Mdtryhht

Consider this hypothetical scenario:

1. You make plans with a significant other


2. They bail on you because they are too tired


3. You find out they went out with someone else


4. You ask, despite knowing the answer, "did you end up going to sleep early last night?"


5. They respond, "Ya"


6. You respond, "That was a(n) _________ question"

I don't think it's rhetorical because you're expecting an answer. However, the question is asked for a different purpose than a traditional question since it's a test to see if the friend (or whomever) will lie or tell the truth. Is there a name for this type of question? Like... "unveiling question" or "truth-seeking question" lol?

EDIT:

The goal of this question is to determine whether the other party will speak the known truth. With that said, it is not a:

• trick question. There is a correct and obvious answer


• loaded question. There is no assumption - it is factual


• trap question. The question can't expose ignorance since both parties know the answer.


• interrogation. This is too generalized for what I'm looking for. "To question thoroughly"


• prompt. This isn't a means to encourage a hesitant speaker

I'm unsure of whether "leading" is correct. To me, a leading question is one where the questioner doesn't actually have an answer to the question, and also needs to make the question specific for legal reasons. Whereas the questioner in my scenario above knows the answer, and doesn't necessarily have to ask a specific question, but rather uses it to expedite the unveiling process since the question in itself is a guise for an ulterior goal.

Also, I'm not looking for a general saying, nor an idiom - I'm looking to fill the blank in my scenario. Similar to how one would ask a rhetorical question where the questioned party answers, you would respond stating, "That was a rhetorical question."

EDIT EDIT:

I'm not looking for a word to describe the question (appending a word to "question"), but rather a word that is the type of question, but also flows well with the sentence and atmosphere. I'm essentially hoping/looking for something like "rhetorical question," but for this context.

If someone asks a rhetorical question and someone answers it, you can state that it's a rhetorical question, which is both the type of question, as well as a standalone explanation where the other party immediately understands that the question was unneeded. However, in this context, I want this type of question to make the other party immediately understand that they made a mistake and are in trouble, without having to add additional explanation.

It's a "leading" question or an "interrogating" question. It is designed to prompt a specific confirmatory response.

However, if those seem too general or insufficient, you might consider "verifying", "substantiating, or "confirmatory" as adequate answers. The truth is already known and verification/confirmation is sought.

6.You respond, "That was a(n) verifying question"

6.You respond, "That was a(n) confirmatory question"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/interrogating

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/verifying

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/confirmatory

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/substantiating

I was looking into it some more, and I think it might be a mix between:

• 
  Control Question - Developed from recently confirmed information from other sources that is not likely to have changed. (Polygraph type questions)


• 
  Suggestive Question - Purposely limit certain answers and suggest others. Specifically the response framing sub-type of Suggestive questioning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Question

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suggestive_question

I wonder if what you're really looking for is the answer that you know, or the name of a question that you ask to check on someone. You could say that it was really a test.

In the event of catching a lying partner, you would say that you are performing a test since you know the truth and are testing to see if they will speak the truth or lie instead. Because you know the truth, and the other person knows the truth, but they might not know you know the truth, we're testing their truthfulness.

So:

A: Did you go to sleep early last night?

B: Yeah, I was tired.

A: That was a test. I know you didn't.

(argument ensues)

I think I would call it a type of loaded question. The reason I say "type of" is because it doesn't exactly fit the more common understanding of "loaded question", which is described by Wikipedia as:

Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such
questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to
limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's
agenda.[2] The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped
beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, he will
admit to having a wife and having beaten her at some time in the past.
Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an
entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and
the fallacy of many questions has been committed.[2] The fallacy
relies upon context for its effect: the fact that a question
presupposes something does not in itself make the question fallacious.
Only when some of these presuppositions are not necessarily agreed to
by the person who is asked the question does the argument containing
them become fallacious.[2] Hence the same question may be loaded in
one context, but not in the other. For example, the previous question
would not be loaded if it were asked during a trial in which the
defendant had already admitted to beating his wife.[2]

However, the OP's question is "loaded", in that the person being questioned is not fully aware that the questioner has a wider agenda in asking it. It sounds innocent enough, but is loaded with implication, and it is likely to explode!

Thank you for putting into words exactly what I have been stressing over for hours now.

How about "insinuating questions"?