Mdtryhht

How to run automated tests after each commit?

A letter with no particular backstory

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

How to write capital alpha?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?

preposition before coffee

What's the point of the test set?

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

1-probability to calculate two events in a row

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Can the Flaming Sphere spell be rammed into multiple Tiny creatures that are in the same 5-foot square?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Misunderstanding of Sylow theory

One-one communication

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?

Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https

macOS: Name for app shortcut screen found by pinching with thumb and three fingers

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

Inversion of subject and verb

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

0

Question one:
Are the following sentences correct? And why?
Statement A:
After storms is not necessarily a bright sky. (I think it will be correct only by inserting there between storms and is)

It seems correct to say:
Statement B:
After storm comes a bright sky.
( to sound more idiomatic, I believe the subject and object should be reversed into: a bright sky comes after storm)

If only statement B is the correct one, this makes a huge difference between copular verb is and come.

If my assumption is not all nonsense, what's the reason beneath this difference? And what the grammar point I should seek references from? Thanks.

Question 2:
Which one is correct?

1. Not always rainbow will follow the rain.


2. Not always will rainbow follow the rain.


3. It is not always that rainbow will follow the rain.


4. Not always there is rainbow following the rain.


5. Not always is there rainbow following the rain.

I'd say among the 5 sentences above, sentences 2, 3, and 5 are rather correct.
And if indeed the rest two are wrongly constructed sentences, why? Thanks.

grammar grammatical-structure grammar-checker

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not a single one of the sentences above is grammatically correct, either before or after the changes you suggest.
  
  – DJClayworth
  1 hour ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DJClayworth my suggested version, if it is wrong, the problem with it is less jarring to me. Can you kindly state the reasons for why they are wrong? And thanks for letting me know none of them are correct.
  
  – user330039
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Unfortunately proofreading is off topic here. However in most cases it is a missing article.
  
  – DJClayworth
  1 hour ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  a bright sky comes after the storm.
  
  – user330039
  58 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So the grammar point is on articles?
  
  – user330039
  57 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

0

Question one:
Are the following sentences correct? And why?
Statement A:
After storms is not necessarily a bright sky. (I think it will be correct only by inserting there between storms and is)

It seems correct to say:
Statement B:
After storm comes a bright sky.
( to sound more idiomatic, I believe the subject and object should be reversed into: a bright sky comes after storm)

If only statement B is the correct one, this makes a huge difference between copular verb is and come.

If my assumption is not all nonsense, what's the reason beneath this difference? And what the grammar point I should seek references from? Thanks.

Question 2:
Which one is correct?

1. Not always rainbow will follow the rain.


2. Not always will rainbow follow the rain.


3. It is not always that rainbow will follow the rain.


4. Not always there is rainbow following the rain.


5. Not always is there rainbow following the rain.

I'd say among the 5 sentences above, sentences 2, 3, and 5 are rather correct.
And if indeed the rest two are wrongly constructed sentences, why? Thanks.

grammar grammatical-structure grammar-checker

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Not a single one of the sentences above is grammatically correct, either before or after the changes you suggest.
  
  – DJClayworth
  1 hour ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DJClayworth my suggested version, if it is wrong, the problem with it is less jarring to me. Can you kindly state the reasons for why they are wrong? And thanks for letting me know none of them are correct.
  
  – user330039
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Unfortunately proofreading is off topic here. However in most cases it is a missing article.
  
  – DJClayworth
  1 hour ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  a bright sky comes after the storm.
  
  – user330039
  58 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So the grammar point is on articles?
  
  – user330039
  57 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Question one:
Are the following sentences correct? And why?
Statement A:
After storms is not necessarily a bright sky. (I think it will be correct only by inserting there between storms and is)

It seems correct to say:
Statement B:
After storm comes a bright sky.
( to sound more idiomatic, I believe the subject and object should be reversed into: a bright sky comes after storm)

If only statement B is the correct one, this makes a huge difference between copular verb is and come.

If my assumption is not all nonsense, what's the reason beneath this difference? And what the grammar point I should seek references from? Thanks.

Question 2:
Which one is correct?

1. Not always rainbow will follow the rain.


2. Not always will rainbow follow the rain.


3. It is not always that rainbow will follow the rain.


4. Not always there is rainbow following the rain.


5. Not always is there rainbow following the rain.

I'd say among the 5 sentences above, sentences 2, 3, and 5 are rather correct.
And if indeed the rest two are wrongly constructed sentences, why? Thanks.

grammar grammatical-structure grammar-checker

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11

asked 1 hour ago

user330039user330039

11