Find general formula for the terms Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Deriving a formula to find the sum of a series.Understanding of formula for arithmetic progressionHow to find the general formula for this recursive problem?Demonstration of a simple formulaFinding general formula for a sequence that is not arithmetic and neither geometric progression?Finding general formula for sequenceThe general term of such a recursion formulaFinding the formula for the sequence: 7, 10, 16, 25, etc, in terms of $n$, given…Does this power sequence converge or diverge? If it converges, what is the limit?The general nth derivative formula of $(1-x/4)^-2$
The bible of geometry: Is there a modern treatment of geometries from the most primitive to the most advanced?
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?
How to evaluate this function?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Noise in Eigenvalues plot
Twin's vs. Twins'
2018 MacBook Pro won't let me install macOS High Sierra 10.13 from USB installer
Why BitLocker does not use RSA
3D Masyu - A Die
Table formatting with tabularx?
Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?
Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?
Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?
The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?
How to resize main filesystem
newbie Q : How to read an output file in one command line
Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple, reliable and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?
What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?
Centre cell contents vertically
Can two people see the same photon?
Find general formula for the terms
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Deriving a formula to find the sum of a series.Understanding of formula for arithmetic progressionHow to find the general formula for this recursive problem?Demonstration of a simple formulaFinding general formula for a sequence that is not arithmetic and neither geometric progression?Finding general formula for sequenceThe general term of such a recursion formulaFinding the formula for the sequence: 7, 10, 16, 25, etc, in terms of $n$, given…Does this power sequence converge or diverge? If it converges, what is the limit?The general nth derivative formula of $(1-x/4)^-2$
$begingroup$
$$a_n=frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649,dots$$
I don't know how to approach this question as it is not arithmetic or geometric. I know the denominator is geometric increasing by a factor of $7$ but I can't find what the numerator should be for the general formula for the terms. Anyone know what it is?
sequences-and-series
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649,dots$$
I don't know how to approach this question as it is not arithmetic or geometric. I know the denominator is geometric increasing by a factor of $7$ but I can't find what the numerator should be for the general formula for the terms. Anyone know what it is?
sequences-and-series
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$a_n=frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649,dots$$
I don't know how to approach this question as it is not arithmetic or geometric. I know the denominator is geometric increasing by a factor of $7$ but I can't find what the numerator should be for the general formula for the terms. Anyone know what it is?
sequences-and-series
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$$a_n=frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649,dots$$
I don't know how to approach this question as it is not arithmetic or geometric. I know the denominator is geometric increasing by a factor of $7$ but I can't find what the numerator should be for the general formula for the terms. Anyone know what it is?
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Jean-Claude Arbaut
15.4k63865
15.4k63865
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
RaV1oLLiRaV1oLLi
242
242
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general term seems to be
$$a_n=frac2(7^n)+(-3)^n7^n=2+left(-frac37right)^n$$
But the last term is given by
$$a_6=2-left(frac37right)^6$$
so this formula does not always work. A suitable formula could be
$$a_n=begincases2-left(frac37right)^n&nequiv0mod6\
2+left(-frac37right)^n &textotherwise
endcases$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general formula for an (infinite) sequence of (e. g. real) numbers from the finite number $n$ of its (first) members is in principle impossible, as the next (not listed) $(n+1)^mathrmth$ member may be an arbitrary number, and there is still a formula for expressing $a_1, dots, a_n, a_n+1,$ e. g. as a polynomial of order $n$:
$$a_k = sum_i=0^nb_ik^i,quad k = 1, dots,n+1$$
The process for finding coefficients $b_0, dots, b_n$ is straightforward enough.
In other words, if someone will find the formula for your "sequence", there is still the infinity number of other formulas, giving different sequences, but all of them producing your "sequence", i. e. $$frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649.$$
Note.
It means that all psychological tests of type
What is the next number of the sequence $1, 2, 3, 4, 5?$
are in principle meaningless ones, because you may tell "$1762$", and then show to surprised psychologist a formula supporting the correctness of your answer:
$$a_k = 439over30k^5-439over 2k^4+7463over 6k^3-6585over 2k^2+60158over 15k-1756$$
If he/she will not trust you, launch SageMath, which will produce accurate, non-rounded results, and write commands
sage: var("k")
sage: a(k) = (439/30)*k^5 - (439/2)*k^4+(7463/6)*k^3-(6585/2)*k^2+(60158/15)*k-1756
sage: a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), a(5), a(6), a(7), a(8)
to obtain the result
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1762, 10543, 36884)
(and to give the psychologist two more members for free).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator of the $n$-th term seems to be
$$2cdot 7^n+(-1)^n 3^n. $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196064%2ffind-general-formula-for-the-terms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general term seems to be
$$a_n=frac2(7^n)+(-3)^n7^n=2+left(-frac37right)^n$$
But the last term is given by
$$a_6=2-left(frac37right)^6$$
so this formula does not always work. A suitable formula could be
$$a_n=begincases2-left(frac37right)^n&nequiv0mod6\
2+left(-frac37right)^n &textotherwise
endcases$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general term seems to be
$$a_n=frac2(7^n)+(-3)^n7^n=2+left(-frac37right)^n$$
But the last term is given by
$$a_6=2-left(frac37right)^6$$
so this formula does not always work. A suitable formula could be
$$a_n=begincases2-left(frac37right)^n&nequiv0mod6\
2+left(-frac37right)^n &textotherwise
endcases$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general term seems to be
$$a_n=frac2(7^n)+(-3)^n7^n=2+left(-frac37right)^n$$
But the last term is given by
$$a_6=2-left(frac37right)^6$$
so this formula does not always work. A suitable formula could be
$$a_n=begincases2-left(frac37right)^n&nequiv0mod6\
2+left(-frac37right)^n &textotherwise
endcases$$
$endgroup$
The general term seems to be
$$a_n=frac2(7^n)+(-3)^n7^n=2+left(-frac37right)^n$$
But the last term is given by
$$a_6=2-left(frac37right)^6$$
so this formula does not always work. A suitable formula could be
$$a_n=begincases2-left(frac37right)^n&nequiv0mod6\
2+left(-frac37right)^n &textotherwise
endcases$$
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Peter ForemanPeter Foreman
8,5061321
8,5061321
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general formula for an (infinite) sequence of (e. g. real) numbers from the finite number $n$ of its (first) members is in principle impossible, as the next (not listed) $(n+1)^mathrmth$ member may be an arbitrary number, and there is still a formula for expressing $a_1, dots, a_n, a_n+1,$ e. g. as a polynomial of order $n$:
$$a_k = sum_i=0^nb_ik^i,quad k = 1, dots,n+1$$
The process for finding coefficients $b_0, dots, b_n$ is straightforward enough.
In other words, if someone will find the formula for your "sequence", there is still the infinity number of other formulas, giving different sequences, but all of them producing your "sequence", i. e. $$frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649.$$
Note.
It means that all psychological tests of type
What is the next number of the sequence $1, 2, 3, 4, 5?$
are in principle meaningless ones, because you may tell "$1762$", and then show to surprised psychologist a formula supporting the correctness of your answer:
$$a_k = 439over30k^5-439over 2k^4+7463over 6k^3-6585over 2k^2+60158over 15k-1756$$
If he/she will not trust you, launch SageMath, which will produce accurate, non-rounded results, and write commands
sage: var("k")
sage: a(k) = (439/30)*k^5 - (439/2)*k^4+(7463/6)*k^3-(6585/2)*k^2+(60158/15)*k-1756
sage: a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), a(5), a(6), a(7), a(8)
to obtain the result
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1762, 10543, 36884)
(and to give the psychologist two more members for free).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general formula for an (infinite) sequence of (e. g. real) numbers from the finite number $n$ of its (first) members is in principle impossible, as the next (not listed) $(n+1)^mathrmth$ member may be an arbitrary number, and there is still a formula for expressing $a_1, dots, a_n, a_n+1,$ e. g. as a polynomial of order $n$:
$$a_k = sum_i=0^nb_ik^i,quad k = 1, dots,n+1$$
The process for finding coefficients $b_0, dots, b_n$ is straightforward enough.
In other words, if someone will find the formula for your "sequence", there is still the infinity number of other formulas, giving different sequences, but all of them producing your "sequence", i. e. $$frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649.$$
Note.
It means that all psychological tests of type
What is the next number of the sequence $1, 2, 3, 4, 5?$
are in principle meaningless ones, because you may tell "$1762$", and then show to surprised psychologist a formula supporting the correctness of your answer:
$$a_k = 439over30k^5-439over 2k^4+7463over 6k^3-6585over 2k^2+60158over 15k-1756$$
If he/she will not trust you, launch SageMath, which will produce accurate, non-rounded results, and write commands
sage: var("k")
sage: a(k) = (439/30)*k^5 - (439/2)*k^4+(7463/6)*k^3-(6585/2)*k^2+(60158/15)*k-1756
sage: a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), a(5), a(6), a(7), a(8)
to obtain the result
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1762, 10543, 36884)
(and to give the psychologist two more members for free).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general formula for an (infinite) sequence of (e. g. real) numbers from the finite number $n$ of its (first) members is in principle impossible, as the next (not listed) $(n+1)^mathrmth$ member may be an arbitrary number, and there is still a formula for expressing $a_1, dots, a_n, a_n+1,$ e. g. as a polynomial of order $n$:
$$a_k = sum_i=0^nb_ik^i,quad k = 1, dots,n+1$$
The process for finding coefficients $b_0, dots, b_n$ is straightforward enough.
In other words, if someone will find the formula for your "sequence", there is still the infinity number of other formulas, giving different sequences, but all of them producing your "sequence", i. e. $$frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649.$$
Note.
It means that all psychological tests of type
What is the next number of the sequence $1, 2, 3, 4, 5?$
are in principle meaningless ones, because you may tell "$1762$", and then show to surprised psychologist a formula supporting the correctness of your answer:
$$a_k = 439over30k^5-439over 2k^4+7463over 6k^3-6585over 2k^2+60158over 15k-1756$$
If he/she will not trust you, launch SageMath, which will produce accurate, non-rounded results, and write commands
sage: var("k")
sage: a(k) = (439/30)*k^5 - (439/2)*k^4+(7463/6)*k^3-(6585/2)*k^2+(60158/15)*k-1756
sage: a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), a(5), a(6), a(7), a(8)
to obtain the result
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1762, 10543, 36884)
(and to give the psychologist two more members for free).
$endgroup$
The general formula for an (infinite) sequence of (e. g. real) numbers from the finite number $n$ of its (first) members is in principle impossible, as the next (not listed) $(n+1)^mathrmth$ member may be an arbitrary number, and there is still a formula for expressing $a_1, dots, a_n, a_n+1,$ e. g. as a polynomial of order $n$:
$$a_k = sum_i=0^nb_ik^i,quad k = 1, dots,n+1$$
The process for finding coefficients $b_0, dots, b_n$ is straightforward enough.
In other words, if someone will find the formula for your "sequence", there is still the infinity number of other formulas, giving different sequences, but all of them producing your "sequence", i. e. $$frac117,frac10749,frac659343,frac48832401,frac3337116807,frac234569117649.$$
Note.
It means that all psychological tests of type
What is the next number of the sequence $1, 2, 3, 4, 5?$
are in principle meaningless ones, because you may tell "$1762$", and then show to surprised psychologist a formula supporting the correctness of your answer:
$$a_k = 439over30k^5-439over 2k^4+7463over 6k^3-6585over 2k^2+60158over 15k-1756$$
If he/she will not trust you, launch SageMath, which will produce accurate, non-rounded results, and write commands
sage: var("k")
sage: a(k) = (439/30)*k^5 - (439/2)*k^4+(7463/6)*k^3-(6585/2)*k^2+(60158/15)*k-1756
sage: a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4), a(5), a(6), a(7), a(8)
to obtain the result
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1762, 10543, 36884)
(and to give the psychologist two more members for free).
edited 35 mins ago
answered 4 hours ago
MarianDMarianD
2,3161619
2,3161619
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator of the $n$-th term seems to be
$$2cdot 7^n+(-1)^n 3^n. $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator of the $n$-th term seems to be
$$2cdot 7^n+(-1)^n 3^n. $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The numerator of the $n$-th term seems to be
$$2cdot 7^n+(-1)^n 3^n. $$
$endgroup$
The numerator of the $n$-th term seems to be
$$2cdot 7^n+(-1)^n 3^n. $$
answered 5 hours ago
BernardBernard
124k742117
124k742117
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
May I ask how you got to this answer? Or is trial and error the only method?Edit: I inputted this answer into the online question and it came out as incorrect.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was thinking the same, but what about the last term? $234569ne 2(7^6)+3^6$
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PeterForeman Arg, yes, the last is $2(7)^6colorred-3^6$!
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@RaV1oLLi: I noticed the numerators are the successive powers of $7$, and the numerators were not far from twice the denominator, with a corrective term. So I subtracted twice the denominators from the numerators, and tried to see a pattern. I tested only the 5 first terms.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
5 hours ago
add a comment |
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RaV1oLLi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3196064%2ffind-general-formula-for-the-terms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Where does it come from?
$endgroup$
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
My online calculus questions platform called Mobius(used to be Maple TA). I believe it must be a mistake as nothing I input is giving me the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– RaV1oLLi
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Have you put it into OEIS?
$endgroup$
– Dave
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is in the OEIS, but not much else - oeis.org/A081657
$endgroup$
– Peter Foreman
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nobody can tell you the correct answer. Whatever answer you give, the proposer can tell you that you are wrong. You an't win this kind of game.
$endgroup$
– Somos
3 hours ago