the Whitehead torsion of the pair $(M,P)$. The interior of $M$ will be isomorphic to $Ptimesmathbb R$, but if $tau$ is nontrivial then $M$ will not be isomorphic to $Ptimes I$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 5 hours ago

























          answered 6 hours ago









          Tom GoodwillieTom Goodwillie

          40.4k3110200




          40.4k3110200











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
            $endgroup$
            – kaba
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Goodwillie
            3 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
            $endgroup$
            – kaba
            4 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Goodwillie
            3 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
          $endgroup$
          – kaba
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you. I do not yet understand the answer; I will have to read about Whitehead torsion tomorrow. Would the same answer apply if $M$ and $N$ were orientable?
          $endgroup$
          – kaba
          4 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
          $endgroup$
          – Tom Goodwillie
          3 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Yes, it has nothing to do with orientability.
          $endgroup$
          – Tom Goodwillie
          3 hours ago










          kaba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          kaba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          kaba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          kaba is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f328149%2fis-a-manifold-with-boundary-with-given-interior-and-non-empty-boundary-essential%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

          How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?How to convey the scale of my humanoid without science or units?How does the “space drive” conserve momentum?Planet Vanishes - How does this affect the orbiting starships?How does a community of a Universe Simulator have the same language as its creator?How would US Presidential elections be affected if voters could choose the state their vote for President was counted in?How Does One Ensures the Immortality of Their ConsciousnessHow do I retain national independence while also having a one world government?How can Ganymede have an Earth-like gravity without us having realized it?How would one make a lion mount for a fantasy world?

          Output visual diagram of pictureASCII-art logic gate diagramBooks on a ShelfDetermine the Dimensions of a Rotated RectangleDraw a Houndstooth PatternDraw and label an ASCII hexagonal gridGolf me an ASCII AlphabetASCII Jigsaw PuzzleOutput a pretty boxASCII-Art Venn DiagramASCII Exact Cover with Rectangles