How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteCan I shoot a photo with my DSLR without the lens on?Why does my DSLR's viewfinder ignore the aperture ring on a legacy lens?DSLRs with separate controls for aperture and shutter?How to calculate the size of the image circle at infinity focus?Canon: Setting exposure compensation in M mode?Can a Samsung NX300 shoot without a lens, for attaching to a telescope?Where can I find the maximum camera weight for my lens?How do I force my Canon dSLR (800D) to take a photo?How can I achieve more clarity in my photos of the moon?How can I get consistent exposure while allowing aperture changes on Fujifilm X-T2?
How to identify unknown coordinate type and convert to lat/lon?
How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?
What does Turing mean by this statement?
The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?
Drawing spherical mirrors
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
How could we fake a moon landing now?
Deconstruction is ambiguous
How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
The Nth Gryphon Number
Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?
macOS: Name for app shortcut screen found by pinching with thumb and three fingers
What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?
One-one communication
Getting prompted for verification code but where do I put it in?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
1-probability to calculate two events in a row
Why can't I install Tomboy in Ubuntu Mate 19.04?
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)
Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?
How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Proposal: Rules for *New* Photo Contest on Main SiteCan I shoot a photo with my DSLR without the lens on?Why does my DSLR's viewfinder ignore the aperture ring on a legacy lens?DSLRs with separate controls for aperture and shutter?How to calculate the size of the image circle at infinity focus?Canon: Setting exposure compensation in M mode?Can a Samsung NX300 shoot without a lens, for attaching to a telescope?Where can I find the maximum camera weight for my lens?How do I force my Canon dSLR (800D) to take a photo?How can I achieve more clarity in my photos of the moon?How can I get consistent exposure while allowing aperture changes on Fujifilm X-T2?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
add a comment |
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
I would like to use my Nikon D3100 for astrophotography. I have attached the camera to my telescope with a T-ring, after which the camera recognized the absence of the lens, which is perfectly normal. However, without the lens on, I am unable to adjust the aperture, which is extremely important for astrophotography. I can set the ISO, the shutter speed, and some other, minor things but not the Aperture.
I’m using the camera in manual mode.
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
dslr camera-settings astrophotography
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Michael C
135k7154384
135k7154384
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
Gergely KovacsGergely Kovacs
1083
1083
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
Is setting the aperture without the lens even possible?
Considering that the aperture is a part of the lens, not the camera body, no, it is not possible.
Telescopes do not typically have variable apertures — there's no need to stop down to limit incoming light (which is absolutely the opposite of what is wanted for star photography), and depth of field control is meaningless when all objects are no closer than the moon.
The aperture of the telescope is the diameter of the front element. In ƒ-number terms, it is the ratio of the focal length of the telescope divided by the diameter of the front element. Be sure to use the same units (i.e., inches, or mm/cm/m).
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
scottbbscottbb
21k75896
21k75896
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
add a comment |
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
I'm not sure about OP's camera - but I know some may refuse to shoot when no aperture is selected in certain modes. Do you know if this affects the D3100?
– Hueco
3 hours ago
1
1
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
@Hueco not sure precisely. It never occurred to me to use a t-mounted camera in anything other than manual mode. I had no problems shooting manual with a D90 mounted on a telescope, nor with my D800E on a scope.
– scottbb
3 hours ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
This is not entirely true--you could use an additional aperture inline between the objective and the flange.
– chrylis
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
add a comment |
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
Check your telescope manual and find the telescope's aperture. Assuming no telescope eyepiece is utilized, the camera is said to be at the "prime focus" position. Find the scope's diameter. Find the scope's focal length. Divide focal length by diameter. The results of this math is the working f number of the system. Example: 1000mm focal length 4 inch diameter. Convert all units to millimeters. Inches to millimeters conversion is 25.4. Thus 1000 / (4 X 25.4) = 1000 / 101.6 = 9.8. Round to f/10. By the way, f/10 is typical of most systems.
answered 4 hours ago
Alan MarcusAlan Marcus
26k23060
26k23060
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gergely Kovacs is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106699%2fhow-can-i-set-the-aperture-on-my-dslr-when-its-attached-to-a-telescope-instead%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown