Is it correct to abbreviate etc as &c? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara“Mic” as an abbreviation for microwaveproper way to write the slang term for “gravitational force”How to correctly assimilate dots, if at all?Correct abbreviation for “byte” and “bit”What is the abbreviation for 'century'?Is IOU an abbreviation, an acronym, or an initialism?Where should the apostrophe go on a possessive abbreviation?The usage of etcApostrophe on plurals of a word abbreviated with a symbol?Parentheses within abbreviations

Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?

The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?

Visa-free travel to the US using refugee travel document from Spain?

Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

Split coins into combinations of different denominations

Function to calculate red-edgeNDVI in Google Earth Engine

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?

Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape

A strange hotel

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Second order approximation of the loss function (Deep learning book, 7.33)

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

Where did Arya get these scars?

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

Economise space with floats

PIC mathematical operations weird problem

How would this chord from "Rocket Man" be analyzed?

Why is this method for solving linear equations systems using determinants works?

Are all CP/M-80 implementations binary compatible?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?



Is it correct to abbreviate etc as &c?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara“Mic” as an abbreviation for microwaveproper way to write the slang term for “gravitational force”How to correctly assimilate dots, if at all?Correct abbreviation for “byte” and “bit”What is the abbreviation for 'century'?Is IOU an abbreviation, an acronym, or an initialism?Where should the apostrophe go on a possessive abbreviation?The usage of etcApostrophe on plurals of a word abbreviated with a symbol?Parentheses within abbreviations



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".



Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.




Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.




That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com



Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

    – WS2
    3 hours ago












  • The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

    – R Mac
    3 hours ago







  • 5





    @RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

    – Aaron
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    @RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

    – WS2
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago

















3















I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".



Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.




Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.




That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com



Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

    – WS2
    3 hours ago












  • The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

    – R Mac
    3 hours ago







  • 5





    @RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

    – Aaron
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    @RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

    – WS2
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago













3












3








3


1






I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".



Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.




Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.




That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com



Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I recently asked someone why they had several instances of "&c" in their writing, to which they told me that &c is another abbreviation for et cetera. I have since looked it up and understand now where this comes from, with the "&" being more than just an "and" symbol, that written correctly it is actually based on, and looks like, "et".



Apparently some people have used it this way before, but "some people have done it, especially in the past" makes it neither correct nor accepted in general. One site I came across in my research on this even states that you should not do this.




Finally, ‘etc.’ should not be written with an ampersand instead of the
‘et’ part (&c) except when an older source is being duplicated or
transcribed.




That is from a description of when to use etc. from proof-reading-service.com



Is "&c" a correct way to abbreviate "et cetera" in English? Or was it a temporary slang term, similar to "aint", but which never caught on and is used to be quaint?







abbreviations






share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









AaronAaron

1162




1162




New contributor




Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Aaron is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

    – WS2
    3 hours ago












  • The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

    – R Mac
    3 hours ago







  • 5





    @RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

    – Aaron
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    @RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

    – WS2
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

    – WS2
    3 hours ago












  • The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

    – R Mac
    3 hours ago







  • 5





    @RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

    – Aaron
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    @RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

    – WS2
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    2 hours ago







1




1





It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

– WS2
3 hours ago






It is not in current use, but in older writings e.g. 19th century & prior it frequently appears. The modern accepted abbreviation is "etc".

– WS2
3 hours ago














The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

– R Mac
3 hours ago






The correct modern abbreviation is "etc." Note that includes the period indicating an abbreviation. The "&c" abbreviation makes little sense. It's "et cetera", not "and cetera", and "&c" mixes the reference languages.

– R Mac
3 hours ago





5




5





@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

– Aaron
3 hours ago






@RMac It is my understanding, from the research I had just done, that "&" refers to the Latin "et" rather than the English "and", that we just happen to say "and" because we are speaking English. Whether that is accurate, I'm not sure, but that is what I read. Supposedly, a properly written historical "&" symbol was supposed to resemble a mixture of "e" and "t" together.

– Aaron
3 hours ago





1




1





@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

– WS2
3 hours ago





@RMac Whether it "makes little sense or not" - it was certainly in widespread use at one time.

– WS2
3 hours ago




1




1





@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago





@RMac The ampersand is literally a stylistic variant of the letters Et. If anything, it’s using an ampersand to represent the English word and that mixes languages.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Eh.... depends?



An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.



Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."



So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .



Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .



I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).



    Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).



    In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496087%2fis-it-correct-to-abbreviate-etc-as-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Eh.... depends?



      An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.



      Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."



      So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .



      Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .



      I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.






      share|improve this answer



























        3














        Eh.... depends?



        An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.



        Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."



        So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .



        Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .



        I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.






        share|improve this answer

























          3












          3








          3







          Eh.... depends?



          An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.



          Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."



          So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .



          Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .



          I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.






          share|improve this answer













          Eh.... depends?



          An abbreviation is a shortening of something. Etc. spelled out is et cetera.



          Et cetera is composed of et ("and"; French still retains this form with an unpronounced "t", Spanish drops the final consonant and just has y) and ceter-a, the plural of ceter-us, meaning things (plural) left behind, or remains, perhaps related to the Latin cēdere "to go, move away, withdraw, yield."



          So we have etc., where the space is dropped and the letters for cetera are dropped and represented by a dot .



          Technically, we have a symbol for "and" and technically et=and. So, with respect to transitive relation, sure: &c., why not? There is precedent the use of numbers or symbols in abbreviations. Take for example "W3", "EC2", and neologisms such as "LGBTQ+" .



          I would suggest though you leave it as a plain "etc." (dot included). "&c." seems like an affectation.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          CarlyCarly

          1,881213




          1,881213























              0














              I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).



              Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).



              In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).



                Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).



                In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).



                  Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).



                  In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I wouldn't call "&c." a slang term, given that even the Oxford English Dictionary used it in 1884 (see this page from the OED web site).



                  Typing "&c" as the search term into Google Books produces many more examples of its use in serious text books (Google Books link).



                  In its day, it was a normal abbreviation of etcetera. Only more recentry has "etc." taken over from it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Simon BSimon B

                  2,6731018




                  2,6731018




















                      Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Aaron is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496087%2fis-it-correct-to-abbreviate-etc-as-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to create a command for the “strange m” symbol in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?Writing bold small caps with mathpazo packageplus-minus symbol with parenthesis around the minus signGreek character in Beamer document titleHow to create dashed right arrow over symbol?Currency symbol: Turkish LiraDouble prec as a single symbol?Plus Sign Too Big; How to Call adfbullet?Is there a TeX macro for three-legged pi?How do I get my integral-like symbol to align like the integral?How to selectively substitute a letter with another symbol representing the same letterHow do I generate a less than symbol and vertical bar that are the same height?

                      Българска екзархия Съдържание История | Български екзарси | Вижте също | Външни препратки | Литература | Бележки | НавигацияУстав за управлението на българската екзархия. Цариград, 1870Слово на Ловешкия митрополит Иларион при откриването на Българския народен събор в Цариград на 23. II. 1870 г.Българската правда и гръцката кривда. От С. М. (= Софийски Мелетий). Цариград, 1872Предстоятели на Българската екзархияПодмененият ВеликденИнформационна агенция „Фокус“Димитър Ризов. Българите в техните исторически, етнографически и политически граници (Атлас съдържащ 40 карти). Berlin, Königliche Hoflithographie, Hof-Buch- und -Steindruckerei Wilhelm Greve, 1917Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars

                      Category:Tremithousa Media in category "Tremithousa"Navigation menuUpload media34° 49′ 02.7″ N, 32° 26′ 37.32″ EOpenStreetMapGoogle EarthProximityramaReasonatorScholiaStatisticsWikiShootMe