Determining the ideals of a quotient ring Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$
What is this word supposed to be?
Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Could Neutrino technically as side-effect, incentivize centralization of the bitcoin network?
Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?
Is a 5 watt UHF/VHF handheld considered QRP?
Where did Arya get these scars?
With indentation set to `0em`, when using a line break, there is still an indentation of a size of a space
Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)
Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson Binomial Distribution?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
std::is_constructible on incomplete types
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
What is it called when you ride around on your front wheel?
Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?
Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?
Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?
The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?
Determining the ideals of a quotient ring
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraShort question on notation of ideals in a quotient ring.Image of a Prime ideals in quotient ringThe number of ideals in the quotient ring $mathbb R[x]/langle x^2-3x+2 rangle$Ideals of the quotient ring of AForm of maximal ideals in an algebraicaly closed polynomial ringExistence of minimal prime ideal contained in given prime ideal and containing a given subsetThe prime ideals of a quotient ringideals of quotient ringRadical Ideal in the Coordinate Ring is Intersection of Maximal IdealsNon Zero ideals of $mathbfZ_12$
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces
New contributor
$endgroup$
Given an ideal $I = langle x^3 - xrangle subseteq BbbR[x]$, determine the ideals in the quotient ring $BbbR[x]/I$.
I understand that the quotient ring is of the form $k[x_1...x_n]/I$ where I is an ideal in $k[x_1...x_n]$. I also understand that the ideals of the quotient ring are in one-to-one correspondence with the ideals of $k[x_1...x_n]$ containing $I$.
However, I'm really confused on how to actually go about finding the ideals of the quotient ring given a specific ideal. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated, thank you.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory ideals quotient-spaces
New contributor
New contributor
edited 5 hours ago
Servaes
31.1k342101
31.1k342101
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
MashaMasha
313
313
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
$endgroup$
Because $BbbR$ is a field, the polynomial ring $BbbR[x]$ in one indeterminate is a principal ideal domain. That means every ideal is of the form $langle frangle$ for some $finBbbR[x]$. Now use the fact that
$$langle x^3-xranglesubsetlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
x^3-xinlangle frangle
qquadiffqquad
ftext divides x^3-x.$$
answered 9 hours ago
ServaesServaes
31.1k342101
31.1k342101
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
$endgroup$
Note that we can factor $x^3 - x = x(x^2 - 1) = x(x + 1)(x - 1)$. Now, by the Chinese Reimander theorem:
$$mathbb R[X]/langle x^3 - xrangle = mathbb R[X] /langle x(x + 1)(x-1) rangle = mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle timesmathbb R[X]/langle x-1 rangle $$
We know that:
$mathbb R[X]/langle x rangle simeq mathbb R$, since quotienting by $x$ kills all polynomials of degree 1 or higher. What's left are the reals- Similarly, $mathbb R[X]/langle x+1 rangle simeq mathbb R [X]/ langle x-1 rangle simeq mathbb R$.
So, the ring that we have is actually $mathbb R times mathbb R times mathbb R$.
Since $mathbb R$ is a field, it has only two idels: the zero ideal and the ring itself.
Now, note that:
- the product of ideals is an ideal of the product ring
- Every ideal of the product ring is a product of ideals
and we complete the proof, since the set of all ideals will all be:
$$
0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R times 0, mathbb R
$$
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Siddharth BhatSiddharth Bhat
3,3601918
3,3601918
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer is not correct. $X^2-1$ factors as $(X-1)(X+1)$ over $mathbbR$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem therefore shows that $mathbbR[X]/langle X^3-X rangle cong mathbbR oplus mathbbR oplus mathbbR$.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh my god, right, I confused $X^2 - 1$ and $X^2 + 1$. Fixing right now!
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim I just fixed it. Could you please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything?
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Looks mostly correct to me! (The factorization is $(X^3-X) = X(X^2-1)$, not $X(1-X^2)$. But this is a minor point, which doesn't affect the computation of the quotient up to isomorphism.
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexWertheim Argh, fixed! Thanks for catching that :)
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Bhat
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Masha is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3200710%2fdetermining-the-ideals-of-a-quotient-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You have just one indeterminate. There's a very useful description of all ideals of $mathbbR[x]$, because it is a principal ideal domain.
$endgroup$
– egreg
9 hours ago