Single word to change groupsA word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True

When did hardware antialiasing start being available?

Acquisition - what happens to stock?

Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

Difficulty understanding group delay concept

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

Turning a hard to access nut?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Probabilities in non-stationary states

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?

Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?

Is "inadequate referencing" a euphemism for plagiarism?

Inhabiting Mars versus going straight for a Dyson swarm

is this saw blade faulty?

Homology of the fiber

label a part of commutative diagram

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements?

Writing in a Christian voice



Single word to change groups


A word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”













5















In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    7 hours ago











  • @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    7 hours ago











  • Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

    – Davo
    3 hours ago















5















In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    7 hours ago











  • @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    7 hours ago











  • Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

    – Davo
    3 hours ago













5












5








5








In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?







single-word-requests






share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









ReedReed

1263




1263




New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    7 hours ago











  • @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    7 hours ago











  • Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

    – Davo
    3 hours ago

















  • A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    7 hours ago











  • @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    7 hours ago











  • Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

    – Davo
    3 hours ago
















A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

– Chaim
7 hours ago





A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

– Chaim
7 hours ago




2




2





If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago





If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

– FumbleFingers
7 hours ago




1




1





Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

– Davo
7 hours ago





Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

– Davo
7 hours ago













@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

– Reed
7 hours ago





@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

– Reed
7 hours ago













Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

– Davo
3 hours ago





Related post suggesting fratricide and confratricide for killing your colleague(s).

– Davo
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10














Defect! might work:




1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

// a former KGB agent who defected to America




(source: Merriam-Webster)



and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




(source: Merriam-Webster)



but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.




Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






share|improve this answer























  • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    7 hours ago







  • 2





    How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

    – Barmar
    5 hours ago


















4














The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:



  1. Be your ally.


  2. Be their enemy.


1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    Betray
    Convert
    Realign
    Turn
    Forsake
    Spurn
    Revolt



    All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 1





      These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

      – Davo
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

      – Reed
      46 mins ago










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10














    Defect! might work:




    1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

    // a former KGB agent who defected to America




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




    : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.




    Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






    share|improve this answer























    • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      5 hours ago















    10














    Defect! might work:




    1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

    // a former KGB agent who defected to America




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




    : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.




    Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






    share|improve this answer























    • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      5 hours ago













    10












    10








    10







    Defect! might work:




    1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

    // a former KGB agent who defected to America




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




    : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.




    Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






    share|improve this answer













    Defect! might work:




    1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

    // a former KGB agent who defected to America




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




    : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




    (source: Merriam-Webster)



    but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.




    Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    GlorfindelGlorfindel

    8,286103742




    8,286103742












    • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      5 hours ago

















    • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      7 hours ago







    • 2





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      5 hours ago
















    "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    7 hours ago






    "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    7 hours ago





    2




    2





    How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

    – Barmar
    5 hours ago





    How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

    – Barmar
    5 hours ago













    4














    The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:



    1. Be your ally.


    2. Be their enemy.


    1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



    However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




    : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




    And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




    : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




    In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






    share|improve this answer



























      4














      The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:



      1. Be your ally.


      2. Be their enemy.


      1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



      However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




      : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




      And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




      : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




      In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:



        1. Be your ally.


        2. Be their enemy.


        1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



        However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




        : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




        And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




        : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




        In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






        share|improve this answer













        The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:



        1. Be your ally.


        2. Be their enemy.


        1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



        However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




        : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




        And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




        : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




        In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

        5,7451127




        5,7451127





















            1














            Betray
            Convert
            Realign
            Turn
            Forsake
            Spurn
            Revolt



            All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.















            • 1





              These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

              – Davo
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

              – Reed
              46 mins ago















            1














            Betray
            Convert
            Realign
            Turn
            Forsake
            Spurn
            Revolt



            All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.















            • 1





              These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

              – Davo
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

              – Reed
              46 mins ago













            1












            1








            1







            Betray
            Convert
            Realign
            Turn
            Forsake
            Spurn
            Revolt



            All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            Betray
            Convert
            Realign
            Turn
            Forsake
            Spurn
            Revolt



            All these basically mean leave one side and join another.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 3 hours ago









            user340641user340641

            111




            111




            New contributor




            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.







            • 1





              These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

              – Davo
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

              – Reed
              46 mins ago












            • 1





              These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

              – Davo
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

              – Reed
              46 mins ago







            1




            1





            These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

            – Davo
            3 hours ago





            These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

            – Davo
            3 hours ago




            1




            1





            This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

            – Reed
            46 mins ago





            This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

            – Reed
            46 mins ago










            Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe

            Dokschytsy (Steed) Kwelen | NawigatsjuunBelarus: Vitebsk Region, citypopulation.de