Determining the ideals of a quotient ring Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$

What is this word supposed to be?

Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Could Neutrino technically as side-effect, incentivize centralization of the bitcoin network?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?

Where did Arya get these scars?

With indentation set to `0em`, when using a line break, there is still an indentation of a size of a space

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

std::is_constructible on incomplete types

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

What is it called when you ride around on your front wheel?

Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?

Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?

Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?

The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?



Determining the ideals of a quotient ring



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$










2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    9 hours ago















2












$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    9 hours ago













2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.



I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.



However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.







abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Servaes

31.1k342101




31.1k342101






New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









MashaMasha

313




313




New contributor




Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Masha is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



    $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



    We know that:




    1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

    2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

    So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



    Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



    Now, note that:



    1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

    2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

    and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



    $$
    0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex Wertheim
      8 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
      $endgroup$
      – Siddharth Bhat
      8 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
    $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    x^3-xinlangle frangle
    qquadiffqquad
    ftext divides x^3-x.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
      $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      x^3-xinlangle frangle
      qquadiffqquad
      ftext divides x^3-x.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
        $$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        x^3-xinlangle frangle
        qquadiffqquad
        ftext divides x^3-x.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        ServaesServaes

        31.1k342101




        31.1k342101





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:



            $$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$



            We know that:




            1. $mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals

            2. Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.

            So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.



            Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.



            Now, note that:



            1. the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring

            2. Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals

            and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:



            $$
            0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago

























            answered 9 hours ago









            Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat

            3,3601918




            3,3601918







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex Wertheim
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
              $endgroup$
              – Siddharth Bhat
              8 hours ago







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            8 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex Wertheim
            8 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Siddharth Bhat
            8 hours ago










            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

            Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

            Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe