Is it correct to abbreviate etc as &c? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara“Mic” as an abbreviation for microwaveproper way to write the slang term for “gravitational force”How to correctly assimilate dots, if at all?Correct abbreviation for “byte” and “bit”What is the abbreviation for 'century'?Is IOU an abbreviation, an acronym, or an initialism?Where should the apostrophe go on a possessive abbreviation?The usage of etcApostrophe on plurals of a word abbreviated with a symbol?Parentheses within abbreviations
Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?
The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?
Visa-free travel to the US using refugee travel document from Spain?
Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Split coins into combinations of different denominations
Function to calculate red-edgeNDVI in Google Earth Engine
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape
A strange hotel
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
Second order approximation of the loss function (Deep learning book, 7.33)
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
Where did Arya get these scars?
My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer
Economise space with floats
PIC mathematical operations weird problem
How would this chord from "Rocket Man" be analyzed?
Why is this method for solving linear equations systems using determinants works?
Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
Is it correct to abbreviate etc as &c?
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara“Mic” as an abbreviation for microwaveproper way to write the slang term for “gravitational force”How to correctly assimilate dots, if at all?Correct abbreviation for “byte” and “bit”What is the abbreviation for 'century'?Is IOU an abbreviation, an acronym, or an initialism?Where should the apostrophe go on a possessive abbreviation?The usage of etcApostrophe on plurals of a word abbreviated with a symbol?Parentheses within abbreviations
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".
Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.
Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.
That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com
Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?
abbreviations
New contributor
|
show 2 more comments
I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".
Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.
Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.
That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com
Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?
abbreviations
New contributor
1
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
5
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
1
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
1
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".
Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.
Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.
That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com
Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?
abbreviations
New contributor
I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".
Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.
Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.
That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com
Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?
abbreviations
abbreviations
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
AaronAaron
1162
1162
New contributor
New contributor
1
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
5
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
1
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
1
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
5
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
1
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
1
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago
1
1
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
5
5
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
1
1
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
1
1
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Eh.... depends?
An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.
Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."
So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .
Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .
I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.
add a comment |
I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).
Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).
In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496087%2fis-it-correct-to-abbreviate-etc-as-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Eh.... depends?
An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.
Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."
So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .
Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .
I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.
add a comment |
Eh.... depends?
An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.
Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."
So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .
Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .
I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.
add a comment |
Eh.... depends?
An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.
Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."
So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .
Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .
I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.
Eh.... depends?
An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.
Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."
So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .
Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .
I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.
answered 3 hours ago
CarlyCarly
1,881213
1,881213
add a comment |
add a comment |
I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).
Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).
In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.
add a comment |
I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).
Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).
In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.
add a comment |
I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).
Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).
In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.
I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).
Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).
In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.
answered 2 hours ago
Simon BSimon B
2,6731018
2,6731018
add a comment |
add a comment |
Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496087%2fis-it-correct-to-abbreviate-etc-as-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".
– WS2
3 hours ago
The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.
– R Mac
3 hours ago
5
@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.
– Aaron
3 hours ago
1
@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.
– WS2
3 hours ago
1
@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago