Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

Multiplicative persistence

Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment

250 Floor Tower

New brakes for 90s road bike

Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density

Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?

L1 and Ln cache: when are they written?

How could a planet have erratic days?

lightning-datatable row number error

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?

Start making guitar arrangements

Can Legal Documents Be Siged In Non-Standard Pen Colors?

copy and scale one figure (wheel)

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

How can I block email signup overlays or javascript popups in Safari?

Problem with TransformedDistribution

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?



Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]


Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”













1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    4 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    4 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);







c++ c++11 interview-questions integer






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Martin R

16.2k12366




16.2k12366










asked 5 hours ago









greggreg

37018




37018











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

General comments



  • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


  • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


  • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


I would simplify your function to just:



int reverse(int i) 

try

auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

return 0;




Further comments




  • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



    int x = 1234;
    std::string s;

    while (x > 0)

    s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
    x /= 10;


    std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


    I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



  • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    General comments



    • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


    • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


    • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


    I would simplify your function to just:



    int reverse(int i) 

    try

    auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
    std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

    const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
    return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

    catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

    return 0;




    Further comments




    • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



      int x = 1234;
      std::string s;

      while (x > 0)

      s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
      x /= 10;


      std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


      I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



    • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      General comments



      • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


      • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


      • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


      I would simplify your function to just:



      int reverse(int i) 

      try

      auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
      std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

      const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
      return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

      catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

      return 0;




      Further comments




      • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



        int x = 1234;
        std::string s;

        while (x > 0)

        s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
        x /= 10;


        std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


        I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



      • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago

























        answered 5 hours ago









        JuhoJuho

        1,471612




        1,471612



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe

            Dokschytsy (Steed) Kwelen | NawigatsjuunBelarus: Vitebsk Region, citypopulation.de