Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?
What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
Disable hyphenation for an entire paragraph
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
What does the "x" in "x86" represent?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
Were Kohanim forbidden from serving in King David's army?
Why does Python start at index -1 when indexing a list from the end?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?
Do you forfeit tax refunds/credits if you aren't required to and don't file by April 15?
Proof involving the spectral radius and the Jordan canonical form
If Jon Snow became King of the Seven Kingdoms what would his regnal number be?
Models of set theory where not every set can be linearly ordered
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
When to stop saving and start investing?
Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?
Did Kevin spill real chili?
Super Attribute Position on Product Page Magento 1
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I have 100 mg of a proteinase K lyophilized powder and I need to make it to a working concentration of 25 mg/mLHow to determine which salt will precipitate from a solution containing multiple ions?Is solubility in Qsp affected by coefficient?Why should I acidify twice in the procedure for qualitative analysis of chloride anions?Adding powdered Pb and Fe to a solutionApparent solubility of Ag2C2O4 in a buffer solutionFinding x and y in Pt(NH3)xClyWhat is the net ionic equation of the following?How to calculate the volume or mass of carbon dioxide gas absorbed by a calcium hydroxide solution?Precipitation of AgCl from the tap water solution of the group 2 chloride
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
$endgroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
The answer was only $ceAgCN$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ceAgI$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ceAgNO3$ available to precipitate with both $ceI-$ and $ceCN-$?
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility
New contributor
New contributor
edited 12 hours ago
andselisk
19.5k664127
19.5k664127
New contributor
asked 12 hours ago
user77021user77021
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
$endgroup$
Consider a $pu10.0 mL$ solution containing $pu1.0e-10 M$ each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$. If $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?
$K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0e-17$; $K_mathrmsp(ceAgI) = pu8.5e-17$.
Assuming that $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ dissociate completely.
$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = 2cdot10^-10$ molar
Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ceAg+$ will be
$ce[Ag+]_i = dfrac3.5cdot10^-9pumol0.010puL = 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
Now if both the $ceCN-$ and $ceI-$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ceAg+$ must be removed.
$ce[CN-]_i + [I-]_i = 4cdot10^-10$ molar
$ce[Ag+]_f = 3.5cdot10^-7puM - 4cdot10^-10puM approx 3.5cdot10^-7puM$
So the final concentration of $ceAg+$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ceAg+$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.
The final concentration of $ceCN-$ is
$ce[CN-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac6.0cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu1.7e-10$
The the final concentration of $ceI-$ is
$ce[I-]_f = dfracK_spce[Ag+]_f = dfrac8.5cdot10^-173.5cdot10^-7 = pu2.4e-10$
Conclusion:
Since $ce[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f$ some $ceAgCN$ will ppt.
Since $ce[I-]_i < [I-]_f$ no $ceAgI$ will ppt.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
MaxWMaxW
15.7k22261
15.7k22261
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
$endgroup$
Alternative method to MaxW method:
Assume that an initial $pu10.0 mL$ solution of $pu1.0e-10 M$ in each of $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ceBa(CN)2$ and $ceBaI2$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:
$$ce[CN-]_i = [I-]_i = pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1$$
Suppose when $pu3.5e-9 mol$ of $ceAgNO3(s)$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:
$$ce[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i = dfracpu3.5cdot10^-9 molpu0.010 L = pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1$$
For precipitation of $ceAgCN(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[CN-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 gt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN) = pu6.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgCN(s)$ will precipitate.
For precipitation of $ceAgI(s)$:
$$Q_mathrmsp = ce[Ag+]_icdot ce[I-]_i = (pu3.5cdot10^-7 mol ! L^-1)(pu2cdot10^-10 mol ! L^-1) \ = pu7.0cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 lt K_mathrmsp(ceAgCN)=pu8.5cdot10^-17 mol^2 ! L^-2 $$
Therefore, $ceAgI(s)$ will not precipitate in this condition.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne
6,358725
6,358725
add a comment |
add a comment |
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
12 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_mathrmsp$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
12 hours ago