“Destructive power” carried by a B-52? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Why is Thailand considered an Axis power in WWII?How did Hitler behave towards all those whom he knew in his childhood and youth after he rose to power?What is the equivalent buying power of one 1945 Reichsmark in 2016 Euros?Why was Spanish Fascist dictatorship left in power after World War II?What level of public support did Adolf Hitler have in his final year of power?Why did ZANU (instead of ZAPU) come to power after the Rhodesian Bush War?Was there a “European Balance of Power Strategy” for Anglo-American interests in between 1925 and 1935?Why was the Cold War carried out over the whole world instead of between Siberia and Alaska?Where can I find data on the amount of fuel carried by WWII Warships and what their operational ranges were?
The bible of geometry: Is there a modern treatment of geometries from the most primitive to the most advanced?
As a dual citizen, my US passport will expire one day after traveling to the US. Will this work?
Understanding piped command in Gnu/Linux
Marquee sign letters
What is the proper term for etching or digging of wall to hide conduit of cables
In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?
Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?
"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?
Is it OK to use the testing sample to compare algorithms?
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?
Centre cell vertically in tabularx
latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file
Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell
Can two people see the same photon?
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
What are some likely causes to domain member PC losing contact to domain controller?
How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?
Where and when has Thucydides been studied?
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
newbie Q : How to read an output file in one command line
Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?
“Destructive power” carried by a B-52?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Why is Thailand considered an Axis power in WWII?How did Hitler behave towards all those whom he knew in his childhood and youth after he rose to power?What is the equivalent buying power of one 1945 Reichsmark in 2016 Euros?Why was Spanish Fascist dictatorship left in power after World War II?What level of public support did Adolf Hitler have in his final year of power?Why did ZANU (instead of ZAPU) come to power after the Rhodesian Bush War?Was there a “European Balance of Power Strategy” for Anglo-American interests in between 1925 and 1935?Why was the Cold War carried out over the whole world instead of between Siberia and Alaska?Where can I find data on the amount of fuel carried by WWII Warships and what their operational ranges were?
In the 1957 film Bombers B-52 an instructor says of the then-new B-52 Stratofortress:
“On a single mission one of these airplanes, just one, can carry greater destructive force than that of all the bombs dropped by the Allied Air Forces during the whole of World War II”.
Is there a sense in which this statement can possibly be true? At what I find, the B-52 could carry up to 32,000 kg of weapons, while “between 1939 and 1945, Allied planes dropped 3.4 million tons of bombs on Axis powers” (source), that is, five orders of magnitude more. Of course a part (how large?) of the B-52 payload could consist of nuclear devices: would this balance the account? Was that sentence just a hyperbole?
world-war-two cold-war aircraft
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
add a comment |
In the 1957 film Bombers B-52 an instructor says of the then-new B-52 Stratofortress:
“On a single mission one of these airplanes, just one, can carry greater destructive force than that of all the bombs dropped by the Allied Air Forces during the whole of World War II”.
Is there a sense in which this statement can possibly be true? At what I find, the B-52 could carry up to 32,000 kg of weapons, while “between 1939 and 1945, Allied planes dropped 3.4 million tons of bombs on Axis powers” (source), that is, five orders of magnitude more. Of course a part (how large?) of the B-52 payload could consist of nuclear devices: would this balance the account? Was that sentence just a hyperbole?
world-war-two cold-war aircraft
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
add a comment |
In the 1957 film Bombers B-52 an instructor says of the then-new B-52 Stratofortress:
“On a single mission one of these airplanes, just one, can carry greater destructive force than that of all the bombs dropped by the Allied Air Forces during the whole of World War II”.
Is there a sense in which this statement can possibly be true? At what I find, the B-52 could carry up to 32,000 kg of weapons, while “between 1939 and 1945, Allied planes dropped 3.4 million tons of bombs on Axis powers” (source), that is, five orders of magnitude more. Of course a part (how large?) of the B-52 payload could consist of nuclear devices: would this balance the account? Was that sentence just a hyperbole?
world-war-two cold-war aircraft
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
In the 1957 film Bombers B-52 an instructor says of the then-new B-52 Stratofortress:
“On a single mission one of these airplanes, just one, can carry greater destructive force than that of all the bombs dropped by the Allied Air Forces during the whole of World War II”.
Is there a sense in which this statement can possibly be true? At what I find, the B-52 could carry up to 32,000 kg of weapons, while “between 1939 and 1945, Allied planes dropped 3.4 million tons of bombs on Axis powers” (source), that is, five orders of magnitude more. Of course a part (how large?) of the B-52 payload could consist of nuclear devices: would this balance the account? Was that sentence just a hyperbole?
world-war-two cold-war aircraft
world-war-two cold-war aircraft
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
edited 2 hours ago
LangLangC
27.1k587138
27.1k587138
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
asked 3 hours ago
DaGDaG
27619
27619
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The B-52 was capable of carrying thermonuclear weapons. By 1957, these had yields measured in megatons.
For example, the Mark 39 nuclear bomb had a yield of 3.8 megatons and the B-52 was able to carry multiples of these (the B-52 in the Goldsboro incident was carrying two of them).
Therefore, if you take the quoted 3.4 million tons of bombs as a starting point, then a single Mark 39 was (theoretically) more powerful than those combined. If you add a second, then it's more so.
The heavier Mark 36 nuclear bomb was also in service in this time period and one variant had a theoretical yield of up to 19 Megatons.
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52241%2fdestructive-power-carried-by-a-b-52%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The B-52 was capable of carrying thermonuclear weapons. By 1957, these had yields measured in megatons.
For example, the Mark 39 nuclear bomb had a yield of 3.8 megatons and the B-52 was able to carry multiples of these (the B-52 in the Goldsboro incident was carrying two of them).
Therefore, if you take the quoted 3.4 million tons of bombs as a starting point, then a single Mark 39 was (theoretically) more powerful than those combined. If you add a second, then it's more so.
The heavier Mark 36 nuclear bomb was also in service in this time period and one variant had a theoretical yield of up to 19 Megatons.
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
add a comment |
The B-52 was capable of carrying thermonuclear weapons. By 1957, these had yields measured in megatons.
For example, the Mark 39 nuclear bomb had a yield of 3.8 megatons and the B-52 was able to carry multiples of these (the B-52 in the Goldsboro incident was carrying two of them).
Therefore, if you take the quoted 3.4 million tons of bombs as a starting point, then a single Mark 39 was (theoretically) more powerful than those combined. If you add a second, then it's more so.
The heavier Mark 36 nuclear bomb was also in service in this time period and one variant had a theoretical yield of up to 19 Megatons.
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
add a comment |
The B-52 was capable of carrying thermonuclear weapons. By 1957, these had yields measured in megatons.
For example, the Mark 39 nuclear bomb had a yield of 3.8 megatons and the B-52 was able to carry multiples of these (the B-52 in the Goldsboro incident was carrying two of them).
Therefore, if you take the quoted 3.4 million tons of bombs as a starting point, then a single Mark 39 was (theoretically) more powerful than those combined. If you add a second, then it's more so.
The heavier Mark 36 nuclear bomb was also in service in this time period and one variant had a theoretical yield of up to 19 Megatons.
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
The B-52 was capable of carrying thermonuclear weapons. By 1957, these had yields measured in megatons.
For example, the Mark 39 nuclear bomb had a yield of 3.8 megatons and the B-52 was able to carry multiples of these (the B-52 in the Goldsboro incident was carrying two of them).
Therefore, if you take the quoted 3.4 million tons of bombs as a starting point, then a single Mark 39 was (theoretically) more powerful than those combined. If you add a second, then it's more so.
The heavier Mark 36 nuclear bomb was also in service in this time period and one variant had a theoretical yield of up to 19 Megatons.
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
answered 2 hours ago
KillingTimeKillingTime
3,53412030
3,53412030
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
add a comment |
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
2
2
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
Nice work - you beat me to this. Here is a yield curve diagram.
– Pieter Geerkens
2 hours ago
1
1
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
You beat me to it. :-)
– sempaiscuba♦
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
Guys! You wonder? Look at the name? ;)
– LangLangC
2 hours ago
1
1
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
The ROU (Rapid Offensive Unit) Killing Time is a spaceship mentioned in Iain M. Banks' Excession novel, part of The Culture series. The GSV Lasting Damage is mentioned in another novel. The Killing Time's name is based on a military pun. 90% of the time in war, you are just killing time. The other 10% of the time is the killing time.
– CSM
47 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52241%2fdestructive-power-carried-by-a-b-52%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
