Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the mass of black hole at the center of our galaxy measured?Understanding Black hole information paradox?Geometry inside the event horizonWhat happens to the wavelength/frequency of a photon as it passes through an event horizon?Why the center of our galaxy doesn't absorb us?How Can Anything Escape A Supermassive Black Hole?Are black holes in a binary system with white holes, and are they both wormholes?Observer inside event horizon of an extremely large black holeIs it possible the space-time manifold itself could stop at a black hole's event horizon?Picture of Sgr A*

Multiply Two Integer Polynomials

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Identify This Plant (Flower)

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

Origin of "cooter" meaning "vagina"

Falsification in Math vs Science

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they wild shape into that animal?

Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

STM32 programming and BOOT0 pin

Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

FPGA - DIY Programming

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Why can Shazam fly?

Where to refill my bottle in India?



Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow is the mass of black hole at the center of our galaxy measured?Understanding Black hole information paradox?Geometry inside the event horizonWhat happens to the wavelength/frequency of a photon as it passes through an event horizon?Why the center of our galaxy doesn't absorb us?How Can Anything Escape A Supermassive Black Hole?Are black holes in a binary system with white holes, and are they both wormholes?Observer inside event horizon of an extremely large black holeIs it possible the space-time manifold itself could stop at a black hole's event horizon?Picture of Sgr A*










10












$begingroup$


First image of a black hole has been released today April 10th, 2019. The team targeted the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy.



Why didn't the team target the Sagittarius A* at the center of our own galaxy. Intuitively, it would seem to be a better target as it is closer to us.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
    $endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
    $endgroup$
    – Halbeard
    4 hours ago
















10












$begingroup$


First image of a black hole has been released today April 10th, 2019. The team targeted the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy.



Why didn't the team target the Sagittarius A* at the center of our own galaxy. Intuitively, it would seem to be a better target as it is closer to us.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
    $endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
    $endgroup$
    – Halbeard
    4 hours ago














10












10








10


1



$begingroup$


First image of a black hole has been released today April 10th, 2019. The team targeted the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy.



Why didn't the team target the Sagittarius A* at the center of our own galaxy. Intuitively, it would seem to be a better target as it is closer to us.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




First image of a black hole has been released today April 10th, 2019. The team targeted the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy.



Why didn't the team target the Sagittarius A* at the center of our own galaxy. Intuitively, it would seem to be a better target as it is closer to us.







black-holes astronomy event-horizon






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Qmechanic

107k121991240




107k121991240










asked 7 hours ago









MaxterMaxter

1279




1279







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
    $endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
    $endgroup$
    – Halbeard
    4 hours ago













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
    $endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
    $endgroup$
    – Halbeard
    4 hours ago








4




4




$begingroup$
Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related question on Astronomy Stack Exchange: astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/30313/2153.
$endgroup$
– HDE 226868
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
$endgroup$
– Halbeard
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
On the EHT website it says that there was too much activity at A* to get a good picture
$endgroup$
– Halbeard
4 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Of course they targeted Sgr A* as well.



I think though that this is a more difficult target to get good images of.



The black hole is about 1500 times less massive than in M87, but is about 2000 times closer. So the angular scale of the event horizons should be similar. However Sgr A* is a fairly dormant black hole and may not be illuminated so well, and there is more scattering material between us and it than in M87.



A bigger problem may be variability timescales. The black hole in M87 is light days across, so images can be combined across several days of observing. Sgr A* is light minutes across, so rapid variability could be a problem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
    $endgroup$
    – World Outsider
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
    $endgroup$
    – Allure
    48 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471792%2fwhy-was-m87-targetted-for-the-event-horizon-telescope-instead-of-sagittarius-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17












$begingroup$

Of course they targeted Sgr A* as well.



I think though that this is a more difficult target to get good images of.



The black hole is about 1500 times less massive than in M87, but is about 2000 times closer. So the angular scale of the event horizons should be similar. However Sgr A* is a fairly dormant black hole and may not be illuminated so well, and there is more scattering material between us and it than in M87.



A bigger problem may be variability timescales. The black hole in M87 is light days across, so images can be combined across several days of observing. Sgr A* is light minutes across, so rapid variability could be a problem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
    $endgroup$
    – World Outsider
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
    $endgroup$
    – Allure
    48 mins ago















17












$begingroup$

Of course they targeted Sgr A* as well.



I think though that this is a more difficult target to get good images of.



The black hole is about 1500 times less massive than in M87, but is about 2000 times closer. So the angular scale of the event horizons should be similar. However Sgr A* is a fairly dormant black hole and may not be illuminated so well, and there is more scattering material between us and it than in M87.



A bigger problem may be variability timescales. The black hole in M87 is light days across, so images can be combined across several days of observing. Sgr A* is light minutes across, so rapid variability could be a problem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
    $endgroup$
    – World Outsider
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
    $endgroup$
    – Allure
    48 mins ago













17












17








17





$begingroup$

Of course they targeted Sgr A* as well.



I think though that this is a more difficult target to get good images of.



The black hole is about 1500 times less massive than in M87, but is about 2000 times closer. So the angular scale of the event horizons should be similar. However Sgr A* is a fairly dormant black hole and may not be illuminated so well, and there is more scattering material between us and it than in M87.



A bigger problem may be variability timescales. The black hole in M87 is light days across, so images can be combined across several days of observing. Sgr A* is light minutes across, so rapid variability could be a problem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Of course they targeted Sgr A* as well.



I think though that this is a more difficult target to get good images of.



The black hole is about 1500 times less massive than in M87, but is about 2000 times closer. So the angular scale of the event horizons should be similar. However Sgr A* is a fairly dormant black hole and may not be illuminated so well, and there is more scattering material between us and it than in M87.



A bigger problem may be variability timescales. The black hole in M87 is light days across, so images can be combined across several days of observing. Sgr A* is light minutes across, so rapid variability could be a problem.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries

70.7k7144245




70.7k7144245











  • $begingroup$
    I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
    $endgroup$
    – World Outsider
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
    $endgroup$
    – Allure
    48 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
    $endgroup$
    – World Outsider
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
    $endgroup$
    – Allure
    48 mins ago















$begingroup$
I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
$endgroup$
– World Outsider
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I was going to protest this answer, but now just have a catch to add. In some places (looking at you, Veritasium) a simulated image of SgrA* is easy to mistake as a genuine photo. Now I understand why SgrA* isn't even in the press release. The circulating SgrA* image is just a simulation. See source material and comments section: youtu.be/VnsZj9RvhFU
$endgroup$
– World Outsider
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
$endgroup$
– Allure
48 mins ago




$begingroup$
I'd intuitively think that dust in the disk of our galaxy plays a part by obscuring the innermost regions.
$endgroup$
– Allure
48 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471792%2fwhy-was-m87-targetted-for-the-event-horizon-telescope-instead-of-sagittarius-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe

Dokschytsy (Steed) Kwelen | NawigatsjuunBelarus: Vitebsk Region, citypopulation.de