What does the phrasing “X is no more Y than Z is about A” mean? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The meaning of “no more … than”“I've got more to do than wait” or “I've got more to do than **to** wait”?the idiomatic use of “no more than” and “no less than”The rhetorical effect of “no more … than” constructionadjective or comparative adjective for measurements and rates“more of” vs “more than”The precise meaning of “to have something more to do with somebody/something”?Late “latter” lastSaying the value is in between the other 2 valuesA question about comparative clauses
Can a sorcerer use careful spell on himself?
Trademark violation for app?
Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines
Most bit efficient text communication method?
What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search?
What do you call the main part of a joke?
What does this say in Elvish?
Sum letters are not two different
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
One-one communication
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?
Dynamic filling of a region of a polar plot
Time evolution of a Gaussian wave packet, why convert to k-space?
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?
How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics
Semigroups with no morphisms between them
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
How to report t statistic from R
Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?
What's the point of the test set?
1-probability to calculate two events in a row
Getting prompted for verification code but where do I put it in?
What does the phrasing “X is no more Y than Z is about A” mean?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The meaning of “no more … than”“I've got more to do than wait” or “I've got more to do than **to** wait”?the idiomatic use of “no more than” and “no less than”The rhetorical effect of “no more … than” constructionadjective or comparative adjective for measurements and rates“more of” vs “more than”The precise meaning of “to have something more to do with somebody/something”?Late “latter” lastSaying the value is in between the other 2 valuesA question about comparative clauses
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am confused about the meaning of the following sentence:
The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was no more about defending the entire black community than the prosecution was about defending black women
The first part of the sentence is clear: that "X is no more Y". However, I am a little confused about the second part of the sentence: "than Z was about A".
comparative
New contributor
add a comment |
I am confused about the meaning of the following sentence:
The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was no more about defending the entire black community than the prosecution was about defending black women
The first part of the sentence is clear: that "X is no more Y". However, I am a little confused about the second part of the sentence: "than Z was about A".
comparative
New contributor
1
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I am confused about the meaning of the following sentence:
The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was no more about defending the entire black community than the prosecution was about defending black women
The first part of the sentence is clear: that "X is no more Y". However, I am a little confused about the second part of the sentence: "than Z was about A".
comparative
New contributor
I am confused about the meaning of the following sentence:
The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was no more about defending the entire black community than the prosecution was about defending black women
The first part of the sentence is clear: that "X is no more Y". However, I am a little confused about the second part of the sentence: "than Z was about A".
comparative
comparative
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 min ago
divibisan
58729
58729
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Gürkan ÇAPARGürkan ÇAPAR
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
1
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago
1
1
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The prosecution, allegedly, wanted to "defend black women"
The defense (adj: spirited), allegedly, wanted to "defend the entire black community"
This sentence is saying that neither of these were the case, and as "spirited" and believable as the defense was, it was not genuinely about 'defending the black community,' but then again, neither was the prosecution genuine about "defending black women" (by prosecuting the alleged perpetrators).
[The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was--] [no more] [--about defending the entire black community] [than] [the prosecution was about defending black women]
The purpose of this complicated construction is for rhetoric.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Gürkan ÇAPAR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494546%2fwhat-does-the-phrasing-x-is-no-more-y-than-z-is-about-a-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The prosecution, allegedly, wanted to "defend black women"
The defense (adj: spirited), allegedly, wanted to "defend the entire black community"
This sentence is saying that neither of these were the case, and as "spirited" and believable as the defense was, it was not genuinely about 'defending the black community,' but then again, neither was the prosecution genuine about "defending black women" (by prosecuting the alleged perpetrators).
[The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was--] [no more] [--about defending the entire black community] [than] [the prosecution was about defending black women]
The purpose of this complicated construction is for rhetoric.
add a comment |
The prosecution, allegedly, wanted to "defend black women"
The defense (adj: spirited), allegedly, wanted to "defend the entire black community"
This sentence is saying that neither of these were the case, and as "spirited" and believable as the defense was, it was not genuinely about 'defending the black community,' but then again, neither was the prosecution genuine about "defending black women" (by prosecuting the alleged perpetrators).
[The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was--] [no more] [--about defending the entire black community] [than] [the prosecution was about defending black women]
The purpose of this complicated construction is for rhetoric.
add a comment |
The prosecution, allegedly, wanted to "defend black women"
The defense (adj: spirited), allegedly, wanted to "defend the entire black community"
This sentence is saying that neither of these were the case, and as "spirited" and believable as the defense was, it was not genuinely about 'defending the black community,' but then again, neither was the prosecution genuine about "defending black women" (by prosecuting the alleged perpetrators).
[The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was--] [no more] [--about defending the entire black community] [than] [the prosecution was about defending black women]
The purpose of this complicated construction is for rhetoric.
The prosecution, allegedly, wanted to "defend black women"
The defense (adj: spirited), allegedly, wanted to "defend the entire black community"
This sentence is saying that neither of these were the case, and as "spirited" and believable as the defense was, it was not genuinely about 'defending the black community,' but then again, neither was the prosecution genuine about "defending black women" (by prosecuting the alleged perpetrators).
[The spirited defense of 2 Live Crew was--] [no more] [--about defending the entire black community] [than] [the prosecution was about defending black women]
The purpose of this complicated construction is for rhetoric.
answered 6 hours ago
CarlyCarly
1,648213
1,648213
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gürkan ÇAPAR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gürkan ÇAPAR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gürkan ÇAPAR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gürkan ÇAPAR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494546%2fwhat-does-the-phrasing-x-is-no-more-y-than-z-is-about-a-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
A was no more about B then C was about D. The speaker wants you to draw a parallel between the statement A-B and the statement C-D. You should expect the speaker to provide supporting evidence about why this should be so for any A-B and C-D.
– MikeJRamsey56
6 hours ago