Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why do hyperbolic “trig” functions seem to be encountered rarely?When was the term “mathematics” first used?Why are trig functions defined for the unit circle?What are the formal terms for the intersection points of the geometric representation of the extended trigonometric functions?Why are the power series for trig functions in radians?Why are turns not used as the default angle measure?Why are the Trig functions defined by the counterclockwise path of a circle?How (or why) did Topology become so central to modern mathematics?Determining compositions of trig functions by knowing Euler's identity etcwhich trig identities are used here?

Dating a Former Employee

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

How to down pick a chord with skipped strings?

Is it a good idea to use CNN to classify 1D signal?

また usage in a dictionary

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Find the length x such that the two distances in the triangle are the same

Delete nth line from bottom

Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?

Where are Serre’s lectures at Collège de France to be found?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

How to find 'n' nodes where all distances between them are greater than 'k'?

What is homebrew?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Closed form of recurrent arithmetic series summation

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?



Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Why do hyperbolic “trig” functions seem to be encountered rarely?When was the term “mathematics” first used?Why are trig functions defined for the unit circle?What are the formal terms for the intersection points of the geometric representation of the extended trigonometric functions?Why are the power series for trig functions in radians?Why are turns not used as the default angle measure?Why are the Trig functions defined by the counterclockwise path of a circle?How (or why) did Topology become so central to modern mathematics?Determining compositions of trig functions by knowing Euler's identity etcwhich trig identities are used here?










26












$begingroup$


I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.



The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?



Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    26












    $begingroup$


    I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.



    The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?



    Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
    How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      26












      26








      26


      8



      $begingroup$


      I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.



      The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?



      Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
      How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I was browsing through a Wikipedia article about the trigonometric identities, when I came across something that caught my attention, namely forgotten trigonometric functions.



      The versine (arguably the most basic of the functions), coversine, haversine and exosecant formulas had once been utilised for navigational purposes, prior to GPS tracking systems. However, recently, they have become less common in modern mathematics and beyond. Why is that?



      Here is a link to a PDF file describing all of these now-obsolete trig functions: "The Forgotten Trigonometric Functions, or
      How Trigonometry was used in the Ancient Art of Navigation (Before GPS!)"







      trigonometry math-history spherical-trigonometry






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      Daniele Tampieri

      2,75721022




      2,75721022






      New contributor




      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 12 hours ago









      Quantum EntanglementQuantum Entanglement

      15517




      15517




      New contributor




      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          40












          $begingroup$

          Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.



          Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.



          For instance, to compute $logsqrta^2+b^2$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrta^2+b^2=log a+logsqrt1+tan^2theta$ and $logsqrt1+tan^2theta=logfrac1cos theta=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.



          For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.



          Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.



          All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 4




            $begingroup$
            The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
            $endgroup$
            – JCRM
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            10 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            9 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            8 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190922%2fwhy-are-the-trig-functions-versine-haversine-exsecant-etc-rarely-used-in-mod%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          40












          $begingroup$

          Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.



          Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.



          For instance, to compute $logsqrta^2+b^2$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrta^2+b^2=log a+logsqrt1+tan^2theta$ and $logsqrt1+tan^2theta=logfrac1cos theta=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.



          For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.



          Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.



          All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 4




            $begingroup$
            The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
            $endgroup$
            – JCRM
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            10 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            9 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            8 hours ago















          40












          $begingroup$

          Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.



          Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.



          For instance, to compute $logsqrta^2+b^2$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrta^2+b^2=log a+logsqrt1+tan^2theta$ and $logsqrt1+tan^2theta=logfrac1cos theta=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.



          For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.



          Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.



          All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 4




            $begingroup$
            The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
            $endgroup$
            – JCRM
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            10 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            9 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            8 hours ago













          40












          40








          40





          $begingroup$

          Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.



          Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.



          For instance, to compute $logsqrta^2+b^2$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrta^2+b^2=log a+logsqrt1+tan^2theta$ and $logsqrt1+tan^2theta=logfrac1cos theta=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.



          For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.



          Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.



          All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Those functions are much less used than before for one reason: the advent of electronic computers.



          Before that, one had to rely either on tables or on slide rules. Tables were usually table of logarithms, and they included the logarithms of trigonometric functions as well. The trigonometric functions were then useful not only for geometric applications, but also to simplify algebraic calculations with logarithms.



          For instance, to compute $logsqrta^2+b^2$ when $log a$ and $log b$ are known, you could find $theta$ such that $logtantheta=logfrac ba=log b-log a$, then $logsqrta^2+b^2=log a+logsqrt1+tan^2theta$ and $logsqrt1+tan^2theta=logfrac1cos theta=-logcostheta$. There are many similar formulas.



          For geometric applications, sometimes versine and similar functions allow computing with greater precision while not adding too much computation. See for instance the haversine formula used to compute great circle distance (useful in navigation). The straightforward formula with arccosine has poor accuracy when the angle is small (the most common case), due to the fact that cosine is flat at $0$. However the formula with haversine is more accurate. To achieve the same, you would have to use $sin^2(theta/2)$ everywhere, which require more computations (but it's still reasonable with logarithms). Therefore, navigation table like Nories's nautical tables have an haversine table.



          Note that tables of logarithms are usually accurate up to 5 digits (some larger tables had 7 digits, some very special ones had better precision but were difficult to use : more digits = much more space on paper). Slide rules have roughly 3 digits of precision.



          All of this is rendered pretty useless with calculators, which have usually around 15 digits of precision and compute fast enough that we don't have to worry about speeding things up with extra functions.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago

























          answered 12 hours ago









          Jean-Claude ArbautJean-Claude Arbaut

          15.1k63565




          15.1k63565







          • 4




            $begingroup$
            The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
            $endgroup$
            – JCRM
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            10 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            9 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            8 hours ago












          • 4




            $begingroup$
            The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
            $endgroup$
            – JCRM
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            10 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            9 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
            $endgroup$
            – Jean-Claude Arbaut
            9 hours ago







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
            $endgroup$
            – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
            8 hours ago







          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
          $endgroup$
          – JCRM
          10 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          The log tables we used at school were four figure. I repeatedly got marked down (indirectly) for using five figure tables: I gave my answers to four figure precision, rather than the three I should have done if I were using four figure tables
          $endgroup$
          – JCRM
          10 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          10 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          @JCRM I have never used tables at school, but the most common ones in France in the 60s-70s (Bouvart et Ratinet) were with 5 digits. This format dates back at least to the 19th century (Hoüel or Dupuis tables for instance). Tables with 4 digits would have been very small (2 pages), maybe for an exam where the teacher does not want to check for "additional" content in larger table (one of my tables has such hand written addition). I also have the 1948 IGN tables (8 digits), but they are much more painful (you need higher order interpolation).
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          10 hours ago





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
          $endgroup$
          – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
          9 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Oddly enough, I bought a log book 5 years back. I have no idea what my 11 year old self was thinking, but it was pretty cool.
          $endgroup$
          – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
          9 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          9 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          @MohammadZuhairKhan That's more or less my age when I stumble of my father's log table. Pretty cool indeed (though I remember I was surprised by exponent-mantissa notation which makes computation so easy with decimal logs). I think I have around twenty tables now. I can't really call this a collection, it's just that I am amazed when I find a new one, I can't resist :) Thinking of the incredible amount of work to compute with the table back then (let alone to compute the table), compared to what a computer can do know.
          $endgroup$
          – Jean-Claude Arbaut
          9 hours ago





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
          $endgroup$
          – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
          8 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Just re-opened the log table. 6 digits of accuracy for logs, anti-logs, trig functions, log of trig functions and so much more at 47 cents in the US. 61 pages including "some" formula and useful data.
          $endgroup$
          – Mohammad Zuhair Khan
          8 hours ago










          Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          Quantum Entanglement is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3190922%2fwhy-are-the-trig-functions-versine-haversine-exsecant-etc-rarely-used-in-mod%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

          The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

          Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe