Is it correct to emphasize with “do” when using the verb to be? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhen is the construction “I myself” suitable?Can “be” be used with the modal verb “do”?Does emphasis ever change the fundamental pronunciation of a word?Words like “do/does/did” to emphasize, but for “am/is/are”How to explain the use of stress to emphasize agreementDoes the word “buttress,” which is both a noun & verb, follow the rules about where to put emphasis based on its part of speech?Contrasting emphasis of an uncountable nounDetermining the stressed word in a sentence when using possessiveHow to emphasize the word I in a sentence?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they wild shape into that animal?
Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?
Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?
Identify This Plant (Flower)
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Loose spokes after only a few rides
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Who coined the term "madman theory"?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Return to UK after being refused entry years previously
Statement true because not provable
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
How technical should a Scrum Master be to effectively remove impediments?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Why can Shazam fly?
Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?
Is it correct to emphasize with “do” when using the verb to be?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhen is the construction “I myself” suitable?Can “be” be used with the modal verb “do”?Does emphasis ever change the fundamental pronunciation of a word?Words like “do/does/did” to emphasize, but for “am/is/are”How to explain the use of stress to emphasize agreementDoes the word “buttress,” which is both a noun & verb, follow the rules about where to put emphasis based on its part of speech?Contrasting emphasis of an uncountable nounDetermining the stressed word in a sentence when using possessiveHow to emphasize the word I in a sentence?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I believe the following sentence is grammatically correct:
I do like burgers.
Meaning that the speaker wants to emphasize that he likes burgers.
What about something like:
I do am happy.
She does is married.
when the speaker wants to emphasize their current situation? Is this grammatically correct? If not, are there any other alternatives to emphasize while using the verb to be?
emphasis
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
add a comment |
I believe the following sentence is grammatically correct:
I do like burgers.
Meaning that the speaker wants to emphasize that he likes burgers.
What about something like:
I do am happy.
She does is married.
when the speaker wants to emphasize their current situation? Is this grammatically correct? If not, are there any other alternatives to emphasize while using the verb to be?
emphasis
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
add a comment |
I believe the following sentence is grammatically correct:
I do like burgers.
Meaning that the speaker wants to emphasize that he likes burgers.
What about something like:
I do am happy.
She does is married.
when the speaker wants to emphasize their current situation? Is this grammatically correct? If not, are there any other alternatives to emphasize while using the verb to be?
emphasis
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
I believe the following sentence is grammatically correct:
I do like burgers.
Meaning that the speaker wants to emphasize that he likes burgers.
What about something like:
I do am happy.
She does is married.
when the speaker wants to emphasize their current situation? Is this grammatically correct? If not, are there any other alternatives to emphasize while using the verb to be?
emphasis
emphasis
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
edited Apr 26 '17 at 6:39
Glorfindel
8,899104243
8,899104243
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
asked Apr 25 '17 at 18:51
JorgeJorge
1145
1145
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
No.
The kind of emphasis you are talking about is called verum focus because it emphasizes the truth of the sentence being uttered.
In sentences with an auxiliary verb (be, have, or a modal verb like might, can, must, etc.) it is that auxiliary verb that gets focused.
The verb do is only used when there is no auxiliary verb in the sentence. This is the same do that shows up in questions and with negation.
So just like you can't say:
- *Does John be happy?
- *John doesn't be happy.
You also can't say:
- *John DOES be happy.
For sentences with auxiliary verbs, just focus the first auxiliary.
- John WILL leave today.
- John MIGHT have been watching TV.
- John IS happy.
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
add a comment |
"I am indeed happy", "She is indeed married". you can move "indeed" around: "Indeed I am happy", "I am happy indeed". The last has added emphasis on "happy" to my ear; it's like "I am happy, very happy" or "I am _definitely_happy!"
You can say "I, indeed, am happy", but it's a little more unusual. It put the emphasis on "i".
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f386399%2fis-it-correct-to-emphasize-with-do-when-using-the-verb-to-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No.
The kind of emphasis you are talking about is called verum focus because it emphasizes the truth of the sentence being uttered.
In sentences with an auxiliary verb (be, have, or a modal verb like might, can, must, etc.) it is that auxiliary verb that gets focused.
The verb do is only used when there is no auxiliary verb in the sentence. This is the same do that shows up in questions and with negation.
So just like you can't say:
- *Does John be happy?
- *John doesn't be happy.
You also can't say:
- *John DOES be happy.
For sentences with auxiliary verbs, just focus the first auxiliary.
- John WILL leave today.
- John MIGHT have been watching TV.
- John IS happy.
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
add a comment |
No.
The kind of emphasis you are talking about is called verum focus because it emphasizes the truth of the sentence being uttered.
In sentences with an auxiliary verb (be, have, or a modal verb like might, can, must, etc.) it is that auxiliary verb that gets focused.
The verb do is only used when there is no auxiliary verb in the sentence. This is the same do that shows up in questions and with negation.
So just like you can't say:
- *Does John be happy?
- *John doesn't be happy.
You also can't say:
- *John DOES be happy.
For sentences with auxiliary verbs, just focus the first auxiliary.
- John WILL leave today.
- John MIGHT have been watching TV.
- John IS happy.
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
add a comment |
No.
The kind of emphasis you are talking about is called verum focus because it emphasizes the truth of the sentence being uttered.
In sentences with an auxiliary verb (be, have, or a modal verb like might, can, must, etc.) it is that auxiliary verb that gets focused.
The verb do is only used when there is no auxiliary verb in the sentence. This is the same do that shows up in questions and with negation.
So just like you can't say:
- *Does John be happy?
- *John doesn't be happy.
You also can't say:
- *John DOES be happy.
For sentences with auxiliary verbs, just focus the first auxiliary.
- John WILL leave today.
- John MIGHT have been watching TV.
- John IS happy.
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
No.
The kind of emphasis you are talking about is called verum focus because it emphasizes the truth of the sentence being uttered.
In sentences with an auxiliary verb (be, have, or a modal verb like might, can, must, etc.) it is that auxiliary verb that gets focused.
The verb do is only used when there is no auxiliary verb in the sentence. This is the same do that shows up in questions and with negation.
So just like you can't say:
- *Does John be happy?
- *John doesn't be happy.
You also can't say:
- *John DOES be happy.
For sentences with auxiliary verbs, just focus the first auxiliary.
- John WILL leave today.
- John MIGHT have been watching TV.
- John IS happy.
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
edited Apr 25 '17 at 19:23
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:18
Alan MunnAlan Munn
1,4921218
1,4921218
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
add a comment |
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Thank you @Alan Munn. Can you think of an alternative for this?
– Jorge
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Just emphasize the auxiliary verb. I'll add that to my answer more explicitly.
– Alan Munn
Apr 25 '17 at 19:21
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
Note that all these are perfectly grammatical (if something old-fashioned) in Ireland, where do be is used to express the consuetudinal present of be.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Apr 25 '17 at 20:30
2
2
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
@Jorge You could add "so" as in: "... will so leave...", " John is so happy..." or add an intensifier such as: really, extremely etc.
– Mari-Lou A
Apr 27 '17 at 7:58
add a comment |
"I am indeed happy", "She is indeed married". you can move "indeed" around: "Indeed I am happy", "I am happy indeed". The last has added emphasis on "happy" to my ear; it's like "I am happy, very happy" or "I am _definitely_happy!"
You can say "I, indeed, am happy", but it's a little more unusual. It put the emphasis on "i".
add a comment |
"I am indeed happy", "She is indeed married". you can move "indeed" around: "Indeed I am happy", "I am happy indeed". The last has added emphasis on "happy" to my ear; it's like "I am happy, very happy" or "I am _definitely_happy!"
You can say "I, indeed, am happy", but it's a little more unusual. It put the emphasis on "i".
add a comment |
"I am indeed happy", "She is indeed married". you can move "indeed" around: "Indeed I am happy", "I am happy indeed". The last has added emphasis on "happy" to my ear; it's like "I am happy, very happy" or "I am _definitely_happy!"
You can say "I, indeed, am happy", but it's a little more unusual. It put the emphasis on "i".
"I am indeed happy", "She is indeed married". you can move "indeed" around: "Indeed I am happy", "I am happy indeed". The last has added emphasis on "happy" to my ear; it's like "I am happy, very happy" or "I am _definitely_happy!"
You can say "I, indeed, am happy", but it's a little more unusual. It put the emphasis on "i".
answered Apr 25 '17 at 19:24
user175542
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f386399%2fis-it-correct-to-emphasize-with-do-when-using-the-verb-to-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
