Split coins into combinations of different denominations Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Split Django into appsSplit large file into smaller filesSplit up an iterable into batchesMaking the same amount from different combinations of coins (top-down approach)Something to store any (standard) data in pythonSplit DAG into disjoint setsSplit mp3 of album into individual tracksSplit a data file into files for each time stepFlipping coins performanceScrape data from website into dataframe(s) using Split function

The art of proof summarizing. Are there known rules, or is it a purely common sense matter?

Implementing 3DES algorithm in Java: is my code secure?

Is there any hidden 'W' sound after 'comment' in : Comment est-elle?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

Does the set of sets which are elements of every set exist?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

Map material from china not allowed to leave the country

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

Additive group of local rings

AI positioning circles within an arc at equal distances and heights

How would I use different systems of magic when they are capable of the same effects?

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Error: Syntax error. Missing ')' for CASE Statement

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Seek and ye shall find

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

A strange hotel

Flash for group photos near wall

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"

SQL Query not selecting all points that it should?

std::is_constructible on incomplete types

Split coins into combinations of different denominations



Split coins into combinations of different denominations



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Split Django into appsSplit large file into smaller filesSplit up an iterable into batchesMaking the same amount from different combinations of coins (top-down approach)Something to store any (standard) data in pythonSplit DAG into disjoint setsSplit mp3 of album into individual tracksSplit a data file into files for each time stepFlipping coins performanceScrape data from website into dataframe(s) using Split function



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


I have 3 types of coins: Gold, Silver, Copper.

1 silver = 100 copper.

1 gold = 100 silver.



My input is always in coppers, and I want to be able to make it a bit more readable. So far my code is:



def api_wallet_translate_gold(value):
"""Translate a value into string of money"""
if value >= 10000: # Gold
return ("0 gold, 1 silver and 2 copper."
.format(str(value)[:-4], str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:]))
elif value >= 100: # Silver
return "0 silver and 1 copper.".format(str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:])
else: # Copper
return "0 copper.".format(str(value)[-2:])


It works, but I am wondering how could it be improved. I think there was a way to format it like xx:2:2 or something but I can't remember how to do it.



Note: We never know how many gold digits we have, it could be 999999 to 1










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    6












    $begingroup$


    I have 3 types of coins: Gold, Silver, Copper.

    1 silver = 100 copper.

    1 gold = 100 silver.



    My input is always in coppers, and I want to be able to make it a bit more readable. So far my code is:



    def api_wallet_translate_gold(value):
    """Translate a value into string of money"""
    if value >= 10000: # Gold
    return ("0 gold, 1 silver and 2 copper."
    .format(str(value)[:-4], str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:]))
    elif value >= 100: # Silver
    return "0 silver and 1 copper.".format(str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:])
    else: # Copper
    return "0 copper.".format(str(value)[-2:])


    It works, but I am wondering how could it be improved. I think there was a way to format it like xx:2:2 or something but I can't remember how to do it.



    Note: We never know how many gold digits we have, it could be 999999 to 1










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I have 3 types of coins: Gold, Silver, Copper.

      1 silver = 100 copper.

      1 gold = 100 silver.



      My input is always in coppers, and I want to be able to make it a bit more readable. So far my code is:



      def api_wallet_translate_gold(value):
      """Translate a value into string of money"""
      if value >= 10000: # Gold
      return ("0 gold, 1 silver and 2 copper."
      .format(str(value)[:-4], str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:]))
      elif value >= 100: # Silver
      return "0 silver and 1 copper.".format(str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:])
      else: # Copper
      return "0 copper.".format(str(value)[-2:])


      It works, but I am wondering how could it be improved. I think there was a way to format it like xx:2:2 or something but I can't remember how to do it.



      Note: We never know how many gold digits we have, it could be 999999 to 1










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have 3 types of coins: Gold, Silver, Copper.

      1 silver = 100 copper.

      1 gold = 100 silver.



      My input is always in coppers, and I want to be able to make it a bit more readable. So far my code is:



      def api_wallet_translate_gold(value):
      """Translate a value into string of money"""
      if value >= 10000: # Gold
      return ("0 gold, 1 silver and 2 copper."
      .format(str(value)[:-4], str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:]))
      elif value >= 100: # Silver
      return "0 silver and 1 copper.".format(str(value)[-4:-2], str(value)[-2:])
      else: # Copper
      return "0 copper.".format(str(value)[-2:])


      It works, but I am wondering how could it be improved. I think there was a way to format it like xx:2:2 or something but I can't remember how to do it.



      Note: We never know how many gold digits we have, it could be 999999 to 1







      python python-3.x formatting






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      200_success

      131k17157422




      131k17157422










      asked 6 hours ago









      SaelythSaelyth

      1553




      1553




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          It may less fragile if you deal with the numbers directly rather than converting to strings. It will also be cleaner code.



          You could start with your values in a list sorted highest to lowest. Then in your function you can find the next-largest value and remained with divmod(). After than it's a matter of deciding how you want to format the resulting dict:



          coins = [
          ("gold", 100 * 100),
          ("silver", 100),
          ("copper", 1)
          ]

          def translate_coins(value, coins):
          res =
          for coin, v in coins:
          res[coin], value = divmod(value, v)
          return res

          translate_coins(1013323, coins)


          Result:



          'gold': 101, 'silver': 33, 'copper': 23





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            5 hours ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
            $endgroup$
            – MarkM
            5 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            4 hours ago











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f219029%2fsplit-coins-into-combinations-of-different-denominations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          It may less fragile if you deal with the numbers directly rather than converting to strings. It will also be cleaner code.



          You could start with your values in a list sorted highest to lowest. Then in your function you can find the next-largest value and remained with divmod(). After than it's a matter of deciding how you want to format the resulting dict:



          coins = [
          ("gold", 100 * 100),
          ("silver", 100),
          ("copper", 1)
          ]

          def translate_coins(value, coins):
          res =
          for coin, v in coins:
          res[coin], value = divmod(value, v)
          return res

          translate_coins(1013323, coins)


          Result:



          'gold': 101, 'silver': 33, 'copper': 23





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            5 hours ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
            $endgroup$
            – MarkM
            5 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            4 hours ago















          8












          $begingroup$

          It may less fragile if you deal with the numbers directly rather than converting to strings. It will also be cleaner code.



          You could start with your values in a list sorted highest to lowest. Then in your function you can find the next-largest value and remained with divmod(). After than it's a matter of deciding how you want to format the resulting dict:



          coins = [
          ("gold", 100 * 100),
          ("silver", 100),
          ("copper", 1)
          ]

          def translate_coins(value, coins):
          res =
          for coin, v in coins:
          res[coin], value = divmod(value, v)
          return res

          translate_coins(1013323, coins)


          Result:



          'gold': 101, 'silver': 33, 'copper': 23





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            5 hours ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
            $endgroup$
            – MarkM
            5 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            4 hours ago













          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          It may less fragile if you deal with the numbers directly rather than converting to strings. It will also be cleaner code.



          You could start with your values in a list sorted highest to lowest. Then in your function you can find the next-largest value and remained with divmod(). After than it's a matter of deciding how you want to format the resulting dict:



          coins = [
          ("gold", 100 * 100),
          ("silver", 100),
          ("copper", 1)
          ]

          def translate_coins(value, coins):
          res =
          for coin, v in coins:
          res[coin], value = divmod(value, v)
          return res

          translate_coins(1013323, coins)


          Result:



          'gold': 101, 'silver': 33, 'copper': 23





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It may less fragile if you deal with the numbers directly rather than converting to strings. It will also be cleaner code.



          You could start with your values in a list sorted highest to lowest. Then in your function you can find the next-largest value and remained with divmod(). After than it's a matter of deciding how you want to format the resulting dict:



          coins = [
          ("gold", 100 * 100),
          ("silver", 100),
          ("copper", 1)
          ]

          def translate_coins(value, coins):
          res =
          for coin, v in coins:
          res[coin], value = divmod(value, v)
          return res

          translate_coins(1013323, coins)


          Result:



          'gold': 101, 'silver': 33, 'copper': 23






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 6 hours ago









          MarkMMarkM

          28316




          28316











          • $begingroup$
            This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            5 hours ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
            $endgroup$
            – MarkM
            5 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            4 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            5 hours ago







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
            $endgroup$
            – MarkM
            5 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
            $endgroup$
            – S0AndS0
            4 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
          $endgroup$
          – S0AndS0
          5 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          This is almost perfect @MarkM, though the def translate_coins(value, coins): line combined with res[coin], value = divmod(value, v), could have the values (one of'em) renamed for easier reading... Neat trick with the dictionary assignment there... One question too, why not use a dict for coins instead of a list of tuples?... Then for coin, quantity in coins.items(): could be used with similar effect and one less object within another. That all said I think your answer is solid, just had a few nits to be picked that I could see.
          $endgroup$
          – S0AndS0
          5 hours ago





          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
          $endgroup$
          – MarkM
          5 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the comment @S0AndS0 those a re great suggestions. I didn't use a dictionary for the coin values because this depends on doing the division in order from highest to lowest. It's only recently that you can count on the order of python dictionaries.
          $endgroup$
          – MarkM
          5 hours ago













          $begingroup$
          After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
          $endgroup$
          – S0AndS0
          4 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          After further testing I see what you're doing, clever @MarkM, really clever there with reassigning value... though I don't envy debugging such mutations, it does totally make sense in this context to mutate... I also now see your wisdom in using a list of tuples, and retract my previous question in regards to using a dict as input to the translate_coins function; that would have made code far hairier than needed... Consider me impressed, eleven lines of code and you've taught me plenty new perversions with Python.
          $endgroup$
          – S0AndS0
          4 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f219029%2fsplit-coins-into-combinations-of-different-denominations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          The Calvary Singular or Plural The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular?Is “audience” singular or plural?“Wasn't” vs. “weren't” in a vernacular sentence“My last couple of years” — singular or plural?Is 'rest' singular or plural?Is “all but one” singular or plural?Whether to use the singular or plural form of basis?Singular and Plural for numbersIs there a plural form of teeth?performance: plural vs singular?singular or plural nouns?Singular and Plural

          What is the correct present continuous form of “thunder” and “lightning”? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhat is the past tense of “lightning”?What part of speech is the “be + verb” here? What tense are these sentences in?Present perfect and present perfect continuous for actions in progressIs it correct to mix past, present and future tense in a sentence?Correct verb form in two sentencesSimple vs Continuous in the Past Tense and in the Future TenseUsing present continuous passive (is being) for describing repeating (undesirable) actionssituations in which simple present and present continuous are interchangeable?Present Perfect Simple vs Present Perfect ContinuousWhat is the proper way to express a future action that depends on a past event?Progressive Form of Be and Lately in Present Continuous

          Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active