What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Which kinds of Philosophy.SE questions should be taken from (or tolerated in)…What is the difference between a statement and a proposition?What are some introductory books about the philosophy of mathematics?Does relating objects implies in the search of a common unity?What is a straight line?What does mathematical constructivism gain us philosophically?Intuitionism and physicswhat is the ontology-ideology distinction in phil of mathIs anything truly continuous?Why do mathematical Axioms work so well in science?Distinguishing between procedure-like and collection-like mathematical objects
How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?
Delete nth line from bottom
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
What is homebrew?
Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?
How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)
Dating a Former Employee
When was Kai Tak permanently closed to cargo service?
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
What do you call a floor made of glass so you can see through the floor?
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Trademark violation for app?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
Circuit to "zoom in" on mV fluctuations of a DC signal?
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
Is it common practice to audition new musicians one-on-one before rehearsing with the entire band?
Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Which kinds of Philosophy.SE questions should be taken from (or tolerated in)…What is the difference between a statement and a proposition?What are some introductory books about the philosophy of mathematics?Does relating objects implies in the search of a common unity?What is a straight line?What does mathematical constructivism gain us philosophically?Intuitionism and physicswhat is the ontology-ideology distinction in phil of mathIs anything truly continuous?Why do mathematical Axioms work so well in science?Distinguishing between procedure-like and collection-like mathematical objects
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain.
Is this a philosophical statement?
what is its mathematical background?
philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-mathematics
add a comment |
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain.
Is this a philosophical statement?
what is its mathematical background?
philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-mathematics
1
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
2
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago
add a comment |
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain.
Is this a philosophical statement?
what is its mathematical background?
philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-mathematics
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
The shortest path between two truths in the real domain passes through the complex domain.
Is this a philosophical statement?
what is its mathematical background?
philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-mathematics
philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-mathematics
edited 7 hours ago
Eliran
4,90131433
4,90131433
asked 13 hours ago
The Last JediThe Last Jedi
985
985
1
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
2
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
2
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago
1
1
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
2
2
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Considering
An important paper concerning the distribution of prime numbers was Riemann's 1859 memoir "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude", the only paper he ever wrote on the subject. Riemann introduced new ideas into the subject, the chief of them being that the distribution of prime numbers is intimately connected with the zeros of the analytically extended Riemann zeta function of a complex variable. In particular, it is in this paper of Riemann that the idea to apply methods of complex analysis to the study of the real function π(x) originates. Extending the ideas of Riemann, two proofs of the asymptotic law of the distribution of prime numbers were obtained independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin and appeared in the same year (1896). Both proofs used methods from complex analysis, [...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem#History_of_the_proof_of_the_asymptotic_law_of_prime_numbers
it seems very likely this quote means something in the spirit of:
Because complex numbers differ in certain ways from real numbers—their structure is simpler in some respects and richer in others—there are differences in detail between real and complex analysis.
https://www.britannica.com/science/analysis-mathematics/Complex-analysis
The precise definition of what it means for a function defined on the real line to be differentiable or integrable will be given in the Real Analysis course. In this course, we will look at what it means for functions defined on the complex plane to be differentiable or integrable and look at ways in which one can integrate complex-valued functions. Surprisingly, the theory turns out to be considerably easier than the real case! Thus the word ‘complex’ in the title refers to the presence of complex numbers, and not that the analysis is harder!
https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/charles.walkden/complex-analysis/complex_analysis.pdf
And in fact, complex numbers are not more complicated than reals: in some ways, they are simpler. For instance, polynomials always have roots. Likewise, complex analysis is often simpler than real analysis: for example, every differentiable function is differentiable as often as we please, and has a power series expansion.
Stewart, I., & Tall, D. (2018). Complex analysis. Cambridge University Press.
New contributor
add a comment |
I don't think there is much philosophical significance in what he said. Basically, he is saying that the complex field is a nice field to work with---and indeed it is. For example, every n degree polynomial in C[x] has exactly n roots in C, while R[x] does not enjoy this property. Of course, there any many reasons why C is nice. Another one is that the general linear group GLn(C) is a connected topological space (path connected, in fact), while GLn(R) is disconnected.
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
add a comment |
It's actually misquoted. From:
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/hadamardquotesource.html
A longer and more nuanced formulation appears (in English) in Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Princeton U. Press, 1945; Dover, 1954; Princeton U. Press, as The Mathematician's Mind, 1996), page 123: "It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one." Note the use of "way" rather than "path", "of" rather than "in", "imaginary" rather than "complex", the added characterization "and best", the qualification "often", and the mysterious introduction "It has been written...".
Now you may be wondering...if he didn't actually write this quote, who did?. It comes from Paul Painlevé's Analyse des travaux scientifiques (Gauthier-Villars, 1900; reprinted in Librairie Scientifique et Technique, Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1967, pp. 1-2; reproduced in Oeuvres de Paul Painlevé, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1972-1975, vol. 1, pp. 72-73)
(TRANSLATED) The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain.
So...it was a literal statement about mathematics which was nicely morphed into sounding philosophical.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "265"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61913%2fwhat-does-this-jacques-hadamard-quote-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Considering
An important paper concerning the distribution of prime numbers was Riemann's 1859 memoir "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude", the only paper he ever wrote on the subject. Riemann introduced new ideas into the subject, the chief of them being that the distribution of prime numbers is intimately connected with the zeros of the analytically extended Riemann zeta function of a complex variable. In particular, it is in this paper of Riemann that the idea to apply methods of complex analysis to the study of the real function π(x) originates. Extending the ideas of Riemann, two proofs of the asymptotic law of the distribution of prime numbers were obtained independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin and appeared in the same year (1896). Both proofs used methods from complex analysis, [...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem#History_of_the_proof_of_the_asymptotic_law_of_prime_numbers
it seems very likely this quote means something in the spirit of:
Because complex numbers differ in certain ways from real numbers—their structure is simpler in some respects and richer in others—there are differences in detail between real and complex analysis.
https://www.britannica.com/science/analysis-mathematics/Complex-analysis
The precise definition of what it means for a function defined on the real line to be differentiable or integrable will be given in the Real Analysis course. In this course, we will look at what it means for functions defined on the complex plane to be differentiable or integrable and look at ways in which one can integrate complex-valued functions. Surprisingly, the theory turns out to be considerably easier than the real case! Thus the word ‘complex’ in the title refers to the presence of complex numbers, and not that the analysis is harder!
https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/charles.walkden/complex-analysis/complex_analysis.pdf
And in fact, complex numbers are not more complicated than reals: in some ways, they are simpler. For instance, polynomials always have roots. Likewise, complex analysis is often simpler than real analysis: for example, every differentiable function is differentiable as often as we please, and has a power series expansion.
Stewart, I., & Tall, D. (2018). Complex analysis. Cambridge University Press.
New contributor
add a comment |
Considering
An important paper concerning the distribution of prime numbers was Riemann's 1859 memoir "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude", the only paper he ever wrote on the subject. Riemann introduced new ideas into the subject, the chief of them being that the distribution of prime numbers is intimately connected with the zeros of the analytically extended Riemann zeta function of a complex variable. In particular, it is in this paper of Riemann that the idea to apply methods of complex analysis to the study of the real function π(x) originates. Extending the ideas of Riemann, two proofs of the asymptotic law of the distribution of prime numbers were obtained independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin and appeared in the same year (1896). Both proofs used methods from complex analysis, [...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem#History_of_the_proof_of_the_asymptotic_law_of_prime_numbers
it seems very likely this quote means something in the spirit of:
Because complex numbers differ in certain ways from real numbers—their structure is simpler in some respects and richer in others—there are differences in detail between real and complex analysis.
https://www.britannica.com/science/analysis-mathematics/Complex-analysis
The precise definition of what it means for a function defined on the real line to be differentiable or integrable will be given in the Real Analysis course. In this course, we will look at what it means for functions defined on the complex plane to be differentiable or integrable and look at ways in which one can integrate complex-valued functions. Surprisingly, the theory turns out to be considerably easier than the real case! Thus the word ‘complex’ in the title refers to the presence of complex numbers, and not that the analysis is harder!
https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/charles.walkden/complex-analysis/complex_analysis.pdf
And in fact, complex numbers are not more complicated than reals: in some ways, they are simpler. For instance, polynomials always have roots. Likewise, complex analysis is often simpler than real analysis: for example, every differentiable function is differentiable as often as we please, and has a power series expansion.
Stewart, I., & Tall, D. (2018). Complex analysis. Cambridge University Press.
New contributor
add a comment |
Considering
An important paper concerning the distribution of prime numbers was Riemann's 1859 memoir "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude", the only paper he ever wrote on the subject. Riemann introduced new ideas into the subject, the chief of them being that the distribution of prime numbers is intimately connected with the zeros of the analytically extended Riemann zeta function of a complex variable. In particular, it is in this paper of Riemann that the idea to apply methods of complex analysis to the study of the real function π(x) originates. Extending the ideas of Riemann, two proofs of the asymptotic law of the distribution of prime numbers were obtained independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin and appeared in the same year (1896). Both proofs used methods from complex analysis, [...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem#History_of_the_proof_of_the_asymptotic_law_of_prime_numbers
it seems very likely this quote means something in the spirit of:
Because complex numbers differ in certain ways from real numbers—their structure is simpler in some respects and richer in others—there are differences in detail between real and complex analysis.
https://www.britannica.com/science/analysis-mathematics/Complex-analysis
The precise definition of what it means for a function defined on the real line to be differentiable or integrable will be given in the Real Analysis course. In this course, we will look at what it means for functions defined on the complex plane to be differentiable or integrable and look at ways in which one can integrate complex-valued functions. Surprisingly, the theory turns out to be considerably easier than the real case! Thus the word ‘complex’ in the title refers to the presence of complex numbers, and not that the analysis is harder!
https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/charles.walkden/complex-analysis/complex_analysis.pdf
And in fact, complex numbers are not more complicated than reals: in some ways, they are simpler. For instance, polynomials always have roots. Likewise, complex analysis is often simpler than real analysis: for example, every differentiable function is differentiable as often as we please, and has a power series expansion.
Stewart, I., & Tall, D. (2018). Complex analysis. Cambridge University Press.
New contributor
Considering
An important paper concerning the distribution of prime numbers was Riemann's 1859 memoir "On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude", the only paper he ever wrote on the subject. Riemann introduced new ideas into the subject, the chief of them being that the distribution of prime numbers is intimately connected with the zeros of the analytically extended Riemann zeta function of a complex variable. In particular, it is in this paper of Riemann that the idea to apply methods of complex analysis to the study of the real function π(x) originates. Extending the ideas of Riemann, two proofs of the asymptotic law of the distribution of prime numbers were obtained independently by Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallée Poussin and appeared in the same year (1896). Both proofs used methods from complex analysis, [...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem#History_of_the_proof_of_the_asymptotic_law_of_prime_numbers
it seems very likely this quote means something in the spirit of:
Because complex numbers differ in certain ways from real numbers—their structure is simpler in some respects and richer in others—there are differences in detail between real and complex analysis.
https://www.britannica.com/science/analysis-mathematics/Complex-analysis
The precise definition of what it means for a function defined on the real line to be differentiable or integrable will be given in the Real Analysis course. In this course, we will look at what it means for functions defined on the complex plane to be differentiable or integrable and look at ways in which one can integrate complex-valued functions. Surprisingly, the theory turns out to be considerably easier than the real case! Thus the word ‘complex’ in the title refers to the presence of complex numbers, and not that the analysis is harder!
https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/charles.walkden/complex-analysis/complex_analysis.pdf
And in fact, complex numbers are not more complicated than reals: in some ways, they are simpler. For instance, polynomials always have roots. Likewise, complex analysis is often simpler than real analysis: for example, every differentiable function is differentiable as often as we please, and has a power series expansion.
Stewart, I., & Tall, D. (2018). Complex analysis. Cambridge University Press.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 12 hours ago
alkchfalkchf
2613
2613
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't think there is much philosophical significance in what he said. Basically, he is saying that the complex field is a nice field to work with---and indeed it is. For example, every n degree polynomial in C[x] has exactly n roots in C, while R[x] does not enjoy this property. Of course, there any many reasons why C is nice. Another one is that the general linear group GLn(C) is a connected topological space (path connected, in fact), while GLn(R) is disconnected.
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think there is much philosophical significance in what he said. Basically, he is saying that the complex field is a nice field to work with---and indeed it is. For example, every n degree polynomial in C[x] has exactly n roots in C, while R[x] does not enjoy this property. Of course, there any many reasons why C is nice. Another one is that the general linear group GLn(C) is a connected topological space (path connected, in fact), while GLn(R) is disconnected.
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think there is much philosophical significance in what he said. Basically, he is saying that the complex field is a nice field to work with---and indeed it is. For example, every n degree polynomial in C[x] has exactly n roots in C, while R[x] does not enjoy this property. Of course, there any many reasons why C is nice. Another one is that the general linear group GLn(C) is a connected topological space (path connected, in fact), while GLn(R) is disconnected.
I don't think there is much philosophical significance in what he said. Basically, he is saying that the complex field is a nice field to work with---and indeed it is. For example, every n degree polynomial in C[x] has exactly n roots in C, while R[x] does not enjoy this property. Of course, there any many reasons why C is nice. Another one is that the general linear group GLn(C) is a connected topological space (path connected, in fact), while GLn(R) is disconnected.
answered 11 hours ago
Eli BashwingerEli Bashwinger
508413
508413
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
Yes. Another example: The "shortest path" to calculating many real-valued definite integrals is use contour integration and the residue theorem in the complex plane.
– olooney
9 hours ago
5
5
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
Oh, and electrical engineers routinely work in the complex plane even though they only care about the real component, because $e^it$ is easier to work with than $sin(t)$ and $cos(t)$. They pass "through" the complex plane on their way to a real valued solution for simplicity sake.
– olooney
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
@olooney Ah, indeed! That is a very nice illustration. My answer obviously shows my bias for theoretical maths.
– Eli Bashwinger
9 hours ago
add a comment |
It's actually misquoted. From:
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/hadamardquotesource.html
A longer and more nuanced formulation appears (in English) in Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Princeton U. Press, 1945; Dover, 1954; Princeton U. Press, as The Mathematician's Mind, 1996), page 123: "It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one." Note the use of "way" rather than "path", "of" rather than "in", "imaginary" rather than "complex", the added characterization "and best", the qualification "often", and the mysterious introduction "It has been written...".
Now you may be wondering...if he didn't actually write this quote, who did?. It comes from Paul Painlevé's Analyse des travaux scientifiques (Gauthier-Villars, 1900; reprinted in Librairie Scientifique et Technique, Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1967, pp. 1-2; reproduced in Oeuvres de Paul Painlevé, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1972-1975, vol. 1, pp. 72-73)
(TRANSLATED) The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain.
So...it was a literal statement about mathematics which was nicely morphed into sounding philosophical.
New contributor
add a comment |
It's actually misquoted. From:
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/hadamardquotesource.html
A longer and more nuanced formulation appears (in English) in Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Princeton U. Press, 1945; Dover, 1954; Princeton U. Press, as The Mathematician's Mind, 1996), page 123: "It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one." Note the use of "way" rather than "path", "of" rather than "in", "imaginary" rather than "complex", the added characterization "and best", the qualification "often", and the mysterious introduction "It has been written...".
Now you may be wondering...if he didn't actually write this quote, who did?. It comes from Paul Painlevé's Analyse des travaux scientifiques (Gauthier-Villars, 1900; reprinted in Librairie Scientifique et Technique, Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1967, pp. 1-2; reproduced in Oeuvres de Paul Painlevé, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1972-1975, vol. 1, pp. 72-73)
(TRANSLATED) The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain.
So...it was a literal statement about mathematics which was nicely morphed into sounding philosophical.
New contributor
add a comment |
It's actually misquoted. From:
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/hadamardquotesource.html
A longer and more nuanced formulation appears (in English) in Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Princeton U. Press, 1945; Dover, 1954; Princeton U. Press, as The Mathematician's Mind, 1996), page 123: "It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one." Note the use of "way" rather than "path", "of" rather than "in", "imaginary" rather than "complex", the added characterization "and best", the qualification "often", and the mysterious introduction "It has been written...".
Now you may be wondering...if he didn't actually write this quote, who did?. It comes from Paul Painlevé's Analyse des travaux scientifiques (Gauthier-Villars, 1900; reprinted in Librairie Scientifique et Technique, Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1967, pp. 1-2; reproduced in Oeuvres de Paul Painlevé, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1972-1975, vol. 1, pp. 72-73)
(TRANSLATED) The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain.
So...it was a literal statement about mathematics which was nicely morphed into sounding philosophical.
New contributor
It's actually misquoted. From:
http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~jorgen/hadamardquotesource.html
A longer and more nuanced formulation appears (in English) in Hadamard's An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (Princeton U. Press, 1945; Dover, 1954; Princeton U. Press, as The Mathematician's Mind, 1996), page 123: "It has been written that the shortest and best way between two truths of the real domain often passes through the imaginary one." Note the use of "way" rather than "path", "of" rather than "in", "imaginary" rather than "complex", the added characterization "and best", the qualification "often", and the mysterious introduction "It has been written...".
Now you may be wondering...if he didn't actually write this quote, who did?. It comes from Paul Painlevé's Analyse des travaux scientifiques (Gauthier-Villars, 1900; reprinted in Librairie Scientifique et Technique, Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1967, pp. 1-2; reproduced in Oeuvres de Paul Painlevé, Éditions du CNRS, Paris, 1972-1975, vol. 1, pp. 72-73)
(TRANSLATED) The natural development of this work soon led the geometers in their studies to embrace imaginary as well as real values of the variable. The theory of Taylor series, that of elliptic functions, the vast field of Cauchy analysis, caused a burst of productivity derived from this generalization. It came to appear that, between two truths of the real domain, the easiest and shortest path quite often passes through the complex domain.
So...it was a literal statement about mathematics which was nicely morphed into sounding philosophical.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
Rob BirdRob Bird
512
512
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Philosophy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61913%2fwhat-does-this-jacques-hadamard-quote-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
See Jacques Hadamard, The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (or.ed.1945), page 122 : it is about the role of intuition in the process of discovery (with some examples).
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
13 hours ago
2
More specifically, H refers to use by Cardan of imaginary quantities in his calculations with roots of equations, in a time when imaginary numbers were not yet rigorously defined.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
12 hours ago
Neither "real" nor "complex" are used in the colloquial sense, they refer to real and complex numbers. What he means is that many problems of real analysis (computation of integrals, summing of series, solving differential equations) are easier solved by passing to the complex domain and using its methods. It raises issues in philosophy of mathematics in justifying such "transition through the imaginary" considered by Husserl, see On Husserl's Mathematical Apprenticeship, pp.20-23.
– Conifold
6 hours ago