Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionDo all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?What does the sky look like to human eyes from orbit?Names, maps for Milky Way dust clouds? (Dark Cloud Constellations)How much of sky can be seen on a typical night from a mid-latitude location?View of the Sun from Voyager 1How deep is the Great Red Spot?How to track the visual path of a LEO satellite as seen from the groundCan the Earth be seen to transit the sun from the outer planets?Establishing true (ie present) positions of cosmic bodiesIf someone from another part of the observable universe had their own Hubble Telescope, would they see different things than we did?How is it possible to see stars-light, from stars millions of light years apart with the naked eye?
When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?
2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?
Can melee weapons be used to deliver Contact Poisons?
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
How to down pick a chord with skipped strings?
How to tell that you are a giant?
Generate an RGB colour grid
Is it common practice to audition new musicians 1-2-1 before rehearsing with the entire band?
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
What is homebrew?
Ports Showing Closed/Filtered in Nmap Scans
What causes the direction of lightning flashes?
Is there a holomorphic function on open unit disc with this property?
What is the escape velocity of a neutron particle (not neutron star)
また usage in a dictionary
What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?
Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?
Extracting terms with certain heads in a function
How to show element name in portuguese using elements package?
Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionDo all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?What does the sky look like to human eyes from orbit?Names, maps for Milky Way dust clouds? (Dark Cloud Constellations)How much of sky can be seen on a typical night from a mid-latitude location?View of the Sun from Voyager 1How deep is the Great Red Spot?How to track the visual path of a LEO satellite as seen from the groundCan the Earth be seen to transit the sun from the outer planets?Establishing true (ie present) positions of cosmic bodiesIf someone from another part of the observable universe had their own Hubble Telescope, would they see different things than we did?How is it possible to see stars-light, from stars millions of light years apart with the naked eye?
$begingroup$
Let's say I was at the very center of the enormous Boötes void, way out in deep, deep space. What could I see with the naked eye? I assume I could see no individual stars, but could I resolve any galaxies? If I gazed in the direction of a super-cluster of galaxies would it seem brighter than other directions? How dark would it be compared to, say, the far side of the moon when it is a full moon on earth?
I am told there are, in fact, a few galaxies in the void. So let's say I pick a spot in the void that is as far from any of those galaxies as possible.
astronomy
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say I was at the very center of the enormous Boötes void, way out in deep, deep space. What could I see with the naked eye? I assume I could see no individual stars, but could I resolve any galaxies? If I gazed in the direction of a super-cluster of galaxies would it seem brighter than other directions? How dark would it be compared to, say, the far side of the moon when it is a full moon on earth?
I am told there are, in fact, a few galaxies in the void. So let's say I pick a spot in the void that is as far from any of those galaxies as possible.
astronomy
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's say I was at the very center of the enormous Boötes void, way out in deep, deep space. What could I see with the naked eye? I assume I could see no individual stars, but could I resolve any galaxies? If I gazed in the direction of a super-cluster of galaxies would it seem brighter than other directions? How dark would it be compared to, say, the far side of the moon when it is a full moon on earth?
I am told there are, in fact, a few galaxies in the void. So let's say I pick a spot in the void that is as far from any of those galaxies as possible.
astronomy
$endgroup$
Let's say I was at the very center of the enormous Boötes void, way out in deep, deep space. What could I see with the naked eye? I assume I could see no individual stars, but could I resolve any galaxies? If I gazed in the direction of a super-cluster of galaxies would it seem brighter than other directions? How dark would it be compared to, say, the far side of the moon when it is a full moon on earth?
I am told there are, in fact, a few galaxies in the void. So let's say I pick a spot in the void that is as far from any of those galaxies as possible.
astronomy
astronomy
edited 2 hours ago
costrom
314128
314128
asked 8 hours ago
Paul YoungPaul Young
1,314116
1,314116
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The number density of galaxies in a void is typically 1/10 the average in the Universe. In this astronomy.SE post, I estimate the number density of galaxies of magnitude $M=-17$ or brighter in the Boötes Void to be $n sim 0.004,mathrmMpc^-3$, or $10^-4,mathrmMlyr^-3$ (i.e. "per cubic mega-light-year"). Hence, the typical distance to a galaxy from a random point in the Boötes Void is
$$
d = left( frac34pi n right)^1/3 simeq 13,mathrmMlyr.
$$
That distance corresponds to a distance modulus of $mu simeq 28$, so the apparent magnitude of the galaxy would be
$$
m = M + mu simeq 11.
$$
Typically, humans cannot see objects darker than $m simeq 6.5$ (the magnitude scale is backwards, so darker means "larger values than 6.5"), although some have claimed to be able to see $msimeq8$ — still an order of magnitude brighter than the $m=11$ estimated above. Moreover, this threshold assumes point sources, whereas a galaxy has its brightness smeared out over a quite large area, lowering its surface brightness significantly!$^dagger$
Hence, you would be floating in complete darkness.$^ddagger$
$^dagger$For instance, the Andromeda galaxy has an apparent magnitude of $m=3.44$ which, if its light were concentrated in a point, would make it easily visibly even under light-polluted conditions.
$^ddagger$Your eye might be able to detect individual photons, at stated in Árpád Szendrei's answer, but that hardly counts as "seeing anything".
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In fact you would see only individual stars. Like on Earth, you can only see individual stars, and no galaxies with the naked eye. Why? Because galaxies are too dim as a whole.
Now, if you would just float in empty space in the void you would be better off then on Earth. It is because here on Earth there is some light pollution.
But in the void, there is basically no light pollution, so you could see even single photons arriving from far away giant stars.
And yes, the human eye is able to detect even single photons.
By the way, all the stars that you can see with the naked eye from Earth are from the Milky Way. But again, that is too because of the light pollution and because our night sky even if there would be no light pollution here on Earth would be filled with brighter start from the Milky way. Our eyes would get used to that, and the start from other galaxies would just appear too dim to see.
Now on the dark side of the moon it would be a little different, but only that there is no light pollution like on Earth. Still, from the dark side of the Moon you could still only see stars from the Milky way.
Now in the void in your case, I think it is different. It is so dark and void, that even a single photon coming from a far away large star would be visible to our eyes that get used to the darkness.
Please see here:
Do all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473330%2fcan-anything-be-seen-from-the-center-of-the-bo%25c3%25b6tes-void-how-dark-would-it-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The number density of galaxies in a void is typically 1/10 the average in the Universe. In this astronomy.SE post, I estimate the number density of galaxies of magnitude $M=-17$ or brighter in the Boötes Void to be $n sim 0.004,mathrmMpc^-3$, or $10^-4,mathrmMlyr^-3$ (i.e. "per cubic mega-light-year"). Hence, the typical distance to a galaxy from a random point in the Boötes Void is
$$
d = left( frac34pi n right)^1/3 simeq 13,mathrmMlyr.
$$
That distance corresponds to a distance modulus of $mu simeq 28$, so the apparent magnitude of the galaxy would be
$$
m = M + mu simeq 11.
$$
Typically, humans cannot see objects darker than $m simeq 6.5$ (the magnitude scale is backwards, so darker means "larger values than 6.5"), although some have claimed to be able to see $msimeq8$ — still an order of magnitude brighter than the $m=11$ estimated above. Moreover, this threshold assumes point sources, whereas a galaxy has its brightness smeared out over a quite large area, lowering its surface brightness significantly!$^dagger$
Hence, you would be floating in complete darkness.$^ddagger$
$^dagger$For instance, the Andromeda galaxy has an apparent magnitude of $m=3.44$ which, if its light were concentrated in a point, would make it easily visibly even under light-polluted conditions.
$^ddagger$Your eye might be able to detect individual photons, at stated in Árpád Szendrei's answer, but that hardly counts as "seeing anything".
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The number density of galaxies in a void is typically 1/10 the average in the Universe. In this astronomy.SE post, I estimate the number density of galaxies of magnitude $M=-17$ or brighter in the Boötes Void to be $n sim 0.004,mathrmMpc^-3$, or $10^-4,mathrmMlyr^-3$ (i.e. "per cubic mega-light-year"). Hence, the typical distance to a galaxy from a random point in the Boötes Void is
$$
d = left( frac34pi n right)^1/3 simeq 13,mathrmMlyr.
$$
That distance corresponds to a distance modulus of $mu simeq 28$, so the apparent magnitude of the galaxy would be
$$
m = M + mu simeq 11.
$$
Typically, humans cannot see objects darker than $m simeq 6.5$ (the magnitude scale is backwards, so darker means "larger values than 6.5"), although some have claimed to be able to see $msimeq8$ — still an order of magnitude brighter than the $m=11$ estimated above. Moreover, this threshold assumes point sources, whereas a galaxy has its brightness smeared out over a quite large area, lowering its surface brightness significantly!$^dagger$
Hence, you would be floating in complete darkness.$^ddagger$
$^dagger$For instance, the Andromeda galaxy has an apparent magnitude of $m=3.44$ which, if its light were concentrated in a point, would make it easily visibly even under light-polluted conditions.
$^ddagger$Your eye might be able to detect individual photons, at stated in Árpád Szendrei's answer, but that hardly counts as "seeing anything".
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The number density of galaxies in a void is typically 1/10 the average in the Universe. In this astronomy.SE post, I estimate the number density of galaxies of magnitude $M=-17$ or brighter in the Boötes Void to be $n sim 0.004,mathrmMpc^-3$, or $10^-4,mathrmMlyr^-3$ (i.e. "per cubic mega-light-year"). Hence, the typical distance to a galaxy from a random point in the Boötes Void is
$$
d = left( frac34pi n right)^1/3 simeq 13,mathrmMlyr.
$$
That distance corresponds to a distance modulus of $mu simeq 28$, so the apparent magnitude of the galaxy would be
$$
m = M + mu simeq 11.
$$
Typically, humans cannot see objects darker than $m simeq 6.5$ (the magnitude scale is backwards, so darker means "larger values than 6.5"), although some have claimed to be able to see $msimeq8$ — still an order of magnitude brighter than the $m=11$ estimated above. Moreover, this threshold assumes point sources, whereas a galaxy has its brightness smeared out over a quite large area, lowering its surface brightness significantly!$^dagger$
Hence, you would be floating in complete darkness.$^ddagger$
$^dagger$For instance, the Andromeda galaxy has an apparent magnitude of $m=3.44$ which, if its light were concentrated in a point, would make it easily visibly even under light-polluted conditions.
$^ddagger$Your eye might be able to detect individual photons, at stated in Árpád Szendrei's answer, but that hardly counts as "seeing anything".
$endgroup$
The number density of galaxies in a void is typically 1/10 the average in the Universe. In this astronomy.SE post, I estimate the number density of galaxies of magnitude $M=-17$ or brighter in the Boötes Void to be $n sim 0.004,mathrmMpc^-3$, or $10^-4,mathrmMlyr^-3$ (i.e. "per cubic mega-light-year"). Hence, the typical distance to a galaxy from a random point in the Boötes Void is
$$
d = left( frac34pi n right)^1/3 simeq 13,mathrmMlyr.
$$
That distance corresponds to a distance modulus of $mu simeq 28$, so the apparent magnitude of the galaxy would be
$$
m = M + mu simeq 11.
$$
Typically, humans cannot see objects darker than $m simeq 6.5$ (the magnitude scale is backwards, so darker means "larger values than 6.5"), although some have claimed to be able to see $msimeq8$ — still an order of magnitude brighter than the $m=11$ estimated above. Moreover, this threshold assumes point sources, whereas a galaxy has its brightness smeared out over a quite large area, lowering its surface brightness significantly!$^dagger$
Hence, you would be floating in complete darkness.$^ddagger$
$^dagger$For instance, the Andromeda galaxy has an apparent magnitude of $m=3.44$ which, if its light were concentrated in a point, would make it easily visibly even under light-polluted conditions.
$^ddagger$Your eye might be able to detect individual photons, at stated in Árpád Szendrei's answer, but that hardly counts as "seeing anything".
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
pelapela
8,2272030
8,2272030
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Well, that's an utterly terrifying concept to imagine. Thanks to everyone for making me aware of it, I am going to go lie down now
$endgroup$
– llama
4 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@llama Luckily, the terrifying scenario would be over in a minute, after which you'd die from asphyxia.
$endgroup$
– pela
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In fact you would see only individual stars. Like on Earth, you can only see individual stars, and no galaxies with the naked eye. Why? Because galaxies are too dim as a whole.
Now, if you would just float in empty space in the void you would be better off then on Earth. It is because here on Earth there is some light pollution.
But in the void, there is basically no light pollution, so you could see even single photons arriving from far away giant stars.
And yes, the human eye is able to detect even single photons.
By the way, all the stars that you can see with the naked eye from Earth are from the Milky Way. But again, that is too because of the light pollution and because our night sky even if there would be no light pollution here on Earth would be filled with brighter start from the Milky way. Our eyes would get used to that, and the start from other galaxies would just appear too dim to see.
Now on the dark side of the moon it would be a little different, but only that there is no light pollution like on Earth. Still, from the dark side of the Moon you could still only see stars from the Milky way.
Now in the void in your case, I think it is different. It is so dark and void, that even a single photon coming from a far away large star would be visible to our eyes that get used to the darkness.
Please see here:
Do all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In fact you would see only individual stars. Like on Earth, you can only see individual stars, and no galaxies with the naked eye. Why? Because galaxies are too dim as a whole.
Now, if you would just float in empty space in the void you would be better off then on Earth. It is because here on Earth there is some light pollution.
But in the void, there is basically no light pollution, so you could see even single photons arriving from far away giant stars.
And yes, the human eye is able to detect even single photons.
By the way, all the stars that you can see with the naked eye from Earth are from the Milky Way. But again, that is too because of the light pollution and because our night sky even if there would be no light pollution here on Earth would be filled with brighter start from the Milky way. Our eyes would get used to that, and the start from other galaxies would just appear too dim to see.
Now on the dark side of the moon it would be a little different, but only that there is no light pollution like on Earth. Still, from the dark side of the Moon you could still only see stars from the Milky way.
Now in the void in your case, I think it is different. It is so dark and void, that even a single photon coming from a far away large star would be visible to our eyes that get used to the darkness.
Please see here:
Do all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In fact you would see only individual stars. Like on Earth, you can only see individual stars, and no galaxies with the naked eye. Why? Because galaxies are too dim as a whole.
Now, if you would just float in empty space in the void you would be better off then on Earth. It is because here on Earth there is some light pollution.
But in the void, there is basically no light pollution, so you could see even single photons arriving from far away giant stars.
And yes, the human eye is able to detect even single photons.
By the way, all the stars that you can see with the naked eye from Earth are from the Milky Way. But again, that is too because of the light pollution and because our night sky even if there would be no light pollution here on Earth would be filled with brighter start from the Milky way. Our eyes would get used to that, and the start from other galaxies would just appear too dim to see.
Now on the dark side of the moon it would be a little different, but only that there is no light pollution like on Earth. Still, from the dark side of the Moon you could still only see stars from the Milky way.
Now in the void in your case, I think it is different. It is so dark and void, that even a single photon coming from a far away large star would be visible to our eyes that get used to the darkness.
Please see here:
Do all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?
$endgroup$
In fact you would see only individual stars. Like on Earth, you can only see individual stars, and no galaxies with the naked eye. Why? Because galaxies are too dim as a whole.
Now, if you would just float in empty space in the void you would be better off then on Earth. It is because here on Earth there is some light pollution.
But in the void, there is basically no light pollution, so you could see even single photons arriving from far away giant stars.
And yes, the human eye is able to detect even single photons.
By the way, all the stars that you can see with the naked eye from Earth are from the Milky Way. But again, that is too because of the light pollution and because our night sky even if there would be no light pollution here on Earth would be filled with brighter start from the Milky way. Our eyes would get used to that, and the start from other galaxies would just appear too dim to see.
Now on the dark side of the moon it would be a little different, but only that there is no light pollution like on Earth. Still, from the dark side of the Moon you could still only see stars from the Milky way.
Now in the void in your case, I think it is different. It is so dark and void, that even a single photon coming from a far away large star would be visible to our eyes that get used to the darkness.
Please see here:
Do all the individual stars that we can see in the night sky belong to Milky Way?
answered 7 hours ago
Árpád SzendreiÁrpád Szendrei
4,3611624
4,3611624
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You can see Andromeda with the naked eye, under optimal conditions. It's mag +3.44. Sagittarius Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy and M33 should also be visible
$endgroup$
– CSM
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473330%2fcan-anything-be-seen-from-the-center-of-the-bo%25c3%25b6tes-void-how-dark-would-it-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The Bootes void has some galaxies in it, and I don't know if it has much of a centre. IMO this needs to be more specific about the conditions.
$endgroup$
– JMac
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Let's pick the spot that is furthest from any galaxy.
$endgroup$
– Paul Young
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PaulYoung so you're saying "if there's a bright center to the Universe, you're at the [point] it's farthest from"?
$endgroup$
– MikeTheLiar
1 hour ago