Single word to change groupsA word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True
When did hardware antialiasing start being available?
Acquisition - what happens to stock?
Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
Difficulty understanding group delay concept
Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?
What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?
Turning a hard to access nut?
Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?
Probabilities in non-stationary states
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?
Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?
Is "inadequate referencing" a euphemism for plagiarism?
Inhabiting Mars versus going straight for a Dyson swarm
is this saw blade faulty?
Homology of the fiber
label a part of commutative diagram
What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?
How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements?
Writing in a Christian voice
Single word to change groups
A word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 2 more comments
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 7 hours ago
ReedReed
1263
1263
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
2
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
1
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 7 hours ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,286103742
8,286103742
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
add a comment |
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
7 hours ago
2
2
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
5 hours ago
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 7 hours ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,7451127
5,7451127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 3 hours ago
user340641user340641
111
111
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
add a comment |
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
1
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
3 hours ago
1
1
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
46 mins ago
add a comment |
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
7 hours ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
7 hours ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
7 hours ago
Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).
– Davo
3 hours ago